It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 2:40 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24550
pizza_Place: It's gone
HOF pitcher. RIP.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24550
pizza_Place: It's gone
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23826
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Always sad when anybody that was in RBI Baseball dies.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 8:49 pm
Posts: 889
pizza_Place: World Famous, Lord Stanley's, DeKalb Rock City
Quote:
He also holds the major league record for most consecutive losses to one team, having lost 13 straight games to the Chicago Cubs.


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.

Red Schoendiest and Rizzuto were worse, earlier selections iirc.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 6:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4040
KDdidit wrote:
Always sad when anybody that was in RBI Baseball dies.


My friend used Sutton to throw a complete game one hitter against me when he was the Angels and I was the Mets.

We still don't know how he did it, Sutton was throwing like 40 MPH in the 9th inning.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
75% of the classic '90s Braves announcing team is gone now.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 12:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31615
pizza_Place: What??
Regular Reader wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.

Red Schoendiest and Rizzuto were worse, earlier selections iirc.

I had always figured Mazeroski was worse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 6:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.

Red Schoendiest and Rizzuto were worse, earlier selections iirc.

I had always figured Mazeroski was worse.



There are worse guys than all of those- Pop Haines, High Pockets Kelly, Tinker, Evers, and Chance, Andre Dawson, and Harold Baines. There was a period there where Frankie Frisch was running the old timers committee and all you had to do was be a friend of his to get in.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.

Red Schoendiest and Rizzuto were worse, earlier selections iirc.

I had always figured Mazeroski was worse.



There are worse guys than all of those- Pop Haines, High Pockets Kelly, Tinker, Evers, and Chance, Andre Dawson, and Harold Baines. There was a period there where Frankie Frisch was running the old timers committee and all you had to do was be a friend of his to get in.

Little Poison, Lloyd Waner, Rabbit Maranville


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
his perm used to give off a pedo vibe

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.

Red Schoendiest and Rizzuto were worse, earlier selections iirc.

I had always figured Mazeroski was worse.



There are worse guys than all of those- Pop Haines, High Pockets Kelly, Tinker, Evers, and Chance, Andre Dawson, and Harold Baines. There was a period there where Frankie Frisch was running the old timers committee and all you had to do was be a friend of his to get in.

What do you think of Sutton's inclusion?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24550
pizza_Place: It's gone
badrogue17 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.

Red Schoendiest and Rizzuto were worse, earlier selections iirc.

I had always figured Mazeroski was worse.



There are worse guys than all of those- Pop Haines, High Pockets Kelly, Tinker, Evers, and Chance, Andre Dawson, and Harold Baines. There was a period there where Frankie Frisch was running the old timers committee and all you had to do was be a friend of his to get in.

What do you think of Sutton's inclusion?


At first I was like no way when he got in. But now I think he barely makes it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31615
pizza_Place: What??
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.

Red Schoendiest and Rizzuto were worse, earlier selections iirc.

I had always figured Mazeroski was worse.



There are worse guys than all of those- Pop Haines, High Pockets Kelly, Tinker, Evers, and Chance, Andre Dawson, and Harold Baines. There was a period there where Frankie Frisch was running the old timers committee and all you had to do was be a friend of his to get in.

I checked it out. So maybe. 8 GGs. Shit, I didn't even know he played 2B. Which I consider an underrated position.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 12:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
badrogue17 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.

Red Schoendiest and Rizzuto were worse, earlier selections iirc.

I had always figured Mazeroski was worse.



There are worse guys than all of those- Pop Haines, High Pockets Kelly, Tinker, Evers, and Chance, Andre Dawson, and Harold Baines. There was a period there where Frankie Frisch was running the old timers committee and all you had to do was be a friend of his to get in.

What do you think of Sutton's inclusion?



I always thought he was weak. Borderline at best. Lot of wins and a good percentage. I'm not sure he was ever the best pitcher on a team.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24550
pizza_Place: It's gone
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


I always thought he was weak. Borderline at best. Lot of wins and a good percentage. I'm not sure he was ever the best pitcher on a team.


correct. the eye test didnt pass with him. never when I saw him pitch did I say to myself 'now there's a future HOFr'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31615
pizza_Place: What??
HawaiiYou wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


I always thought he was weak. Borderline at best. Lot of wins and a good percentage. I'm not sure he was ever the best pitcher on a team.


correct. the eye test didnt pass with him. never when I saw him pitch did I say to myself 'now there's a future HOFr'.

