Yeah. I acted that way because eugenics is a stupid idea. Never said it couldn't work.

I can't comprehend his argument because it's stupid.

His premise conceeds that ethics makes the argument in favor of eugenics untenable. He then argues that "people on Twitter" who say that eugenics wouldn't work biologically are wrong. Ok. So what?

Even if eugenics works biologically he's aleady conceded that he would never put it into practice because of the ethical implications.

He's not saying anything of substance and I treated it like the dumbass argument that it was.

Eugenics is retarded. Cause I said.

I don't care about Greta Thunberg one way or another, but let's not act like she's somebody's kid who came down the stairs while you and your friends were playing cards and mumbled something controversial. She was Time's Person of the Year. She's the face of a movement. And it seems as if that's exactly what she wants to be. It's not like criticizing a four year old whose mom stuck a pussy hat on her head and made her hold a sign that says, "FUCK TRUMP!"

If you can't decide how the parameters work it's probally not a good idea.