It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:55 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 180 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
It's also the difference between how our daughter treats the kids she teaches in a charter school, versus what her kids experienced in the CPS.


And this is the difference between a person that is actually in the profession for a living and a person that merely provides the perspective as provided from his daughter's point of view.

MANY people involved with education already know this. The exact same points that I provided earlier as a matter of fact.
Quote:
https://www.nprillinois.org/post/cultur ... g#stream/0

But despite its prestigious reputation, Noble has a peculiarly high teacher turnover rate.

And some of those teachers are speaking up about policies they describe as “dehumanizing.”

Noble’s handbook lists more than 20 behaviors that can elicit demerits. The dress code, for example, requires students to wear light khakis, plain black leather belts, black leather dress shoes, and school-branded polo-style shirts that must be tucked in. Hair must be only a “natural” color, and students can't have any designs in their hair.


Sure does sound like a "caring and nurturing" environment doesn't it?


I was curious about your views on some on the Noble schools. In general, they are predominantly Hispanic, but the data says that a couple are doing really well. Granted it's limited in some cases.


The highest performing ones perform at about the level of your lowest performing Selective enrollments/Higher performing neighborhood schools.

The best performing ones are fairly solid but even their best are nowhere in the league of Young, Payton, North Side, Jones, or Lane Tech.

As Charters have proliferated the overall quality of them has declined. They have to fill seats like any other school and as they have had to keep enrollment up their lesser schools have tended to suffer.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
The kids who get them are happy that they did.

And my daughter has students going to Garfield Park next year from Englewood.

LOVE CHANGES PEOPLES LIVES. INSTANTANEOUSLY.

One person at a time.


The kids that attend Payton Young North Side Jones and Lane Tech are often happy as well.

And there are MANY more of them to count than there are students waiting for the pittance that Schools like Parker and the Latin School will happen to bestow upon them. That's for sure.


Payton is disproportionately white.

North Side is only 7% black.

Lane Tech is 10% black.

That's a pittance of the total number of black students in the CPS getting a chance at the better schools.

Your defense of it is troubling.


There are other selective enrollment schools that have a greater black population. Also, there are more whites living in poverty than any other group of people in America. Failing communities, families and schools impact all groups of people.


The rest of America has nothing to do with forcing kids who could have better outcomes into under performing schools when there is a better educational opportunities available to them.

And selectively pointing out racist policies of others, while excusing those of your employer.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Seacrest wrote:
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
The kids who get them are happy that they did.

And my daughter has students going to Garfield Park next year from Englewood.

LOVE CHANGES PEOPLES LIVES. INSTANTANEOUSLY.

One person at a time.


The kids that attend Payton Young North Side Jones and Lane Tech are often happy as well.

And there are MANY more of them to count than there are students waiting for the pittance that Schools like Parker and the Latin School will happen to bestow upon them. That's for sure.


Payton is disproportionately white.

North Side is only 7% black.

Lane Tech is 10% black.

That's a pittance of the total number of black students in the CPS getting a chance at the better schools.

Your defense of it is troubling.


There are other selective enrollment schools that have a greater black population. Also, there are more whites living in poverty than any other group of people in America. Failing communities, families and schools impact all groups of people.


The rest of America has nothing to do with forcing kids who could have better outcomes into under performing schools when there is a better educational opportunities available to them.

And selectively pointing out racist policies of others, while excusing those of your employer.


Just like you didn't know much about the ability of students to "choose" Fenwick or Lab you really don't know much about this either.

Claiming that Charters "really do care" about their kids is further indicative of this.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
The kids who get them are happy that they did.

And my daughter has students going to Garfield Park next year from Englewood.

LOVE CHANGES PEOPLES LIVES. INSTANTANEOUSLY.

One person at a time.


The kids that attend Payton Young North Side Jones and Lane Tech are often happy as well.

And there are MANY more of them to count than there are students waiting for the pittance that Schools like Parker and the Latin School will happen to bestow upon them. That's for sure.


Payton is disproportionately white.

North Side is only 7% black.

Lane Tech is 10% black.

That's a pittance of the total number of black students in the CPS getting a chance at the better schools.

Your defense of it is troubling.


Spoken like a person that is truly ignorant of CPS but then I already knew that.

