It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:56 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How about this? We shouldn't take social commentary seriously by influential NBA players while they openly court Chinese dollars. Is that fair?

LeBron is willing to go after Drew Brees and his poorly thought out comments but he isn't willing to call out the NBA for banning kneeling or China for anything and getting mad at another NBA person for saying something that cost him business meetings.


Donald Trump takes money from the Chinese Govt and did so well before he ran for President. Do you think that ever precluded guys such as JLN or Leotardo from voting for him? Do you think that they ever demanded that he divest from China?

As far as the players go they don't have an obligation to speak out against Chinese oppression just because they wear a black lives matter T Shirt.

They can do what they want but it undercuts their other messages.


Their message has always been undercut when it comes to China. It was undercut not only when they decided to market themselves to China it was also undercut more specifically when Yao Ming was drafted by the Rockets.

The Rockets and the NBA sold their collective souls in order for Yao Ming to play in the NBA. It was always understood and known that the Chinese Govt in essence owned him. They were quite comfortable with that particular arrangement too. It told me all that I needed to know about the integrity of the NBA.

I only take issue with those looking for an aha moment. They care neither for the NBA nor oppression in China so they are using this as a way of suggesting that NBA players "shut up and dribble". Personally I think that the NBA is the most progressive of the Sports leagues but that doesn't mean that they are necessarily progressive.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
NFL doesn't have Chinese issues like this!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
She's as big a piece of shit as her other opportunist hypocrites like Tom Cotton or the clown freshman senator from Missouri.

I ignore everything coming from them. They're useless clowns.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How about this? We shouldn't take social commentary seriously by influential NBA players while they openly court Chinese dollars. Is that fair?

LeBron is willing to go after Drew Brees and his poorly thought out comments but he isn't willing to call out the NBA for banning kneeling or China for anything and getting mad at another NBA person for saying something that cost him business meetings.


Donald Trump takes money from the Chinese Govt and did so well before he ran for President. Do you think that ever precluded guys such as JLN or Leotardo from voting for him? Do you think that they ever demanded that he divest from China?

As far as the players go they don't have an obligation to speak out against Chinese oppression just because they wear a black lives matter T Shirt.
I did not vote for Donald Trump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How about this? We shouldn't take social commentary seriously by influential NBA players while they openly court Chinese dollars. Is that fair?

LeBron is willing to go after Drew Brees and his poorly thought out comments but he isn't willing to call out the NBA for banning kneeling or China for anything and getting mad at another NBA person for saying something that cost him business meetings.


Donald Trump takes money from the Chinese Govt and did so well before he ran for President. Do you think that ever precluded guys such as JLN or Leotardo from voting for him? Do you think that they ever demanded that he divest from China?

As far as the players go they don't have an obligation to speak out against Chinese oppression just because they wear a black lives matter T Shirt.

They can do what they want but it undercuts their other messages.


Their message has always been undercut when it comes to China. It was undercut not only when they decided to market themselves to China it was also undercut more specifically when Yao Ming was drafted by the Rockets.

The Rockets and the NBA sold their collective souls in order for Yao Ming to play in the NBA. It was always understood and known that the Chinese Govt in essence owned him. They were quite comfortable with that particular arrangement too. It told me all that I needed to know about the integrity of the NBA.

I only take issue with those looking for an aha moment. They care neither for the NBA nor oppression in China so they are using this as a way of suggesting that NBA players "shut up and dribble". Personally I think that the NBA is the most progressive of the Sports leagues but that doesn't mean that they are necessarily progressive.

Of course it was an aha moment. China said "shut the fuck up" and they did. Players, coaches, management, all on the same page. Partners. Listen, I'm sorry players have been exposed as capitalists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2020 11:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How about this? We shouldn't take social commentary seriously by influential NBA players while they openly court Chinese dollars. Is that fair?

LeBron is willing to go after Drew Brees and his poorly thought out comments but he isn't willing to call out the NBA for banning kneeling or China for anything and getting mad at another NBA person for saying something that cost him business meetings.


Donald Trump takes money from the Chinese Govt and did so well before he ran for President. Do you think that ever precluded guys such as JLN or Leotardo from voting for him? Do you think that they ever demanded that he divest from China?

As far as the players go they don't have an obligation to speak out against Chinese oppression just because they wear a black lives matter T Shirt.

They can do what they want but it undercuts their other messages.


Their message has always been undercut when it comes to China. It was undercut not only when they decided to market themselves to China it was also undercut more specifically when Yao Ming was drafted by the Rockets.

