It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:25 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 704 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ... 24  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Only Antarctica wants war. I just want to find ways to fuck them in the ass as painfully as possible.

Because you're rational.

They've caused a lot of damage in the world, and not just recently. And just keep skipping along merrily. That has to stop.


It's only going to be stopped by going to war with them. Sanctions aren't going to do it. Aligning with other nations against them diplomatically will not accomplish it either.

It's been suggested African nation seize their assets back under the protection of the United States. Imperial China has billions locked up in Africa.


But those were due to investments. They haven't Colonized any country on the African continent. They haven't started wars abroad. Their human rights abuses are troubling but again that is mostly an internal issue.

Bioterrorism is an act of war though. That would up the stakes tremendously.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue May 19, 2020 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Only Antarctica wants war. I just want to find ways to fuck them in the ass as painfully as possible.

Because you're rational.

They've caused a lot of damage in the world, and not just recently. And just keep skipping along merrily. That has to stop.


It's only going to be stopped by going to war with them. Sanctions aren't going to do it. Aligning with other nations against them diplomatically will not accomplish it either.

It's been suggested African nation seize their assets back under the protection of the United States. Imperial China has billions locked up in Africa.

The debt forgiveness suggested by many now sounds like it was a far better idea than MANY suggested.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31668
pizza_Place: What??
long time guy wrote:
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Only Antarctica wants war. I just want to find ways to fuck them in the ass as painfully as possible.

Because you're rational.

They've caused a lot of damage in the world, and not just recently. And just keep skipping along merrily. That has to stop.


It's only going to be stopped by going to war with them. Sanctions aren't going to do it. Aligning with other nations against them diplomatically will not accomplish it either.

It's been suggested African nation seize their assets back under the protection of the United States. Imperial China has billions locked up in Africa.


But those were due to investments. They haven't Colonized any country on the African continent. They haven't started wars abroad. Their human rights abuses are troubling but again that is mostly an internal issue.

Bioterrorism is an act of war though. That would up the stakes tremendously.

Locking down an infected province completely and then sending people out on planes to infect the world was pretty bad. Is that bio-terrrism?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
long time guy wrote:

But those were due to investments. They haven't Colonized any country on the African continent. They haven't started wars abroad. Their human rights abuses are troubling but again that is mostly an internal issue.

Bioterrorism is an act of war though. That would up the stakes tremendously.

Nardi wrote:
Locking down an infected province completely and then sending people out on planes to infect the world was pretty bad. Is that bio-terrrism?


I don't think so. If they purposely created the virus in a lab and unleashed it unto the rest of the world that would be Bioterrorism. We'd have to prove intent.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue May 19, 2020 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 4:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Regular Reader wrote:
But I cannot accept sending my sons to that fight vs my paying more for American made Nikes and smartphones.

Sons pay for the sins of their fathers. The generation that enabled China has a lot of blood on their hands.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
We are not getting into a hot war with China. It's can't be done. I think we could win a soft war against them because eventually the population will rise us. Use Hong Kong and spread the civil disobedience. In the mean time get with our allies and start decoupling now.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Antarctica wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
But I cannot accept sending my sons to that fight vs my paying more for American made Nikes and smartphones.

Sons pay for the sins of their fathers. The generation that enabled China has a lot of blood on their hands.

And where did you live and what have you done for "work" traveller?

As Nardi accurately pointed out, you come here to vent your gibberish and add nothing to any non football discussion around here. Next.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Antarctica wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
But I cannot accept sending my sons to that fight vs my paying more for American made Nikes and smartphones.

Sons pay for the sins of their fathers. The generation that enabled China has a lot of blood on their hands.


Hey World Atlas at what point did you decide to make your proverbial pivot?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 5:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Regular Reader wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
But I cannot accept sending my sons to that fight vs my paying more for American made Nikes and smartphones.

Sons pay for the sins of their fathers. The generation that enabled China has a lot of blood on their hands.

And where did you live and what have you done for "work" traveller?

As Nardi accurately pointed out, you come here to vent your gibberish and add nothing to any non football discussion around here. Next.

