It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:28 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Turns out the paper that pretty much halted trials of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID was total bullshit. Not only was the data it was based on total bullshit, but there was no peer review process prior to publication, and the data and methodology were so bunk that the company behind the data wouldn't even submit to the peer review instituted after enough people called bullshit. But remember, TRUST THE SCIENCE!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... ine-trials

Quote:
The Lancet paper that halted global trials of hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 because of fears of increased deaths has been retracted after a Guardian investigation found inconsistencies in the data.

The lead author, Prof Mandeep Mehra, from the Brigham and Women’s hospital in Boston, Massachusetts decided to ask the Lancet for the retraction because he could no longer vouch for the data’s accuracy.

The journal’s editor, Richard Horton, said he was appalled by developments. “This is a shocking example of research misconduct in the middle of a global health emergency,” he told the Guardian.




And LTG, THIS is why I immediately question every study offered as evidence of a claim, and you should too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
TRUST THE SCIENCE, even when the editors of scientific journals retweet defenses of their unabashed political bias!



[LTG, this is ALSO why I question every study that is presented as evidence of a claim, and you should too]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
That's the problem when everyone is rushing with science and medicine.

The Abbott COVID test and this research both were rushed, and the vaccine will likely be the same way.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
That research always had me scratching my head. The drug has been approved fior use since 1955 and is widely used today. Maybe it’s not effective, but it is generally safe.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I fucking love science-that's-really-just-a-political-hitjob.

https://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog ... y-badass-/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 11:03 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 11:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Nas wrote:
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.

How about view both with some degree of skepticism and common sense? Except the media, who lies so much that at this point it must be recreational.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 11:10 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Antarctica wrote:
Nas wrote:
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.

How about view both with some degree of skepticism and common sense? Except the media, who lies so much that at this point it must be recreational.


That's reasonable, but that's not what happens.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:42 am
Posts: 4502
pizza_Place: The Hut
Nas wrote:
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.

What will your life be like when Trump is re-elected?

Answer: it will be much better. The sky only falls when it rains.

_________________
We Now Know That JOE BIDEN has been COMPROMISED by CHINA! (let that sink in)

Election 2020-The Largest Fraud in the History of Mankind.

*If you believe that Biden won, you also believe that Epstein killed himself*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 11:14 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FukNuggitt wrote:
Nas wrote:
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.

What will your life be like when Trump is re-elected?

Answer: it will be much better. The sky only falls when it rains.


Wrong!

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 12:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Turns out the paper that pretty much halted trials of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID was total bullshit. Not only was the data it was based on total bullshit, but there was no peer review process prior to publication, and the data and methodology were so bunk that the company behind the data wouldn't even submit to the peer review instituted after enough people called bullshit. But remember, TRUST THE SCIENCE!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... ine-trials

Quote:
The Lancet paper that halted global trials of hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 because of fears of increased deaths has been retracted after a Guardian investigation found inconsistencies in the data.

The lead author, Prof Mandeep Mehra, from the Brigham and Women’s hospital in Boston, Massachusetts decided to ask the Lancet for the retraction because he could no longer vouch for the data’s accuracy.

The journal’s editor, Richard Horton, said he was appalled by developments. “This is a shocking example of research misconduct in the middle of a global health emergency,” he told the Guardian.




And LTG, THIS is why I immediately question every study offered as evidence of a claim, and you should too.


I would think that there is a huge lawsuit potential in what jut happened. If treatment was withheld for a patient because of that paper and the people who lied about it and patients died, I'd say that there is liability involved.

But this also does show how big money was involved in this. Hydro was a cheap drug and there were other treatments which were much more expensive which were being hawked by other medical "experts" who they probably had a vested interest in.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Nas wrote:
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.
That's an incomplete summation of what happened, though. It wasn't just that the data was faulty, it was completely "unreliable" (read: made up), and The Lancet abandoned their own standards of review just to get it published. How do we know that they must have not peer reviewed the study? Because the later attempt to put the data through peer review made one of the co-authors of the study fold and refuse to partake in the review process. The very attempt to peer review the data and methodology revealed the whole thing to be a fraud, but curiously that didn't happen before the paper was published and labeled as peer reviewed. Now, why would that happen? What would, or could, cause a respected medical journal like The Lancet, during a pandemic, to abandon their review process in favor of publishing a piece that definitively states that hydroxychloroquine is killing people who take it as treatment for COVID? Keep in mind, this is the medical journal that published an editorial piece calling for the removal of President Trump, who as luck would have it, has been an outspoken proponent of hydroxychloroquine as treatment for COVID.

