It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38332
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I would never dispute that Chicago is a great place to visit. It's living there that fucking sucks.

Then again, it is Chicagoans themselves who are voting with their feet on that matter.


I don't mind having this conversation with you and you usually bring up valid points.

It gets me going a bit when the exurbanites whose greatest travel adventure is never leaving the grounds of the Sandals resort on a vacation to Mexico or DR pipe in with their educated opinions about the thoughts of travelers around the world.

Anyone who claims Chicago was "cooler" in the 70's either wasn't alive then or has a very skewed perspective on what the term means.


THIS

And even into the early to mid 80's as well.

Downtown was a seedy place pock marked by X-rated bookstores and movie theaters.

Block 37 was just that, a square block of beat up buildings.

The near north side has similar issues as well.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
It wasn't until 84-88 when the city began to turn around. It was grimy as hell before then.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 6:57 pm
Posts: 133
pizza_Place: chicago pizza
cookie23 wrote:
Fact is the city and state has been losing population since 2000.

My fav are the people from Iowa or Ohio who move here who are convinced because their are tall buildings, its just like New York.

New York is its own category but Chicago is the closest comparison in the US.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
cookie23 wrote:
I know LA is having its problems as well and NYC covid situation in my opinion will be gone in a year.

New York City, for example, was losing 376 residents per day to domestic migration in 2019 -- an increase of more than 100 per day from the previous year -- before it became the epicenter of the country’s virus outbreak in March this year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s latest survey of population shifts.

According to the latest population figures from the California Department of Finance, Los Angeles County lost 40,036 residents between July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020 — the steepest decline of any county in the state.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Regular Reader wrote:
It wasn't until 84-88 when the city began to turn around. It was grimy as hell before then.

I think it's fair to say that describes most cities in that timeline. Urban decay entered the lexicon for most people around that time.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
cookie23 wrote:
I know LA is having its problems as well and NYC covid situation in my opinion will be gone in a year.

New York City, for example, was losing 376 residents per day to domestic migration in 2019 -- an increase of more than 100 per day from the previous year -- before it became the epicenter of the country’s virus outbreak in March this year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s latest survey of population shifts.

According to the latest population figures from the California Department of Finance, Los Angeles County lost 40,036 residents between July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020 — the steepest decline of any county in the state.

It's fair to say that the last few years have been really bad for the city. I discussed that extensively in this thread viewtopic.php?f=175&t=121549

I also think some of the changes we will see will be permanent. Companies will decrease their physical office footprint, which will negatively harm downtowns. It will also reduce the incentive for people to live in an urban environment where easy travel to that downtown is required M-F.

Remote work is here to stay for many of us and even if many companies don't adopt it permanently, enough will to change the landscape. People move to a city like Chicago for the work opportunities as while I feel Chicago is losing ground to the suburbs, it still has more opportunities than Detroit, Cleveland, or most other Midwestern cities. However, that anchor draw of the city is lost when people no longer have to move for that opportunity.

As bad as Chicago is going to be hit by this, just wait until you see the impact this will have on the Bay Area. A lot of people with vesting stock options are going to realize they can live like kings away from their overpriced and overregulated California.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
The studies that are coming out of this are that optimal remote work for both employer and employee is 1 to possibly 2 days per week.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
back to the question at hand, I think the #1 and #2 items are the quality of schools and the affordability of housing. The Ogie scenario of everyone he knows moving to the suburbs is due, largely, to being unable to have confidence that they are providing their children with free, quality education all the way through high school. There really shouldn't be bad schools and good schools in CPS. There should be an entire school system that has a character that is applicable no matter where you live.

Sure, some people find nirvana in a cul de sac. I think the majority would prefer to live in urban centers if all things could be equal.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As bad as Chicago is going to be hit by this, just wait until you see the impact this will have on the Bay Area. A lot of people with vesting stock options are going to realize they can live like kings away from their overpriced and overregulated California.


maybe instead of people paying $2000 a month to rent someone's walk in closet in a 3 bedroom house with 6 other people sharing 1 bathroom the real estate market in the Bay Area/Silicon Valley will regress to a more livable mean


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55947
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Climate change is still a problem. We can't have an entire nation at the population density of Huntley. We need density.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
cookie23 wrote:
I know LA is having its problems as well and NYC covid situation in my opinion will be gone in a year.

