It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 255 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Frankie Frequencies wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
It's also important to note that the attempt to lure the dog over with treats was apparently immediately preceded by the "I'm going to do what I want to do, and you're not going to like it" line. In that context his actions would certainly sound like a threat to even a cautious dog owner (whether they actually constitute a threat is a different question).
If we entertain that thought though, she didn't say that to either the guy or the police and she didn't act like she thought her dog was in danger.
Didn't she tell the dispatcher that the guy was threatening her and her dog? And didn't she tell the guy that she was going to say that to the police? If so, that means she told all parties involved that she felt threatened by the guy and, implicitly, his actions up to that point.


No she didn't you lying fuckface. the whole call is on the fucking internet you dumbass. none of that ever happened you ignoramous. So take your "if so that means..." and shove it up your pasty pimpled ass you fuckhead. get back to pretending to be a lawyer on a sports message board so you can amuse me, fucking krusty clown motherfucker.

:shock:

That escalated quickly.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
Ok, I'll accept that they were being aggressive by bringing a gun with them on a car chase of a man on foot.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ok, I'll accept that they were being aggressive by bringing a gun with them on a car chase of a man on foot.


They had a previous encounter where the shooter thought he saw Abery reach for a gun unless he was lying to the 911 operator. And do you think trying to wrestle the gun away from someone without talking to them is a smart or rational decision?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
They had a previous encounter where the shooter thought he saw Abery reach for a gun unless he was lying to the 911 operator.
I'm confused. Was it weird and aggressive or not to do what they did that day?


WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
And do you think trying to wrestle the gun away from someone without talking to them is a smart or rational decision?
I honestly don't know. If two guys drove up to me in a car with guns loaded then I would expect they plan to kill me. Getting the gun may have been my only chance to live.

Now, compare that situation to a woman who feels threatened because a man has dog treats.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22518
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Frankie Frequencies wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
It's also important to note that the attempt to lure the dog over with treats was apparently immediately preceded by the "I'm going to do what I want to do, and you're not going to like it" line. In that context his actions would certainly sound like a threat to even a cautious dog owner (whether they actually constitute a threat is a different question).
If we entertain that thought though, she didn't say that to either the guy or the police and she didn't act like she thought her dog was in danger.
Didn't she tell the dispatcher that the guy was threatening her and her dog? And didn't she tell the guy that she was going to say that to the police? If so, that means she told all parties involved that she felt threatened by the guy and, implicitly, his actions up to that point.


No she didn't you lying fuckface. the whole call is on the fucking internet you dumbass. none of that ever happened you ignoramous. So take your "if so that means..." and shove it up your pasty pimpled ass you fuckhead. get back to pretending to be a lawyer on a sports message board so you can amuse me, fucking krusty clown motherfucker.
Frankie, babe, you gotta calm down.

But I must correct myself: She only told police that the guy was threatening her and her dog. However she did tell Cooper to not touch her dog after he pulled out his dog treats after telling her that he was going to do something she wasn't going to like.

Can anyone present the argument that given his "you're not going to like it" line and pulling out dog treats, the woman saying not to touch her dog as soon as he pulled out the treats, and then telling police that the guy was threatening her dog, either that she didn't in fact feel threatened, or that her belief was unreasonable?


Last edited by Juice's Lecture Notes on Thu May 28, 2020 1:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
They had a previous encounter where the shooter thought he saw Abery reach for a gun unless he was lying to the 911 operator.
I'm confused. Was it weird and aggressive or not to do what they did that day?


WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
And do you think trying to wrestle the gun away from someone without talking to them is a smart or rational decision?
I honestly don't know. If two guys drove up to me in a car with guns loaded then I would expect they plan to kill me. Getting the gun may have been my only chance to live.

Now, compare that situation to a woman who feels threatened because a man has dog treats.


