It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:13 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Rick, do you not understand the point of DBing The Lancet here? It's not just because it derailed some clinical trials. In fact that point is so insignificant I now wish I hadn't made reference to it.
You could tell me the point instead of having me guess.
A peer-reviewed medical journal ignored their peer review process so they could publish a study that damaged the messaging of a political opponent. Secondary issue: A peer-reviewed medical journal has become so unabashedly political that it can reasonably be said to have political opponents.
What is your proof this was done to hurt Donald Trump?
I'm not going through this again. Read the thread. The tweet from the post under OP was retweeted by the journal's editor, and is a specific defense of the editor's politicking and politicization of the journal.


Nothing in the article suggests that this was politically done to hurt Trump yet you falsely claim that it is. Your only "source" regarding it being political is a tweet from some person on Twitter. Shocking!
Well, and the Lancet published an unsigned editorial calling for the removal of Trump. So yes, that in concert with the tacit admission by the editor that he has politicized the journal, along with the ease with which the journal abandoned its peer review process on this specific topic, looks a whole lot like the journal trying to make a political hit job out of a bunk study.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Rick, do you not understand the point of DBing The Lancet here? It's not just because it derailed some clinical trials. In fact that point is so insignificant I now wish I hadn't made reference to it.
You could tell me the point instead of having me guess.
A peer-reviewed medical journal ignored their peer review process so they could publish a study that damaged the messaging of a political opponent. Secondary issue: A peer-reviewed medical journal has become so unabashedly political that it can reasonably be said to have political opponents.
What is your proof this was done to hurt Donald Trump?
I'm not going through this again. Read the thread. The tweet from the post under OP was retweeted by the journal's editor, and is a specific defense of the editor's politicking and politicization of the journal.
Oh, a tweet.
:roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, and the Lancet published an unsigned editorial calling for the removal of Trump. So yes, that in concert with the tacit admission by the editor that he has politicized the journal, along with the ease with which the journal abandoned its peer review process on this specific topic, looks a whole lot like the journal trying to make a political hit job out of a bunk study.


You'd never consider them political if they agreed with Trump however. Their assertion that Trump is undermining scientists has a ton of validity to it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, and the Lancet published an unsigned editorial calling for the removal of Trump. So yes, that in concert with the tacit admission by the editor that he has politicized the journal, along with the ease with which the journal abandoned its peer review process on this specific topic, looks a whole lot like the journal trying to make a political hit job out of a bunk study.


You'd never consider them political if they agreed with Trump however. Their assertion that Trump is undermining scientists has a ton of validity to it.
So we agree that they're political? Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, and the Lancet published an unsigned editorial calling for the removal of Trump. So yes, that in concert with the tacit admission by the editor that he has politicized the journal, along with the ease with which the journal abandoned its peer review process on this specific topic, looks a whole lot like the journal trying to make a political hit job out of a bunk study.


You'd never consider them political if they agreed with Trump however. Their assertion that Trump is undermining scientists has a ton of validity to it.
So we agree that they're political?.


Nope we don't.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, and the Lancet published an unsigned editorial calling for the removal of Trump. So yes, that in concert with the tacit admission by the editor that he has politicized the journal, along with the ease with which the journal abandoned its peer review process on this specific topic, looks a whole lot like the journal trying to make a political hit job out of a bunk study.


You'd never consider them political if they agreed with Trump however. Their assertion that Trump is undermining scientists has a ton of validity to it.


"Scientists" as well as doctors can be deceitful and false prophets. That publication is just another tripe organization peddling a liberal agenda. This is the same shit show that all of the liberal hate mongers like CNN, MSDNC, and 95% of the "News" papers in the country are all about.

But of course you'd defend these bogus outfits for their lies. Hell, you lie regularly about the same things on this site. You're made of the same cloth that they are.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Well, and the Lancet published an unsigned editorial calling for the removal of Trump. So yes, that in concert with the tacit admission by the editor that he has politicized the journal, along with the ease with which the journal abandoned its peer review process on this specific topic, looks a whole lot like the journal trying to make a political hit job out of a bunk study.


