It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:39 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Regular Reader wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
I would assume Quinn gets fired tonight.

I'd fire him on the field

I think that's why he didn't go out to meet Nagy after the game -- too busy getting canned on the sideline.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 4492
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I hope that Reader got $10 down on the Bears ML with in-game betting when Foles came in.


How about $10,000?



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
billypootons wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Both of these teams should be executed.


Worst 3-0 team ever lol


You two are idiots. That looked like a very good team as soon as Foles came in.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky sucks foles less sucks do not start mitch ever again i love russian vodka

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38691
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
NME wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
So I guess we have a new starting quarterback.




Yeah, hard to argue with these results. He should look even better with a full week of practice taking all the snaps too.


Mitch needs to stay ready tho, Foles has a really dicey injury history


Not surprised Foles looks better but Atl didn't prepare for him. He'll regress to the mean in two weeks and we'll go back to not having a QB.


Image

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Peoria Matt wrote:
Robinson 10-123 TD.


I still wouldn’t pay him. Calvin Ridley shows what an elite receiver looks like.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Hub Arkush is not good at evaluating.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's
unbelievable.

I'm still in shock.

Why was (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky benched? He wasnt playin' that terribly.

This was like 3 games: (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky; then Foles came in and he played mediocre with an INT in the 3rd quarter, then Foles in the 4th quarter.

Anyway, the game turned on the play calling. With about 5:32 left, ATL up 26-10, ALL they had to do was run the ball. Instead, they passed 3 times, 3 and out, and Bears scored quickly after that. If you run the ball (Gurley was having a great game), you probly take the clock down to about 3 minutes, then the Bears, sure they may score after that, but it takes the time down to 2:00 or below. In which case now they have to do an onside kick. And still score 2 more times.

ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE PLAYCALLING IS WHY QUINN LOST THIS GAME. REMEMBER THAT. THAT IS THE REASON THE FALCONS LOST.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Today’s ratings:

Foles 95.2
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 94.9

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:35 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5078
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
veganfan21 wrote:
NME wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
So I guess we have a new starting quarterback.




Yeah, hard to argue with these results. He should look even better with a full week of practice taking all the snaps too.


Mitch needs to stay ready tho, Foles has a really dicey injury history


Not surprised Foles looks better but Atl didn't prepare for him. He'll regress to the mean in two weeks and we'll go back to not having a QB.



Maybe. I’ll be fair for now and give both Foles and Nagy together a shot over the next couple games before drawing a conclusion. I’m still pretty sure I know what Nagy and Foles are, but let’s see how it plays out..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Jbi11s wrote:
Hub Arkush is not good at evaluating.

He likes to say things like this so that if Foles doesn't pan out, he can say that he told you he didn't look any better in game three, and it was just public perception that pushed it. If Foles does great, he can say that he never said that it wasn't time for a QB change, he was for it the whole time, but in that particular game Foles didn't distance himself that much from (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
I don’t miss listening to him on the radio

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
How is Quinn employed still? He got his dick kicked in by MM and Nagy in back to back weeks with late 4th quarter 2 score leads.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:39 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5078
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Today’s ratings:

Foles 95.2
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 94.9




Today’s Bears TD throws:


Foles 3
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 1


Foles, for not having played at all came in and looked better.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3612
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
newper wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Hub Arkush is not good at evaluating.

He likes to say things like this so that if Foles doesn't pan out, he can say that he told you he didn't look any better in game three, and it was just public perception that pushed it. If Foles does great, he can say that he never said that it wasn't time for a QB change, he was for it the whole time, but in that particular game Foles didn't distance himself that much from (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


Hub is the same guy whose two favorite Who songs are Baba O'Reilly and Teenage Wasteland. He is a nice listen on The Score, but newper is right here.

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Today’s ratings:

Foles 95.2
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 94.9


That's why I want to see PFF's rating. They take context into account. You can spike your traditonal rating by completing 10 two yard passes in a row in the middle of the first quarter. PFF accounts for that bullshit.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:42 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5078
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Jbi11s wrote:
Hub Arkush is not good at evaluating.




Agreed. Years ago during the Lovie years I actually thought Hub was pretty decent.. over the years his opinions have toe’d the line of bizarre to flat out stupid and unlistenable.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
How will Atlanta do it again?
Just stop. Falcons are going to hang on and win.

You thought that I was kidding :lol:

:lol: Yeah I really didn't know that the Falcons were the Browns and Lions of the southeast.


They blew a big lead against the Patriots a few years ago in kind of an important game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
veganfan21 wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Today’s ratings:

Foles 95.2
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 94.9


That's why I want to see PFF's rating. They take context into account. You can spike your traditonal rating by completing 10 two yard passes in a row in the middle of the first quarter. PFF accounts for that bullshit.


Yeah, it shows how QB rating can be misleading.

Hard to judge Foles. Several throws were shaky/lucky, but he got the job done with no notice.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38691
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Harvard Dan wrote:

Hub is the same guy whose two favorite Who songs are Baba O'Reilly and Teenage Wasteland. He is a nice listen on The Score, but newper is right here.


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Today’s ratings:

Foles 95.2
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 94.9


So one is better

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
badrogue17 wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:

Hub is the same guy whose two favorite Who songs are Baba O'Reilly and Teenage Wasteland. He is a nice listen on The Score, but newper is right here.


:lol: :lol:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Today’s ratings:

Foles 95.2
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 94.9


That's why I want to see PFF's rating. They take context into account. You can spike your traditonal rating by completing 10 two yard passes in a row in the middle of the first quarter. PFF accounts for that bullshit.


Yeah, it shows how QB rating can be misleading.

Hard to judge Foles. Several throws were shaky/lucky, but he got the job done with no notice.

He threw the ball with confidence.

That is the complete opposite of Mitch.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Jaw Breaker wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Today’s ratings:

Foles 95.2
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 94.9


That's why I want to see PFF's rating. They take context into account. You can spike your traditonal rating by completing 10 two yard passes in a row in the middle of the first quarter. PFF accounts for that bullshit.


Yeah, it shows how QB rating can be misleading.

Hard to judge Foles. Several throws were shaky/lucky, but he got the job done with no notice.


Watch his arm. He throws like god intended. And still makes good throws.

Mitch throws like he wants to be chained to the corner while his wife fucks his best friend

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I'm getting too old for this shit.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I'm getting too old for this shit.


Strap it down, Doc. Probably gonna be a bumpy ride.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
It's the fantasy football effect. Too many of you dopes don't use the eye test anymore.

No fucking way there was a true QB competition.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:55 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5078
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Furious Styles wrote:
It's the fantasy football effect. Too many of you dopes don't use the eye test anymore.

No fucking way there was a true QB competition.





How’d the Raiders do today..?

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Furious Styles wrote:
It's the fantasy football effect. Too many of you dopes don't use the eye test anymore.

No fucking way there was a true QB competition.


Exactly. And exactly why wouldnt you pick mahomes. I know its not worth worrying about now, but WHAT THE FUCK. This is like thinking a black man will eat baked chicken

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Falcons
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6848
IkeSouth wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Today’s ratings:

Foles 95.2
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 94.9


So one is better


One was Super Bowl MVP, the other is still "learning" the offense after 3yrs.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 411 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Curious Hair, NME, The Doctor Of Style, USA and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group