It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:11 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 1:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
Brick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Brick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
You can consider draft position while still attempting to win.

If you're not trying to win and you're trying to improve draft position above winning, you are tanking.
How can you consider draft position while still attempting to win when they two results are the complete opposite?

Because you can trade for more picks or future picks while still trying to win.

You would have to really fleece the other team to not only get draft picks from them but also improve your team for the next game too.

Still though, the entire concept of considering draft position indicates that you would rather not improve the team in a trade for the current year.


:lol: "draft picks". They acquired 3 2nd round picks and a Journeyman Center for a 2 time All Star. Thats tanking.


Last edited by Liberal Lion on Fri Nov 20, 2020 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Not really. You can trade potential stars who maybe arent helping you win right now for draft picks. You can trade future picks for this year's draft. You can trade a good player because you're deep at the position and feel like you can win just as much without them.

All of those hypotheticals make your team worse though for this year. I think that's the part you aren't getting. Trading for a draft pick is trading production in the next game for potential better production in future seasons.

The Bears could trade Foles for the likely #1 pick in the draft next year and by your definition that would be tanking.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Brick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Not really. You can trade potential stars who maybe arent helping you win right now for draft picks. You can trade future picks for this year's draft. You can trade a good player because you're deep at the position and feel like you can win just as much without them.

All of those hypotheticals make your team worse though for this year. I think that's the part you aren't getting. Trading for a draft pick is trading production in the next game for potential better production in future seasons.

The Bears could trade Foles for the likely #1 pick in the draft next year and by your definition that would be tanking.

What?

Trading future picks for this years draft makes the current team worse? Trading a young guy with potential who isn't helping you win right now makes the team worse?

Trading Nick Foles would not make the Bears more likely to lose.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 1:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
Brick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Not really. You can trade potential stars who maybe arent helping you win right now for draft picks. You can trade future picks for this year's draft. You can trade a good player because you're deep at the position and feel like you can win just as much without them.

All of those hypotheticals make your team worse though for this year. I think that's the part you aren't getting. Trading for a draft pick is trading production in the next game for potential better production in future seasons.

The Bears could trade Foles for the likely #1 pick in the draft next year and by your definition that would be tanking.


They traded for 3 2nd round picks in the NBA. 98% of those picks are considered worthless. When they made the trade it was considered extremely lopsided. Thats because it was extremely lopsided. They made it in order to have the worst record in the league. That's tanking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
Caller Bob wrote:
This isn't LTG btw, Sanfratellos? Come one now...


That used to be my Spot CB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
Except if this was like now a player like Jordan would have walked or demanded a trade around 89 because he could not beat the Pistons. Would have found somewhere to go and formed a super team with Barkley and Oakley.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Brick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Brick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
You can consider draft position while still attempting to win.

If you're not trying to win and you're trying to improve draft position above winning, you are tanking.
How can you consider draft position while still attempting to win when they two results are the complete opposite?

Because you can trade for more picks or future picks while still trying to win.

You would have to really fleece the other team to not only get draft picks from them but also improve your team for the next game too.

Not really. You can trade potential stars who maybe arent helping you win right now for draft picks.

That's exactly what the Bulls did. So what's the problem?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
This isn’t LTG.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23827
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Liberal Lion wrote:
You still haven't explained how this particular trade improved the team.

They were 21-27 and in contention for a playoff berth with Theus.

They benched him early (their best player) only to trade him later.

They finished 6-27 after the trade. They received nothing in return for him.

They tanked.


Let's get some context here

Quote:
The Chicago Bulls, who have been trying to trade Reggie Theus since Coach Kevin Loughery benched the high-scoring guard last Dec. 13, finally succeeded last night, one hour before the National Basketball Association's trading deadline.

Theus was sent to the Kansas City Kings for Steve Johnson and three second-round draft choices. The 6-foot-6 1/2-inch Theus, the Bulls' top draft choice in 1978, led the team in scoring, assists and steals last season, averaging 23.8 points.