You'd never consider them political if they agreed with Trump however. Their assertion that Trump is undermining scientists has a ton of validity to it.


"Scientists" as well as doctors can be deceitful and false prophets. That publication is just another tripe organization peddling a liberal agenda. This is the same shit show that all of the liberal hate mongers like CNN, MSDNC, and 95% of the "News" papers in the country are all about.

But of course you'd defend these bogus outfits for their lies. Hell, you lie regularly about the same things on this site. You're made of the same cloth that they are.


Here is but one of the numerous lies that you have told on here. I never did any of this. You still lied about it and never admitted that you were wrong. Shocking!
The Hawk wrote:
Another was pulled when I said that Khalil Mack reminding me of a silverback gorilla in the way that he attacks the guys trying to block him and gets to the quarterback anyway. I was praising the guy's athleticism and power and not degrading him at all. LTG accused me of being racist and Seacrest agreed with him.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:42 am
Posts: 4502
pizza_Place: The Hut
All you nee to know about HCQ is in those MedCram videos I put up.

This entire back and forth is really unnecessary and uninformed if you just educate yourselves by watching those videos.

I have shared this numerous times from the beginning of this virus: It must be used with zinc to be effective.

HCQ is an ionophore for Zinc, which means it attached to the positively charged zinc ion and helps to pass the Zinc into the cell to prevent the virus from both getting in (via clogged ace2 receptors) and once in, it prevents its replication. If taken early or as a preventative, the virus' replication capabilities are significantly attenuated. If given at a later stage, replication is no longer an issue, as ACE2 receptors have been exploited and endothelial damage and clotting has already begun, so other treatments must be employed at that stage to prevent clotting.

_________________
We Now Know That JOE BIDEN has been COMPROMISED by CHINA! (let that sink in)

Election 2020-The Largest Fraud in the History of Mankind.

*If you believe that Biden won, you also believe that Epstein killed himself*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 6:00 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Are we still "following the science"? :lol: :lol:

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 6:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are we still "following the science"? :lol: :lol:


Well yeah. South Korea and Vietnam did and it worked out just fine. We didn't for the first 2 months and now you get what you get. One of the worst per capita rates in the world.
Quote:
Mass production, distribution, and promotion of face masks
In the absence of a vaccine or a treatment, there are only two interventions that can prevent the spread of the virus—social distancing measures and the use of face masks. Many countries have carried out aggressive social distancing measures over the past several months, with many imposing a lockdown that allows only for essential functions, such as buying food or seeking medical care. At the extreme, China’s Hubei (the greater region of the city of Wuhan) province was under a full lockdown for more than two months. These measures have been effective at preventing the spread of the virus and flattening the curve.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 6:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
More from South Korea on how best to deal with the virus.
Quote:
Before testing, a question of trust in the government
Perhaps the most surprising difference in the countries' response was that South Korea never instituted a true lock-down the way the U.S. has in most states -- in part because the government assumed the people would properly social distance without a mandate. Businesses weren't forced to close, and borders weren't shut down to prevent people from coming in from abroad.

“People were willing to follow social distancing and voluntarily wear masks when they went out,” Lee said. “There was a lot of trust in how the government was responding. South Koreans have a collective spirit when confronted with disaster.”

MORE: South Korea takes new measures to have enough face masks domestically amid coronavirus
Steve Sanchez/Pacific Press via REX via Shutterstock
NYC Health and Hospital/Gotham Health Belvis Covid-19 walk-in testing site is shown in The Bronx, New York, April 28, 2020.
Steve Sanchez/Pacific Press via REX via Shutterstock

From the very beginning of the outbreak, South Koreans diligently complied with the government directive to wear N95 masks in public, already having become accustomed to wearing masks due to air pollution. When the demand for the masks skyrocketed in mid- to late-February, the government quickly took over the distribution and rationed two N95 masks per week per person.

Even as the curve appears to be flattening and the country reopens, South Koreans continue to protect themselves by wearing masks whenever out in public.

In the U.S., many people have abided by, and vocally encouraged, social distancing measures on their own, but a segment of the population balked at what some called draconian government-imposed restrictions as states locked down. Across the U.S., residents went to parties and beaches, and in some places thousands gathered for "anti-lockdown" protests -- encouraged at one point by the president himself.