A "respected" medical journal didn't bother to peer-review a study it published because that study served as a direct counter to a stance of Donald Trump. They put their politics ahead of the science, hoping nobody would notice, and here you are defending them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:42 am
Posts: 4502
pizza_Place: The Hut
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Turns out the paper that pretty much halted trials of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID was total bullshit. Not only was the data it was based on total bullshit, but there was no peer review process prior to publication, and the data and methodology were so bunk that the company behind the data wouldn't even submit to the peer review instituted after enough people called bullshit. But remember, TRUST THE SCIENCE!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... ine-trials

Quote:
The Lancet paper that halted global trials of hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 because of fears of increased deaths has been retracted after a Guardian investigation found inconsistencies in the data.

The lead author, Prof Mandeep Mehra, from the Brigham and Women’s hospital in Boston, Massachusetts decided to ask the Lancet for the retraction because he could no longer vouch for the data’s accuracy.

The journal’s editor, Richard Horton, said he was appalled by developments. “This is a shocking example of research misconduct in the middle of a global health emergency,” he told the Guardian.




And LTG, THIS is why I immediately question every study offered as evidence of a claim, and you should too.

Love the Thread, but take me off ignore: :lol:

viewtopic.php?f=47&t=120379&p=3455304&hilit=surgisphere#p3455024

_________________
We Now Know That JOE BIDEN has been COMPROMISED by CHINA! (let that sink in)

Election 2020-The Largest Fraud in the History of Mankind.

*If you believe that Biden won, you also believe that Epstein killed himself*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 12:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
denisdman wrote:
That research always had me scratching my head. The drug has been approved fior use since 1955 and is widely used today. Maybe it’s not effective, but it is generally safe.


There have been many documented cases where it was shown to be very successful in treating patients, particularly if treated in early stages of the virus. This was a combination of some doctors and drug developers wanting their own drugs to be used because of the money that they'd be receiving and wanting to run hydro down because Trump was mentioning it as a treatment and the media didn't want it to work because Trump came out for it.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 12:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Nas wrote:
FukNuggitt wrote:
Nas wrote:
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.

What will your life be like when Trump is re-elected?

Answer: it will be much better. The sky only falls when it rains.


Wrong!


Hopefully all of those assholes who said that they'd leave the country if Trump got elected in 2016 and didn't do it will instead kill themselves and make the world a better place.

Trump's second term is going to be terrific for the country. Think of the economy alone :!: :!: A big time raise in the standard of living. Every American that wants a job will have a job. And the removal of incompetent mayors and governors as people rise up and take the cities and states back.

Also, Barr and company are going to a house cleaning of the federal government corruption and the lifetime traitors within the justice department, FBI, and state department will be serving federal prison sentences.

Its going to be a GREAT FOUR MORE YEARS. Maybe they can bring Sheriff Joe back to run the Federal Prisons and put all of the treasonous Dems in pink work suits to work hard labor building roads and bridges. :eye: :eye: :eye:

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
The Hawk wrote:
denisdman wrote:
That research always had me scratching my head. The drug has been approved fior use since 1955 and is widely used today. Maybe it’s not effective, but it is generally safe.


There have been many documented cases where it was shown to be very successful in treating patients, particularly if treated in early stages of the virus. This was a combination of some doctors and drug developers wanting their own drugs to be used because of the money that they'd be receiving and wanting to run hydro down because Trump was mentioning it as a treatment and the media didn't want it to work because Trump came out for it.


It may or may not work, but I supported people using it. I was surprised when news came out that it was unsafe. It is a widely used drug and has been for a long time. If I recall, it is available OTC in some African countries.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 4492
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Wasn't the biggest criticism of the study always zinc not being taken with the hydroxychlooquine?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 12:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
denisdman wrote:
That research always had me scratching my head. The drug has been approved fior use since 1955 and is widely used today. Maybe it’s not effective, but it is generally safe.


There have been many documented cases where it was shown to be very successful in treating patients, particularly if treated in early stages of the virus. This was a combination of some doctors and drug developers wanting their own drugs to be used because of the money that they'd be receiving and wanting to run hydro down because Trump was mentioning it as a treatment and the media didn't want it to work because Trump came out for it.


It may or may not work, but I supported people using it. I was surprised when news came out that it was unsafe. It is a widely used drug and has been for a long time. If I recall, it is available OTC in some African countries.