5000 innings and not getting tatooed counts for something. Deserving. Absolutely.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 12:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4040
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


I think the criticism of a complier (Sutton or otherwise) ignores one skill set that is essentially uniform to a complier. They were good to very good players as underaged players (think 23 and younger) and were good to average as older players (37 and older). That's a very unique combination.

All good/great players are studs from age 24-33, but they didn't have the skillset to be valuable to a major league team before that or after that. I never understood why the skill to be a good MLB player is something that isn't valued if the player can do it for 20 seasons.

In addition to that compliers are often remarkably healthy. So to flip the criticism, people have prejudice against "compilers" because they were essentially no worse than average, but predominately good to very good for 20+ MLB seasons, and never got hurt? That's an argument against a guy?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
One Post wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


I think the criticism of a complier (Sutton or otherwise) ignores one skill set that is essentially uniform to a complier. They were good to very good players as underaged players (think 23 and younger) and were good to average as older players (37 and older). That's a very unique combination.

All good/great players are studs from age 24-33, but they didn't have the skillset to be valuable to a major league team before that or after that. I never understood why the skill to be a good MLB player is something that isn't valued if the player can do it for 20 seasons.

In addition to that compliers are often remarkably healthy. So to flip the criticism, people have prejudice against "compilers" because they were essentially no worse than average, but predominately good to very good for 20+ MLB seasons, and never got hurt? That's an argument against a guy?

Yeah theres something to be said being good enough to be run out there every 5th day for 20 plus years for sure.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2016 10:39 am
Posts: 1493
pizza_Place: Aurelio's
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.


Who is questioning 300+ wins?

_________________
God is the uncaused cause of the universe. He had no beginning and has no end. He is not bound by the laws of the universe he created.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 1:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Drake LaRrieta wrote:
Who is questioning 300+ wins?

300 game
300 Spartans
Chrysler 300

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Drake LaRrieta wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.


Who is questioning 300+ wins?

Its more the old maxim when discussing the eye test for the HOF . When the guy was playing did you stop and think " that guy is a HOf'er." Im guessing regarding Sutton ( who pitched during my formative years of baseball fandom) , that wasnt the case . I dont think he was ever considered one of the top 5 starters in the league in any year he pitched , I dont think opponents or managers were really concerned about facing him but in the end , his numbers are really good and he did eclipse the 300 win number by a decent amount.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 1:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
badrogue17 wrote:
Drake LaRrieta wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.


Who is questioning 300+ wins?

Its more the old maxim when discussing the eye test for the HOF . When the guy was playing did you stop and think " that guy is a HOf'er." Im guessing regarding Sutton ( who pitched during my formative years of baseball fandom) , that wasnt the case . I dont think he was ever considered one of the top 5 starters in the league in any year he pitched , I dont think opponents or managers were really concerned about facing him but in the end , his numbers are really good and he did eclipse the 300 win number by a decent amount.



I couldn't say he was better than Buehrle or Jim Kaat or Tommy John or Hershiser or Saberhagen. Certainly not better than David Cone. There are just too many guys in that category. I guess the 326 wins set him apart, but that's it.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23826
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
He's third in career starts, which is obviously a compiling stat, but it's not for nothing. Everyone else in the top 15 is in the Hall except for Clemens and Tommy John.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31615
pizza_Place: What??
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Drake LaRrieta wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Always thought of him as more of a compiler and being on good teams rather than a HOF worthy pitcher but 326 wins, .560 winning % and career 3.26 ERA aint no joke.


yes he was the first or one of the first where his candidacy into the HOF was questioned by many.


Who is questioning 300+ wins?

Its more the old maxim when discussing the eye test for the HOF . When the guy was playing did you stop and think " that guy is a HOf'er." Im guessing regarding Sutton ( who pitched during my formative years of baseball fandom) , that wasnt the case . I dont think he was ever considered one of the top 5 starters in the league in any year he pitched , I dont think opponents or managers were really concerned about facing him but in the end , his numbers are really good and he did eclipse the 300 win number by a decent amount.



I couldn't say he was better than Buehrle or Jim Kaat or Tommy John or Hershiser or Saberhagen. Certainly not better than David Cone. There are just too many guys in that category. I guess the 326 wins set him apart, but that's it.

He got guys out for 20 years. Had a career 1.14 WHIP. David Cone was 1.25. I don't understand the beef with Sutton. Was it because he was a Dodger?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Don Sutton
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 1:59 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
His 162 game average was 34 starts and 235 innings, and he pitched full time until age 42. There's something to be said for longevity.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group