Very little of this happened here. We were told by MANY that there was nothing "Govt could have done" Well it sure seems as if their Govt found things that could have been done.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are we still "following the science"? :lol: :lol:


Yeah. We followed the "science" where they told us that millions of Americans were going to be killed based on the worst case scenarios and assumptions that got shoved into the predictive models used to establish policies on how to deal with this pandemic. GARBAGE IN. GARBAGE OUT. In other words. :roll: :roll:

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
More from South Korea on how best to deal with the virus.
Quote:
Before testing, a question of trust in the government
Perhaps the most surprising difference in the countries' response was that South Korea never instituted a true lock-down the way the U.S. has in most states -- in part because the government assumed the people would properly social distance without a mandate. Businesses weren't forced to close, and borders weren't shut down to prevent people from coming in from abroad.

“People were willing to follow social distancing and voluntarily wear masks when they went out,” Lee said. “There was a lot of trust in how the government was responding. South Koreans have a collective spirit when confronted with disaster.”

MORE: South Korea takes new measures to have enough face masks domestically amid coronavirus
Steve Sanchez/Pacific Press via REX via Shutterstock
NYC Health and Hospital/Gotham Health Belvis Covid-19 walk-in testing site is shown in The Bronx, New York, April 28, 2020.
Steve Sanchez/Pacific Press via REX via Shutterstock

From the very beginning of the outbreak, South Koreans diligently complied with the government directive to wear N95 masks in public, already having become accustomed to wearing masks due to air pollution. When the demand for the masks skyrocketed in mid- to late-February, the government quickly took over the distribution and rationed two N95 masks per week per person.

Even as the curve appears to be flattening and the country reopens, South Koreans continue to protect themselves by wearing masks whenever out in public.

In the U.S., many people have abided by, and vocally encouraged, social distancing measures on their own, but a segment of the population balked at what some called draconian government-imposed restrictions as states locked down. Across the U.S., residents went to parties and beaches, and in some places thousands gathered for "anti-lockdown" protests -- encouraged at one point by the president himself.


Very little of this happened here. We were told by MANY that there was nothing "Govt could have done" Well it sure seems as if their Govt found things that could have been done.


Funny shit by the board buffoon once again. All of that social distancing preached by Dem. Leaders really got observed by the wacko mayors and governors when their anarchist soldiers went out to destroy out cities in the BLM and ANTIFA led insurrections going on the this country's streets right now. Really worried about Covid being transmitted aren't they? Pathetic hypocrites is what these assholes are. :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
long time guy wrote:
Well it sure seems as if their Govt found things that could have been done.

Of course they did after the fact. This all turned it to be yet another example of the government acting and making things worSE.
It's a new day, perhaps there will be new science conclusion that's 180 degrees off on their last conclusion.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Last edited by BigW72 on Tue Jun 09, 2020 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
More from South Korea on how best to deal with the virus.
Quote:
Before testing, a question of trust in the government
Perhaps the most surprising difference in the countries' response was that South Korea never instituted a true lock-down the way the U.S. has in most states -- in part because the government assumed the people would properly social distance without a mandate. Businesses weren't forced to close, and borders weren't shut down to prevent people from coming in from abroad.

“People were willing to follow social distancing and voluntarily wear masks when they went out,” Lee said. “There was a lot of trust in how the government was responding. South Koreans have a collective spirit when confronted with disaster.”

MORE: South Korea takes new measures to have enough face masks domestically amid coronavirus
Steve Sanchez/Pacific Press via REX via Shutterstock
NYC Health and Hospital/Gotham Health Belvis Covid-19 walk-in testing site is shown in The Bronx, New York, April 28, 2020.
Steve Sanchez/Pacific Press via REX via Shutterstock

From the very beginning of the outbreak, South Koreans diligently complied with the government directive to wear N95 masks in public, already having become accustomed to wearing masks due to air pollution. When the demand for the masks skyrocketed in mid- to late-February, the government quickly took over the distribution and rationed two N95 masks per week per person.

