It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 7:33 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FF blaming the wind for his team getting their clock cleaned.

Wind! :lol:

Clock cleaned? They were within 6 and driving. As the GOAT would say, they didn’t lose, they just ran out of time.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
JustAGayGuy wrote:
I wouldn't say they got their clock cleaned. It was a 6 point game.
That being said they lost to a team that was literally trying to lose.

You watch the game? Looked to me that the Vikings were trying to win.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24559
pizza_Place: It's gone
JustAGayGuy wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
they cut in here at the end of the game. few questions

why did packers got for 2 instead of 1 to be down 7. that seemed risky

why not call a timeout w/ 2:30 left instead of letting it go down to 2min? they would have had like 1:30 to work with at the last drive then.

Because if they got it a td wins. If they didn't get it they have another shot at a 2 pt to tie which they'd only be doing if they took the 1 point try.


it was 28-20. if they kick the pat it's 28-21. then if they score they just need another pat to tie and play OT at home which is in their advantage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 9:37 pm
Posts: 773
pizza_Place: She/Him
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FF blaming the wind for his team getting their clock cleaned.

Wind! :lol:

Clock cleaned? They were within 6 and driving. As the GOAT would say, they didn’t lose, they just ran out of time.

Well... thats stupid.

_________________
This signature space is available for inappropriate, suggestive, and lewd ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
This team is a pretender...just like last year. Looks like FF believes the Packers played on a windy field but when the Vikings took over it was 75 and sunny with no wind. Maybe it's climate change?

You drunk? This post makes no sense


You said "strong winds made for a strange game". Game didn't seem so strange on the part of the Vikings - they executed. Seems like you're suggesting wind was a factor for the Packers but not the Vikings.

String winds affected the passing game quite a bit. That helps like a team like Minnesota more. I didn’t realize I had to spell this out but I forgot I’m talking to the guy who recently wondered if a sack or incomplete pass was a better offensive play.


Nope, you're just peddling soft excuses for horrid defense on the part of GB. If everyone knows Minny is running then why can't the supposedly strong defense of GB - you've said they're strong on numerous occasions - clamp down. Take the L here and admit the defense blows.

GB has a good pass defense and a bad run defense. Most weeks that’s gonna mean you have a solid defense.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 9:37 pm
Posts: 773
pizza_Place: She/Him
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
I wouldn't say they got their clock cleaned. It was a 6 point game.
That being said they lost to a team that was literally trying to lose.

You watch the game? Looked to me that the Vikings were trying to win.

It only looks like that when the defense didn't bother to do anything. You know damn well the Vikings are tanking.

_________________
This signature space is available for inappropriate, suggestive, and lewd ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:28 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Wind! :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 9:37 pm
Posts: 773
pizza_Place: She/Him
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
This team is a pretender...just like last year. Looks like FF believes the Packers played on a windy field but when the Vikings took over it was 75 and sunny with no wind. Maybe it's climate change?

You drunk? This post makes no sense


You said "strong winds made for a strange game". Game didn't seem so strange on the part of the Vikings - they executed. Seems like you're suggesting wind was a factor for the Packers but not the Vikings.

String winds affected the passing game quite a bit. That helps like a team like Minnesota more. I didn’t realize I had to spell this out but I forgot I’m talking to the guy who recently wondered if a sack or incomplete pass was a better offensive play.


Nope, you're just peddling soft excuses for horrid defense on the part of GB. If everyone knows Minny is running then why can't the supposedly strong defense of GB - you've said they're strong on numerous occasions - clamp down. Take the L here and admit the defense blows.

GB has a good pass defense and a bad run defense. Most weeks that’s gonna mean you have a solid defense.

Well the Vikings just gave everyone a blueprint for how to beat the Packers.

_________________
This signature space is available for inappropriate, suggestive, and lewd ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
JustAGayGuy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
I wouldn't say they got their clock cleaned. It was a 6 point game.
That being said they lost to a team that was literally trying to lose.

You watch the game? Looked to me that the Vikings were trying to win.

It only looks like that when the defense didn't bother to do anything. You know damn well the Vikings are tanking.

There’s literally no such thing as tanking in the nfl. That’s an idiotic narrative. The Jets are trying to win games still currently

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 9:37 pm
Posts: 773
pizza_Place: She/Him
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
I wouldn't say they got their clock cleaned. It was a 6 point game.
That being said they lost to a team that was literally trying to lose.