Whitney Young, Brooks, Lindblom, not to mention The Phoenix Academy are all highly rated schools that service a large % of African American students.

Not so surprising you neglected to include them.


Not surprising you won't speak out against those who sign your check.

You complain here almost daily about racism, while gleefully supporting and holding up as an example, a system that engages in the same behavior you claim to be against.


There are high performing selective enrollments with a large percentage of blacks. In fact I listed them already. Meanwhile Fenwick has a black population percentage of 2.8%.

I guess they couldn't find enough scholarships to dish out to all of the needy kids desiring the sort of "choice" that you have been touting aye?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92102
Location: To the left of my post
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
tax dollars shouldn't go to private roads, or private parks, or private clubs, or anything else that isn't a public service.


I think there can be a balance, though, between prohibiting all tax dollars for private use and recognizing that when one sends their kid to a private school, they are relieving the public of most of the financial burden of educating that child.

Why is that a good thing? Taking some of the best students and tax dollars with them isn't a great deal for the school.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
tax dollars shouldn't go to private roads, or private parks, or private clubs, or anything else that isn't a public service.


I think there can be a balance, though, between prohibiting all tax dollars for private use and recognizing that when one sends their kid to a private school, they are relieving the public of most of the financial burden of educating that child.

Why is that a good thing? Taking some of the best students and tax dollars with them isn't a great deal for the school.


You’re so opposed to Medicare for All presumably because you like your private insurance. But when presented with a market of private and public education, you are against private education. Where is the disconnect?

You are depriving the public health care system of dollars by going into a private plan. I mean, that is your education argument above, right?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
denisdman wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
tax dollars shouldn't go to private roads, or private parks, or private clubs, or anything else that isn't a public service.


I think there can be a balance, though, between prohibiting all tax dollars for private use and recognizing that when one sends their kid to a private school, they are relieving the public of most of the financial burden of educating that child.

Why is that a good thing? Taking some of the best students and tax dollars with them isn't a great deal for the school.


You’re so opposed to Medicare for All presumably because you like your private insurance. But when presented with a market of private and public education, you are against private education. Where is the disconnect?

You are depriving the public health care system of dollars by going into a private plan. I mean, that is your education argument above, right?


Public dollars shouldn't be funneled into private education. If you want your child to attend private then you should have to pay for it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I agree with that. But these movements toward charters, which are public, and tax credits for private schools is a direct reaction to the poorly run public school districts.

For high school, I paid $11,000 or so per child per year and received a $500 IL tax credit per child. The credit made no difference to me.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
denisdman wrote:
I agree with that. But these movements toward charters, which are public, and tax credits for private schools is a direct reaction to the poorly run public school districts.

For high school, I paid $11,000 or so per child per year and received a $500 IL tax credit per child. The credit made no difference to me.


The performance of most private schools isn't that great and the cost for the better ones are astronomical.

The movement is mostly due to a larger movement to further privatize education. It's not because of the performance of public schools either. Private School performance once you get past the truly elite isn't particularly great either.

They have built in advantages which inflate their numbers. Just like Charter Schools do. Public Schools do not have the same advantages.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
denisdman wrote:
I agree with that. But these movements toward charters, which are public, and tax credits for private schools is a direct reaction to the poorly run public school districts.

For high school, I paid $11,000 or so per child per year and received a $500 IL tax credit per child. The credit made no difference to me.


There is never going to be enough.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Seacrest wrote:
There is never going to be enough.


Fenwick has a Black population of 2.8%. Most are probably athletes. By your logic Fenwick would be a rather racist school correct?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
There is never going to be enough.


Fenwick has a Black population of 2.8%. Most are probably athletes. By your logic Fenwick would be a rather racist school correct?


There is no logical formulation to your statement.

The most are probably athletes is quite biased,(against young black men) but not surprising coming from you.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
long time guy wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I agree with that. But these movements toward charters, which are public, and tax credits for private schools is a direct reaction to the poorly run public school districts.

For high school, I paid $11,000 or so per child per year and received a $500 IL tax credit per child. The credit made no difference to me.


The performance of most private schools isn't that great and the cost for the better ones are astronomical.

The movement is mostly due to a larger movement to further privatize education. It's not because of the performance of public schools either. Private School performance once you get past the truly elite isn't particularly great either.