Even as the curve appears to be flattening and the country reopens, South Koreans continue to protect themselves by wearing masks whenever out in public.

In the U.S., many people have abided by, and vocally encouraged, social distancing measures on their own, but a segment of the population balked at what some called draconian government-imposed restrictions as states locked down. Across the U.S., residents went to parties and beaches, and in some places thousands gathered for "anti-lockdown" protests -- encouraged at one point by the president himself.


Very little of this happened here. We were told by MANY that there was nothing "Govt could have done" Well it sure seems as if their Govt found things that could have been done.


Funny shit by the board buffoon once again. All of that social distancing preached by Dem. Leaders really got observed by the wacko mayors and governors when their anarchist soldiers went out to destroy out cities in the BLM and ANTIFA led insurrections going on the this country's streets right now. Really worried about Covid being transmitted aren't they? Pathetic hypocrites is what these assholes are. :roll: :roll: :roll:

None of this is relative to the point being made

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Hawk wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are we still "following the science"? :lol: :lol:


Yeah. We followed the "science" where they told us that millions of Americans were going to be killed based on the worst case scenarios and assumptions that got shoved into the predictive models used to establish policies on how to deal with this pandemic. GARBAGE IN. GARBAGE OUT. In other words. :roll: :roll:


You're the garbage that we all can agreed upon.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 11:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I will take full ownership for overreacting to what I thought the economic damage would be. I was absolutely wrong on that.

But this virus was obviously a ploy and a colossal overreaction on the part of MANY. Also, the social damage its done is significant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 12:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Antarctica wrote:
I will take full ownership for overreacting to what I thought the economic damage would be. I was absolutely wrong on that.

But this virus was obviously a ploy and a colossal overreaction on the part of MANY. Also, the social damage its done is significant.
I don't think we know the full scare of the economic damage, even thought I agree that there was a huge overreaction by MANY. It's probably not going to be as bad as we thought, but its not as good as the markets may suggest right now either.

Quote:
The National Bureau of Economic Research said Monday that the COVID-19 crisis has officially launched the U.S. economy into a recession, thus ending the longest economic expansion on record.

The NBER’s business cycle dating committee calls recessions based on broad checks on employment and production activity.

A recession is generally perceived to be two consecutive quarters of negative growth in U.S. production, measured as real GDP.

But the NBER has other criteria that can constitute a recession, which is particularly applicable to the COVID-19 crisis given the speed of the economic downturn. The committee looks for a “significant decline in economic activity” across several economic indicators, which covers not just GDP but factors like real income and employment, as well as retail and manufacturing sales.
https://news.yahoo.com/us-economy-offic ... 26139.html

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
BigW72 wrote:
It's a new day

Image

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:42 am
Posts: 4502
pizza_Place: The Hut
BigW72 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Well it sure seems as if their Govt found things that could have been done.

Of course they did after the fact. This all turned it to be yet another example of the government acting and making things work.
It's a new day, perhaps there will be new science conclusion that's 180 degrees off on their last conclusion.

This means nothing to us - Asian countries had previous experience with fending off SARS and MERS, which had a much higher death rate.

They also have a more subservient, disciplined culture.

Americans don't listen to anybody who tells them what to do.

_________________
We Now Know That JOE BIDEN has been COMPROMISED by CHINA! (let that sink in)

Election 2020-The Largest Fraud in the History of Mankind.

*If you believe that Biden won, you also believe that Epstein killed himself*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Type-o....the government acting and making things WORSE. Just like anything they touch.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are we still "following the science"? :lol: :lol:


Yeah. We followed the "science" where they told us that millions of Americans were going to be killed based on the worst case scenarios and assumptions that got shoved into the predictive models used to establish policies on how to deal with this pandemic. GARBAGE IN. GARBAGE OUT. In other words. :roll: :roll:


You're the garbage that we all can agreed upon.


How weak you really are. You obviously do not know shit about predictive models. I do. I had a statistical emphasis included with my Masters degree. The use of those fallacious predictive numbers cost this country many deaths and bad policy. That is the truth, numbnuts. So go back and investigate how you should distort what actually happened in the history of the world in order to suit your socialist/communist bent.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Antarctica wrote:
I will take full ownership for overreacting to what I thought the economic damage would be. I was absolutely wrong on that.

