It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:43 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 604 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 21  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2021 7:26 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
His partner when he was in Dallas was Brian Broaddus the long time Cowboy scout. If he'd been offered jobs I think he would know. He put out a 400-500 page draft guide every year that sold well and had a Dallas radio show. The Athletic made a good enough offer for him to give up the show and offer his guide thru them. I think The Athletic are the only ones paying anyone right now. Zeirlein has a morning show in Houston and is head draft scout for NFL.com. Jeremiah is the draft guy for NFL Network and has already interviewed for jobs. Mayock was hired with the Raiders. If you don't think the teams are aware of these guys I don't know what to tell you...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2021 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13254
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
MongoMuller wrote:
His partner when he was in Dallas was Brian Broaddus the long time Cowboy scout. If he'd been offered jobs I think he would know. He put out a 400-500 page draft guide every year that sold well and had a Dallas radio show. The Athletic made a good enough offer for him to give up the show and offer his guide thru them. I think The Athletic are the only ones paying anyone right now. Zeirlein has a morning show in Houston and is head draft scout for NFL.com. Jeremiah is the draft guy for NFL Network and has already interviewed for jobs. Mayock was hired with the Raiders. If you don't think the teams are aware of these guys I don't know what to tell you...

Aware of them? Sure. I’m sure they are all aware of Kiper too and watch his best available list before they select so that they get a good grade post-draft. Clearly the Raiders thought enough of Mayock to hire him. Then again Reinsdorf once hired Hawk as GM. If Bruger is viewed by an NFL team as being a great scout then I’m sure they could pay him more than The Atlantic considering how much money is at stake every draft.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
MongoMuller wrote:
Brugler has been offered jobs but he's making too much money doing what he's doing according to his former partner when he was in Dallas. We'll see some of these guys take jobs if they're offered Director of College Scouting or better but they aren't going to give up the gigs they have to be scouts. Jeremiah will probably be the next guy to get a GM job.




Again, who have they predicted success/failure for correctly in the past that has you giving your trust to them from an analytical standpoint..? I mean, Hub Arkush predicts/analyzes all kinds of things, publishes his own magazine (or whatever his family started).. but he’s become so legendarily bad at analyzing it’s hard to take him serious.


That’s why I posted that YouTube clip of O’Sullivan breaking down tape of Jones. That’s tangible, he’s showing you plays then walking you through and thoroughly explains what he’s seeing, which demonstrates an intimate working knowledge of the game, the position, the positions responsibilities.. I’ll take that over ‘he doesn’t have lightning his arm, he’ll never sling bolts through the heavens like Zeus..’ Ok, cool, walk me through what you specifically see that brings you to that conclusion.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Btw, before this goes too far I’d like to add I’m not predicting great success at the next level for Jones.. I do like him, but who knows how good he’ll be.. this is becoming more about questioning people’s sources and why they trust those sources.


(For example)

I’ve used ‘Lindy’s’ draft guides for over 20 years. I find they have a very good track record with how they’ve graded players in the past who have gone on to varying degrees of success.. so I have continued to use them because of that. They’re not always right.. but their analysis has always been pretty consistently accurate. That said, I use various sources every year for this stuff and try to keep track of who seems to have a good eye based off their past predictions/grades and how accurate those are/were.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Local or regional scout is a low paid, entry level position with high turnover. My guess is that the bulk of scouts aren't even full time employees. I don't doubt some of these guys could find a job somewhere in the league.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
NME wrote:
MongoMuller wrote:
Brugler has been offered jobs but he's making too much money doing what he's doing according to his former partner when he was in Dallas. We'll see some of these guys take jobs if they're offered Director of College Scouting or better but they aren't going to give up the gigs they have to be scouts. Jeremiah will probably be the next guy to get a GM job.




Again, who have they predicted success/failure for correctly in the past that has you giving your trust to them from an analytical standpoint..? I mean, Hub Arkush predicts/analyzes all kinds of things, publishes his own magazine (or whatever his family started).. but he’s become so legendarily bad at analyzing it’s hard to take him serious.


