It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:53 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 836 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 28  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16475
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
storkinastorm wrote:


"To appease unhappy staff"? Unhappy because they disagreed with the halt on moral grounds, or unhappy because they had millions of customers reaming them a new asshole?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 1:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:


"To appease unhappy staff"? Unhappy because they disagreed with the halt on moral grounds, or unhappy because they had millions of customers reaming them a new asshole?


:lol: Probably both.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:


"To appease unhappy staff"? Unhappy because they disagreed with the halt on moral grounds, or unhappy because they had millions of customers reaming them a new asshole?


:lol: Probably both.

Image


We ask you, to please bear (market) with us


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
:lol: :lol:

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 2:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I prefer open and free markets.


Then you must not be in favor of trading platforms preventing them simply because hedge funds have a problem.


Exactly. It was a dumb move on many levels.



I don't mean this as a criticism of you. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is the COO of a $6 billion company and his views on the subject are very similar to yours. I just don't think you guys or guys who think the way you do- I'm sure Buffett and Munger fall into that category- understand the way so many of guys who are buying shares in these companies are thinking. Their motivations just aren't the same as yours. They're not building a blue chip portfolio. (Maybe some of them are, but this isn't part of it and they know that.) These are guys who are throwing $500-1000 into a stock for fun. They wouldn't be buying 4 shares of AAPL with that money if they weren't joining the GameStop train. More likely they'd be betting props in the conference finals.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I prefer open and free markets.


Then you must not be in favor of trading platforms preventing them simply because hedge funds have a problem.


Exactly. It was a dumb move on many levels.



I don't mean this as a criticism of you. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is the COO of a $6 billion company and his views on the subject are very similar to yours. I just don't think you guys or guys who think the way you do- I'm sure Buffett and Munger fall into that category- understand the way so many of guys who are buying shares in these companies are thinking. Their motivations just aren't the same as yours. They're not building a blue chip portfolio. (Maybe some of them are, but this isn't part of it and they know that.) These are guys who are throwing $500-1000 into a stock for fun. They wouldn't be buying 4 shares of AAPL with that money if they weren't joining the GameStop train. More likely they'd be betting props in the conference finals.


Very much this. But also BlackRock holds what is now like a billion dollars worth of GameStop stock at this point.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 2:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's


These people see this as "financial damage". Yeah, to their bank accounts.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Boring end to the week. Where is the $1000 gme?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16475
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Brick wrote:
Boring end to the week. Where is the $1000 gme?


Seems far away for a stock at 325, but the Feb5 800 calls (the highest strike listed) are at 45/46. In other words, all you have to do to pocket $4,500 is sell one and hope GME doesn't close above $800 by next Friday. :lol:

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I prefer open and free markets.


Then you must not be in favor of trading platforms preventing them simply because hedge funds have a problem.


Exactly. It was a dumb move on many levels.



I don't mean this as a criticism of you. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is the COO of a $6 billion company and his views on the subject are very similar to yours. I just don't think you guys or guys who think the way you do- I'm sure Buffett and Munger fall into that category- understand the way so many of guys who are buying shares in these companies are thinking. Their motivations just aren't the same as yours. They're not building a blue chip portfolio. (Maybe some of them are, but this isn't part of it and they know that.) These are guys who are throwing $500-1000 into a stock for fun. They wouldn't be buying 4 shares of AAPL with that money if they weren't joining the GameStop train. More likely they'd be betting props in the conference finals.


I have about as an unique as a perspective as anyone simply because I insure all these folks and see both the regulatory burden and their dirty laundry. The SEC is all over public companies. And since the Obama administration, the SEC has been issuing subpoenas to hedge funds like crazy. There was so much regulation that Congress passed the JOBS Act to relieve a lot of it.

Someone like Melvin has a public ADV disclosure on the SEC site. They also have their holdings shown on a form 13. It’s not like this is some unregulated, completely hidden unknown entity.

