It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:46 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 604 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 21  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Late 1st/early 2nd for Stafford.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I don't even think Detroit can get a first for him.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:44 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
I can see the Colts giving a 1st for him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23837
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
312player wrote:
Picking 1st is a no brainer, even these chumps couldn't fuck that up. They are picking 23rd I believe.

They fucked up the second pick, no reason they couldn't fuck up the first too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
NME wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
invest in the OL this year and Foles will be no worse than any of the other bad possible moves they could make at the position

Let's see what the combine reveals. It wouldn't be shocking if a guy like Newman shot up draft boards




I know Pace and Nagy won’t think this way (yet another reason ties should have been cut) next season is most likely a wash ..but the future is QB, that’s what they need to draft now. This shouldn’t be about trying to make the most out of Foles. No 1st round linemen is going to change the outcome of this team enough to pass on the QB talent of this years draft in the 1st round.


You and some others here continue to see this wrong.


I don't hold the QB talent in this draft in as high esteem as others. I don't think Trask or Jones are first round talents. I think Wilson is a mid to back of the first round talent. I know nothing about Lance and anyone but scouts who say they do are lying.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
blackhawksfan wrote:
If the Bears had to pay 2 or 3 times more than other clubs to get Stafford would you do it? Something stupid like a #1 and #2 this year and a #1 next year. I've heard people expect the Lions to get one first round pick for him.

:lol: :lol: two 1sts and a 2nd for Stafford? That would be fucking hilarious

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
MongoMuller wrote:
I can see the Colts giving a 1st for him.


Colts-S.F. could win a SB with him.. It would be worth it.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
I don't even think Detroit can get a first for him.

Seems borderline. If I was Denver, SF, or Indy I would do it I think.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
NME wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
NME wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
invest in the OL this year and Foles will be no worse than any of the other bad possible moves they could make at the position

Let's see what the combine reveals. It wouldn't be shocking if a guy like Newman shot up draft boards


I know Pace and Nagy won’t think this way (yet another reason ties should have been cut) next season is most likely a wash ..but the future is QB, that’s what they need to draft now. This shouldn’t be about trying to make the most out of Foles. No 1st round linemen is going to change the outcome of this team enough to pass on the QB talent of this years draft in the 1st round.

You and some others here continue to see this wrong.

Not to speak for anybody else, but I don’t want them drafting a developmental QB because I have zero faith in Pace’s ability to evaluate the position. A bad 1st round draft pick at QB can set them back a few years; a bad veteran maybe helps out next draft.



I’m not crazy about the circumstances involving who’s in charge either -but if they pick the right guy this is less of a problem. My point is, you don’t pass on a talented class for the reasons you mentioned.


You can get quality linemen in the 2nd and so on. Someone pointed out the other day KC’s entire unit is undrafted and mid-late round guys.


and KC can't run the football when they need to

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6284
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
FavreFan wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
If the Bears had to pay 2 or 3 times more than other clubs to get Stafford would you do it? Something stupid like a #1 and #2 this year and a #1 next year. I've heard people expect the Lions to get one first round pick for him.

:lol: :lol: two 1sts and a 2nd for Stafford? That would be fucking hilarious


True, but Detroit would never trade him in division unless they got a insane offer. The Bears options are limited and Pace/Nagy are desperate. Who knows!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
I don't even think Detroit can get a first for him.

Seems borderline. If I was Denver, SF, or Indy I would do it I think.


Denver is still getting clobbered by S.D. and K.C. with Stafford. They gotta draft a guy and draft some skill position players not trade picks for an ageing QB.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
I wouldn't be angry if they took a WR. This draft is packed to the gills with talent at WR. I see 20 WR I like.

It's supposed to be deep with OL as well.

I like picking to the strength of the draft.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
I don't even think Detroit can get a first for him.

Seems borderline. If I was Denver, SF, or Indy I would do it I think.


Denver is still getting clobbered by S.D. and K.C. with Stafford. They gotta draft a guy and draft some skill position players not trade picks for an ageing QB.

Strongly disagree. KC would still be better because they are better than everyone. But Denver is a QB away from going 11-5. Sutton, Jeudy, Fant, Hamler, a decent OL, and a Fangio defense is a contending team with a decent QB.

Denver does not need to draft more skill position players :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Fant is decent, RBs blow. They should draft Pitts if hes there and a WR in the second.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
Fant is decent, RBs blow. They should draft Pitts if hes there and a WR in the second.

RBs are a dime a dozen. It was dumb of them to pay Gordon. Lindsay is a better back and a fine starting RB.

It would be incredibly wasteful for them to draft Pitts. Fant is going to be great for the next several years and Albert O showed some flash this year as well before getting hurt.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
Fant is decent, RBs blow. They should draft Pitts if hes there and a WR in the second.

RBs are a dime a dozen. It was dumb of them to pay Gordon. Lindsay is a better back and a fine starting RB.

It would be incredibly wasteful for them to draft Pitts. Fant is going to be great for the next several years and Albert O showed some flash this year as well before getting hurt.



Lyndsey ain't shit either, Whoever getts Pitts is going to have the next Kelsey.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:35 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
312player wrote:
Fant is decent, RBs blow. They should draft Pitts if hes there and a WR in the second.


The defense is in trouble. Miller is gone and they're probably going to let Simmons walk. They need at least one corner probably 2. They'll go Farley at #9 and probably an edge or safety in the 2nd. If I had to bet money on one pick 2-10 it would be Farley to the Broncos at #9.