I would gladly tell you RR but I dont trust some of these posters to not try and dox me. Not to mention the looming DiCaro threat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 5:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
long time guy wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
But I cannot accept sending my sons to that fight vs my paying more for American made Nikes and smartphones.

Sons pay for the sins of their fathers. The generation that enabled China has a lot of blood on their hands.


Hey World Atlas at what point did you decide to make your proverbial pivot?

I fucked up. I was absent-minded about it too, Hong Kong is what really brought things into focus. We spent the last twenty years fighting the wrong enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Antarctica wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
But I cannot accept sending my sons to that fight vs my paying more for American made Nikes and smartphones.

Sons pay for the sins of their fathers. The generation that enabled China has a lot of blood on their hands.


Hey World Atlas at what point did you decide to make your proverbial pivot?

I fucked up. I was absent-minded about it too, Hong Kong is what really brought things into focus. We spent the last twenty years fighting the wrong enemy.


So what do you propose in this newly actualized fight of yours?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 5:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
If you dont want war you blockade them. Starve them out, force them to only trade with India (who hates them), Central Asia (who hates them) and Russia (who is scared shitless of them). It will absolutely work and it will result in minimal bloodshed.

Unless they decide to lash out, which they may do.

Evil like the PRC just cannot be allowed to exercise itself freely. Even if it does burn itself out like the USSR it will do so only after exhausting the lives of millions of innocent people.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Antarctica wrote:
If you dont want war you blockade them. Starve them out, force them to only trade with India (who hates them), Central Asia (who hates them) and Russia (who is scared shitless of them). It will absolutely work and it will result in minimal bloodshed.

Unless they decide to lash out, which they may do.

Evil like the PRC just cannot be allowed to exercise itself freely. Even if it does burn itself out like the USSR it will do so only after exhausting the lives of millions of innocent people.


All of that sounds good but you might as well forget it. It's either all out war or nothing. Limited engagements and proxy wars are simply feeding tic tacs to whales.

They are a most formidable foe and unless there is all out war then you might as well stop talking. Blockades and sanctions won't work either.

We made our bed once we decided to become economically entangled with them years 20-30 years ago Just another case of their (Chinese Govt) being assholes
but they're our assholes scenario. There is no way for the U.S. to effectively "deal" with the Chinese at this point without going to war. Anything else is simply empty rhetoric.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 6:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
You are probably right but I am OK with a blockade. It is the most severe thing we could do short of violence. It could collapse them, they need food imports.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 6:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Antarctica wrote:
You are probably right but I am OK with a blockade. It is the most severe thing we could do short of violence. It could collapse them, they need food imports.


Worked in a modified version with the Soviets.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 6:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Regular Reader wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
You are probably right but I am OK with a blockade. It is the most severe thing we could do short of violence. It could collapse them, they need food imports.


Worked in a modified version with the Soviets.

Eventually, sure. Took about forty years and a few proxy wars.

The failure of the USA to do anything from 1945 onwards about the Soviet menace was a colossal mistake that cost millions of lives and set Eastern Europe and Central Asia back a century. It sentenced much of Africa to languish under Marxist ideologies (just in time for colonialism to end!) and still to this day reverberates in places like Cuba and DPRK. We had them in 1946, we had the bomb (they didn't) and we had all our soldiers with our allies just miles away from them. The Wehrmacht was kept somewhat in tact at the behest of Churchill just so they could be the tip of the spear against the Soviets.

Would it have been terrible? Of course. But worse than what followed? I dont think so. But China is a little different, they have many more mouths to feed and rely so much more on exports. Cutting them off from everyone except their land neighbours (who aside from the DPRK all hate them) could collapse the PRC. I think its worth a try.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Nice to have a measured exchange with you Australia

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Antarctica wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
You are probably right but I am OK with a blockade. It is the most severe thing we could do short of violence. It could collapse them, they need food imports.


Worked in a modified version with the Soviets.

Eventually, sure. Took about forty years and a few proxy wars.

