tHeY wErE pEacEfUl PrOtEsTeRs nO rEaSoN tO bE sCaReD!

Shit does happen Zimmerman.

Shit does happen.

Whoever broke the gate should pay for it, that wasn't very nice.

So, Zimmerman, should the couple brandishing their weapons, at people walking past their house, have pulled the trigger?

Do you believe they would have been in their rights?

At some point, as 500 people made their way through the gate towards the mayor's house, the gate was wrenched upon and broken. Were these upstanding members of the community within their right to shoot their weapons?

What's your opinion ZLN?

_________________

ZLN, how do you feel about the mayor doxxing minors and other members of the community, otentially putting their jobs and lives in jeapordy?

_________________

ok so a barrier to a subdivision is broken that means put on your best summer church shirt and grab your AR-15 and wave it around at the protestors? oh, dont forget to let your drunk housewife casually point a pistol at everyone. someone illegally entering a private subdivision doesnt mean you up the ante of stupid and wave automatic rifles around like they are props.

step one... call police, step 2, stay inside and wait for police
-rational people

Who are you talking to?

When someone violently enters private property, the residents on that property are perfectly reasonable in arming themselves and readying to defend their property/selves.

ok, sure

I'm glad you can understand.

Do you feel the same about no knock raids?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Stupid question libtard. In violet neighborhoods its' stupid to even knock. You must protect you're self at all cost. Just ridle the gang banger's home with bullets. Even if some1 dies who wasnt wanted then its likely they did something wrong in the past so they're kiling is justified in a court of law.

_________________
libtard's personfied:

George, it's pretty clear from the video that people were passing through the gate in an orderly fashion. At some point the gate was vandalized.

You don't know if it happened coming or going, do you?

_________________

RFDC once again ahead of the game with his firm position of "St. Louis sucks"

_________________

Wait, GJ...who is George?

Edit: Oooooh, duh. Ignore that.

Fuck St Louis

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Zimmerman's Lecture Notes.

JLN has taken on the persona of wannabe neighborhood watch guy, attorney guy, cop guy know-it-all...he is the George Zimmerman of the board.

That is how I will be referring to him.

_________________

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley

What can I say, I watched the video and a dude was holding the gate for others to pass by...all orderly and shit.

_________________

Are you asking me if I'm fine with citizens arming themselves when a no-knock raid is performed and they shoot at police, and are you further asking me if I think they shouldn't be charged with a crime for shooting at the people coming through their door? Yep!

But the gate was unlocked! Someone held the gate open for the peaceful protesters before they destroyed it and threatened these people!

For once a legal scholar has common sense

Did you watch the full video? I watched the one on NY Post. It seems they only came out after the people started on their property and then made motions to the front entrance. The man never left front area and the shouting was basically telling them all to stay off. The state it happened in is a stand your ground when it involves your house.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"

I've yet to see anyone in the thread question the legality of their actions. Their judgement is poor at best.

You quoted a legal scholar then highlighted the part of their statement that has nothing to do with their authority as a scholar.
Fucking idiot.

HEY PRETEND LAWYER... find in this thread where i've said what they did was illegal.

there are lots of things i can do that are legal AND stupid. the fact they reacted to one groups stupid decision by doing something ten times more stupid is what anyone with brains can decipher... you are hung up on the legal aspects of their stupid actions (of course, because as a pretend lawyer it's good to litigate)

Find in this thread where I accused you of saying their actions were illegal you insufferable dolt.

rather than trade insults with the guy who was so insufferable he self banned himself....let me channel frank....
Was their decision to wildly brandish weapons a good one, yes or no? i say it was a poor decision.

I'm not going to answer such a vague question. How do you define "good" and "not good"?

How has he not quit again yet?

_________________
(REDACTED)

When would’ve been a good time for them to wildly brandish their weapons Bill ? As they were coming through their front door?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.