It will be interesting to see if Eagles pull the trigger on Pitts at #7.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
Fant is decent, RBs blow. They should draft Pitts if hes there and a WR in the second.

RBs are a dime a dozen. It was dumb of them to pay Gordon. Lindsay is a better back and a fine starting RB.

It would be incredibly wasteful for them to draft Pitts. Fant is going to be great for the next several years and Albert O showed some flash this year as well before getting hurt.



Lyndsey ain't shit either, Whoever getts Pitts is going to have the next Kelsey.

Kelsey? :lol:

Lindsay is a good back. Him and a between the tackles cheap guy would be a fine RB duo. RB isn't that important for running a good offense. And regardless of how good Pitts is a prospect, it makes no fucking sense for Denver to take him in the first. They are very set at TE. They need another OT and a QB, and then defensive pieces. Their offense is basically set if they can figure out the QB.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HawaiiJet over here

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
FavreFan wrote:
HawaiiJet over here


Hey, I've been busy

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
good dolphin wrote:

and KC can't run the football when they need to




But they can pass when they need to because they found the right guy, the 3rd QB taken in the 1st round of that draft.


You know when the right time to ‘mortgage the future of your franchise on a QB’ is?


Every year until you get it right.


This is a passing league, QB’s dominate this league more than ever. The rules are in place now to make the transition from college QB to pro QB successfully better than ever.


I know, let’s keep mortgaging the future on castaway veteran QB’s and a declining defense because ‘the window for this defense might still be open’ -because this works out so well for the team and always positions them well in the upcoming drafts.


How’s that gone the last 2 decades?


They need to change it up. Now is the time to do it.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
Fant is decent, RBs blow. They should draft Pitts if hes there and a WR in the second.

RBs are a dime a dozen. It was dumb of them to pay Gordon. Lindsay is a better back and a fine starting RB.

It would be incredibly wasteful for them to draft Pitts. Fant is going to be great for the next several years and Albert O showed some flash this year as well before getting hurt.



Lyndsey ain't shit either, Whoever getts Pitts is going to have the next Kelsey.

Kelsey? :lol:

Lindsay is a good back. Him and a between the tackles cheap guy would be a fine RB duo. RB isn't that important for running a good offense. And regardless of how good Pitts is a prospect, it makes no fucking sense for Denver to take him in the first. They are very set at TE. They need another OT and a QB, and then defensive pieces. Their offense is basically set if they can figure out the QB.



Obviously you think Fant is way better than I do. Hell be an average TE..nothing more. Lyndsey can't block for shit, that's why Gordon gets more PT.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
312player wrote:
Picking 1st is a no brainer, even these chumps couldn't fuck that up. They are picking 23rd I believe.




The point I’m making there was: you don’t pass on making a certain type of pick for this reason, especially if it’s the right player.


What if Zach Wilson is this drafts Patrick Mahomes and he slides to the Bears and they say ‘nah, we might fuck this up so let’s be safe and grab the 3rd best tackle instead’.


‘Let’s keep doing what we always do instead of acknowledging and recognizing our past mistakes.’ That’s not how you move forward and improve.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Last edited by NME on Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
Fant is decent, RBs blow. They should draft Pitts if hes there and a WR in the second.

RBs are a dime a dozen. It was dumb of them to pay Gordon. Lindsay is a better back and a fine starting RB.

It would be incredibly wasteful for them to draft Pitts. Fant is going to be great for the next several years and Albert O showed some flash this year as well before getting hurt.



Lyndsey ain't shit either, Whoever getts Pitts is going to have the next Kelsey.

Kelsey? :lol:

Lindsay is a good back. Him and a between the tackles cheap guy would be a fine RB duo. RB isn't that important for running a good offense. And regardless of how good Pitts is a prospect, it makes no fucking sense for Denver to take him in the first. They are very set at TE. They need another OT and a QB, and then defensive pieces. Their offense is basically set if they can figure out the QB.



Obviously you think Fant is way better than I do. Hell be an average TE..nothing more. Lyndsey can't block for shit, that's why Gordon gets more PT.

Average TE? That makes me think you don't have a good understanding of how many bad TEs are starting for teams right now. Fant is 23 years old and has only played two seasons and this past season he was already an above average TE, and TE's generally take a couple years to develop.

Care to wager on which player has more receptions, yardage, and TDs in 2021 between Pitts and Fant?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Lets see where Pitts gets drafted. I will do that bet with Kittle, Kelsey, Waller, Henry, Thomas, Hockenson, Andrews or Gosicki.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
Lets see where Pitts gets drafted. I will do that bet with Kittle, Kelsey, Waller, Henry, Thomas, Hockenson, Andrews or Gosicki.

I'll take the bet with Gesicki right now. Let's say this:

Fant vs Gesicki

Minimum 12 games played in 2021.

Receptions, Receiving yardage, Receiving TDs

Whichever player wins at least 2/3 of those categories wins the bet. You got Gesicki, I got Fant. $100?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Scared of Logan Thomas. ?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6284
pizza_Place: PizzaHut


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 26, 2021 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30322
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
Fant is decent, RBs blow. They should draft Pitts if hes there and a WR in the second.

RBs are a dime a dozen. It was dumb of them to pay Gordon. Lindsay is a better back and a fine starting RB.

It would be incredibly wasteful for them to draft Pitts. Fant is going to be great for the next several years and Albert O showed some flash this year as well before getting hurt.



Lyndsey ain't shit either, Whoever getts Pitts is going to have the next Kelsey.

Come on now 312, Pitts and Kelsey aren't close to the same player.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 604 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 21  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: McCareins_Fan and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group