He was the Bulls' most popular player until Loughery took over as Chicago's coach this season. When Theus, who has a 19.5-point career average, failed to fit into Loughery's plans, he was benched in favor of an all-rookie backcourt of Mitchell Wiggins and Ennis Whatley. Earlier in the day Rod Thorn, the Bulls' general manager, while working on several deals, said: ''It would be better for all concerned if we can trade Reggie. All the attention has been focused on him lately and it has not been good for our other players.'' Johnson, 6-10 1/2 and the Kings' top draft choice in 1981, provides the Bulls, who have a five-game winning streak, with the strong backup center they have been seeking.


The Bulls were 5-14 when they benched Theus and 16-13 after it, before the trade.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
FavreFan wrote:
That's exactly what the Bulls did. So what's the problem?


The problem was that they received nothing from the trade.


Last edited by Liberal Lion on Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Brick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Brick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
You can consider draft position while still attempting to win.

If you're not trying to win and you're trying to improve draft position above winning, you are tanking.
How can you consider draft position while still attempting to win when they two results are the complete opposite?

Because you can trade for more picks or future picks while still trying to win.

You would have to really fleece the other team to not only get draft picks from them but also improve your team for the next game too.

Not really. You can trade potential stars who maybe arent helping you win right now for draft picks.

That's exactly what the Bulls did. So what's the problem?

I dont if this was tanking specifically. My bulls fandom began a few years later but wasnt Theus their best player?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This isn’t LTG.

It's a good impression if it's not


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
KDdidit wrote:
Liberal Lion wrote:
You still haven't explained how this particular trade improved the team.

They were 21-27 and in contention for a playoff berth with Theus.

They benched him early (their best player) only to trade him later.

They finished 6-27 after the trade. They received nothing in return for him.

They tanked.


Let's get some context here

Quote:
The Chicago Bulls, who have been trying to trade Reggie Theus since Coach Kevin Loughery benched the high-scoring guard last Dec. 13, finally succeeded last night, one hour before the National Basketball Association's trading deadline.

Theus was sent to the Kansas City Kings for Steve Johnson and three second-round draft choices. The 6-foot-6 1/2-inch Theus, the Bulls' top draft choice in 1978, led the team in scoring, assists and steals last season, averaging 23.8 points.

He was the Bulls' most popular player until Loughery took over as Chicago's coach this season. When Theus, who has a 19.5-point career average, failed to fit into Loughery's plans, he was benched in favor of an all-rookie backcourt of Mitchell Wiggins and Ennis Whatley. Earlier in the day Rod Thorn, the Bulls' general manager, while working on several deals, said: ''It would be better for all concerned if we can trade Reggie. All the attention has been focused on him lately and it has not been good for our other players.'' Johnson, 6-10 1/2 and the Kings' top draft choice in 1981, provides the Bulls, who have a five-game winning streak, with the strong backup center they have been seeking.


The Bulls were 5-14 when they benched Theus and 16-13 after it, before the trade.


BIG, if true.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
The Bulls did not tank for Jordan. Hell, they would have taken Bowie had he been available.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
KDdidit wrote:
Liberal Lion wrote:
You still haven't explained how this particular trade improved the team.

They were 21-27 and in contention for a playoff berth with Theus.

They benched him early (their best player) only to trade him later.

They finished 6-27 after the trade. They received nothing in return for him.

They tanked.


Let's get some context here

Quote:
The Chicago Bulls, who have been trying to trade Reggie Theus since Coach Kevin Loughery benched the high-scoring guard last Dec. 13, finally succeeded last night, one hour before the National Basketball Association's trading deadline.

Theus was sent to the Kansas City Kings for Steve Johnson and three second-round draft choices. The 6-foot-6 1/2-inch Theus, the Bulls' top draft choice in 1978, led the team in scoring, assists and steals last season, averaging 23.8 points.