You watch the game? Looked to me that the Vikings were trying to win.

It only looks like that when the defense didn't bother to do anything. You know damn well the Vikings are tanking.

There’s literally no such thing as tanking in the nfl. That’s an idiotic narrative. The Jets are trying to win games still currently

Ok.

_________________
This signature space is available for inappropriate, suggestive, and lewd ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
HawaiiYou wrote:
they cut in here at the end of the game. few questions

why did packers got for 2 instead of 1 to be down 7. that seemed risky

why not call a timeout w/ 2:30 left instead of letting it go down to 2min? they would have had like 1:30 to work with at the last drive then.

The downs reset so your timing scenario wouldn’t have been correct. The Vikings got a 1st down and the Packers would only have 2 timeouts. 30 seconds saved or 45? They ran for 8 on 1st down so playing for the next set of downs made sense.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
I wouldn't say they got their clock cleaned. It was a 6 point game.
That being said they lost to a team that was literally trying to lose.

You watch the game? Looked to me that the Vikings were trying to win.

It only looks like that when the defense didn't bother to do anything. You know damn well the Vikings are tanking.

There’s literally no such thing as tanking in the nfl. That’s an idiotic narrative. The Jets are trying to win games still currently

Can we at least agree that neither of you understands what “literally” means?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 9:37 pm
Posts: 773
pizza_Place: She/Him
Yes. I used it improperly. Thanks Mr. Bernstein.

_________________
This signature space is available for inappropriate, suggestive, and lewd ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
JustAGayGuy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You drunk? This post makes no sense


You said "strong winds made for a strange game". Game didn't seem so strange on the part of the Vikings - they executed. Seems like you're suggesting wind was a factor for the Packers but not the Vikings.

String winds affected the passing game quite a bit. That helps like a team like Minnesota more. I didn’t realize I had to spell this out but I forgot I’m talking to the guy who recently wondered if a sack or incomplete pass was a better offensive play.


Nope, you're just peddling soft excuses for horrid defense on the part of GB. If everyone knows Minny is running then why can't the supposedly strong defense of GB - you've said they're strong on numerous occasions - clamp down. Take the L here and admit the defense blows.

GB has a good pass defense and a bad run defense. Most weeks that’s gonna mean you have a solid defense.

Well the Vikings just gave everyone a blueprint for how to beat the Packers.

Agreed. All David Montgomery has to do is play like Dalvin Cook and the Packers would be in trouble against the Bears. We’ll see if that happens.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
I wouldn't say they got their clock cleaned. It was a 6 point game.
That being said they lost to a team that was literally trying to lose.

You watch the game? Looked to me that the Vikings were trying to win.

It only looks like that when the defense didn't bother to do anything. You know damn well the Vikings are tanking.

There’s literally no such thing as tanking in the nfl. That’s an idiotic narrative. The Jets are trying to win games still currently

Can we at least agree that neither of you understands what “literally” means?

I know what it means. I believe I used it properly. Tanking simply does not exist in the NFL. It never has.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 9:37 pm
Posts: 773
pizza_Place: She/Him
Well a blueprint for everyone except the Bears. Im not sure they could run on the Saint Francis Home For Elder and Memory Care flag football team.

_________________
This signature space is available for inappropriate, suggestive, and lewd ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FF blaming the wind for his team getting their clock cleaned.

Wind! :lol:

Clock cleaned? They were within 6 and driving. As the GOAT would say, they didn’t lose, they just ran out of time.

Again: half, downs, punt, downs, TD, fumble. That is a Bearsesque streak of possessions there.

If only football games worth 65 minutes long and it wasn't windy today! :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FF blaming the wind for his team getting their clock cleaned.

Wind! :lol:

Clock cleaned? They were within 6 and driving. As the GOAT would say, they didn’t lose, they just ran out of time.

Again: half, downs, punt, downs, TD, fumble. That is a Bearsesque streak of possessions there.

If only football games worth 65 minutes long and it wasn't windy today! :lol:

Yes, they had some bad possessions today and lost a game. It happens. You’re trying to make a non-existent point.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
FavreFan wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
I wouldn't say they got their clock cleaned. It was a 6 point game.
That being said they lost to a team that was literally trying to lose.