The Rockets and the NBA sold their collective souls in order for Yao Ming to play in the NBA. It was always understood and known that the Chinese Govt in essence owned him. They were quite comfortable with that particular arrangement too. It told me all that I needed to know about the integrity of the NBA.

I only take issue with those looking for an aha moment. They care neither for the NBA nor oppression in China so they are using this as a way of suggesting that NBA players "shut up and dribble". Personally I think that the NBA is the most progressive of the Sports leagues but that doesn't mean that they are necessarily progressive.

Of course it was an aha moment. China said "shut the fuck up" and they did. Players, coaches, management, all on the same page. Partners. Listen, I'm sorry players have been exposed as capitalists


It's not just the players. The owners and Silver can end this tomorrow if they wanted to.

They have been in bed with China. When I was really, really in the classroom I would use Yao Ming and his situation as an example of how dictatorships and communism works.
Again people here are using this as a reason to tell NBA players to shut up and dribble. That's it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 6:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How about this? We shouldn't take social commentary seriously by influential NBA players while they openly court Chinese dollars. Is that fair?

LeBron is willing to go after Drew Brees and his poorly thought out comments but he isn't willing to call out the NBA for banning kneeling or China for anything and getting mad at another NBA person for saying something that cost him business meetings.


Donald Trump takes money from the Chinese Govt and did so well before he ran for President. Do you think that ever precluded guys such as JLN or Leotardo from voting for him? Do you think that they ever demanded that he divest from China?

As far as the players go they don't have an obligation to speak out against Chinese oppression just because they wear a black lives matter T Shirt.

They can do what they want but it undercuts their other messages.


Their message has always been undercut when it comes to China. It was undercut not only when they decided to market themselves to China it was also undercut more specifically when Yao Ming was drafted by the Rockets.

The Rockets and the NBA sold their collective souls in order for Yao Ming to play in the NBA. It was always understood and known that the Chinese Govt in essence owned him. They were quite comfortable with that particular arrangement too. It told me all that I needed to know about the integrity of the NBA.

I only take issue with those looking for an aha moment. They care neither for the NBA nor oppression in China so they are using this as a way of suggesting that NBA players "shut up and dribble". Personally I think that the NBA is the most progressive of the Sports leagues but that doesn't mean that they are necessarily progressive.

So you seem to agree.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 6:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How about this? We shouldn't take social commentary seriously by influential NBA players while they openly court Chinese dollars. Is that fair?

LeBron is willing to go after Drew Brees and his poorly thought out comments but he isn't willing to call out the NBA for banning kneeling or China for anything and getting mad at another NBA person for saying something that cost him business meetings.


Donald Trump takes money from the Chinese Govt and did so well before he ran for President. Do you think that ever precluded guys such as JLN or Leotardo from voting for him? Do you think that they ever demanded that he divest from China?

As far as the players go they don't have an obligation to speak out against Chinese oppression just because they wear a black lives matter T Shirt.

They can do what they want but it undercuts their other messages.


Their message has always been undercut when it comes to China. It was undercut not only when they decided to market themselves to China it was also undercut more specifically when Yao Ming was drafted by the Rockets.

The Rockets and the NBA sold their collective souls in order for Yao Ming to play in the NBA. It was always understood and known that the Chinese Govt in essence owned him. They were quite comfortable with that particular arrangement too. It told me all that I needed to know about the integrity of the NBA.

I only take issue with those looking for an aha moment. They care neither for the NBA nor oppression in China so they are using this as a way of suggesting that NBA players "shut up and dribble". Personally I think that the NBA is the most progressive of the Sports leagues but that doesn't mean that they are necessarily progressive.

So you seem to agree.


Actually I don't. I don't think its hypocritical at all. They never claimed to be crusaders for all of the oppressed people of the world. If they had then yeah it would be hypocritical. They complained about the treatment of black people by police.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9960
pizza_Place: world famous
Phil Leotardo wrote:
The NBA is putting political groups and catch phrases on courts and jerseys. They are politicizing their sport. Even the UK is waking up as the labour party and broadcasters are pointing out the radical ideas of BLM.

I wonder what the NBA would say if someone wanted to put "Free Hong Kong" on their jersey?

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How about this? We shouldn't take social commentary seriously by influential NBA players while they openly court Chinese dollars. Is that fair?

LeBron is willing to go after Drew Brees and his poorly thought out comments but he isn't willing to call out the NBA for banning kneeling or China for anything and getting mad at another NBA person for saying something that cost him business meetings.


Donald Trump takes money from the Chinese Govt and did so well before he ran for President. Do you think that ever precluded guys such as JLN or Leotardo from voting for him? Do you think that they ever demanded that he divest from China?