New York City, for example, was losing 376 residents per day to domestic migration in 2019 -- an increase of more than 100 per day from the previous year -- before it became the epicenter of the country’s virus outbreak in March this year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s latest survey of population shifts.

According to the latest population figures from the California Department of Finance, Los Angeles County lost 40,036 residents between July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020 — the steepest decline of any county in the state.

It's fair to say that the last few years have been really bad for the city. I discussed that extensively in this thread viewtopic.php?f=175&t=121549

I also think some of the changes we will see will be permanent. Companies will decrease their physical office footprint, which will negatively harm downtowns. It will also reduce the incentive for people to live in an urban environment where easy travel to that downtown is required M-F.

Remote work is here to stay for many of us and even if many companies don't adopt it permanently, enough will to change the landscape. People move to a city like Chicago for the work opportunities as while I feel Chicago is losing ground to the suburbs, it still has more opportunities than Detroit, Cleveland, or most other Midwestern cities. However, that anchor draw of the city is lost when people no longer have to move for that opportunity.

As bad as Chicago is going to be hit by this, just wait until you see the impact this will have on the Bay Area. A lot of people with vesting stock options are going to realize they can live like kings away from their overpriced and overregulated California.

You grossly overstate the movement towards work-from-home. The composition of this board is primarily introverted hermits so working-from-home is right up their alley. However, most employer and employee surveys point toward a hybrid model at best.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
cookie23 wrote:
I know LA is having its problems as well and NYC covid situation in my opinion will be gone in a year.

New York City, for example, was losing 376 residents per day to domestic migration in 2019 -- an increase of more than 100 per day from the previous year -- before it became the epicenter of the country’s virus outbreak in March this year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s latest survey of population shifts.

According to the latest population figures from the California Department of Finance, Los Angeles County lost 40,036 residents between July 1, 2019 and July 1, 2020 — the steepest decline of any county in the state.

It's fair to say that the last few years have been really bad for the city. I discussed that extensively in this thread viewtopic.php?f=175&t=121549

I also think some of the changes we will see will be permanent. Companies will decrease their physical office footprint, which will negatively harm downtowns. It will also reduce the incentive for people to live in an urban environment where easy travel to that downtown is required M-F.

Remote work is here to stay for many of us and even if many companies don't adopt it permanently, enough will to change the landscape. People move to a city like Chicago for the work opportunities as while I feel Chicago is losing ground to the suburbs, it still has more opportunities than Detroit, Cleveland, or most other Midwestern cities. However, that anchor draw of the city is lost when people no longer have to move for that opportunity.

As bad as Chicago is going to be hit by this, just wait until you see the impact this will have on the Bay Area. A lot of people with vesting stock options are going to realize they can live like kings away from their overpriced and overregulated California.

You grossly overstate the movement towards work-from-home. The composition of this board is primarily introverted hermits so working-from-home is right up their alley. However, most employer and employee surveys point toward a hybrid model at best.

Even a hybrid model would change how people go about looking where they wish to live. It is worth noting that some of the largest tech companies are offering full remote to their employees and it's fair to say that depending on how that works out, others will adopt it as well. I have a friend who just moved from California to Texas since he no longer had to be in Palo Alto for his job that did have him at Facebook HQ at the former "Sun Quentin."

Let's see what happens when some of Chicago's largest corporate employers offer that option. Even with a hybrid model, someone who only has to come in 2 or 3 times a week may find that commuting on those few days isn't so bad and may move further out.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Curious Hair wrote:
Climate change is still a problem. We can't have an entire nation at the population density of Huntley. We need density.