That’s why I posted that YouTube clip of O’Sullivan breaking down tape of Jones. That’s tangible, he’s showing you plays then walking you through and thoroughly explains what he’s seeing, which demonstrates an intimate working knowledge of the game, the position, the positions responsibilities.. I’ll take that over ‘he doesn’t have lightning his arm, he’ll never sling bolts through the heavens like Zeus..’ Ok, cool, walk me through what you specifically see that brings you to that conclusion.


I don't think I've ever heard Hub correctly predict a deaft bust or draft star.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11005
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store


Ryan Pace currently checking the rules to see how many future firsts he is allowed to give up


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2021 1:59 pm
Posts: 83
pizza_Place: HomeRunInn
Hard hitting analysis for a Bears beatwriter/blogger.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
billypootons wrote:


Ryan Pace currently checking the rules to see how many future firsts he is allowed to give up


He only had to give up one past 1st rd pick to get him. Trading future picks to get him now, when he is ridiculously expensive is beyond a fireable offense.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Like he wants to leave his current garbage ownership situation only to go to another one that includes both a lame-duck coach and GM in a cold-weather city. :lol:

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
This is going to get embarrassing before it gets better.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
billypootons wrote:


Ryan Pace currently checking the rules to see how many future firsts he is allowed to give up


He only had to give up one past 1st rd pick to get him. Trading future picks to get him now, when he is ridiculously expensive is beyond a fireable offense.



This is why not fifing these dopes is disastrous, Watson is a good QB but you can not trade away your future to get him.. He is making a huge salary and no draft picks will tank a franchise.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
312player wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
billypootons wrote:


Ryan Pace currently checking the rules to see how many future firsts he is allowed to give up


He only had to give up one past 1st rd pick to get him. Trading future picks to get him now, when he is ridiculously expensive is beyond a fireable offense.



This is why not fifing these dopes is disastrous, Watson is a good QB but you can not trade away your future to get him.. He is making a huge salary and no draft picks will tank a franchise.




^Agreed. Watson’s a helluva player but the Bears already blew their best shot at him in 2017. McCaskey really needs to keep these idiots reigned in on this stuff.


Watson on the Bears with a declining defense, doomed coaching staff and front office with no way to build around him for at least 3 years is a disaster.


Once again, the draft is the Bears best shot at getting this right. Be patient, don’t overpay, select the best QB available in this draft.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Put me in the Watson is a good get but you can’t gut your team and future drafts to do it.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2021 8:21 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I fear a Jimmy G will be coming to the "rescue". This seems like a great year to find a stop gap solution and draft a developmental guy. Foles or Garoppolo aren't the answers.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2021 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
pittmike wrote:
Put me in the Watson is a good get but you can’t gut your team and future drafts to do it.

Bad take imo. A guy like Watson is never available. For a team like the Bears you pay literally whatever the fuck it takes and figure it out later. Or you could just go the next few decades hoping to get a QB as good as Watson eventually.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2021 8:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Put me in the Watson is a good get but you can’t gut your team and future drafts to do it.

Bad take imo. A guy like Watson is never available. For a team like the Bears you pay literally whatever the fuck it takes and figure it out later. Or you could just go the next few decades hoping to get a QB as good as Watson eventually.


The salary cap will probably be about $180M or less next year. The Texans aren't going to take a $70M dead cap hit and need to gut the rest of their team in order to trade Watson for a bunch of future lottery tickets. Talk of a Watson trade is just talk for at least the next 2 years. He'll be on IR by then.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2021 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6284
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
Nas wrote:
I fear a Jimmy G will be coming to the "rescue". This seems like a great year to find a stop gap solution and draft a developmental guy. Foles or Garoppolo aren't the answers.


Pace and Nagy don't have time to develop someone. They need to put a professional offense on the field next near or they are gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Amari Rodgers in the 2nd or 3rd round is intriguing.

That dude makes big catches, and he is fast.

https://www.windycitygridiron.com/2021/1/31/22258392/chicago-bears-2021-nfl-draft-senior-bowl-standouts-scouting-report-mac-jones-quinn-meinerz

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Put me in the Watson is a good get but you can’t gut your team and future drafts to do it.

