It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2021 9:58 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Silence of the Lambs is one of my favorite movies. Maybe my favorite.

I loved the relationship between Clarice and Lector. I loved their conversations. He was a killer, but Clarice considered him smart. Which he was. She considered him a mentor. In the end, he helped her solve the case.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2021 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
W_Z wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
W_Z wrote:
i was rooting for "Boyz in the Hood".


Siskel said that about Boyz in the Hood? I heard him say that in his Terminator review. I guess it was his go to when giving a thumbs down, but he didn't hate it.


no, they loved the movie. i meant i was rooting for it to win Best Picture for 1991.


Got it. I didn't want to go back and start watching more reviews again.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2021 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
W_Z wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
W_Z wrote:
Siskel wasn't really into sci-fi action films. He didn't like "Predator" either.

He did, however, like & recommend "The Thing". and it completely went over Ebert's head.


Siskel loved Back to the Future, while saying that he usually dislikes time travel and sci fi. He was a guy who wanted there to be some sort of positive message/character growth in a movie. I guess if Lector had renounced his serial killing ways at the end he would have given Lambs a better review.


BTTF was more character driven and that's what connected with both Siskel & Ebert. They both loved "Star Wars" and were a vocal minority of respected critics who supported those movies (especially "Jedi"). So there were movies in the genre that Siskel liked but he definitely had a pretty low tolerance for it overall.

I never liked Siskel nor most of his reviews. He had a very narrow tolerance for movies he liked, and brought a vast, hollow word salad for movies he didn't.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2021 10:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3385
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
i was hoping that 'an american werewolf in london' would win the 1982 best picture from the academy. they made a star out of the dr. pepper guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2021 11:24 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Regular Reader wrote:
W_Z wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
W_Z wrote:
Siskel wasn't really into sci-fi action films. He didn't like "Predator" either.

He did, however, like & recommend "The Thing". and it completely went over Ebert's head.


Siskel loved Back to the Future, while saying that he usually dislikes time travel and sci fi. He was a guy who wanted there to be some sort of positive message/character growth in a movie. I guess if Lector had renounced his serial killing ways at the end he would have given Lambs a better review.


BTTF was more character driven and that's what connected with both Siskel & Ebert. They both loved "Star Wars" and were a vocal minority of respected critics who supported those movies (especially "Jedi"). So there were movies in the genre that Siskel liked but he definitely had a pretty low tolerance for it overall.

I never liked Siskel nor most of his reviews. He had a very narrow tolerance for movies he liked, and brought a vast, hollow word salad for movies he didn't.


Agreed. While he seemed to like talking about movies, he didn't have anything interesting to say about them. Dave Kehr, who succeeded Siskel as the Tribune's principal film critic, was far superior in that role.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 1:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43565
Franky T wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Here is the Siskel and Ebert review: https://youtu.be/fgX0hASKpBU

Siskel has some strange thoughts, saying that the musical build up to Lector was too dramatic. There are a ton of reviews on YouTube. Siskel also disliked Aliens for being too much action, and the same with the Terminator.

Well, that took me down a Siskel and Ebert review rabbit hole.

That reminds me of one of my favorite Ebert blurbs about the movie The Village:

“To call it an anticlimax would be an insult not only to climaxes but to prefixes. It’s a crummy secret, about one step up the ladder of narrative originality from It Was All a Dream. It’s so witless, in fact, that when we do discover the secret, we want to rewind the film so we don’t know the secret anymore. And then keep on rewinding, and rewinding, until we’re back at the beginning, and can get up from our seats and walk backward out of the theater and go down the up escalator and watch the money spring from the cash register into our pockets.”

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 7:45 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Spaulding wrote:
Franky T wrote:
Well, that took me down a Siskel and Ebert review rabbit hole.


I got a commercial for Marvel and tuned out.

All those movies are the same, there is almost no plot, and the characters are boring. Only pluses are RDJ and some fight scenes, otherwise they are dumb and boring.


I was a HUGE fan of Marvel comics when I was a kid and I had a big collection that I eventually sold to Larry at the comic shop over near Loyola. The thing that made Marvel so much different than D.C. was the way the characters were developed. (This was before the rebooting of Batman as "The Dark Knight." Frank Miller was doing Daredevil for Marvel at the time and I hated his ugly ass pencil work.) The writing was a lot more sophisticated. The characters were real people with real problems. They just happened to have super powers.

Whenever I've attempted to watch a Marvel movie, and admittedly I haven't seen a lot of them, I've been sorely disappointed. It's as if the franchise is geared to be watched in China so the dialogue must be minimal and the action constant. That's the exact opposite of what I have always considered the Marvel ethic.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Whenever I've attempted to watch a Marvel movie, and admittedly I haven't seen a lot of them, I've been sorely disappointed. It's as if the franchise is geared to be watched in China so the dialogue must be minimal and the action constant. That's the exact opposite of what I have always considered the Marvel ethic.
It depends which ones you are watching. The actual Avengers movies are full of what you describe. The character development happens in the other movies dedicated to individuals. They are much more storyline/dialogue based.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37831
Location: ...
Douchebag wrote:
Franky T wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Here is the Siskel and Ebert review: https://youtu.be/fgX0hASKpBU

Siskel has some strange thoughts, saying that the musical build up to Lector was too dramatic. There are a ton of reviews on YouTube. Siskel also disliked Aliens for being too much action, and the same with the Terminator.

Well, that took me down a Siskel and Ebert review rabbit hole.

That reminds me of one of my favorite Ebert blurbs about the movie The Village:

“To call it an anticlimax would be an insult not only to climaxes but to prefixes. It’s a crummy secret, about one step up the ladder of narrative originality from It Was All a Dream. It’s so witless, in fact, that when we do discover the secret, we want to rewind the film so we don’t know the secret anymore. And then keep on rewinding, and rewinding, until we’re back at the beginning, and can get up from our seats and walk backward out of the theater and go down the up escalator and watch the money spring from the cash register into our pockets.”


One of Ebert's best riffs, on "Year of the Horse": And as for the musical segments, they reminded me of nothing more than a group of shaggy mountain men hunkering in a circle and doing imitations of autistic lumberjacks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 8:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Whenever I've attempted to watch a Marvel movie, and admittedly I haven't seen a lot of them, I've been sorely disappointed. It's as if the franchise is geared to be watched in China so the dialogue must be minimal and the action constant. That's the exact opposite of what I have always considered the Marvel ethic.
It depends which ones you are watching. The actual Avengers movies are full of what you describe. The character development happens in the other movies dedicated to individuals. They are much more storyline/dialogue based.



That's why I was interested in Wandavision. If it's a story about the two of them living a suburban life on Long Island and occasionally being interrupted by calls to show up at Tony Stark's Avengers clubhouse in Manhattan to discuss saving mankind and then going out and doing it while struggling to fit in parent-teacher conferences for the twins, that seems cool.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Silence of the Lambs
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2021 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Whenever I've attempted to watch a Marvel movie, and admittedly I haven't seen a lot of them, I've been sorely disappointed. It's as if the franchise is geared to be watched in China so the dialogue must be minimal and the action constant. That's the exact opposite of what I have always considered the Marvel ethic.
It depends which ones you are watching. The actual Avengers movies are full of what you describe. The character development happens in the other movies dedicated to individuals. They are much more storyline/dialogue based.


The Captain America movies are very character driven and not just him.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group