There are lots of self serving bad actors. You worry about the little guy. I feel the same way. What you have to understand is I want him/her buying Gamestop at a fair price. Pumping the shit out it so a 25 year old buys in at $250 is not helping the retail investor. Short sellers help price discovery by counterbalancing the sell side analysts and all the momentum traders.

I also want lots of financial products available to people. They all serve a purpose.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I prefer open and free markets.


Then you must not be in favor of trading platforms preventing them simply because hedge funds have a problem.


Exactly. It was a dumb move on many levels.



I don't mean this as a criticism of you. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is the COO of a $6 billion company and his views on the subject are very similar to yours. I just don't think you guys or guys who think the way you do- I'm sure Buffett and Munger fall into that category- understand the way so many of guys who are buying shares in these companies are thinking. Their motivations just aren't the same as yours. They're not building a blue chip portfolio. (Maybe some of them are, but this isn't part of it and they know that.) These are guys who are throwing $500-1000 into a stock for fun. They wouldn't be buying 4 shares of AAPL with that money if they weren't joining the GameStop train. More likely they'd be betting props in the conference finals.


I have about as an unique as a perspective as anyone simply because I insure all these folks and see both the regulatory burden and their dirty laundry. The SEC is all over public companies. And since the Obama administration, the SEC has been issuing subpoenas to hedge funds like crazy. There was so much regulation that Congress passed the JOBS Act to relieve a lot of it.

Someone like Melvin has a public ADV disclosure on the SEC site. They also have their holdings shown on a form 13. It’s not like this is some unregulated, completely hidden unknown entity.

There are lots of self serving bad actors. You worry about the little guy. I feel the same way. What you have to understand is I want him/her buying Gamestop at a fair price. Pumping the shit out it so a 25 year old buys in at $250 is not helping the retail investor. Short sellers help price discovery by counterbalancing the sell side analysts and all the momentum traders.

I also want lots of financial products available to people. They all serve a purpose.


We need more idealists like Denis in the marketplace. Seems like it is quite easy to be corrupted by piles and piles of cash.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I prefer open and free markets.


Then you must not be in favor of trading platforms preventing them simply because hedge funds have a problem.


Exactly. It was a dumb move on many levels.



I don't mean this as a criticism of you. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is the COO of a $6 billion company and his views on the subject are very similar to yours. I just don't think you guys or guys who think the way you do- I'm sure Buffett and Munger fall into that category- understand the way so many of guys who are buying shares in these companies are thinking. Their motivations just aren't the same as yours. They're not building a blue chip portfolio. (Maybe some of them are, but this isn't part of it and they know that.) These are guys who are throwing $500-1000 into a stock for fun. They wouldn't be buying 4 shares of AAPL with that money if they weren't joining the GameStop train. More likely they'd be betting props in the conference finals.


I have about as an unique as a perspective as anyone simply because I insure all these folks and see both the regulatory burden and their dirty laundry. The SEC is all over public companies. And since the Obama administration, the SEC has been issuing subpoenas to hedge funds like crazy. There was so much regulation that Congress passed the JOBS Act to relieve a lot of it.

Someone like Melvin has a public ADV disclosure on the SEC site. They also have their holdings shown on a form 13. It’s not like this is some unregulated, completely hidden unknown entity.

There are lots of self serving bad actors. You worry about the little guy. I feel the same way. What you have to understand is I want him/her buying Gamestop at a fair price. Pumping the shit out it so a 25 year old buys in at $250 is not helping the retail investor. Short sellers help price discovery by counterbalancing the sell side analysts and all the momentum traders.

I also want lots of financial products available to people. They all serve a purpose.

So why do you hate hedge funds then?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24052
pizza_Place: Pizanos
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

This guy obviously doesn’t know the dicks, pussies, ass holes speech.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I prefer open and free markets.


Then you must not be in favor of trading platforms preventing them simply because hedge funds have a problem.


Exactly. It was a dumb move on many levels.