If Abrery hand not attacked them he would be alive. If he had not repeatedly trespassed until there was a confrontation he would be alive. He was not innocently jogging then hunted down.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
They had a previous encounter where the shooter thought he saw Abery reach for a gun unless he was lying to the 911 operator.
I'm confused. Was it weird and aggressive or not to do what they did that day?


WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
And do you think trying to wrestle the gun away from someone without talking to them is a smart or rational decision?
I honestly don't know. If two guys drove up to me in a car with guns loaded then I would expect they plan to kill me. Getting the gun may have been my only chance to live.

Now, compare that situation to a woman who feels threatened because a man has dog treats.


If Abrery hand not attacked them he would be alive. If he had not repeatedly trespassed until there was a confrontation he would be alive. He was not innocently jogging then hunted down.

If she had her dog on a leash she'd still have a job. If she hadn't called the cops she would have a job. No matter what she did she would be alive. She was not innocently walking her dog and then attacked.

If Arbery's own actions led to his death then her actions led to her being fired.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If she had her dog on a leash she'd still have a job. If she hadn't called the cops she would have a job. No matter what she did she would be alive. She was not innocently walking her dog and then attacked.

If Arbery's own actions led to his death then her actions led to her being fired.



Attacking someone with a gun while fleeing from a place you have at the very least trespassed on multiple times is a bit different from not having a dog on a leash. But whatever you want man. It's about a confrontation between people so perfectly comparable.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If she had her dog on a leash she'd still have a job. If she hadn't called the cops she would have a job. No matter what she did she would be alive. She was not innocently walking her dog and then attacked.

If Arbery's own actions led to his death then her actions led to her being fired.



Attacking someone with a gun while fleeing from a place you have at the very least trespassed on multiple times is a bit different from not having a dog on a leash. But whatever you want man. It's about a confrontation between people so perfectly comparable.

Just pointing out that you seem more upset about her losing her job than you do about him losing his life.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If she had her dog on a leash she'd still have a job. If she hadn't called the cops she would have a job. No matter what she did she would be alive. She was not innocently walking her dog and then attacked.

If Arbery's own actions led to his death then her actions led to her being fired.



Attacking someone with a gun while fleeing from a place you have at the very least trespassed on multiple times is a bit different from not having a dog on a leash. But whatever you want man. It's about a confrontation between people so perfectly comparable.

Just pointing out that you seem more upset about her losing her job than you do about him losing his life.


:lol: How do you measure the emotional response to news stories in posters? And what other posters are you this concerned over whether they are having the proper emotional response in your estimation?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:49 pm
Posts: 1150
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati’s
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
:lol: How do you measure the emotional response to news stories in posters?

With racist assholes like you it's pretty easy.

_________________
(REDACTED)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 2:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2020 1:02 pm
Posts: 789
pizza_Place: Marie's
Its great seeing the libs trying to figure out whether to defend the oppressed black man or the single female.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
:lol: How do you measure the emotional response to news stories in posters? And what other posters are you this concerned over whether they are having the proper emotional response in your estimation?
It's pretty easy to read you in threads like this.

I'm just pointing out what I think is a far different standard between what one person was doing and another and whether the consequences of those actions were deserved. If you want to act like I'm picking on you because JLN said it then go ahead.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
:lol: How do you measure the emotional response to news stories in posters? And what other posters are you this concerned over whether they are having the proper emotional response in your estimation?
It's pretty easy to read you in threads like this.

I'm just pointing out what I think is a far different standard between what one person was doing and another and whether the consequences of those actions were deserved. If you want to act like I'm picking on you because JLN said it then go ahead.


Don't flirt with women on the Metra. Do threaten women in the park if you don't approve of their conduct.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Frankie Frequencies wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Frankie Frequencies wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
It's also important to note that the attempt to lure the dog over with treats was apparently immediately preceded by the "I'm going to do what I want to do, and you're not going to like it" line. In that context his actions would certainly sound like a threat to even a cautious dog owner (whether they actually constitute a threat is a different question).
If we entertain that thought though, she didn't say that to either the guy or the police and she didn't act like she thought her dog was in danger.
Didn't she tell the dispatcher that the guy was threatening her and her dog? And didn't she tell the guy that she was going to say that to the police? If so, that means she told all parties involved that she felt threatened by the guy and, implicitly, his actions up to that point.