They have built in advantages which inflate their numbers. Just like Charter Schools do. Public Schools do not have the same advantages.


My mom worked in District 54 for two decades. It is one of the better districts in the state. The stories she would tell me about disengaged teachers, uncaring parents, and the inability to discipline students were very sad.

The private schools that my children attended were quite the opposite. Parents were heavily involved. Every student and parent signed a code of conduct. Teachers were very committed to the students even showing up to my son’s travel baseball games on their own time to watch him. Sure, it’s a self selected group. But we don’t have to deal with the nonsense that goes along in the public schools including girls who think they are boys peeing in the urinals at Dundee Crown.

I’d love to fix the public schools. But try to enact rigorous standards and real teacher evaluations and see how hard teachers and parents push back.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
There is never going to be enough.


Fenwick has a Black population of 2.8%. Most are probably athletes. By your logic Fenwick would be a rather racist school correct?


There is no logical formulation to your statement.

The most are probably athletes is quite biased,(against young black men) but not surprising coming from you.


Nah I just demonstrated once again how much of a phony and a hypocrite that you happen to be.

As far as the actual math goes it was a simple deduction. In one instance you were quick to label CPS racist but not Fenwick which has an even lower percentage of blacks.

Again you are quite the phony and the hyoocrite.
Seacrest wrote:
Payton is disproportionately white.

North Side is only 7% black.

Lane Tech is 10% black.

That's a pittance of the total number of black students in the CPS getting a chance at the better schools.

Your defense of it is troubling.


Seacrest wrote:
Not surprising you won't speak out against those who sign your check.

You complain here almost daily about racism, while gleefully supporting and holding up as an example, a system that engages in the same behavior you claim to be against.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
denisdman wrote:
long time guy wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I agree with that. But these movements toward charters, which are public, and tax credits for private schools is a direct reaction to the poorly run public school districts.

For high school, I paid $11,000 or so per child per year and received a $500 IL tax credit per child. The credit made no difference to me.


The performance of most private schools isn't that great and the cost for the better ones are astronomical.

The movement is mostly due to a larger movement to further privatize education. It's not because of the performance of public schools either. Private School performance once you get past the truly elite isn't particularly great either.

They have built in advantages which inflate their numbers. Just like Charter Schools do. Public Schools do not have the same advantages.


My mom worked in District 54 for two decades. It is one of the better districts in the state. The stories she would tell me about disengaged teachers, uncaring parents, and the inability to discipline students were very sad.

The private schools that my children attended were quite the opposite. Parents were heavily involved. Every student and parent signed a code of conduct. Teachers were very committed to the students even showing up to my son’s travel baseball games on their own time to watch him. Sure, it’s a self selected group. But we don’t have to deal with the nonsense that goes along in the public schools including girls who think they are boys peeing in the urinals at Dundee Crown.

I’d love to fix the public schools. But try to enact rigorous standards and real teacher evaluations and see how hard teachers and parents push back.

If they actually privatized schools to the level that you are advocating the overall quality of them would diminish too.

We work in a system which tells you that every child has to be educated. Private schools don't have that hindrance. When you have the ability to "self select" it makes a difference. You can talk about arbitrary things like standards but CPS has and has had them every year that I worked in it. It made little to know difference. The greatest predictor of achievement is the income level of the child's parent. That is what studies have shown.

We have to reform society first and then we can reform schools. I have worked in environments with extreme poverty. 95% plus poverty rates. I know what the challenges are which confront kids and teachers in theat environment. Kids I have worked with were sometimes shot or shot at as they walked to school in the morning. Parents non existent with many students in attendance just so that they would be guaranteed 2 meals (breakfast and lunch) per day. 15%-20% homeless rates.

The type of upheaval in their daily lives that you couldn't even imagine and amidst all of that they were expected to receive a "quality" education. They were the sort of kids that were invisible to the rest of society. Often times what they really and truly needed no school system was ever designed to provide for them.

And with all of this I will simply say that I would not have changed anything one bit. I preferred to work in that sort of environment because I truly believed that there was a tremendous need in them. You don't understand what teaching actually is until you have to teach in that environment.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
long time guy wrote:
If they actually privatized schools to the level that you are advocating the overall quality of them would diminish too.

