It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 459 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24552
pizza_Place: It's gone
Bears will be 5-6 when December rolls around.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
That's some irrational confidence in a kicker who hit the upright on a chip shot earlier and is kicking in gusty weather on shite turf


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24077
pizza_Place: Pizanos
HawaiiYou wrote:
Bears will be 5-6 when December rolls around.

Yup

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Frank Coztansa wrote:
If he makes this kick, this game was lost in the third quarter with the terrible offense

We're the taller midget today. Ugh.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:37 pm
Posts: 911
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn...Frozen!
Bears aren't going 5-6.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5088
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Bad coaching, bad O-line play, and bad QB play -tough to overcome just 1 of those 3 and the Bears playing games right now with all 3.


Turrible

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
NME wrote:
Bad coaching, bad O-line play, and bad QB play -tough to overcome just 1 of those 3 and the Bears playing games right now with all 3.


Turrible

Yep!!!

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
BigW72 wrote:
tough to call....home should give the Bears an advantage, but as I still think this is an awful 5-2 team.

Saints 23
Bears 20 (one TD will be garbage TD)

Good call

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Once the Bears hit 5-5 there will be changes.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5088
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Also love the point Aikmen brought up during the broadcast regarding everything about the Bears offense being slow and taking too much time and guys just wondering in and out of plays -that’s Nagy. That’s coaching. There is no hustle or tempo to this offense and it’s a big part of the problem.


Get 30 yards on a big pass play? Don’t keep the momentum going by getting up to the line and getting off another play. No, huddle up, waste time, and pull the player who just made the big play off the field.. just flat out dumb football. Nagy is a terrible play caller and overall coach. Even Andy Reid had to make excuses for him after he ran a dominant Chiefs offense into the ground with stupidity.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6856
NME wrote:
Also love the point Aikmen brought up during the broadcast regarding everything about the Bears offense being slow and taking too much time and guys just wondering in and out of plays -that’s Nagy. That’s coaching. There is no hustle or tempo to this offense and it’s a big part of the problem.


Get 30 yards on a big pass play? Don’t keep the momentum going by getting up to the line and getting off another play. No, huddle up, waste time, and pull the player who just made the big play off the field.. just flat out dumb football. Nagy is a terrible play caller and overall coach. Even Andy Reid had to make excuses for him after he ran a dominant Chiefs offense into the ground with stupidity.


"Be You" makes me sick to my stomach every time I hear that stupid saying. Why would he not let Foles call plays when the helmet mic went out? Foles looked like a dumbass running to the sidelines between those plays.

Bears almost got lucky again with the Kmet fumble being ruled forward progress.

Bears defense drop way too many INT's to be called elite.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37836
Location: ...
A tie would’ve fit this game perfectly.

Doesn’t even feel like a win...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Juiced wrote:
Bears defense drop way too many INT's to be called elite.


I've heard them called good/great but not elite.

The defense is the least of this teams problems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6284
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
Why is Hub Arkush so invested in Mitch? Both of the Bears QB's suck. Going back to Mitch isn't going to make any difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 11:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8011
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Juiced wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Time to go back to Mitch. Never thought I'd say it.


something is going on w/ him and nagy. has to be. maybe mitch acted immaturely when foles got the job. i dont know. but seems mitch is in the doghouse for the rest of the season.


I heard Nagy sent PMs to the offense saying Foles is our QB


:lol:

_________________
Not a mult.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 12:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jbi11s wrote:
Once the Bears hit 5-5 there will be changes.

Count that as a W if Anthony Lynn is still employed

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 6:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6284
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
I've been forced to listen to the games on radio lately. Tom Thayer is so whiny and Jeff Joniak's description of the game sucks. Worst broadcast team in Chicago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 6:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
blackhawksfan wrote:
Why is Hub Arkush so invested in Mitch? Both of the Bears QB's suck. Going back to Mitch isn't going to make any difference.

Because (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is better and the Bears are good this year?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4082
pizza_Place: Lino's
blackhawksfan wrote:
Why is Hub Arkush so invested in Mitch? Both of the Bears QB's suck. Going back to Mitch isn't going to make any difference.


Hub has become almost laughable over the past few weeks, he has always gone out of his way to defend Bears management, but his defense of Nagy sounds silly. I know he has to stay on the teams good side in order to receive full access, but he's lost all credibility lately and makes me yearn for the days he was still pissed off for being launched from the team broadcast crew.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6284
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
Brick wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
Why is Hub Arkush so invested in Mitch? Both of the Bears QB's suck. Going back to Mitch isn't going to make any difference.