No she didn't you lying fuckface. the whole call is on the fucking internet you dumbass. none of that ever happened you ignoramous. So take your "if so that means..." and shove it up your pasty pimpled ass you fuckhead. get back to pretending to be a lawyer on a sports message board so you can amuse me, fucking krusty clown motherfucker.
Frankie, babe, you gotta calm down.

But I must correct myself: She only told police that the guy was threatening her and her dog. However she did tell Cooper to not touch her dog after he pulled out his dog treats after telling her that he was going to do something she wasn't going to like.

Can anyone present the argument that given his "you're not going to like it" line and pulling out dog treats, the woman saying not to touch her dog as soon as he pulled out the treats, and then telling police that the guy was threatening her dog, either that she didn't in fact feel threatened, or that her belief was unreasonable?


hey dumbfuck, i see you came back with your shinebox. good dog. let me correct you a second time: you skipped over the part where she - clearly threatened - approached the man, invaded his personal space out of caution because she was threatened, forced the threatening man to tell her to step away because obviously he's more of a threat to her when there is more distance between them, and then she, out of an abundance of sheer fear and trepidation, continued to stand in front of him and, fearing for her life, told him what she was going to do before she did it, did it while standing six feet in front of him to ensure the threat he posed was mitigated, and continued to talk to him afterwards because talking to someone who is threatening you is a self defense best practice especially when youre alone and vulnerable.

get the fuck out of here and quick you fake ass wanna be. don't you have a dogshit podcast to attend do? pathetic sorry ass mother fucker. the only bar you've passed is the one on the way to your mom's basement, where you live. shut the fuck up.


good lord this is an awful bit


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
FACT: Rogers Park Bryan > Central Park Karen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This guy threatened a woman alone in the park.

:lol:

I like when Rick frustrates WFR to the point where WFR just starts making shit up. Always amusing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If she had her dog on a leash she'd still have a job. If she hadn't called the cops she would have a job. No matter what she did she would be alive. She was not innocently walking her dog and then attacked.

If Arbery's own actions led to his death then her actions led to her being fired.



Attacking someone with a gun while fleeing from a place you have at the very least trespassed on multiple times is a bit different from not having a dog on a leash. But whatever you want man. It's about a confrontation between people so perfectly comparable.

Just pointing out that you seem more upset about her losing her job than you do about him losing his life.


:lol: How do you measure the emotional response to news stories in posters? And what other posters are you this concerned over whether they are having the proper emotional response in your estimation?

It's pretty easy to gauge your level of emotional instability on a topic. You're not exactly known for your poker face here Champ.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22518
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Frankie Frequencies wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Frankie Frequencies wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
It's also important to note that the attempt to lure the dog over with treats was apparently immediately preceded by the "I'm going to do what I want to do, and you're not going to like it" line. In that context his actions would certainly sound like a threat to even a cautious dog owner (whether they actually constitute a threat is a different question).
If we entertain that thought though, she didn't say that to either the guy or the police and she didn't act like she thought her dog was in danger.
Didn't she tell the dispatcher that the guy was threatening her and her dog? And didn't she tell the guy that she was going to say that to the police? If so, that means she told all parties involved that she felt threatened by the guy and, implicitly, his actions up to that point.


No she didn't you lying fuckface. the whole call is on the fucking internet you dumbass. none of that ever happened you ignoramous. So take your "if so that means..." and shove it up your pasty pimpled ass you fuckhead. get back to pretending to be a lawyer on a sports message board so you can amuse me, fucking krusty clown motherfucker.
Frankie, babe, you gotta calm down.