I know my single family home lifestyle is not carbon neutral or environmentally friendly, but frankly that won't ever stop me.

Maybe I'll eventually put some solar panels on my roof if I feel guilty and decide it makes economic sense as prices fall.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
good dolphin wrote:
The studies that are coming out of this are that optimal remote work for both employer and employee is 1 to possibly 2 days per week.


with companies abandoning downtown space there's going to be a metric fuckton of unused floors in big buildings throughout the loop and beyond. might be an opportunity for creating short-term living spaces to be used by worker-bees 3 days/2 nights a week and then by tourists on weekends.

Instead of employees piling into metra cars every day they commute in Monday AM, work Monday, stay downtown in one of these new not-quite-hotels-nor-air-b-n-b spaces Monday night, work Tuesday, stay over again Tuesday night, work Wednesday and then commute home Wednesday after work. And then another "shift" arrives downtown Wednesday AM, repeat. Friday everyone clears out for exurbia and the spaces are available for weekend tourists.

This cuts down on the back and forth commuting and attendant covid hazards/environmental impact.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Hussra wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As bad as Chicago is going to be hit by this, just wait until you see the impact this will have on the Bay Area. A lot of people with vesting stock options are going to realize they can live like kings away from their overpriced and overregulated California.


maybe instead of people paying $2000 a month to rent someone's walk in closet in a 3 bedroom house with 6 other people sharing 1 bathroom the real estate market in the Bay Area/Silicon Valley will regress to a more livable mean

That is one market where such a migration may actually be helpful to the city/area.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Even a hybrid model would change how people go about looking where they wish to live. It is worth noting that some of the largest tech companies are offering full remote to their employees and it's fair to say that depending on how that works out, others will adopt it as well. I have a friend who just moved from California to Texas since he no longer had to be in Palo Alto for his job that did have him at Facebook HQ at the former "Sun Quentin."

Let's see what happens when some of Chicago's largest corporate employers offer that option. Even with a hybrid model, someone who only has to come in 2 or 3 times a week may find that commuting on those few days isn't so bad and may move further out.

Unlikely.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 1:24 pm
Posts: 24
pizza_Place: Damiani's
The city will still be a bigger draw for the young crowd than the suburbs. Few kids in their 20's wants to live in a Chicago suburb. And if they have enough money, they can stay and have a decent public school option. Semi-affordable private schools like DePaul Prep (formerly Gordon Tech) are helping out too.

For at least the last 20 years, I've seen plenty of young people move to the city for the nightlife, lakefront, social clubs, etc. and reverse commute to their jobs in the suburbs. Pre Covid, the reverse commute was as bad and sometimes worse, especially the Eisenhower and Edens. The future of remote work will make the city even more attractive when you don't lose your freshly shoveled parking spot each morning and after work can still walk to your favorite neighborhood tavern, restaurant, or go for a run on the lakefront.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Even a hybrid model would change how people go about looking where they wish to live. It is worth noting that some of the largest tech companies are offering full remote to their employees and it's fair to say that depending on how that works out, others will adopt it as well. I have a friend who just moved from California to Texas since he no longer had to be in Palo Alto for his job that did have him at Facebook HQ at the former "Sun Quentin."

Let's see what happens when some of Chicago's largest corporate employers offer that option. Even with a hybrid model, someone who only has to come in 2 or 3 times a week may find that commuting on those few days isn't so bad and may move further out.

Unlikely.

the downsizing of commercial office space says otherwise.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2021 11:19 am
Posts: 209
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Regular Reader wrote:
It wasn't until 84-88 when the city began to turn around. It was grimy as hell before then.


Yep I know because I'm from it. Like Seacrest said and you know well Downtown was a cesspool of seedy bullshit. Movie Theaters (Shout-out to the McVickers Theater) game rooms with a few crappy restaurants mixed in. Downtown was where you went when you wanted to find a little action and guys I knew from the "hood" used to walk sometimes because the walk was only about 3 miles. We loved going down there primarily for that purpose when I was an adolescent/teenager.

