Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, my take is that the fascination with the walk isn't really working well for the offenses. As you say, strikeouts are way up and have been over the last several seasons while walk rates have remained relatively static. What that suggests to me is that batters are getting themselves into bad counts by watching pitches they could be hitting and then ultimately striking out more than walking.
In any case, we have a boring game on our hands. People don't pay to see guys walk. Even if it were a successful strategy. I'm so thankful to have Nick Madrigal on my team.
Interesting. I believe we find ourselves on opposite ends of the debate here. See, I pay (when I go to games which is pretty rare given the expense of such an endeavor) to see wins. And if a high OBP guy draws a walk I'd argue the two run homer is more exciting than the solo bomb. It pains me to see Bryant try to be an uppercut HR swinger and push a sad sub 600 OPS. What could he be if he leveled his swing and drove those wwrning track shots into the walls at the gap instead? I love a crazy triple, takes a hard hit ball, speed, reading the defense and high quality baserunning. 4 tools.
Now who doesn't love a majestic 430 foot shot? Nobody. But nuance is lacking in the modern game.
In my opinion, what makes baseball boring is the Nomaring of every at bat. Step out, adjust your gloves for 10 seconds, step in, dig in, swing a few times, adjust your balls, adjust your feet, take a pitch, step out, adjust your gloves et cetera. Get in, dig in, stay in and lets play the game. Time between pitches, either by a slow pitcher or a fidgety batter makes my mind wander and I find myself no longer immersed in the game.