Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
What, though, do you F*ing mean about "all things remaining equal" if the Bears had gotten barely mediocre play out of their qb they make the play-offs? That is total crap as a statement. They had a TERRIBLE offensive line last year. They had a TERRIBLE TE group last year. They had BELOW average RBS last year and a less than good receiver group also. SO...... ALL THINGS WERE NOT EQUAL LAST YEAR.
I covered all of this already, you old fart.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The defense has issues last year. Piniero missed kicks last year. There were injuries to vital players. There was questionable- at best- play calling nearly every game. There were inopportune penalties. The OLine was full of turnstyles. The blew a double digit 4th quarter lead to the fucking Chargers. Cue Furious to let us know that Mack disappeared. ALL of those issues aside, if Mitch had played well enough to rank in the middle third of NFL QBs as opposed to the bottom third which is where he ended up, the Bears are a playoff team.
The Hawk wrote:
You see, Frank, it takes more than just a quarterback to have a winning play-off team.
A better QB makes his team a winning team due to his own play. Mitch doesn't do that. Outside of one game here and there, he hasn't ever.
What "mediocre QB" would have led the Bears in the play-offs last year, Frank? With the same cast of below average to awful personnel at TE, ROT, LOT, RG, RB1 and RB2 who is this magic "MEDIOCRE QB", Frank?
I am trying my very best to try to glean out of you what quarterback that the Bear's should merely plug in and get into the play-offs. One that they can afford and not some pipe dream. YOu said that I "run" from you so talk.