Super transfer Sunday was always the Fun day because you could ride the bus and the "L" for the entire day for 70 cents.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2018 12:04 am
Posts: 594
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
What I was asking about was pre covid number of population loss. Yes, Covid is going to affect Chicago and many other cities with work at home. No doubt.

Chicago is not the closest to NYC. Chicago is a midwestern city. Boston, Philly, NYC are simply older citiies with coastal feels. San Fran has more density than Chicago.

Back to original questions, what Chicago has going for it - Cost of living is cheap compared to coastal cities, public transport good, very good restaurant scene, arts, sports city.

Negative - Weather sucks for 4 months(bigger than some think, that is 1/3rd of the year), property taxes are 2nd highest in nation, not near any fun getaways nearby, kinda stuck in the midwest - Wisconsin or Michigan for weekend trips.

Real estate values and COL shows everything - Seattle down to San Diego cost of living way higher than Chicago, as well as all east coast cities.

Most people moving out are moving from south and west sides.

Also Chi is extreeeeeemly segregated if you travel for 2020. Gotta little mix from Uptown to Rogers Park, but "city of neighborhoods" is basically white north/northwest, some hispanic on north ave, Pilsen area, Black south and west.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Even a hybrid model would change how people go about looking where they wish to live. It is worth noting that some of the largest tech companies are offering full remote to their employees and it's fair to say that depending on how that works out, others will adopt it as well. I have a friend who just moved from California to Texas since he no longer had to be in Palo Alto for his job that did have him at Facebook HQ at the former "Sun Quentin."

Let's see what happens when some of Chicago's largest corporate employers offer that option. Even with a hybrid model, someone who only has to come in 2 or 3 times a week may find that commuting on those few days isn't so bad and may move further out.

Unlikely.

the downsizing of commercial office space says otherwise.

You keep saying this without any evidence. Using your tech companies as an example. Facebook recently purchased REI's headquarters campus in Seattle. Amazon is continuing with its buildout of HQ2 in Virginia. Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google all expanded their physical footprint in 2020 in NYC.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
maybe things won't work this way post-COVID as people have adapted to actually being productive when working from home. But, pre-COVID, I noticed that employees given a single work from home day, usually a Friday or Monday every other week, often treated it as an extra PTO day. Maybe everyone is nowadays acclimatized/conditioned to actually working when working from home that that won't happen; especially if it's multiple days each week of working from home vs a keep-an-eye-on-email-while-running-errands day every other week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
the downsizing of commercial office space says otherwise.


You keep saying this without any evidence. Using your tech companies as an example. Facebook recently purchased REI's headquarters campus in Seattle. Amazon is continuing with its buildout of HQ2 in Virginia. Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google all expanded their physical footprint in 2020 in NYC.


uber wealthy tech companies vulture investing in depressed assets? :shock:

there's going to be more abandoned space than all the FAANG companies can gobble up at discounted covid prices:

Image


Last edited by Hussra on Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Even a hybrid model would change how people go about looking where they wish to live. It is worth noting that some of the largest tech companies are offering full remote to their employees and it's fair to say that depending on how that works out, others will adopt it as well. I have a friend who just moved from California to Texas since he no longer had to be in Palo Alto for his job that did have him at Facebook HQ at the former "Sun Quentin."

Let's see what happens when some of Chicago's largest corporate employers offer that option. Even with a hybrid model, someone who only has to come in 2 or 3 times a week may find that commuting on those few days isn't so bad and may move further out.

Unlikely.

the downsizing of commercial office space says otherwise.

You keep saying this without any evidence. Using your tech companies as an example. Facebook recently purchased REI's headquarters campus in Seattle. Amazon is continuing with its buildout of HQ2 in Virginia. Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google all expanded their physical footprint in 2020 in NYC.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... r-pandemic

The move to reduce office space is well documented. 53% of companies surveyed (over 1,500 were asked this) said they are going to reduce office space

This is something we probably would have seen happen at some point later in the 2020s, but Covid forced companies to consider it sooner.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 12:09 pm
Posts: 382
pizza_Place: Apart Pizza
you can take JERK WOOD out of the SUBRUBS,,,but you Can"t take the SUBURUS out of the JERKWOOD!