But this virus was obviously a ploy and a colossal overreaction on the part of MANY. Also, the social damage its done is significant.


It was a deliberate attempt to knock Trump out of office which was further coupled by the coordinated fake rage going on within the cities. What both resulted in though are great outrage by a lot of people who are absolutely pissed off at the actions of China and Soros and company.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are we still "following the science"? :lol: :lol:


Yeah. We followed the "science" where they told us that millions of Americans were going to be killed based on the worst case scenarios and assumptions that got shoved into the predictive models used to establish policies on how to deal with this pandemic. GARBAGE IN. GARBAGE OUT. In other words. :roll: :roll:


You're the garbage that we all can agreed upon.


How weak you really are. You obviously do not know shit about predictive models. I do. I had a statistical emphasis included with my Masters degree. The use of those fallacious predictive numbers cost this country many deaths and bad policy. That is the truth, numbnuts. So go back and investigate how you should distort what actually happened in the history of the world in order to suit your socialist/communist bent.


Your expertise in the use of "statistical models" has your dumbass believing that Trump will get 60% of the Hispanic vote and 30% of the black vote. My understanding of history tells me that this is impossible.

Anyone that believes your mentally deranged ass is an expert on anything is an idiot. You are to stats what a prostitute is to chastity you mentally ill asswipe.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14921
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are we still "following the science"? :lol: :lol:


Yeah. We followed the "science" where they told us that millions of Americans were going to be killed based on the worst case scenarios and assumptions that got shoved into the predictive models used to establish policies on how to deal with this pandemic. GARBAGE IN. GARBAGE OUT. In other words. :roll: :roll:


You're the garbage that we all can agreed upon.


How weak you really are. You obviously do not know shit about predictive models. I do. I had a statistical emphasis included with my Masters degree. The use of those fallacious predictive numbers cost this country many deaths and bad policy. That is the truth, numbnuts. So go back and investigate how you should distort what actually happened in the history of the world in order to suit your socialist/communist bent.


Your expertise in the use of "statistical models" has your dumbass believing that Trump will get 60% of the Hispanic vote and 30% of the black vote. My understanding of history tells me that this is impossible.

Anyone that believes your mentally deranged ass is an expert on anything is an idiot. You are to stats what a prostitute is to chastity you mentally ill asswipe.


First of all, dickhead, I am not mentally deranged. I have PTSD because I was in combat and was wounded and have killed people. I have bad nightmares sometimes and need to see counseling because of my reactions to stressful conditions. My PTSD needs to be controlled for obvious reasons and I have taken the proper actions to do that.

But dickhead, I am not a mentally "deranged ass". I am perfectly coherent and have embarrassed your sorry ass for a long time on this board.

By the way, I made no claim that statistical models has anything to do with my statement of how the blacks and Hispanics are going to vote. That was simply a prediction based on the current situation in the US. No, the use of statistical models have their place but not in this case. If you knew a damn thing about anything you'd realize this. Thanks, BTW, for mocking my military disability incurred in my service to the United States, asshole. :twisted: :twisted:

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Are we still "following the science"? :lol: :lol:


Yeah. We followed the "science" where they told us that millions of Americans were going to be killed based on the worst case scenarios and assumptions that got shoved into the predictive models used to establish policies on how to deal with this pandemic. GARBAGE IN. GARBAGE OUT. In other words. :roll: :roll:


You're the garbage that we all can agreed upon.


How weak you really are. You obviously do not know shit about predictive models. I do. I had a statistical emphasis included with my Masters degree. The use of those fallacious predictive numbers cost this country many deaths and bad policy. That is the truth, numbnuts. So go back and investigate how you should distort what actually happened in the history of the world in order to suit your socialist/communist bent.


Your expertise in the use of "statistical models" has your dumbass believing that Trump will get 60% of the Hispanic vote and 30% of the black vote. My understanding of history tells me that this is impossible.