The woman who murdered her husband with fish tank cleaner doesn't help.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24550
pizza_Place: It's gone
if hillary was president and said the same thing trump said about hydroclo she would be touted a genius.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
HawaiiYou wrote:
if hillary was president and said the same thing trump said about hydroclo she would be touted a genius.

No she wouldn’t because there’s no proof that it works. Anecdotal stories at best.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 1:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2020 7:19 pm
Posts: 11
pizza_Place: Denis' leftovers
The Hawk wrote:
Every American that wants a job will have a job.


Mr Hawk, how do I sign up for this sir?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 3:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Hawk wrote:
Nas wrote:
FukNuggitt wrote:
Nas wrote:
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.

What will your life be like when Trump is re-elected?

Answer: it will be much better. The sky only falls when it rains.


Wrong!


Hopefully all of those assholes who said that they'd leave the country if Trump got elected in 2016 and didn't do it will instead kill themselves and make the world a better place.

Trump's second term is going to be terrific for the country. Think of the economy alone :!: :!: A big time raise in the standard of living. Every American that wants a job will have a job. And the removal of incompetent mayors and governors as people rise up and take the cities and states back.

Also, Barr and company are going to a house cleaning of the federal government corruption and the lifetime traitors within the justice department, FBI, and state department will be serving federal prison sentences.

Its going to be a GREAT FOUR MORE YEARS. Maybe they can bring Sheriff Joe back to run the Federal Prisons and put all of the treasonous Dems in pink work suits to work hard labor building roads and bridges. :eye: :eye: :eye:


Will there be mass suicide if Bunker Trump loses?

It doesn't matter who gets elected. The next decade will be brutal and filled with austerity measures. You don't run up a nearly $10 trillion annual deficit and then pretend things are fine.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10107
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Nas wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Nas wrote:
FukNuggitt wrote:
Nas wrote:
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.

What will your life be like when Trump is re-elected?

Answer: it will be much better. The sky only falls when it rains.


Wrong!


Hopefully all of those assholes who said that they'd leave the country if Trump got elected in 2016 and didn't do it will instead kill themselves and make the world a better place.

Trump's second term is going to be terrific for the country. Think of the economy alone :!: :!: A big time raise in the standard of living. Every American that wants a job will have a job. And the removal of incompetent mayors and governors as people rise up and take the cities and states back.

Also, Barr and company are going to a house cleaning of the federal government corruption and the lifetime traitors within the justice department, FBI, and state department will be serving federal prison sentences.

Its going to be a GREAT FOUR MORE YEARS. Maybe they can bring Sheriff Joe back to run the Federal Prisons and put all of the treasonous Dems in pink work suits to work hard labor building roads and bridges. :eye: :eye: :eye:


Will there be mass suicide if Bunker Trump loses?

It doesn't matter who gets elected. The next decade will be brutal and filled with austerity measures. You don't run up a nearly $10 trillion annual deficit and then pretend things are fine.

Not to mention the increase in domestic terrorism from the extreme 1% on both the left and the right, or as some might say the bottom of the horseshoe.

My plan has been to stay in NC until 2034 and then have a plan for my remaining years (I will be 70 then). About 10 years ago, i predicted that younger family members would start emigrating away from the US by then. I didnt think it would be because of this century's Troubles.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:42 am
Posts: 4502
pizza_Place: The Hut
The Hawk wrote:
Nas wrote:
FukNuggitt wrote:
Nas wrote:
IGNORE science because a study was faulty. Ignore media because a story wasn't correct. It's amazing how a certain percentage of our population wants to condition people to believe whatever they want to believe for purely political reasons.

What will your life be like when Trump is re-elected?

Answer: it will be much better. The sky only falls when it rains.


Wrong!


Hopefully all of those assholes who said that they'd leave the country if Trump got elected in 2016 and didn't do it will instead kill themselves and make the world a better place.

It will be. You mentioning Dems offing themselves made me think back to Dave Chappelle's last special.

In it, he describes a buddy who had everything going for him I believe in terms of a career, woman, etc, and then he lost it all. Now Dave was saying that, if that happened to a white man, he would have just offed himself right away after simply entertaining the thought of having to go back to living a humble life after being so high on the hog. Instead, he said old dude just moved back in with his mom or grandma and took up some crap job somewhere, just surviving, but showed no lasting resentment.

I can't remember the exact point he was trying to make about blacks vs. whites, but the differences he highlighted stood out. The black guy was able to say, "fuck it, this hi-rolling shit is over, time for a new chapter. There's no way we're just ending this shit, so lets just get back to a more simple life" (kind of like the "black guys don't jump out of a perfectly good plane" material), whereas the white guy panicked and cut off the power to the whole ship.