Bad take imo. A guy like Watson is never available. For a team like the Bears you pay literally whatever the fuck it takes and figure it out later. Or you could just go the next few decades hoping to get a QB as good as Watson eventually.
Wasn't that roughly the same logic on the Mack trade, which you were pretty critical of even from the start?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Put me in the Watson is a good get but you can’t gut your team and future drafts to do it.

Bad take imo. A guy like Watson is never available. For a team like the Bears you pay literally whatever the fuck it takes and figure it out later. Or you could just go the next few decades hoping to get a QB as good as Watson eventually.
Wasn't that roughly the same logic on the Mack trade, which you were pretty critical of even from the start?

I suppose it could be, but are you trying to say a DE is as valuable as a QB?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Put me in the Watson is a good get but you can’t gut your team and future drafts to do it.

Bad take imo. A guy like Watson is never available. For a team like the Bears you pay literally whatever the fuck it takes and figure it out later. Or you could just go the next few decades hoping to get a QB as good as Watson eventually.
Wasn't that roughly the same logic on the Mack trade, which you were pretty critical of even from the start?

I suppose it could be, but are you trying to say a DE is as valuable as a QB?

A top QB is more valuable than a top 5 DE but either greatly improves your team.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Brick wrote:
A top QB is more valuable than a top 5 DE but either greatly improves your team.

In theory.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Put me in the Watson is a good get but you can’t gut your team and future drafts to do it.

Bad take imo. A guy like Watson is never available. For a team like the Bears you pay literally whatever the fuck it takes and figure it out later. Or you could just go the next few decades hoping to get a QB as good as Watson eventually.
Wasn't that roughly the same logic on the Mack trade, which you were pretty critical of even from the start?

I suppose it could be, but are you trying to say a DE is as valuable as a QB?

A top QB is more valuable than a top 5 DE but either greatly improves your team.

But you shouldn't be giving up a ton of draft capital for the DE until you have the QB. I think the last couple seasons in Chicago has shown that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
I'm not sure if a top DE is worth the same as even 4-5 years ago...The best offenses/QBs are designed to either get the ball out quick, or scramble away from pressure. Individual sack performances were down across the board this year. The best (stat wise) defense in the NFL this year(Ravens) did not have a bell cow sack artist.

Or I could be overreacting to a 1 season anomaly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Put me in the Watson is a good get but you can’t gut your team and future drafts to do it.

Bad take imo. A guy like Watson is never available. For a team like the Bears you pay literally whatever the fuck it takes and figure it out later. Or you could just go the next few decades hoping to get a QB as good as Watson eventually.


The salary cap will probably be about $180M or less next year. The Texans aren't going to take a $70M dead cap hit and need to gut the rest of their team in order to trade Watson for a bunch of future lottery tickets. Talk of a Watson trade is just talk for at least the next 2 years. He'll be on IR by then.


few people are talking about what a huge injury risk this guy is. I still think that's why Pace didn't take him.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Put me in the Watson is a good get but you can’t gut your team and future drafts to do it.

Bad take imo. A guy like Watson is never available. For a team like the Bears you pay literally whatever the fuck it takes and figure it out later. Or you could just go the next few decades hoping to get a QB as good as Watson eventually.


The salary cap will probably be about $180M or less next year. The Texans aren't going to take a $70M dead cap hit and need to gut the rest of their team in order to trade Watson for a bunch of future lottery tickets. Talk of a Watson trade is just talk for at least the next 2 years. He'll be on IR by then.


few people are talking about what a huge injury risk this guy is. I still think that's why Pace didn't take him.

He hasn't been injured since his rookie year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Caller Bob wrote:
I'm not sure if a top DE is worth the same as even 4-5 years ago...The best offenses/QBs are designed to either get the ball out quick, or scramble away from pressure.

Bob is wise.

Wait, what?

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
He hasn't been injured since his rookie year.
Probably why so few people are talking about his injury risk :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
He hasn't been injured since his rookie year.
Probably why so few people are talking about his injury risk :lol:

:lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 604 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 21  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: badrogue17 and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group