It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:45 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis


Haha defending Rodgers :lol:

Smart guy

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 2:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Khalil Mack went from best football player in the world to fringe pro bowler. Didn't see that coming.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis


lol Im dying at all the caveats needed for homer Packer writers to try to find optimism

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
FavreFan wrote:


lol Im dying at all the caveats needed for homer Packer writers to try to find optimism

Sweaty Teddy left Packers with a ton of holes. Gute did very well it last year patching things up. But ya can't spend like that every offseason.

Picks from past 1-3 seasons gotta show up now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 12:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
I'm not reading all of this, but they traded UP to get a backup QB and a 3rd string RB.

I do not disagree with these moves. Thanks!

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10794
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
spanky wrote:
I'm not reading all of this, but they traded UP to get a backup QB and a 3rd string RB.

I do not disagree with these moves. Thanks!

right...and that makes them trying to be the 49ers since they sprinkled in a couple of offensive line picks

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2020 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82242
Runyon might not have been drafted if his name wasn't Runyon.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2020 9:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11007
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
https://youtu.be/NIbW3t47Azk

:lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82242
billypootons wrote:


Mom! Meatloaf!

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis


This is almost as bad as that famous Mitch photo with Burton wide open in the end zone :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
FavreFan wrote:


This is almost as bad as that famous Mitch photo with Burton wide open in the end zone :lol:



WR #3 isn't really "wide open".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Correct but #2 is wide fucking open by the time Rodgers is getting ready to throw

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
And #3 is getting ready to be way more open as that back safety is coming up to help on #2

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Who was receiver #2? If it's Jimmy Graham(provided he catches it) he falls down for a meager 10 yard game. If you got Adams 1 on 1 for a TD you go there all day. What was the result of this play?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Here's the full play. #2 was the easy read


_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
yeah that really looks like a Mitch highlight if you didn't know better.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
There are a lot of problems on that play...and why is WR #3 running himself into where the coverage is?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
There are a lot of problems on that play...and why is WR #3 running himself into where the coverage is?

:lol:

Because all of our WRs outside of Adams are AAF quality and there's a good chance our dipshit rookie coach actually drew it up like that too.

Still, Rodgers gotta play better.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82242
I'm sure Love will do better

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
I'm sure Love will do better

By 2023 that's the hope.

He'll be more fun to watch than Tim Boyle if Rodgers goes down again

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:55 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I'm sure Love will do better

By 2023 that's the hope.

He'll be more fun to watch than Tim Boyle if Rodgers goes down again


Won't Love be starting before then?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11007
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
you're complaining he gave adams a shot 1 on 1 on a deep pass? number three was open because rodgers rolled left on the play action, #3 had to be read #3 on that play. but i dont blame him for going to adams 1 on 1... sheesh


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 6:03 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
Yeah I don't think this is a good example. They got what they wanted outside and Rodgers knew it. He would have went back to Graham if there was safety help over the top. I don't think this guy breaks down a lot of film.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
FavreFan wrote:


lol Im dying at all the caveats needed for homer Packer writers to try to find optimism




Winkler was great on Draft Day and the days after.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
MongoMuller wrote:
Yeah I don't think this is a good example. They got what they wanted outside and Rodgers knew it. He would have went back to Graham if there was safety help over the top. I don't think this guy breaks down a lot of film.

Imo that’s a crazy interpretation. You like Adams 1 on 1 deep but not when you have a clearly open Graham 10-15 yards downfield for a wide open catch to get inside the 10. It’s crazy to me that you and billy saw that play and think Rodgers made the right read.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Graham would've dropped the ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 7:21 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
If Chris Cooley still had his radio show I'd ask him to look at it. I used to send him Raiders plays all the time and he was great about answering questions. Do you remember this game? I suspect they'd been setting the corner up on earlier plays and when they got the look they wanted they took the shot. I would be surprised if the coaching staff wasn't happy with where Rodgers went with the ball.

I can only imagine how much damage Rodgers could do with Waller, Ruggs, Renfro, and Jacobs...

Green Bay fans are in an awkward position right now where fans from other teams are trying to convince them Rodgers is still a great QB. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
MongoMuller wrote:
If Chris Cooley still had his radio show I'd ask him to look at it. I used to send him Raiders plays all the time and he was great about answering questions. Do you remember this game? I suspect they'd been setting the corner up on earlier plays and when they got the look they wanted they took the shot. I would be surprised if the coaching staff wasn't happy with where Rodgers went with the ball.

I can only imagine how much damage Rodgers could do with Waller, Ruggs, Renfro, and Jacobs...

Green Bay fans are in an awkward position right now where fans from other teams are trying to convince them Rodgers is still a great QB. :lol:

I think Rodgers is still pretty great. I don’t think the Raiders have better offensive weapons (particular lol @ Ruggs). This was just not an example of great QB play and I think was accurately described as an example of his over-reliance on Adams when other guys are open.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 7:42 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
FavreFan wrote:
I think Rodgers is still pretty great. I don’t think the Raiders have better offensive weapons (particular lol @ Ruggs). This was just not an example of great QB play and I think was accurately described as an example of his over-reliance on Adams when other guys are open.


Yeah but how many times did the other guys let him down? I was listening to a podcast the other day and they got into the metrics of the other receivers and it was pretty brutal.

I'm biased but I'll be surprised if Ruggs isn't very good. Most speed guys are like Hamler where they're fighting the ball every catch. Ruggs has very soft hands and they're larger than Lamb or Jeudy. He only had 1 drop in 2019.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
MongoMuller wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think Rodgers is still pretty great. I don’t think the Raiders have better offensive weapons (particular lol @ Ruggs). This was just not an example of great QB play and I think was accurately described as an example of his over-reliance on Adams when other guys are open.


Yeah but how many times did the other guys let him down? I was listening to a podcast the other day and they got into the metrics of the other receivers and it was pretty brutal.

I'm biased but I'll be surprised if Ruggs isn't very good. Most speed guys are like Hamler where they're fighting the ball every catch. Ruggs has very soft hands and they're larger than Lamb or Jeudy. He only had 1 drop in 2019.

Hard to get a lot of drops as WR 3/4 on a team. We’ll disagree on Ruggs, I thought that was a horrendous pick but we’ll see how it turns out.

I’m not defending Packers secondary WRs with posting that tweet, nor defending the Love pick and saying Rodgers is washed up. Just something that was noticeable last year and I came across it today so posted it out of boredom.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group