But I must correct myself: She only told police that the guy was threatening her and her dog. However she did tell Cooper to not touch her dog after he pulled out his dog treats after telling her that he was going to do something she wasn't going to like.

Can anyone present the argument that given his "you're not going to like it" line and pulling out dog treats, the woman saying not to touch her dog as soon as he pulled out the treats, and then telling police that the guy was threatening her dog, either that she didn't in fact feel threatened, or that her belief was unreasonable?


hey dumbfuck, i see you came back with your shinebox. good dog. let me correct you a second time: you skipped over the part where she - clearly threatened - approached the man, invaded his personal space out of caution because she was threatened, forced the threatening man to tell her to step away because obviously he's more of a threat to her when there is more distance between them, and then she, out of an abundance of sheer fear and trepidation, continued to stand in front of him and, fearing for her life, told him what she was going to do before she did it, did it while standing six feet in front of him to ensure the threat he posed was mitigated, and continued to talk to him afterwards because talking to someone who is threatening you is a self defense best practice especially when youre alone and vulnerable.

get the fuck out of here and quick you fake ass wanna be. don't you have a dogshit podcast to attend do? pathetic sorry ass mother fucker. the only bar you've passed is the one on the way to your mom's basement, where you live. shut the fuck up.
"....,where you live" just made it for me. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Glad to hear we agree that she felt threatened (people stricken with fear induced by threat often react so rationally, don't they?).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
So, if she keeps that mask on . . . would


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This guy threatened a woman alone in the park.

:lol:

I like when Rick frustrates WFR to the point where WFR just starts making shit up. Always amusing.


That's literally what happened. You have no idea what you are talking about. You half read things and half understand them anyway.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 7:22 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The truth half, or the WFR bullshit half?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This guy threatened a woman alone in the park.

:lol:

I like when Rick frustrates WFR to the point where WFR just starts making shit up. Always amusing.


That's literally what happened. You have no idea what you are talking about. You half read things and half understand them anyway.

It’s not what happened at all. That narrative has already been debunked several times in this thread alone. As usual you continue to emotionally lie and bullshit your way through this thread.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Thu May 28, 2020 10:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This guy threatened a woman alone in the park.

:lol:

I like when Rick frustrates WFR to the point where WFR just starts making shit up. Always amusing.


That's literally what happened. You have no idea what you are talking about. You half read things and half understand them anyway.

It’s not what happened at all. That narrative has already been debunked several times in this thread alone. As usual you continue to emotionally lie and bullshit your way through this thread.



as if "I know exactly what I'm going to do" doesnt come off as creepy. The guy was a fuckhead.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2020 6:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This guy threatened a woman alone in the park.

:lol:

I like when Rick frustrates WFR to the point where WFR just starts making shit up. Always amusing.


That's literally what happened. You have no idea what you are talking about. You half read things and half understand them anyway.

It’s not what happened at all. That narrative has already been debunked several times in this thread alone. As usual you continue to emotionally lie and bullshit your way through this thread.


You really are not much more than a B Mac with most of your face still attached. You are so offended by the way I post, but it's fine for LTG you create multiple threads to attack people. Or Reader to tell people who were your friends to drink themselves to death. This is Cooper's self reported quote that started the entire thing:

Quote:
“Look, if you’re going to do what you want, I’m going to do what I want, but you’re not going to like it.”


That's a threat.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2020 6:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This guy threatened a woman alone in the park.

:lol:

I like when Rick frustrates WFR to the point where WFR just starts making shit up. Always amusing.


That's literally what happened. You have no idea what you are talking about. You half read things and half understand them anyway.

It’s not what happened at all. That narrative has already been debunked several times in this thread alone. As usual you continue to emotionally lie and bullshit your way through this thread.


You really are not much more than a B Mac with most of your face still attached. You are so offended by the way I post, but it's fine for LTG you create multiple threads to attack people. Or Reader to tell people who were your friends to drink themselves to death. This is Cooper's self reported quote that started the entire thing:

Quote:
“Look, if you’re going to do what you want, I’m going to do what I want, but you’re not going to like it.”