Anyone that believes your mentally deranged ass is an expert on anything is an idiot. You are to stats what a prostitute is to chastity you mentally ill asswipe.


First of all, dickhead, I am not mentally deranged. I have PTSD because I was in combat and was wounded and have killed people. I have bad nightmares sometimes and need to see counseling because of my reactions to stressful conditions. My PTSD needs to be controlled for obvious reasons and I have taken the proper actions to do that.

But dickhead, I am not a mentally "deranged ass". I am perfectly coherent and have embarrassed your sorry ass for a long time on this board.

By the way, I made no claim that statistical models has anything to do with my statement of how the blacks and Hispanics are going to vote. That was simply a prediction based on the current situation in the US. No, the use of statistical models have their place but not in this case. If you knew a damn thing about anything you'd realize this. Thanks, BTW, for mocking my military disability incurred in my service to the United States, asshole. :twisted: :twisted:


Your attesting to the brilliance of a clown that instructed you to ingest poison into your body as remedy for an illness qualifies as deranged.

If your dumbass actually studied stats you wouldn't make so many baseless predictions.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:42 am
Posts: 4502
pizza_Place: The Hut
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Yeah. We followed the "science" where they told us that millions of Americans were going to be killed based on the worst case scenarios and assumptions that got shoved into the predictive models used to establish policies on how to deal with this pandemic. GARBAGE IN. GARBAGE OUT. In other words. :roll: :roll:


You're the garbage that we all can agreed upon.


How weak you really are. You obviously do not know shit about predictive models. I do. I had a statistical emphasis included with my Masters degree. The use of those fallacious predictive numbers cost this country many deaths and bad policy. That is the truth, numbnuts. So go back and investigate how you should distort what actually happened in the history of the world in order to suit your socialist/communist bent.


Your expertise in the use of "statistical models" has your dumbass believing that Trump will get 60% of the Hispanic vote and 30% of the black vote. My understanding of history tells me that this is impossible.

Anyone that believes your mentally deranged ass is an expert on anything is an idiot. You are to stats what a prostitute is to chastity you mentally ill asswipe.


First of all, dickhead, I am not mentally deranged. I have PTSD because I was in combat and was wounded and have killed people. I have bad nightmares sometimes and need to see counseling because of my reactions to stressful conditions. My PTSD needs to be controlled for obvious reasons and I have taken the proper actions to do that.

But dickhead, I am not a mentally "deranged ass". I am perfectly coherent and have embarrassed your sorry ass for a long time on this board.

By the way, I made no claim that statistical models has anything to do with my statement of how the blacks and Hispanics are going to vote. That was simply a prediction based on the current situation in the US. No, the use of statistical models have their place but not in this case. If you knew a damn thing about anything you'd realize this. Thanks, BTW, for mocking my military disability incurred in my service to the United States, asshole. :twisted: :twisted:


Your attesting to the brilliance of a clown that instructed you to ingest poison into your body as remedy for an illness qualifies as deranged.

If your dumbass actually studied stats you wouldn't make so many baseless predictions.

Dude, just because you teach phys ed at the local community college does not make you "schmaht".

Image

_________________
We Now Know That JOE BIDEN has been COMPROMISED by CHINA! (let that sink in)

Election 2020-The Largest Fraud in the History of Mankind.

*If you believe that Biden won, you also believe that Epstein killed himself*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 11:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FukNuggitt wrote:
Dude, just because you teach phys ed at the local community college does not make you "schmaht".

Image


You ain't exactly wowing the masses with your budding genius either.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 12:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:42 am
Posts: 4502
pizza_Place: The Hut
long time guy wrote:
FukNuggitt wrote:
Dude, just because you teach phys ed at the local community college does not make you "schmaht".

Image


You ain't exactly wowing the masses with your budding genius either.

Curious, did you do your dissertation on 'The Perfect Pushup'?

_________________
We Now Know That JOE BIDEN has been COMPROMISED by CHINA! (let that sink in)

Election 2020-The Largest Fraud in the History of Mankind.

*If you believe that Biden won, you also believe that Epstein killed himself*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Lancet
PostPosted: Mon Jun 15, 2020 7:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/1 ... ine-319872

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group