He was the Bulls' most popular player until Loughery took over as Chicago's coach this season. When Theus, who has a 19.5-point career average, failed to fit into Loughery's plans, he was benched in favor of an all-rookie backcourt of Mitchell Wiggins and Ennis Whatley. Earlier in the day Rod Thorn, the Bulls' general manager, while working on several deals, said: ''It would be better for all concerned if we can trade Reggie. All the attention has been focused on him lately and it has not been good for our other players.'' Johnson, 6-10 1/2 and the Kings' top draft choice in 1981, provides the Bulls, who have a five-game winning streak, with the strong backup center they have been seeking.


The Bulls were 5-14 when they benched Theus and 16-13 after it, before the trade.

Then probably not tanking. They could legit say they were better off without him


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
KDdidit wrote:
The Bulls were 5-14 when they benched Theus and 16-13 after it, before the trade.


Yeah and they finished 6-21 after he was traded.

He wasn't completely benched. They brought him off the bench. He was undoubtedly their best player. Once they started rolling with him coming off the bench they traded him. They were on a 5 game winning streak at the time he was traded. They also were in contention for a playoff spot.

He was easily their best player at the time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
rogers park bryan wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Liberal Lion wrote:
You still haven't explained how this particular trade improved the team.

They were 21-27 and in contention for a playoff berth with Theus.

They benched him early (their best player) only to trade him later.

They finished 6-27 after the trade. They received nothing in return for him.

They tanked.


Let's get some context here

Quote:
The Chicago Bulls, who have been trying to trade Reggie Theus since Coach Kevin Loughery benched the high-scoring guard last Dec. 13, finally succeeded last night, one hour before the National Basketball Association's trading deadline.

Theus was sent to the Kansas City Kings for Steve Johnson and three second-round draft choices. The 6-foot-6 1/2-inch Theus, the Bulls' top draft choice in 1978, led the team in scoring, assists and steals last season, averaging 23.8 points.

He was the Bulls' most popular player until Loughery took over as Chicago's coach this season. When Theus, who has a 19.5-point career average, failed to fit into Loughery's plans, he was benched in favor of an all-rookie backcourt of Mitchell Wiggins and Ennis Whatley. Earlier in the day Rod Thorn, the Bulls' general manager, while working on several deals, said: ''It would be better for all concerned if we can trade Reggie. All the attention has been focused on him lately and it has not been good for our other players.'' Johnson, 6-10 1/2 and the Kings' top draft choice in 1981, provides the Bulls, who have a five-game winning streak, with the strong backup center they have been seeking.


The Bulls were 5-14 when they benched Theus and 16-13 after it, before the trade.

Then probably not tanking. They could legit say they were better off without him


If that were the case then they would not have gone 6-21 to close the season without him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23827
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Sometimes trades don’t work out the way you want. They got the number seven pick in the draft from two years before.If you want to say trading a bench guy is tanking I am going to disagree.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
KDdidit wrote:
Sometimes trades don’t work out the way you want. They got the number seven pick in the draft from two years before.If you want to say trading a bench guy is tanking I am going to disagree.


Which bench guy did the Bulls happen to trade?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23827
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Liberal Lion wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Sometimes trades don’t work out the way you want. They got the number seven pick in the draft from two years before.If you want to say trading a bench guy is tanking I am going to disagree.


Which bench guy did the Bulls happen to trade?


The guy you said they brought off the bench.


Liberal Lion wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
The Bulls were 5-14 when they benched Theus and 16-13 after it, before the trade.


Yeah and they finished 6-21 after he was traded.

He wasn't completely benched. They brought him off the bench. He was undoubtedly their best player. Once they started rolling with him coming off the bench they traded him. They were on a 5 game winning streak at the time he was traded. They also were in contention for a playoff spot.

He was easily their best player at the time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
KDdidit wrote:
Liberal Lion wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Sometimes trades don’t work out the way you want. They got the number seven pick in the draft from two years before.If you want to say trading a bench guy is tanking I am going to disagree.


