It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 2:59 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
It's not that he's a secret liberal, more that if you say things like "smoking has never given anyone lung cancer," you're either a galactic black hole of cynicism or have an IQ of 12. Then he died of lung cancer from smoking. lol

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2507
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t get the people who say he didn’t believe what he was saying.

I mean that genuinely - is there evidence of him extolling left wing virtues in private while selling snake oil to the rubes?

It’s always seemed a way to dismiss a guy who was effective at boosting a worldview disfavored by MANY. Yet for as many times as I’ve heard this explanation, I’ve never seen somebody explain why it was always a ‘bit.’


You don't think he was trying to push people's buttons to get an emotional response? I have no doubt he was a legit right winger, I just think he was ramping it up to an 11 when it was probably more of a 7 or 8.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Curious Hair wrote:
It's not that he's a secret liberal, more that if you say things like "smoking has never given anyone lung cancer," you're either a galactic black hole of cynicism or have an IQ of 12. Then he died of lung cancer from smoking. lol

But point is I highly doubt he ever said anything like that. Similar to how the AIDS thing that so animated the Spiral Stairs of the world turned out to be a 2 week bit he’s long apologized for, there seems to be a deliberate lack of understanding as to what this guy did and who he was.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
He knew his shtick and he knew his audience.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Warren Newson wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t get the people who say he didn’t believe what he was saying.

I mean that genuinely - is there evidence of him extolling left wing virtues in private while selling snake oil to the rubes?

It’s always seemed a way to dismiss a guy who was effective at boosting a worldview disfavored by MANY. Yet for as many times as I’ve heard this explanation, I’ve never seen somebody explain why it was always a ‘bit.’


You don't think he was trying to push people's buttons to get an emotional response? I have no doubt he was a legit right winger, I just think he was ramping it up to an 11 when it was probably more of a 7 or 8.

I think you’re exactly right. He effectively communicated his audience’s views and ramped those views up for entertainment value.

I don’t claim to be a regular listener or anything. I’d throw him on when I was driving out of Chicago range; he seemed a brilliant off the cuff speaker with a great feel for radio mechanics. Put differently, he seemed a true believer and I think his ability to clearly articulate that worldview helped make him so reviled by the Clintons & Obamas of the world.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2507
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t get the people who say he didn’t believe what he was saying.

I mean that genuinely - is there evidence of him extolling left wing virtues in private while selling snake oil to the rubes?

It’s always seemed a way to dismiss a guy who was effective at boosting a worldview disfavored by MANY. Yet for as many times as I’ve heard this explanation, I’ve never seen somebody explain why it was always a ‘bit.’


You don't think he was trying to push people's buttons to get an emotional response? I have no doubt he was a legit right winger, I just think he was ramping it up to an 11 when it was probably more of a 7 or 8.

I think you’re exactly right. He effectively communicated his audience’s views and ramped those views up for entertainment value.

I don’t claim to be a regular listener or anything. I’d throw him on when I was driving out of Chicago range; he seemed a brilliant off the cuff speaker with a great feel for radio mechanics. Put differently, he seemed a true believer and I think his ability to clearly articulate that worldview helped make him so reviled by the Clintons & Obamas of the world.


In my opinion, deliberately pushing people's emotional buttons is, at least somewhat, cynical.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
It's not that he's a secret liberal, more that if you say things like "smoking has never given anyone lung cancer," you're either a galactic black hole of cynicism or have an IQ of 12. Then he died of lung cancer from smoking. lol

But point is I highly doubt he ever said anything like that. Similar to how the AIDS thing that so animated the Spiral Stairs of the world turned out to be a 2 week bit he’s long apologized for, there seems to be a deliberate lack of understanding as to what this guy did and who he was.

Quote:
Just five years ago, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh went on a pro-tobacco rant on his show, during which he downplayed the risks of smoking, said it’s “a myth” that secondhand smoke causes illness or death and argued that smokers aren’t at any greater risk than people who “eat carrots.”

