It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Discuss
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Chicago, Il
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=778410


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Discuss
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I'd be in favor but it will never happen. The Vikings maybe (doubtful) but they would never trade him to the Bears and they would be crazy to do so.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Discuss
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
If it came down to Bears or Vikings, I think they'd go Bears in a heartbeat. Even with Favre, the Bears have a shitty O-line, shitty receivers, and a mediocre running game.

For the Packers, he's less of a threat as a Bear, than he is as a Viking.

But, it'll never happen.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Discuss
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 1103
Location: Roselle
pizza_Place: Oven Grinders
No2fAVrE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Discuss
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:59 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Albert Hofmann wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Vikings might offer a 2nd round pick and GB will take it and run.


No. The Packers are asking for a first and third rounder. I know that sounds stupid, but thats what they want. Supposedly they said no to the Jets proposed offer of a 2nd and 4th.


They won't get that, even for Farve. Farve is a short-term answer, that's way too much for a team to give up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Discuss
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Farve is better than anything the Bears have...

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Discuss
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:49 am
Posts: 141
Location: Rock Island, IL
If I am the Green Bay Packers and it came down to a choice of whether to trade Favre to Chicago Or Minnesota, I vote Chicago and it has almost nothing to do with the level of talent on the Bears.

I would send him to Chicago because the Bears and Packers don't play each other until like week 10 or 11 where as they play Minnesota week 1 on Monday Night Football AT LAMBEAU. Those factors alone would make me take Chicago over Minnesota in a heartbeat.

_________________
-Larry D.

Host of Chicago Bears Review
http://chicagobearsreview.mypodcast.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Discuss
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:10 pm
Posts: 6774
Bears management is dumb. To say they promised these 2 losers the chance, and they would never look at Favre is stupid.

_________________
Fuck Edwards and Zobrist


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Discuss
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
What everyone is forgetting is that Favre blows when indoors. The ButtPackers shouldn't have much to fear trading him to the Viqueens.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Discuss
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Nas wrote:
Someone might offer a 1st round pick just for the sake of the gates. Favre in NY would be huge and would make the Giants the second team for a year or 2. He has a better opportunity to win a SB in Minnesota. It looks like they are an NFL quarterback short of having a SB team.


Just about every team in the NFL sells out, it wouldn't be necessary from that POV. Maybe in Jacksonville, but they wouldn't make that tade with Garrard.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: badrogue17 and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group