That's a threat.

But three yahoos, two armed and coming at an unarmed man running in the middle of the street in broad daylight isn't in your world since he was black. Got it. And filming it pleased you to no end, didn't it?

When's your next white citizens council meeting champ? Will your bigoted butt buddy in arms be riding with you, as usual?

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2020 7:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Isn't in my world? What are you even talking about? This happens how often? There were 23 people shot in Chicago on Monday. But some guy in Georgia in February is the real concern.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2020 7:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This guy threatened a woman alone in the park.

:lol:

I like when Rick frustrates WFR to the point where WFR just starts making shit up. Always amusing.


That's literally what happened. You have no idea what you are talking about. You half read things and half understand them anyway.

It’s not what happened at all. That narrative has already been debunked several times in this thread alone. As usual you continue to emotionally lie and bullshit your way through this thread.


You really are not much more than a B Mac with most of your face still attached. You are so offended by the way I post, but it's fine for LTG you create multiple threads to attack people. Or Reader to tell people who were your friends to drink themselves to death. This is Cooper's self reported quote that started the entire thing:

Quote:
“Look, if you’re going to do what you want, I’m going to do what I want, but you’re not going to like it.”


That's a threat.


I attack bigoted pieces of shit like you. As I should. Bigots are pieces of shit. People who obviously believe that blacks and others are sub human (as you, Hawk obviously a mult, Chas, World Atlas, and a few others that I will fail to mention) deserve to be attacked.

Your conception of what constitutes victimhood is also quite ironic and hypocritical too. Its obvious in your rather bigoted and biased world that a black person will never be viewed as being victimized. Even ones that have been murdered. Yet guys being told to drink themselves to death on a message board (did this even happen?), have threads started about them, and white women with unleashed dogs, will never be viewed as a anything but victims by you..

Its obvious that you and the other aforementioned people are bigots and the only reason that you aren't called on it as much as you are is because many people here think that it is better to ignore you than it is to engage you on it.

As far as Leash goes he was no damn victim either. He used the fact that he had capital with certain posters here to promote, enable, and cultivate the bigotry that guys like you, America, and Toxic often partook in.

Your thoughts were often "enlightening" "valued" "provocative" while those that dared to react to them were always considered to be "the real problem"

I attack clowns like you because I know who you are. Unlike Nas I'm not trying to find a "better you" because I understand that a "better you" doesn't actually exist. People that think as you think will never see "others" as anything other than people that are beneath you. I personally do not care as long as you don't bring your bigotry my way. You can't and I know this already.

My very being irks you. It will always irk you. It bothers your clown ass but there isn't anything that you can do about it other than be irked which I know already.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Fri May 29, 2020 9:47 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2020 7:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Isn't in my world? What are you even talking about? This happens how often? There were 23 people shot in Chicago on Monday. But some guy in Georgia in February is the real concern.


Were the shooters allowed to walk after having video of their crimes provided to police? If so then that's a problem.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Central Park Karen
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2020 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This guy threatened a woman alone in the park.

:lol:

I like when Rick frustrates WFR to the point where WFR just starts making shit up. Always amusing.


That's literally what happened. You have no idea what you are talking about. You half read things and half understand them anyway.

It’s not what happened at all. That narrative has already been debunked several times in this thread alone. As usual you continue to emotionally lie and bullshit your way through this thread.


You really are not much more than a B Mac with most of your face still attached. You are so offended by the way I post, but it's fine for LTG you create multiple threads to attack people. Or Reader to tell people who were your friends to drink themselves to death. This is Cooper's self reported quote that started the entire thing:

Quote:
“Look, if you’re going to do what you want, I’m going to do what I want, but you’re not going to like it.”


That's a threat.

I'm not offended by the way you post. I, and most others here, just view you as an emotional child about these things.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 255 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group