As far as the players go they don't have an obligation to speak out against Chinese oppression just because they wear a black lives matter T Shirt.

They can do what they want but it undercuts their other messages.


Their message has always been undercut when it comes to China. It was undercut not only when they decided to market themselves to China it was also undercut more specifically when Yao Ming was drafted by the Rockets.

The Rockets and the NBA sold their collective souls in order for Yao Ming to play in the NBA. It was always understood and known that the Chinese Govt in essence owned him. They were quite comfortable with that particular arrangement too. It told me all that I needed to know about the integrity of the NBA.

I only take issue with those looking for an aha moment. They care neither for the NBA nor oppression in China so they are using this as a way of suggesting that NBA players "shut up and dribble". Personally I think that the NBA is the most progressive of the Sports leagues but that doesn't mean that they are necessarily progressive.

So you seem to agree.


Actually I don't. I don't think its hypocritical at all. They never claimed to be crusaders for all of the oppressed people of the world. If they had then yeah it would be hypocritical. They complained about the treatment of black people by police.

That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
long time guy wrote:
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How about this? We shouldn't take social commentary seriously by influential NBA players while they openly court Chinese dollars. Is that fair?

LeBron is willing to go after Drew Brees and his poorly thought out comments but he isn't willing to call out the NBA for banning kneeling or China for anything and getting mad at another NBA person for saying something that cost him business meetings.


Donald Trump takes money from the Chinese Govt and did so well before he ran for President. Do you think that ever precluded guys such as JLN or Leotardo from voting for him? Do you think that they ever demanded that he divest from China?

As far as the players go they don't have an obligation to speak out against Chinese oppression just because they wear a black lives matter T Shirt.

They can do what they want but it undercuts their other messages.


Their message has always been undercut when it comes to China. It was undercut not only when they decided to market themselves to China it was also undercut more specifically when Yao Ming was drafted by the Rockets.

The Rockets and the NBA sold their collective souls in order for Yao Ming to play in the NBA. It was always understood and known that the Chinese Govt in essence owned him. They were quite comfortable with that particular arrangement too. It told me all that I needed to know about the integrity of the NBA.

I only take issue with those looking for an aha moment. They care neither for the NBA nor oppression in China so they are using this as a way of suggesting that NBA players "shut up and dribble". Personally I think that the NBA is the most progressive of the Sports leagues but that doesn't mean that they are necessarily progressive.

Of course it was an aha moment. China said "shut the fuck up" and they did. Players, coaches, management, all on the same page. Partners. Listen, I'm sorry players have been exposed as capitalists


It's not just the players. The owners and Silver can end this tomorrow if they wanted to.

They have been in bed with China. When I was really, really in the classroom I would use Yao Ming and his situation as an example of how dictatorships and communism works.
Again people here are using this as a reason to tell NBA players to shut up and dribble. That's it.

Players are Nike. They are Big Oil, they are Wall St., they are the 1%. They sold out to China just like all the big Corps. They get no special dispensation because what they do is entertainment. This goes to the Hollywood phonies too. Shutup and say your lines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.
"Actively silencing criticism of a regime is not supporting it" is a whopper. Are you this stupid or this much of a liar when it comes to protecting your precious Woke Bae League?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.
"Actively silencing criticism of a regime is not supporting it" is a whopper. Are you this stupid or this much of a liar when it comes to protecting your precious Woke Bae League?

Let me explain this in terms that even a stupid fuck such as yourself can comprehend Asstapper.

If you complain about the proliferation of transgenderism rights in society on this board but neglect to do so on your job (because it may cost you your job) does it make you a hypocrite?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.
"Actively silencing criticism of a regime is not supporting it" is a whopper. Are you this stupid or this much of a liar when it comes to protecting your precious Woke Bae League?


Basketball players aren't politicians. They are businessmen. The made a business decision. The same sort of business decision that every sanctimonious person on here currently bashing them would have made if given the opportunity.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Why should the NBA have to explain its relationship with China? That's the point of this thread.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.
"Actively silencing criticism of a regime is not supporting it" is a whopper. Are you this stupid or this much of a liar when it comes to protecting your precious Woke Bae League?


Basketball players aren't politicians. They are businessmen. The made a business decision. The same sort of business decision that every sanctimonious person on here currently bashing them would have made if given the opportunity.

Kinda like Henry Ford making business decisions with the Nazis.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
long time guy wrote:
Why should the NBA have to explain its relationship with China? That's the point of this thread.


For the same reason WWE has to explain their relationship with Saudi Arabia.

If you talk about equality and inclusiveness and freedom but then take money from brutal dictatorships, you open yourself up to questions.