We work in a system which tells you that every child has to be educated. Private schools don't have that hindrance. When you have the ability to "self select" it makes a difference. You can talk about arbitrary things like standards but CPS has and has had them every year that I worked in it. It made little to know difference. The greatest predictor of achievement is the income level of the child's parent. That is what studies have shown.

We have to reform society first and then we can reform schools. I have worked in environments with extreme poverty. 95% plus poverty rates. I know what the challenges are which confront kids and teachers in theat environment. Kids I have worked with were sometimes shot or shot at as they walked to school in the morning. Parents non existent with many students in attendance just so that they would be guaranteed 2 meals (breakfast and lunch) per day. 15%-20% homeless rates.

The type of upheaval in their daily lives that you couldn't even imagine and amidst all of that they were expected to receive a "quality" education. They were the sort of kids that were invisible to the rest of society. Often times what they really and truly needed no school system was ever designed to provide for them.

And with all of this I will simply say that I would not have changed anything one bit. I preferred to work in that sort of environment because I truly believed that there was a tremendous need in them. You don't understand what teaching actually is until you have to teach in that environment.


You and Nas discussed unruly, disruptive students last week. It's seen in middle class districts and becoming more prevalent. I think that's the issue and the school districts don't have the power to do anything about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Spaulding wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If they actually privatized schools to the level that you are advocating the overall quality of them would diminish too.

We work in a system which tells you that every child has to be educated. Private schools don't have that hindrance. When you have the ability to "self select" it makes a difference. You can talk about arbitrary things like standards but CPS has and has had them every year that I worked in it. It made little to know difference. The greatest predictor of achievement is the income level of the child's parent. That is what studies have shown.

We have to reform society first and then we can reform schools. I have worked in environments with extreme poverty. 95% plus poverty rates. I know what the challenges are which confront kids and teachers in theat environment. Kids I have worked with were sometimes shot or shot at as they walked to school in the morning. Parents non existent with many students in attendance just so that they would be guaranteed 2 meals (breakfast and lunch) per day. 15%-20% homeless rates.

The type of upheaval in their daily lives that you couldn't even imagine and amidst all of that they were expected to receive a "quality" education. They were the sort of kids that were invisible to the rest of society. Often times what they really and truly needed no school system was ever designed to provide for them.

And with all of this I will simply say that I would not have changed anything one bit. I preferred to work in that sort of environment because I truly believed that there was a tremendous need in them. You don't understand what teaching actually is until you have to teach in that environment.


You and Nas discussed unruly, disruptive students last week. It's seen in middle class districts and becoming more prevalent. I think that's the issue and the school districts don't have the power to do anything about it.


They are getting away from holding kids accountable in CPS and around the state too apparently from what you're describing. It's due mostly to the SB 100 law that was passed about 5 years ago.

I believe that it is a huge mistake. There has to be accountability in the school system. Not just for teachers either. That seems to be where most of the pendulum shift has occurred in the 15-20 years or so unfortunately.
The social justice movement is running roughshod over public education currently. Much to the detriment of it imo.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92102
Location: To the left of my post
denisdman wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
tax dollars shouldn't go to private roads, or private parks, or private clubs, or anything else that isn't a public service.


I think there can be a balance, though, between prohibiting all tax dollars for private use and recognizing that when one sends their kid to a private school, they are relieving the public of most of the financial burden of educating that child.

Why is that a good thing? Taking some of the best students and tax dollars with them isn't a great deal for the school.


You’re so opposed to Medicare for All presumably because you like your private insurance. But when presented with a market of private and public education, you are against private education. Where is the disconnect?

You are depriving the public health care system of dollars by going into a private plan. I mean, that is your education argument above, right?

I'm not against private education. I'm against public dollars going to private education. Medicaid For All would ban private insurance. Private insurance and private schools should exist. Public tax dollars shouldn't fund private insurance or private schools.

That's consistent.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Last edited by Brick on Wed Jul 01, 2020 8:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 8:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
long time guy wrote:

They are getting away from holding kids accountable in CPS and around the state too apparently from what you're describing. It's due mostly to the SB 100 law that was passed about 5 years ago.