I don't mean this as a criticism of you. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is the COO of a $6 billion company and his views on the subject are very similar to yours. I just don't think you guys or guys who think the way you do- I'm sure Buffett and Munger fall into that category- understand the way so many of guys who are buying shares in these companies are thinking. Their motivations just aren't the same as yours. They're not building a blue chip portfolio. (Maybe some of them are, but this isn't part of it and they know that.) These are guys who are throwing $500-1000 into a stock for fun. They wouldn't be buying 4 shares of AAPL with that money if they weren't joining the GameStop train. More likely they'd be betting props in the conference finals.


I have about as an unique as a perspective as anyone simply because I insure all these folks and see both the regulatory burden and their dirty laundry. The SEC is all over public companies. And since the Obama administration, the SEC has been issuing subpoenas to hedge funds like crazy. There was so much regulation that Congress passed the JOBS Act to relieve a lot of it.

Someone like Melvin has a public ADV disclosure on the SEC site. They also have their holdings shown on a form 13. It’s not like this is some unregulated, completely hidden unknown entity.

There are lots of self serving bad actors. You worry about the little guy. I feel the same way. What you have to understand is I want him/her buying Gamestop at a fair price. Pumping the shit out it so a 25 year old buys in at $250 is not helping the retail investor. Short sellers help price discovery by counterbalancing the sell side analysts and all the momentum traders.

I also want lots of financial products available to people. They all serve a purpose.


Anyone who buys Gamestop at $300 a share thinking it is a good long-term investment deserves to lose that money. It seems that you give people far too little credit. Buying and selling basic stocks is not rocket science. The way you describe retail investors makes it seem like they are neanderthals.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


These people see this as "financial damage". Yeah, to their bank accounts.

The extent to which she and her ilk are tone deaf is providing the extra laughs to the weekend.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
storkinastorm wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I prefer open and free markets.


Then you must not be in favor of trading platforms preventing them simply because hedge funds have a problem.


Exactly. It was a dumb move on many levels.



I don't mean this as a criticism of you. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is the COO of a $6 billion company and his views on the subject are very similar to yours. I just don't think you guys or guys who think the way you do- I'm sure Buffett and Munger fall into that category- understand the way so many of guys who are buying shares in these companies are thinking. Their motivations just aren't the same as yours. They're not building a blue chip portfolio. (Maybe some of them are, but this isn't part of it and they know that.) These are guys who are throwing $500-1000 into a stock for fun. They wouldn't be buying 4 shares of AAPL with that money if they weren't joining the GameStop train. More likely they'd be betting props in the conference finals.


I have about as an unique as a perspective as anyone simply because I insure all these folks and see both the regulatory burden and their dirty laundry. The SEC is all over public companies. And since the Obama administration, the SEC has been issuing subpoenas to hedge funds like crazy. There was so much regulation that Congress passed the JOBS Act to relieve a lot of it.

Someone like Melvin has a public ADV disclosure on the SEC site. They also have their holdings shown on a form 13. It’s not like this is some unregulated, completely hidden unknown entity.

There are lots of self serving bad actors. You worry about the little guy. I feel the same way. What you have to understand is I want him/her buying Gamestop at a fair price. Pumping the shit out it so a 25 year old buys in at $250 is not helping the retail investor. Short sellers help price discovery by counterbalancing the sell side analysts and all the momentum traders.

I also want lots of financial products available to people. They all serve a purpose.


Anyone who buys Gamestop at $300 a share thinking it is a good long-term investment deserves to lose that money. It seems that you give people far too little credit. Buying and selling basic stocks is not rocket science. The way you describe retail investors makes it seem like they are neanderthals.


I do wonder what percentage of the people holding actually believe the stock is worth north of $300 per share. Less than five percent?

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
What you have to understand is I want him/her buying Gamestop at a fair price.



What better way do you have to determine a "fair" price than the free market? Do you want some kind of commission or czar setting the price that we are allowed to buy at? Geez, Dennis, I didn't realize you were some kind of commie.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SpiralStairs wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I prefer open and free markets.


Then you must not be in favor of trading platforms preventing them simply because hedge funds have a problem.


Exactly. It was a dumb move on many levels.



