"Extra force" should only be used if there is a serious risk of harm to the officers or the public in general.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

I'm sorry he didn't enjoy his arrest. He can speak with manager if he was upset with his customer service experience, thank you for eating at Chili's.

So a resisting suspect gets to resist for as long as they can hold out. Interesting.

When I see pictures like that business it makes me wonder why people are still trying to insist that this is about the police or quibble about the latest video from Minneapolis about a bad arrest. We are in a fight for the maintenance of our civilization right now. Could you imagine what it's like to deal with people who are doing this?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

Post from local PD last night said looters are now taking uhauls to the suburbs to transport more looters , start hitting the subdivisions , torching houses . That should make things interesting .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

DAMN those white supremacists!

And what kind of bullshit is this that I have to buy a license to buy/own/possess a firearm in this piece of shit state?

I don't know what you are referring to here but it's pretty obvious that there are limits on what a police officer should do to a resisting suspect who isn't causing a serious danger to the officers or the public.

Get him handcuffed. Call in more cops to help. Use the standard ways that certainly wouldn't include punching them in the back. Charge them with the crime of resisting arrest afterwards.

Even you called it "extra force" here so you know this is true.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Juicy, I really don't want to go back and read through 12 pages of bullshit to find out, so can you direct me to where you discussed Posse Comitatus last night? Thanks for being a peach.

_________________
(REDACTED)

Do you not accept the premise that cops knock people around even when they are not resisting? George Floyd is just a part of the larger issue that's never been addressed. Thuggery, unprofessionalism, and twisting the training book for their own purposes.

And how does he put his left arm back while it's being kneeled on. His partner clearly had control of his right arm after 30 seconds but for some reason his other arm is kneeled on while he is being punched in the back. Feel free to address that and you can go.

thank god i have insurance

Burbank and Oak Lawn cops have been chasing and arresting people non stop for last 48 hours or so. There has been minimal damage so far. I guess it was seen yesterday on 79th and Cicero as the Chicago side was being looted and the Burbank side was cops.

_________________

Nobody has argued that there are no limits.

Ah yes, just handcuff the resisting suspect. Why don't they teach that at the academy? The course could be called "Just get him handcuffed". Brilliant, Rick!

6o0 pOuNdS oF oFfIcErS


You mean like trying to take the suspect's arm and place it behind his back, the exact maneuver that is being resisted?

After what? They're still not arrested yet. All you've done here is just say "well they should just arrest the resisting suspect."

It is "extra" only because to pull on someone's arm while they're resisting is, to me, using force. I have no idea whether that is technically a "use of force" as the phrase is used in policing. So moving from pulling on the arm of a resisting suspect to striking what is being used to resist may not be an abject "escalation of force".

I called this. Not the protests, but all criminals looking alike.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

After perusing all the information on across the internet, tv and real world, you might be surprised to learn that I don't have the answer.

I'd start with something that would seem to be easy, like a justice department level, academic discussion on police reforms and a concerted implementation of the conclusions.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

This is nonsense, the officer is obviously trying to pull on the right arm, and the guy is resisting the pulling, for the entirety of the time the two are locked up. At no point does the guy surrender control of his arm. I have no idea where you're getting this notion that the other officer is clearly kneeling on the guy's arm, the video is gone now but I couldn't see it from the angle of the video.

Nothing Juicy? This should be right up your alley.

_________________
(REDACTED)

Ok. You stick on the side of it being acceptable to repeatedly punch a suspect in the back who is on the ground. I'll take the other side.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Sorry, last night instead of brushing up on posse comitatus I was practicing coitus interruptus with your mom.

Scottsdale Shopping Center....at one time, before I was born, dat place was da sh*t

I think officers are allowed to reasonably escalate the use of force to effectuate the arrest of a resisting suspect.

What was in the video Matt shared?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

Once someone is cuffed behind their back, they are virtually zero threat to any officer (other than maybe spitting). If you are cuffed and still resist, expect a taser.

_________________

Why didnt they just cuff him ?

https://youtu.be/NjY9WKbMB6c

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

Maybe JLN would change his tune if he were roughed up a bit while his hands were secured behind his back.

_________________

The guy in the video Rick and I are discussing wasn't cuffed, and was actively resisting arrest with his arms.

We had this discussion before and she was dead wrong. Based on her background she shouldn't have even been a cop.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

Where is this coming from? The guy in the video wasn't in cuffs and was clearly using his arms to resist the effort of officers to get him cuffed.

He should have been tazed.

_________________

Your posting, your bootlicking, your defending every cop every chance you get, and your pseudo law degree.

_________________