In my opinion, that's why Black people do not really need to be aligned with the Democratic Party of whiny, expectation-lead, idealistic, self-offing lunatics. They are capable of great perseverance in the face of struggle, and thus are better-suited to a more conservative line of thinking. 8)

_________________
We Now Know That JOE BIDEN has been COMPROMISED by CHINA! (let that sink in)

Election 2020-The Largest Fraud in the History of Mankind.

*If you believe that Biden won, you also believe that Epstein killed himself*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 6:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Turns out the paper that pretty much halted trials of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID was total bullshit. Not only was the data it was based on total bullshit, but there was no peer review process prior to publication, and the data and methodology were so bunk that the company behind the data wouldn't even submit to the peer review instituted after enough people called bullshit. But remember, TRUST THE SCIENCE!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... ine-trials

Quote:
The Lancet paper that halted global trials of hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 because of fears of increased deaths has been retracted after a Guardian investigation found inconsistencies in the data.

The lead author, Prof Mandeep Mehra, from the Brigham and Women’s hospital in Boston, Massachusetts decided to ask the Lancet for the retraction because he could no longer vouch for the data’s accuracy.

The journal’s editor, Richard Horton, said he was appalled by developments. “This is a shocking example of research misconduct in the middle of a global health emergency,” he told the Guardian.




And LTG, THIS is why I immediately question every study offered as evidence of a claim, and you should too.


You question things that don't fit your narrative. Anyone can do that. You don't even have an argument here though whatever it is you will still believe that you're correct.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 6:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
if hillary was president and said the same thing trump said about hydroclo she would be touted a genius.

No she wouldn’t because there’s no proof that it works. Anecdotal stories at best.


And that's the most important thing. Trump touted this drug as cure for the virus and he was wrong about it. He continued to tout the drug even though he had no truth that it works...

However we aren't supposed to listen to the scientists. Listen to our buffoonish President instead.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Turns out the paper that pretty much halted trials of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID was total bullshit. Not only was the data it was based on total bullshit, but there was no peer review process prior to publication, and the data and methodology were so bunk that the company behind the data wouldn't even submit to the peer review instituted after enough people called bullshit. But remember, TRUST THE SCIENCE!
This is a good nomination but this is also why you don't rush through unproven treatments for diseases without clear evidence. Pretty much all the evidence for or against it didn't reach the standard you are complaining about not being met here.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16474
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Turns out the paper that pretty much halted trials of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID was total bullshit. Not only was the data it was based on total bullshit, but there was no peer review process prior to publication, and the data and methodology were so bunk that the company behind the data wouldn't even submit to the peer review instituted after enough people called bullshit. But remember, TRUST THE SCIENCE!
This is a good nomination but this is also why you don't rush through unproven treatments for diseases without clear evidence. Pretty much all the evidence for or against it didn't reach the standard you are complaining about not being met here.


Off-label use of a drug is very common. As denis said, this medicine has been used for 60 years.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Turns out the paper that pretty much halted trials of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID was total bullshit. Not only was the data it was based on total bullshit, but there was no peer review process prior to publication, and the data and methodology were so bunk that the company behind the data wouldn't even submit to the peer review instituted after enough people called bullshit. But remember, TRUST THE SCIENCE!
This is a good nomination but this is also why you don't rush through unproven treatments for diseases without clear evidence. Pretty much all the evidence for or against it didn't reach the standard you are complaining about not being met here.


Off-label use of a drug is very common. As denis said, this medicine has been used for 60 years.

It doesn't matter if the drug has been around a while. They need to make sure that it won't hurt, and then that it will help, before it becomes a standard practice to use it.

There is another thread on here that asked if someone would get the COVID vaccine when it came out, and a large group said they wouldn't because they aren't doing it because it would be "unproven" when we've been making vaccines for 60 years too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Turns out the paper that pretty much halted trials of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID was total bullshit. Not only was the data it was based on total bullshit, but there was no peer review process prior to publication, and the data and methodology were so bunk that the company behind the data wouldn't even submit to the peer review instituted after enough people called bullshit. But remember, TRUST THE SCIENCE!
This is a good nomination but this is also why you don't rush through unproven treatments for diseases without clear evidence. Pretty much all the evidence for or against it didn't reach the standard you are complaining about not being met here.
There were trials being done to see if the treatment was viable against COVID that his paper halted. Aren't clinical trials a crucial part of gathering evidence on a treatment?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group