I believe that it is a huge mistake. There has to be accountability in the school system. Not just for teachers either. That seems to be where most of the pendulum shift has occurred in the 15-20 years or so unfortunately.
The social justice movement is running roughshod over public education currently. Much to the detriment of it imo.


There's no accountability for most things. I think that's the key. Catholic schools don't really have those issues not because they can kick people out but because it's not tolerated, by the teachers or the parents. Teachers and parents are still more of a team and the admin is directed by them not the other way around.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Spaulding wrote:
long time guy wrote:

They are getting away from holding kids accountable in CPS and around the state too apparently from what you're describing. It's due mostly to the SB 100 law that was passed about 5 years ago.

I believe that it is a huge mistake. There has to be accountability in the school system. Not just for teachers either. That seems to be where most of the pendulum shift has occurred in the 15-20 years or so unfortunately.
The social justice movement is running roughshod over public education currently. Much to the detriment of it imo.


There's no accountability for most things. I think that's the key. Catholic schools don't really have those issues not because they can kick people out but because it's not tolerated, by the teachers or the parents. Teachers and parents are still more of a team and the admin is directed by them not the other way around.


There's still a lot of goofy parents in Catholic schools who want their little angel coddled and will complain to the principal about a teacher being too hard.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19378
Senate Bill 100 is the worst thing to happen in education in Illinois since I started almost 20 years ago.

As for fixing teaching evals and more rigorous standards, unless the district pays well, many places have jobs they can not fill or even get applications for. We had two jobs go unfilled the entire year.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Terry's Peeps wrote:

There's still a lot of goofy parents in Catholic schools who want their little angel coddled and will complain to the principal about a teacher being too hard.


Sure, but their impact on others is not the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19378
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
long time guy wrote:

They are getting away from holding kids accountable in CPS and around the state too apparently from what you're describing. It's due mostly to the SB 100 law that was passed about 5 years ago.

I believe that it is a huge mistake. There has to be accountability in the school system. Not just for teachers either. That seems to be where most of the pendulum shift has occurred in the 15-20 years or so unfortunately.
The social justice movement is running roughshod over public education currently. Much to the detriment of it imo.


There's no accountability for most things. I think that's the key. Catholic schools don't really have those issues not because they can kick people out but because it's not tolerated, by the teachers or the parents. Teachers and parents are still more of a team and the admin is directed by them not the other way around.


There's still a lot of goofy parents in Catholic schools who want their little angel coddled and will complain to the principal about a teacher being too hard.


The first school I taught at closed specifically because the pastor did not hire a teacher at the school who applied to be principal. The lady who came in took a bunch of shit all year from the parent groups and when the pastor refused to fire her, more half the school up and left for another local catholic school at the end of the year. Went from a school of 200 to less than 90 and closed the following year.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
conns7901 wrote:
As for fixing teaching evals and more rigorous standards, unless the district pays well, many places have jobs they can not fill or even get applications for. We had two jobs go unfilled the entire year.


Herein lies the problem with Charters. No one wants to work in an environment where they are underpaid, underappreciated, and with little to no job security.

The turnover rate in such schools is obscene.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Spaulding wrote:
long time guy wrote:

They are getting away from holding kids accountable in CPS and around the state too apparently from what you're describing. It's due mostly to the SB 100 law that was passed about 5 years ago.

I believe that it is a huge mistake. There has to be accountability in the school system. Not just for teachers either. That seems to be where most of the pendulum shift has occurred in the 15-20 years or so unfortunately.
The social justice movement is running roughshod over public education currently. Much to the detriment of it imo.


There's no accountability for most things. I think that's the key. Catholic schools don't really have those issues not because they can kick people out but because it's not tolerated, by the teachers or the parents. Teachers and parents are still more of a team and the admin is directed by them not the other way around.


The ability to kick kids out without due process is something that cannot happen in CPS. That is one difference.

The ability to kick students out that aren't on course to graduate allows them to fraudulently inflate their graduation rate.

They can deny admittance to students they don't want. Public Schiols cannot. Ambiguous analysis such as parents and administration working as a team is just that, ambiguous.

Public Schools are required by law to accept every student. Catholics are not and when they want they can simply get rid of students. That makes a huge difference whether you think so or not.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
long time guy wrote:

The ability to kick kids out without due process is something that cannot happen in CPS. That is one difference.