The failure of the USA to do anything from 1945 onwards about the Soviet menace was a colossal mistake that cost millions of lives and set Eastern Europe and Central Asia back a century. It sentenced much of Africa to languish under Marxist ideologies (just in time for colonialism to end!) and still to this day reverberates in places like Cuba and DPRK. We had them in 1946, we had the bomb (they didn't) and we had all our soldiers with our allies just miles away from them. The Wehrmacht was kept somewhat in tact at the behest of Churchill just so they could be the tip of the spear against the Soviets.

Would it have been terrible? Of course. But worse than what followed? I dont think so. But China is a little different, they have many more mouths to feed and rely so much more on exports. Cutting them off from everyone except their land neighbours (who aside from the DPRK all hate them) could collapse the PRC. I think its worth a try.


The Soviet menace was never much of a "menace" It was nothing more than a propaganda campaign designed to build up our military. Your allusion to Africa is nothing more than an allusion also. Africa removed itself from the shackles of European colonization during the 50's 60's and 70's. None of it had to do with the Soviets. The Soviets weren't colonial powers in Africa.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
There's virtually no way we're entering any combative war with China.

But then it'll turn into a race to control manufacturing and supply chains from other Third World regions.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 7:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
long time guy wrote:

The Soviet menace was never much of a "menace" It was nothing more than a propaganda campaign designed to build up our military. Your allusion to Africa is nothing more than an allusion also. Africa removed itself from the shackles of European colonization during the 50's 60's and 70's. None of it had to do with the Soviets. The Soviets weren't colonial powers in Africa.

ZANU-PF and ZAPU in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, though Mugabe is kind of debatable. He certainly didn't turn down their money.
Congolese Party of Labour in Zaire/DRC
Kerekou government in Benin
Very famously both of the big Portuguese colonies succumbed to Marxist revolutionaries.

Let's just say communism, propped up by the Soviets, did not idly pass Africa by.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Antarctica wrote:
long time guy wrote:

The Soviet menace was never much of a "menace" It was nothing more than a propaganda campaign designed to build up our military. Your allusion to Africa is nothing more than an allusion also. Africa removed itself from the shackles of European colonization during the 50's 60's and 70's. None of it had to do with the Soviets. The Soviets weren't colonial powers in Africa.

ZANU-PF and ZAPU in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, though Mugabe is kind of debatable. He certainly didn't turn down their money.
Congolese Party of Labour in Zaire/DRC
Kerekou government in Benin
Very famously both of the big Portuguese colonies succumbed to Marxist revolutionaries.

Let's just say communism, propped up by the Soviets, did not idly pass Africa by.


Yeah there was some countries that were Marxist but to say that the ideology permeated the Continent is a stretch. Africa was ravaged by Western European Colonialism much more than they were Soviet Marxism. Marxism was more was of passing fad for some of them than anything. But yeah you are correct that some nations fell victim to it. That was mostly due to the vacuum created once Colonialism ended ironically.

Marxism thrives best when there is chaos and in Africa it was no different.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 8:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38369
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Until you change American culture, nothing will happen with China.


Well said.

Welcome to the front lines of the culture war.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41379
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Are we going to nuke these fucks yet or what?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24565
pizza_Place: It's gone
China owns Africa. They pretty much bribed all of the poor African nations.

But i ask myself this - when European nations raped and pillaged during colonialism, it was ok. But now if someone else does it its suddenly a bad thing?

Not saying it's a good thing, but it's a double standard. And not a supporter of China. no way.

Just something to think about.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 10:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
long time guy wrote:

But those were due to investments. They haven't Colonized any country on the African continent. They haven't started wars abroad. Their human rights abuses are troubling but again that is mostly an internal issue.

Bioterrorism is an act of war though. That would up the stakes tremendously.

Nardi wrote:
Locking down an infected province completely and then sending people out on planes to infect the world was pretty bad. Is that bio-terrrism?


I don't think so. If they purposely created the virus in a lab and unleashed it unto the rest of the world that would be Bioterrorism. We'd have to prove intent.


