Where did I say that the saming and ridiculing of America and TM weren't warranted, or that their bans weren't warranted? Do you think this "smoking gun" says that?

Claims to have supported the banning of America and Toxic

and yet:



There is always a smoking gun to be found
somewhere[/quote]


It's in bold.print. You opposed their banning. Argue, lie whatever you like. Doesn't change anything. You will never admit the truth anyway. Everything that I said is:supported by your words. I'm not going back and forth about it but I will reference it whenever I feel the need to reference your own bigotry and support for bigots.

I know you to be a liar that will lie about anything so this little attempt at spin was already anticipated.

_________________

No, I said there was a disparity in how the powers-that-be policed the board. Nowhere did I say that the "policing" wasn't warranted. In fact, as I have pointed out to you, I have explicitly and unequivocally said they should have been banned. You're grasping at straws and it's hilarious.

Also, good lord, learn to clean up your quote usage if you're going to try to get cute with it.

You claimed that they were allowed to "shame" and "ridicule" two bigots?

That statement alone illustrates that you had a problem with the treatment of them. If by no one else then by the other posters.


In the two succeeding statements you are caught lying again.


The aforementioned statement was a lie. You were never "unequivocally in support of the banning". If so why did it matter to you where the impetus behind it came from? Remember you "unequivocally supported" it?

_________________

Why would the shaming and ridicule of two bigots appall you so much Litigation Notes?

_________________

Doesn't this talk about JLN belong in the cancelation thread? Mods.... fix it!

It didn't appall me, I was appalled at how easily a board member got off for completely doxxing another member. I wanted a harsher punishment for the irreverent doxxing, not an easier punishment for the bigotry. That is why I highlighted the disparity.

Yet you used the word "allowed" to ridicule and shame this which clearly means that you believed that it was out of bounds.

Conveniently one that shares similar views as you and the other 2 regarding race.


Using your logic there were numerous other times in which they "got off" as well only to continue to do the same thing. They were banned and "allowed" back and still continued to promote their racist beliefs. The poster in question was doxxed once and they were warned about it never to do it again.

Those 2 taunted and baited the mods with their bullshit (not that a likeminded fellow such as yourself would ever noticed) and then they were banned. There was no equivalency and if I or BMac were the 2 instead of those two is there any doubt that you would have been arguing as vociferously as you were? Not in my mind there isn't.

_________________

Whether either of you are right or wrong, there’s no denying that you two are the biggest board-shitters here.

Have a good evening.

_________________
Not a mult.

And then banned again, another banning I supported.



Yeah, that's a pretty light punishment considering the act. Doxxing can get someone killed.

This is just jibberish to me. What are you trying to ask? Would I have said that the punishment for doxxing another board member should be as harsh as the hypothetical punishment you and BMac received for being toxic assholes? Yes.

Preach!

Roger Sterling was cool because he was a pedantic and petty bitch. That's what I took away from mad man.

Also ltg won't stfu ever

_________________

Once I finally check out I sincerely hope that this place becomes the utopia that some think that it is destined to be.

_________________