The ability to kick students out that aren't on course to graduate allows them to fraudulently inflate their graduation rate.

They can deny admittance to students they don't want. Public Schiols cannot. Ambiguous analysis such as parents and administration working as a team is just that, ambiguous.

Public Schools are required by law to accept every student. Catholics are not and when they want they can simply get rid of students. That makes a huge difference whether you think so or not.


Do you think that a lot of Catholic Schools kick kids out? They don't and it's not arbitrary. You and Nas had a lengthy discussion about students, parents,and the administration. That's the real problem. You know there are disruptive kids but the public schools can't or don't do anything about it, they aren't allowed to. They cater to them and everybody else is left behind. Volunteers don't help, more money doesn't help, and you know the teachers are helpless.

My son's high school has a 98%+ acceptance rate I think. It's not competitive. They don't kick people out. The economic, racial, and social status doesn't matter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Spaulding wrote:
long time guy wrote:

The ability to kick kids out without due process is something that cannot happen in CPS. That is one difference.

The ability to kick students out that aren't on course to graduate allows them to fraudulently inflate their graduation rate.

They can deny admittance to students they don't want. Public Schiols cannot. Ambiguous analysis such as parents and administration working as a team is just that, ambiguous.

Public Schools are required by law to accept every student. Catholics are not and when they want they can simply get rid of students. That makes a huge difference whether you think so or not.


Do you think that a lot of Catholic Schools kick kids out? They don't and it's not arbitrary. You and Nas had a lengthy discussion about students, parents,and the administration. That's the real problem. You know there are disruptive kids but the public schools can't or don't do anything about it, they aren't allowed to. They cater to them and everybody else is left behind. Volunteers don't help, more money doesn't help, and you know the teachers are helpless.

My son's high school has a 98%+ acceptance rate I think. It's not competitive. They don't kick people out. The economic, racial, and social status doesn't matter.


Catholic School enrollment has been on the decline for decades now. If they were the panacea or even a much better option that would not have occurred.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4053
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
tax dollars shouldn't go to private roads, or private parks, or private clubs, or anything else that isn't a public service.


I think there can be a balance, though, between prohibiting all tax dollars for private use and recognizing that when one sends their kid to a private school, they are relieving the public of most of the financial burden of educating that child.



Should someone get a tax break if they have their own private security team because they have relieved that state of the financial prudence of police protection for that individual?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2020 5:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31668
pizza_Place: What??
One Post wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
tax dollars shouldn't go to private roads, or private parks, or private clubs, or anything else that isn't a public service.


I think there can be a balance, though, between prohibiting all tax dollars for private use and recognizing that when one sends their kid to a private school, they are relieving the public of most of the financial burden of educating that child.



Should someone get a tax break if they have their own private security team because they have relieved that state of the financial prudence of police protection for that individual?

Should Elon Musk get a tax break because he has relieved the government of going to space?
Who pays for the UN to shit all over the US?
Why does Joe Windmill get breaks and not Pete Nuclear?
Are these good questions or stupid questions?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 1:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
The kids who get them are happy that they did.

And my daughter has students going to Garfield Park next year from Englewood.

LOVE CHANGES PEOPLES LIVES. INSTANTANEOUSLY.

One person at a time.


The kids that attend Payton Young North Side Jones and Lane Tech are often happy as well.

And there are MANY more of them to count than there are students waiting for the pittance that Schools like Parker and the Latin School will happen to bestow upon them. That's for sure.


Payton is disproportionately white.

North Side is only 7% black.

Lane Tech is 10% black.

That's a pittance of the total number of black students in the CPS getting a chance at the better schools.

Your defense of it is troubling.


Spoken like a person that is truly ignorant of CPS but then I already knew that.

Whitney Young, Brooks, Lindblom, not to mention The Phoenix Academy are all highly rated schools that service a large % of African American students.

Not so surprising you neglected to include them.


Not surprising you won't speak out against those who sign your check.

You complain here almost daily about racism, while gleefully supporting and holding up as an example, a system that engages in the same behavior you claim to be against.



Well, the students aren't buying the CPS party line anymore.


https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/bre ... story.html

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 180 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group