“Smokers aren’t killing anybody,” the conservative host declared in an April 2015 segment of the “Rush Limbaugh Show,” then argued that tobacco users should be thanked because their purchases generate tax dollars that fund children’s health care programs.

“I’m just saying there ought to be a little appreciation shown for them, instead of having them hated and reviled,” Limbaugh said. “I would like a medal for smoking cigars, is what I’m saying.”


Well, he got his medal, and smoking killed him. Call it even.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2021 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
If that’s the extent of it, you’re a ways off from “smoking has never given anybody lung cancer.”

He’s minimizing second hand smoke, sure. That’s dumb. But he’s more trolling re: the tax benefits availed to society by smokers.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t get the people who say he didn’t believe what he was saying.

I mean that genuinely - is there evidence of him extolling left wing virtues in private while selling snake oil to the rubes?

It’s always seemed a way to dismiss a guy who was effective at boosting a worldview disfavored by MANY. Yet for as many times as I’ve heard this explanation, I’ve never seen somebody explain why it was always a ‘bit.’


You don't think he was trying to push people's buttons to get an emotional response? I have no doubt he was a legit right winger, I just think he was ramping it up to an 11 when it was probably more of a 7 or 8.

I think you’re exactly right. He effectively communicated his audience’s views and ramped those views up for entertainment value.

I don’t claim to be a regular listener or anything. I’d throw him on when I was driving out of Chicago range; he seemed a brilliant off the cuff speaker with a great feel for radio mechanics. Put differently, he seemed a true believer and I think his ability to clearly articulate that worldview helped make him so reviled by the Clintons & Obamas of the world.


Do you think Art Bell believed in most of the stuff he offered on his shows?

I would say it is better described as he didn't disbelieve.

Then he took that not disbelief and exaggerated it and surrounded it with bells and whistles. Classic shock jock radio. Stupid slogans, tchatchkis for sale, radio fights with competitors...all classic shock jock tropes.

Did he get in arguments with station management or have his wife on the air?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
It's not that he's a secret liberal, more that if you say things like "smoking has never given anyone lung cancer," you're either a galactic black hole of cynicism or have an IQ of 12. Then he died of lung cancer from smoking. lol

But point is I highly doubt he ever said anything like that. Similar to how the AIDS thing that so animated the Spiral Stairs of the world turned out to be a 2 week bit he’s long apologized for, there seems to be a deliberate lack of understanding as to what this guy did and who he was.

Quote:
Just five years ago, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh went on a pro-tobacco rant on his show, during which he downplayed the risks of smoking, said it’s “a myth” that secondhand smoke causes illness or death and argued that smokers aren’t at any greater risk than people who “eat carrots.”

“Smokers aren’t killing anybody,” the conservative host declared in an April 2015 segment of the “Rush Limbaugh Show,” then argued that tobacco users should be thanked because their purchases generate tax dollars that fund children’s health care programs.

“I’m just saying there ought to be a little appreciation shown for them, instead of having them hated and reviled,” Limbaugh said. “I would like a medal for smoking cigars, is what I’m saying.”


Well, he got his medal, and smoking killed him. Call it even.


Just looking at the context it seems to me that this:
Quote:
it's “a myth” that secondhand smoke causes illness or death and argued that smokers aren’t at any greater risk than people who “eat carrots.”

may be a misquote that actually did not include the "at".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4040
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I don’t get the people who say he didn’t believe what he was saying.

I mean that genuinely - is there evidence of him extolling left wing virtues in private while selling snake oil to the rubes?

It’s always seemed a way to dismiss a guy who was effective at boosting a worldview disfavored by MANY. Yet for as many times as I’ve heard this explanation, I’ve never seen somebody explain why it was always a ‘bit.’


You don't think he was trying to push people's buttons to get an emotional response? I have no doubt he was a legit right winger, I just think he was ramping it up to an 11 when it was probably more of a 7 or 8.

I think you’re exactly right. He effectively communicated his audience’s views and ramped those views up for entertainment value.