Which bench guy did the Bulls happen to trade?


The guy you said they brought off the bench.


Liberal Lion wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
The Bulls were 5-14 when they benched Theus and 16-13 after it, before the trade.


Yeah and they finished 6-21 after he was traded.

He wasn't completely benched. They brought him off the bench. He was undoubtedly their best player. Once they started rolling with him coming off the bench they traded him. They were on a 5 game winning streak at the time he was traded. They also were in contention for a playoff spot.

He was easily their best player at the time.


Reggie Theus was the best player on the Bulls team. They benched him to hurt the team's record and then traded him in order to get the No. 1 pick. That's tanking.

They would never been in position to draft Jordan if they didn't make those moves.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23827
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Liberal Lion wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Liberal Lion wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Sometimes trades don’t work out the way you want. They got the number seven pick in the draft from two years before.If you want to say trading a bench guy is tanking I am going to disagree.


Which bench guy did the Bulls happen to trade?


The guy you said they brought off the bench.


Liberal Lion wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
The Bulls were 5-14 when they benched Theus and 16-13 after it, before the trade.


Yeah and they finished 6-21 after he was traded.

He wasn't completely benched. They brought him off the bench. He was undoubtedly their best player. Once they started rolling with him coming off the bench they traded him. They were on a 5 game winning streak at the time he was traded. They also were in contention for a playoff spot.

He was easily their best player at the time.


Reggie Theus was the best player on the Bulls team. They benched him to hurt the team's record and then traded him in order to get the No. 1 pick. That's tanking.

They would never been in position to draft Jordan if they didn't make those moves.


They were 5-14 when they benched him and 16-13 after it :lol: Some fucking best player he was :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
KDdidit wrote:
They were 5-14 when they benched him and 16-13 after it :lol: Some fucking best player he was :lol:


If he wasn't then who was?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
Quote:
Theus Traded to Kings
Feb. 16, 1984
The Chicago Bulls, who have been trying to trade Reggie Theus

since Coach Kevin Loughery benched the high-scoring guard last Dec.

13, finally succeeded last night, one hour before the National Basketball

Association's trading deadline.

Theus was sent to the Kansas City

Kings for Steve Johnson and three second-round draft choices. The 6-foot-6 1/2-inch Theus, the Bulls' top draft choice in 1978, led the

team in scoring, assists and steals last season, averaging 23.8 points.


He was the Bulls' most popular player until Loughery took over as Chicago's coach this season. When Theus, who has a 19.5-point career average, failed to fit into Loughery's plans, he was benched in favor of an

all-rookie backcourt of Mitchell Wiggins and Ennis Whatley. Earlier in the day Rod Thorn, the Bulls' general manager, while

working on several deals, said: ''It would be better for all concerned if

we can trade Reggie. All the attention has been focused on him lately

and it has not been good for our other players.'' Johnson, 6-10 1/2 and the Kings' top draft choice in 1981, provides the

Bulls, who have a five-game winning streak, with the strong backup

center they have been seeking


Yeah they tanked.


Last edited by Liberal Lion on Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Caller Bob wrote:
I've never met a liberal lion.

Liberal Lyin!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
They tanked. Jordan was their 3rd choice.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2020 7:52 pm
Posts: 421
pizza_Place: Sanfratellos
GoldenJet wrote:
They tanked. Jordan was their 3rd choice.


Yep and they were thisclose to getting the number 1 overall that year.


Last edited by Liberal Lion on Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
ok, I'm sold. This is LTG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23827
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
I don’t care who the best player was. They were 5-14 when they benched him, if they were interested in tanking they would have let him keep starting. If they were interested in tanking they would have started him again when they were winning 7 in a row and 9 out of 12 with him on the bench.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2020 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Liberal Lion wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
They tanked. Jordan was their 3rd choice.


Yep and they were thisclose to getting the number 1 overall that year.


The Dream would have been alright too.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group