Because (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is better and the Bears are good this year?


That's like saying Caleb Hanie was better than Cade McNown


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37836
Location: ...
after the delay of game debacle and some of the other impotent offensive drives, nagy should've put mitch in. it was clear that foles was not going to inspire their offense to do anything. mitch at least has the athleticism to keep a defense on their toes. and with the woeful saints defense, mitch probably could've made some big plays (as he's done in 4th quarters a lot in his career).

nagy's arrogance and stubbornness is going to cost him his job pretty soon. even aikman and buck were implying that mitch should've been brought in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
blackhawksfan wrote:
Brick wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
Why is Hub Arkush so invested in Mitch? Both of the Bears QB's suck. Going back to Mitch isn't going to make any difference.

Because (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is better and the Bears are good this year?


That's like saying Caleb Hanie was better than Cade McNown
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Foles have proven to be capable NFL quarterbacks though probably right on the edge of being a below average starter or a top backup.

Put the best quarterback in and let them both go next year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
NME wrote:
Also love the point Aikmen brought up during the broadcast regarding everything about the Bears offense being slow and taking too much time and guys just wondering in and out of plays -that’s Nagy. That’s coaching. There is no hustle or tempo to this offense and it’s a big part of the problem.


Get 30 yards on a big pass play? Don’t keep the momentum going by getting up to the line and getting off another play. No, huddle up, waste time, and pull the player who just made the big play off the field.. just flat out dumb football. Nagy is a terrible play caller and overall coach. Even Andy Reid had to make excuses for him after he ran a dominant Chiefs offense into the ground with stupidity.


I loved Aikman's honesty about the ineptitude of both Nagy and Foles.

Foles is supposed to be the smart, unflappable veteran who has seen it all. Instead, he makes a lot of stupid mistakes and plays with an arrogance that is not commensurate to his abilities. He bitched about Nagy calling plays for which he would not have the time to execute. He had time this week. That dickhead just holds the ball forever.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:26 pm
Posts: 1568
I didn't realize that Foles was completely immobile. Even Qb's like Brady, Peyton or Marino who weren't scramblers could move in the pocket, take a step up or to the side and buy an extra half second to complete a pass. Foles plays like he has cement shoes. On one play and I think Aikman mentioned it, Foles could have stepped up in the pocket, instead he threw of his back foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
enigma wrote:
I didn't realize that Foles was completely immobile. Even Qb's like Brady, Peyton or Marino who weren't scramblers could move in the pocket, take a step up or to the side and buy an extra half second to complete a pass. Foles plays like he has cement shoes. On one play and I think Aikman mentioned it, Foles could have stepped up in the pocket, instead he threw of his back foot.

I don't know if that's immobility or a Mitch like tendency to stare down intended targets.

Although he doesn't hold a candle to Mitch in terms of frequency on that.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
I would have been happy with winning one of these three games against the Rams, Saints and Titans. We can still do that with the Titans, who are, themselves, hurting.

I liked what I saw yesterday from the OL and RB. I even thought Nagy had a good game plan. His in game was not good but they looked like they had a plan going in. Could have had that game. Even a tie would have been fine.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
I would have been happy with winning one of these three games against the Rams, Saints and Titans. We can still do that with the Titans, who are, themselves, hurting.

I liked what I saw yesterday from the OL and RB. I even thought Nagy had a good game plan. His in game was not good but they looked like they had a plan going in. Could have had that game. Even a tie would have been fine.


They could have had the game, I agree, but the Saints defense is at best mediocre. Probably made the Bears offense look better than it actually is.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
good dolphin wrote:
I would have been happy with winning one of these three games against the Rams, Saints and Titans. We can still do that with the Titans, who are, themselves, hurting.

I liked what I saw yesterday from the OL and RB. I even thought Nagy had a good game plan. His in game was not good but they looked like they had a plan going in. Could have had that game. Even a tie would have been fine.

Were we watching the same OL & RB (except for the one long run)?

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
I think Aikman had it right when he said that everyone looks tentative on offense. That would include the RB and TE's. I did think the OL did better but I think Montgomery is shell shocked at this point.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
Regular Reader wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I would have been happy with winning one of these three games against the Rams, Saints and Titans. We can still do that with the Titans, who are, themselves, hurting.

I liked what I saw yesterday from the OL and RB. I even thought Nagy had a good game plan. His in game was not good but they looked like they had a plan going in. Could have had that game. Even a tie would have been fine.

Were we watching the same OL & RB (except for the one long run)?


I believe we were, although we were not together so I do not know that for sure

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 459 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group