Now you can certainly ignore those questions like WWE does, but that doesn't make the questions invalid.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Terry's Peeps wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Why should the NBA have to explain its relationship with China? That's the point of this thread.


For the same reason WWE has to explain their relationship with Saudi Arabia.

If you talk about equality and inclusiveness and freedom but then take money from brutal dictatorships, you open yourself up to questions.
.


That isn't much of a reason. This country has borrowed Trillions of dollars from China. Its pathetically hypocritical to question anyone's "relationship" with China with this being the case. Trump borrowed $500 million himself and Supporters such as Jorr, JLN, Hawk, Two Buck Chuck, and others on here didn't so much as bat an eye. Today he still continues to conduct business with China even as he complains about the "evils" of China and not one of them says a word about it. Yet we are supposed to believe that they are being objective in their views on the NBA. Sure we are.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:

hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.
"Actively silencing criticism of a regime is not supporting it" is a whopper. Are you this stupid or this much of a liar when it comes to protecting your precious Woke Bae League?


Basketball players aren't politicians. They are businessmen. The made a business decision. The same sort of business decision that every sanctimonious person on here currently bashing them would have made if given the opportunity.

Kinda like Henry Ford making business decisions with the Nazis.


As a country we conduct business with China and have for years. The NBA isn't doing anything that we as a country have not promoted for years.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.
"Actively silencing criticism of a regime is not supporting it" is a whopper. Are you this stupid or this much of a liar when it comes to protecting your precious Woke Bae League?


Basketball players aren't politicians. They are businessmen. The made a business decision. The same sort of business decision that every sanctimonious person on here currently bashing them would have made if given the opportunity.
They certainly acted politically when they tried to silence Morrey's position on Hong Kong to try to save their relationship with China. You can try to couch it as purely a business decision all you want, doesn't make it true.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:49 pm
Posts: 1150
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati’s
Has she come out and condemned the Trump 2020 NASCAR yet? Or is than exempt from “shut up and dribble”

Come to think of it, have any of our resident board “stick to sports” dipshits condemned it yet?

_________________
(REDACTED)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Basketball players aren't politicians. They are businessmen. The made a business decision. The same sort of business decision that every sanctimonious person on here currently bashing them would have made if given the opportunity.
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
They certainly acted politically when they tried to silence Morrey's position on Hong Kong to try to save their relationship with China. You can try to couch it as purely a business decision all you want, doesn't make it true.


I noticed that you ducked my extremely relevant question. Shocking!

They silenced Morey in order to protect their business investment.

If this isn't the "true" reason then what is?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.

"They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for ____________

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the ______________".

There are a lot of things you could fill in the blanks there that wouldn't get a pass.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.

"They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for ____________

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the ______________".

There are a lot of things you could fill in the blanks there that wouldn't get a pass.


As a country we conduct Trillions of dollars worth of business with China. They are the owners of more U.S. debt than any other nation in the world. Its hypocritical to expect the NBA to discontinue their business arrangement with China when we don't demand similar things of our Govt or our President.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
long time guy wrote:
As a country we conduct business with China and have for years. The NBA isn't doing anything that we as a country have not promoted for years.

And I've been against it for two decades. We're such whores that we just give away proprietary info and technology to them. That's only a recent thing along with Google doing their censoring for them, no charge.

The bigger narrative is China is part of the union busting in this country that both the left and the right participated in(IMO, the biggest reason for income inequality). Of course NBA players are small potatoes but they are still part of the problem...the 1 percenters. They are EXACTLY the same as Nike. Pressuring the Redskins on skin deep issues while employing slave labor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's pretty much the definition of hypocritical that they choose who they should worry about based on how much money it would cost them.


hypocrite[ hip-uh-krit ]SHOW IPA
SEE SYNONYMS FOR hypocrite ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, especially a person whose actions belie stated beliefs



The only way that it can be hypocritical would be if they openly support the oppression of the Chinese Govt while criticizing police oppression.

That's not what they are doing.

See how they tried to silence Morey for that.


They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for Chinese oppression

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the Chinese Government.

"They made a business decision and it still wasn't a show of support for ____________

They asked him to pipe down for financial reasons. They aren't openly supporting the ______________".

There are a lot of things you could fill in the blanks there that wouldn't get a pass.
:lol: Because you've never classified criticism of critiques of, say, Donald Trump as outright support for him, right? You're the worst.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Marsha Blackburn
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Nardi wrote:
Pressuring the Redskins on skin deep issues while employing slave labor.


Like I said, perfect opportunity for Snyder. " I won't change the name unless Nike stops employing slave labor."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group