AS long as HOPLEAF! and WHILE FOODS stays open, CITY still fine for MANY??? Just IMAGINE would be in BEtter shape with myguy CHUY runing things!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Even a hybrid model would change how people go about looking where they wish to live. It is worth noting that some of the largest tech companies are offering full remote to their employees and it's fair to say that depending on how that works out, others will adopt it as well. I have a friend who just moved from California to Texas since he no longer had to be in Palo Alto for his job that did have him at Facebook HQ at the former "Sun Quentin."

Let's see what happens when some of Chicago's largest corporate employers offer that option. Even with a hybrid model, someone who only has to come in 2 or 3 times a week may find that commuting on those few days isn't so bad and may move further out.

Unlikely.

the downsizing of commercial office space says otherwise.

You keep saying this without any evidence. Using your tech companies as an example. Facebook recently purchased REI's headquarters campus in Seattle. Amazon is continuing with its buildout of HQ2 in Virginia. Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google all expanded their physical footprint in 2020 in NYC.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... r-pandemic

The move to reduce office space is well documented. 53% of companies surveyed (over 1,500 were asked this) said they are going to reduce office space

Yup, new companies move in with lower rents. My firm just recently move their San Diego office to Chicago given the attractive leasing rates.

You'll see MANY firms jumping into downtown areas at discounted prices. The suburban commercial market is going to get demolished.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Even a hybrid model would change how people go about looking where they wish to live. It is worth noting that some of the largest tech companies are offering full remote to their employees and it's fair to say that depending on how that works out, others will adopt it as well. I have a friend who just moved from California to Texas since he no longer had to be in Palo Alto for his job that did have him at Facebook HQ at the former "Sun Quentin."

Let's see what happens when some of Chicago's largest corporate employers offer that option. Even with a hybrid model, someone who only has to come in 2 or 3 times a week may find that commuting on those few days isn't so bad and may move further out.

Unlikely.

the downsizing of commercial office space says otherwise.

You keep saying this without any evidence. Using your tech companies as an example. Facebook recently purchased REI's headquarters campus in Seattle. Amazon is continuing with its buildout of HQ2 in Virginia. Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google all expanded their physical footprint in 2020 in NYC.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... r-pandemic

The move to reduce office space is well documented. 53% of companies surveyed (over 1,500 were asked this) said they are going to reduce office space

Yup, new companies move in with lower rents. My firm just recently move their San Diego office to Chicago given the attractive leasing rates.

You'll see MANY firms jumping into downtown areas at discounted prices. The suburban commercial market is going to get demolished.

The entirety of commercial real estate markets are going to get demolished. City and suburban commercial real estate alike are going to collapse.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
In the short-term there will be pain. However, if your investment horizon is longer than 5 years then downtown cores will be back. There will some reinvention and transformation but betting against urban business districts would be very foolish.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Kirkwood wrote:
In the short-term there will be pain. However, if your investment horizon is longer than 5 years then downtown cores will be back. There will some reinvention and transformation but betting against urban business districts would be very foolish.

Long term I'd still bet against them. They're not going to die, but they also probably won't return to their pre-Covid workforce levels. The numbers are there to show us the future and yes some people will go in the office M-F 5 days a week without fail, but enough will be partial or fully work from home that it will not reach what we saw as the norm 12 months ago.

Going semi off-topic here, but air travel and hotels will be the same way. Other than conferences or really important client meetings that must be f2f, you'll see a drop off in business travel as companies realize they can save thousands per employee per year by moving a lot of meetings to virtual. It's not going to be all of them of course, but enough to prevent a return to pre-Covid levels for years to come. I think other than a couple of conferences per year, my personal business travel will not reach the level it was the last few years and that's just fine with me.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Image



Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 170 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group