You watch the game? Looked to me that the Vikings were trying to win.

It only looks like that when the defense didn't bother to do anything. You know damn well the Vikings are tanking.

There’s literally no such thing as tanking in the nfl. That’s an idiotic narrative. The Jets are trying to win games still currently

Can we at least agree that neither of you understands what “literally” means?

I know what it means. I believe I used it properly. Tanking simply does not exist in the NFL. It never has.

Of course it has. I don’t mean the players aren’t giving their all and generally not from the start of a season - although the 2019 Dolphins certainly looked like it. But after a season is clearly done it’s pretty clear when management has packed it in. Colts for Andrew Luck? Tampa for Winston?

Edit: if forgot about the 2016 Browns.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You watch the game? Looked to me that the Vikings were trying to win.

It only looks like that when the defense didn't bother to do anything. You know damn well the Vikings are tanking.

There’s literally no such thing as tanking in the nfl. That’s an idiotic narrative. The Jets are trying to win games still currently

Can we at least agree that neither of you understands what “literally” means?

I know what it means. I believe I used it properly. Tanking simply does not exist in the NFL. It never has.

Of course it has. I don’t mean the players aren’t giving their all and generally not from the start of a season - although the 2019 Dolphins certainly looked like it. But after a season is clearly done it’s pretty clear when management has packed it in. Colts for Andrew Luck? Tampa for Winston?

None of the examples you mentioned were clear tanking, and it’s laughable you included the 2019 Dolphins in there because no single team from recent memory helps my point more than them.

Bad teams exist and always will. No NFL team is out there trying to lose a game. You’ll never see an equivalent to the Mark Madsen Tanking game in the nfl. That’s my only point and my use of literally was correct.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
FavreFan wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
There’s literally no such thing as tanking in the nfl. That’s an idiotic narrative. The Jets are trying to win games still currently

Can we at least agree that neither of you understands what “literally” means?

I know what it means. I believe I used it properly. Tanking simply does not exist in the NFL. It never has.

Of course it has. I don’t mean the players aren’t giving their all and generally not from the start of a season - although the 2019 Dolphins certainly looked like it. But after a season is clearly done it’s pretty clear when management has packed it in. Colts for Andrew Luck? Tampa for Winston?

None of the examples you mentioned were clear tanking, and it’s laughable you included the 2019 Dolphins in there because no single team from recent memory helps my point more than them.

Bad teams exist and always will. No NFL team is out there trying to lose a game. You’ll never see an equivalent to the Mark Madsen Tanking game in the nfl. That’s my only point and my use of literally was correct.

It’s certainly less common in the NFL but you’re dead wrong to say it literally hasn’t happened. And “clearly” is subjective.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ok. I guess we can drop it because I do think you are clearly wrong here. I don’t think there’s any subjectivity needed. I believe you are conflating bad teams with tanking.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 9:37 pm
Posts: 773
pizza_Place: She/Him
A team can have 52 players trying their best but still be tanking.

_________________
This signature space is available for inappropriate, suggestive, and lewd ideas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
FavreFan wrote:
Ok. I guess we can drop it because I do think you are clearly wrong here. I don’t think there’s any subjectivity needed. I believe you are conflating bad teams with tanking.

I’m ready to drop it as well and I wish you well this afternoon. But as a last comment - why did the Bucs pull their starters in the 2nd half of a game they were leading?...game 17 btw.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Ok. I guess we can drop it because I do think you are clearly wrong here. I don’t think there’s any subjectivity needed. I believe you are conflating bad teams with tanking.

I’m ready to drop it as well and I wish you well this afternoon. But as a last comment - why did the Bucs pull their starters in the 2nd half of a game they were leading?...game 17 btw.

Hard to say. Lovie’s had a rough football tenure since being fired by the bears.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
JustAGayGuy wrote:
A team can have 52 players trying their best but still be tanking.

Change players to players and coaches and I think you’re wrong. Zimmer’s not coaching to lose games right now.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Absolutely Pathetic is all I can say.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82242
49ers are not what they were last year but they are more than enough to extend the Packer losing streak

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11007
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
packer positive covid test. virtual practice today. hope the game gets pushed back to monday or tuesday (signed aaron jones fantasy managers)



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
AJ Dillon done got the covid.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group