I don't mean this as a criticism of you. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is the COO of a $6 billion company and his views on the subject are very similar to yours. I just don't think you guys or guys who think the way you do- I'm sure Buffett and Munger fall into that category- understand the way so many of guys who are buying shares in these companies are thinking. Their motivations just aren't the same as yours. They're not building a blue chip portfolio. (Maybe some of them are, but this isn't part of it and they know that.) These are guys who are throwing $500-1000 into a stock for fun. They wouldn't be buying 4 shares of AAPL with that money if they weren't joining the GameStop train. More likely they'd be betting props in the conference finals.


Very much this. But also BlackRock holds what is now like a billion dollars worth of GameStop stock at this point.

Yes and no. It started out very much like JORR described. I already know several people who do not have much disposable income, if any, and are not treating this like gambling. They are trying to jump in now to make money.

It seems to me like there is very good reason to be concerned with the "common man" or whatever you wanna call it jumping in on this phenomenon without knowing what the fuck they are doing and losing the little bit left they have. But, there's not much you can do to save people from their own poor choices ultimately. I certainly don't think any potential regulations that come from this will help those type of people, but I think criticizing the notion of being concerned is misguided.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I prefer open and free markets.


Then you must not be in favor of trading platforms preventing them simply because hedge funds have a problem.


Exactly. It was a dumb move on many levels.



I don't mean this as a criticism of you. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is the COO of a $6 billion company and his views on the subject are very similar to yours. I just don't think you guys or guys who think the way you do- I'm sure Buffett and Munger fall into that category- understand the way so many of guys who are buying shares in these companies are thinking. Their motivations just aren't the same as yours. They're not building a blue chip portfolio. (Maybe some of them are, but this isn't part of it and they know that.) These are guys who are throwing $500-1000 into a stock for fun. They wouldn't be buying 4 shares of AAPL with that money if they weren't joining the GameStop train. More likely they'd be betting props in the conference finals.


Very much this. But also BlackRock holds what is now like a billion dollars worth of GameStop stock at this point.

Yes and no. It started out very much like JORR described. I already know several people who do not have much disposable income, if any, and are not treating this like gambling. They are trying to jump in now to make money.

It seems to me like there is very good reason to be concerned with the "common man" or whatever you wanna call it jumping in on this phenomenon without knowing what the fuck they are doing and losing the little bit left they have. But, there's not much you can do to save people from their own poor choices ultimately. I certainly don't think any potential regulations that come from this will help those type of people, but I think criticizing the notion of being concerned is misguided.


The thing is, I think most of the concern is fake. It's being used as cover for, once again, giving the rich guy a break.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Well, sure. The old fucks on CNBC feigning concern fit in that boat. I just don't think Denis does :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets ... at_melvin/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Bagels wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l8539h/cnbc_now_running_ads_promoting_that_melvin/


Not the lest bit suspicious. Half of me thinks the funds would rather bankrupt themselves than capitulate to the hoi polloi.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 7:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
SpiralStairs wrote:
Bagels wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l8539h/cnbc_now_running_ads_promoting_that_melvin/


Not the lest bit suspicious. Half of me thinks the funds would rather bankrupt themselves than capitulate to the hoi polloi.

Hedge funds now the underdogs. Rooting for them to win.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 7:46 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79553
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Poor Gabe Plotkin is right that GameStop is ackchyually almost worthless. Too bad a bunch of chatroom losers are making it worth over $300 a share.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
I never fully realized how detached MANY of the CNBC hosts and guests were from reality.

There are some good reoccurring guests who have been overall positive about the recent events, but MANY of the hosts have been exposed as billionaire dick sucking clowns.

It’s been really eye opening.

Also, LOL at Cramer calling in from his hospital bed this morning to tell the WSB traders to be careful because this could really end badly.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Accelerationists about to have a moment.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jbi11s wrote:

“You should have considered the risks involved” quite obviously applies to the bottom three. The 2008 collapse was something different.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: GameStop
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
That is your opinion.

My opinion is I agree with all 4.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 836 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 28  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group