Larry's 12-6 Curveball wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Larry's 12-6 Curveball wrote:
Darkside wrote:
You're 6 months in. You really don't have much standing to be talking shit.
Why can't I call out bullshit when I see it? The man implicitly claims he has medical and law degrees. This unqualified and fake analysis does great violence to the vibe and misleads a lot of people. He should be checked, that is all.
How have I implicitly claimed to have a law or medical degree, simply by talking about those topics?
If I tell you that Reno is west of Los Angeles, am I implicitly professing to have a degree or some expertise in geography?
More than 30 people to think so.
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
shakes wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I could see them both as douchebags but she's the one ultimately weaponizing her race against him.
For the board lawers, does she have a case for wrongful termination or possibly more here (defamation)? Given the wording of the dismissal announcement, they basically implied she's a racist and committed a racist act. This casts aspersions on her character, hurts her earning potential, and obviously places a social stigma on her that's going to take a long time to erase. I don't feel bad for her but does she have a lawsuit on her hands against her former employer?
Juice, you wanna take this one?
I'd have to take a look at her employment contract, if she has one. If not then I think the only case she has as an at-will employee would be if FTI was stupid and said they fired her as a result of their investigation, which determined that she acted out of racism. If they say there are objective facts that make her a racist, and they fired her because of those facts, that might be something, maybe.
But most likely, no, she's got nothing.
Are you an attorney?
No, I'm not. I'm pretty sure shakes was having a laugh there, and I played along with the joke and then gave my opinion. I'm quite certain that every poster here knows I'm not an attorney.
Larry's 12-6 Curveball wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Miiiight be time to start shooting some people.
You seem to take great offense at posters wanting other people shot or killed but here you've got no problem doing that yourself. Hypocrite much? On top of being a phony and a hack, you are also massively depraved.
Yes, I'm hypocritical for wanting force used to stop mass rioting. You got me.
Larry's 12-6 Curveball wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Depending on how advanced his serious conditions were, it could be that it didn't require acts with "depraved indifference" or "unreasonable risk" created by the officer(s) to put him into cardiac arrest, and at the very least it could be very tough to prove that it was the unreasonable acts of the cop that put him into arrest. Hell, with some kinds of heart failure, the heart can just go into arrest on its own, hence the need for ICDs and their vest-born counterparts.
Oh, really? So what medical training of yours led you to the conclusion? It’s actually wrong but do enlighten me. Perhaps as a medical professional I can learn from your untrained mind.
If you're a medical professional you know I'm right about ICDs and LVs going into fibrillation with some forms of heart failure, I misused "arrest" there, my sincerest apologies. If you don't know that, then you're not much of a medical professional.
Larry's 12-6 Curveball wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Suffice it to say I've learned more than I thought I'd ever know about these kinds of conditions, and how potentially fragile you become when you have them.
Really? Do elaborate. Because it sounds as if you are trying to tendentiously clear the cop of wrongdoing by leaning on a medical claim that you can't support but are bravely doing so. Disingenuous much?
No, that's personal stuff that I don't want to share with you.
Larry's 12-6 Curveball wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Good lord can you imagine if the FBI was churning out agents as vulgar and combative as that, and not just the ones that unmask political opponents, leak classified materials to the press to damage political opponents, and lie on warrant applications to spy on political opponents?
The first thing that jumped to your mind about the wrongful detention clip was the verbal reaction of the person that was wrongly detained and not the police that nabbed the wrong man. Do you encourage wrongfully detained suspects not to say anything to prove their innocence? Should they offer to put the cuffs on themselves and give the cops a foot massage as well for thier trouble? Would the cops be justified in shooting him in the head after they cuffed him? Perhaps the man had a talking disorder that would have killed him anyway so like in Minnesota the murder would have been just been an assisted suicide. This is a good time for you to combine your legal and medical expertise to enlighten the messageboard with a answer.
How have you established that my post represents "the first thing that jumped to [my] mind"? Once it was established that the guy wasn't an FBI agent, I wanted to make a joke about the other horrible things FBI agents have done recently. I think I remember my first thought while watching the video being wondering why or how the cops would try to arrest someone for warrants that they claim to know by face, but send officers that don't know the guy by face.
The rest of your "critique" here is just utter nonsense.
Larry's 12-6 Curveball wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Does the stuff from the ME about hypertensive heart disease and coronary heart disease still stand? Because with narrowed arteries and out of control blood pressure, that diagnosis means he was also suffering some form of heart failure, and taking meth and fentanyl on top of all of that.
Oh really? Please do elaborate. I’d love to upgrade my own medical training with any insight you have that I missed during my training. For someone who says they've never claimed to be trained you sure do speak as if you have training. Why is that? Maybe you're just a liar.
I don't know how to "speak like you have training". I guess I tend to focus on detail when I write, maybe? Dunno. I'll use my tongue not so perty for ya next time.
Larry's 12-6 Curveball wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
That's not what the ME said, apparently there were no signs of asphyxia. But I don't know how differing autopsy reports are handled in court, nor do I know the qualifications of either person who performed the respective autopsies.
You don’t know the “qualifications” of the medical examiners. Tell me, since you claim to be not trained but are very adept at suggesting you have expertise, what lack of training would you lean on to judge the qualifications of the medical examiners? Have you thought about starting your own medical examiner certification program?
I have never "suggested" nor claimed expertise in anything, I don't think. You want to project that onto me because, for some reason, you have a massive hardon for me. In my experience that tends to come from a place of fear of inadequacy about yourself, and since you focus on my speech so much I'm going to further guess that you want to test your mettle against someone you think may be smarter than you? Well I probably am, but I'm not as learned as you are, rest assured.
And since it turned out that your beef really boiled down to "he talks about these topics, he must claim to be an expert!" Let me tell you: I'm not an expert, but I'm going to continue talking about whatever interests me, and let the highs of being right and the lows of being wrong come as they may, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