Nope. It was the act of spreading that virus that constitutes terrorism. They knew that the drug was transmitted from human to human BEFORE they sent those millions of people to the countries in the world. That was biological warfare. That was INTENT.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 10:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
We are not getting into a hot war with China. It's can't be done. I think we could win a soft war against them because eventually the population will rise us. Use Hong Kong and spread the civil disobedience. In the mean time get with our allies and start decoupling now.



Trump understands that the war on China is going to be an economic war and we are already winning it. I think that the next four years are going to see the best economic growth for the United States ever. The world is pissed at China and they have been proven to be vile monsters and not to be trusted. And if they try to rattle their sabers against Taiwan they will be met with great force. In any war, they will lose. They have no allies. Russia is certainly not going to help them because Russia has gotten infected just like the rest of the world with this virus and Putin is no guy to piss off.

China is being isolated and will have to pretty much apologize to the world.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Antarctica wrote:
If you dont want war you blockade them. Starve them out, force them to only trade with India (who hates them), Central Asia (who hates them) and Russia (who is scared shitless of them). It will absolutely work and it will result in minimal bloodshed.

Unless they decide to lash out, which they may do.

Evil like the PRC just cannot be allowed to exercise itself freely. Even if it does burn itself out like the USSR it will do so only after exhausting the lives of millions of innocent people.


They can't lash out. hen you think about it, China is really just a regional military power. They are blocked by Russia and NATO and then they have Japan, South Korea, and the US Pacific fleet on the other side. The US owns the sea and the air and all of the soldiers of the Chinese will basically be starved out because they would be basically land-locked. China has a huge trouble feeding its own people already and if they lock horns with the US, it will be over.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
If you dont want war you blockade them. Starve them out, force them to only trade with India (who hates them), Central Asia (who hates them) and Russia (who is scared shitless of them). It will absolutely work and it will result in minimal bloodshed.

Unless they decide to lash out, which they may do.

Evil like the PRC just cannot be allowed to exercise itself freely. Even if it does burn itself out like the USSR it will do so only after exhausting the lives of millions of innocent people.


All of that sounds good but you might as well forget it. It's either all out war or nothing. Limited engagements and proxy wars are simply feeding tic tacs to whales.

They are a most formidable foe and unless there is all out war then you might as well stop talking. Blockades and sanctions won't work either.

We made our bed once we decided to become economically entangled with them years 20-30 years ago Just another case of their (Chinese Govt) being assholes
but they're our assholes scenario. There is no way for the U.S. to effectively "deal" with the Chinese at this point without going to war. Anything else is simply empty rhetoric.



Bullcrap. The Chinese are screwed whatever they do. Our economy doesn't need them and without us trading with them, they are screwed. They also are paper tigers militarily and pose no threat whatsoever to us. And they know it. They know that if they try and strike in a nuclear fashion, their entire population will be killed and ours would not. If they try a standard war, we would obliterate their air forces and navy in less than a week and then basically they would be starved to death. The entire world is against China. They have no allies. They've basically tried to kill a lot of the rest of the world.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2020 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55971
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
HawaiiYou wrote:
China owns Africa. They pretty much bribed all of the poor African nations.

But i ask myself this - when European nations raped and pillaged during colonialism, it was ok. But now if someone else does it its suddenly a bad thing?

Not saying it's a good thing, but it's a double standard. And not a supporter of China. no way.

Just something to think about.


Neither was good, but even I have enough good sense to know which team I'm on.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2020 5:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
The Soviet menace was never much of a "menace" It was nothing more than a propaganda campaign designed to build up our military. Your allusion to Africa is nothing more than an allusion also. Africa removed itself from the shackles of European colonization during the 50's 60's and 70's. None of it had to do with the Soviets. The Soviets weren't colonial powers in Africa.


The Soviet Union, which you assert was singlehandedly responsible for winning the Second World War, and that occupied all of Eastern Europe for 50 year was never a "menace". It's so nice to view history from the convenience of knowing how the Cold War would turn out.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 704 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ... 24  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group