I don’t claim to be a regular listener or anything. I’d throw him on when I was driving out of Chicago range; he seemed a brilliant off the cuff speaker with a great feel for radio mechanics. Put differently, he seemed a true believer and I think his ability to clearly articulate that worldview helped make him so reviled by the Clintons & Obamas of the world.


I hate to burst your bubble, but all those great off the cuff speakers on radio and TV, really aren't speaking off the cuff but have rehearsed and pre-planned the segments 99% of the time. It's professional entertainment, you really think Rush just rolled out of bed and opened the phone lines?

Rush was an entertainer who cultivated and retained a vast audience. There are few people who have done that in radio for the duration that he did it. That's about 98% of his biography right there, and it's a hellava accomplishment. To ascribe anything more to him than that is pure poppycock.

Lets put it this way, how many of his listeners would have been straight ticket democrats had there not been a Rush. I'll start the bidding at zero. He provided entertainment to a radio audience, no different than Stern, Jim Rome, or Dahl.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
One Post wrote:
I hate to burst your bubble, but all those great off the cuff speakers on radio and TV, really aren't speaking off the cuff but have rehearsed and pre-planned the segments 99% of the time. It's professional entertainment, you really think Rush just rolled out of bed and opened the phone lines?

Rush was an entertainer who cultivated and retained a vast audience. There are few people who have done that in radio for the duration that he did it. That's about 98% of his biography right there, and it's a hellava accomplishment. To ascribe anything more to him than that is pure poppycock.

Lets put it this way, how many of his listeners would have been straight ticket democrats had there not been a Rush. I'll start the bidding at zero. He provided entertainment to a radio audience, no different than Stern, Jim Rome, or Dahl.

I’m sure you’re aware that live radio is not 99% scripted. Yes, his show was planned and produced, but he still had to drive it.

Regarding his influence, there are major members of both parties going back decades who felt otherwise re: his impact on the country’s political dialogue. Whether he was shifting voters - or helping recruit new ones - is obviously unknowable. I can’t imagine a down the line Dem would enjoy his content, but I wouldn’t remove the possibility he could persuade people on the margins.

The guy was arguably the most impactful person in political media in the last 40 years aside from maybe Roger Ailes. Stern may be in a similar class in terms of cultural impact; guys like Jim Rome and Steve Dahl are nowhere close.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
I don't think the argument that Rush believed everything he said helps his legacy.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6848
GoldenJet wrote:
He knew his shtick and he knew his audience.


When was the last time you listened to Rush?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
I don't think the argument that Rush believed everything he said helps his legacy.

I think it may be worse if he was in character for 40 years as some type of proto own-the-libs guy.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6848
Brick wrote:
I don't think the argument that Rush believed everything he said helps his legacy.


Everyone on this board has said something they regret. Judging someone's legacy off of a couple stupid comments is lazy. The sad truth is the anti Limbaugh voices have not listened to more then 5 minutes of his radio show in the last decade and base their opinion from leftist who tell them what to think and say.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Juiced wrote:
Brick wrote:
I don't think the argument that Rush believed everything he said helps his legacy.


Everyone on this board has said something they regret. Judging someone's legacy off of a couple stupid comments is lazy. The sad truth is the anti Limbaugh voices have not listened to more then 5 minutes of his radio show in the last decade and base their opinion from leftist who tell them what to think and say.

As a result of my job having me in and out of the car for years, I've always listened in stretches. People would ask why, to which I'd respond for comedic relief. It'd be even funnier when he'd be replaced by obnoxious gasbags like Mark Steyn. His crap was always predictable, lowest common denominator drivel aimed precisely at the prejudices and partisan beliefs of his cult of personality.

Whether he believed it or not is irrelevant, he was consistent over 30+ years in his hate.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Juiced wrote:
Brick wrote:
I don't think the argument that Rush believed everything he said helps his legacy.


Everyone on this board has said something they regret. Judging someone's legacy off of a couple stupid comments is lazy. The sad truth is the anti Limbaugh voices have not listened to more then 5 minutes of his radio show in the last decade and base their opinion from leftist who tell them what to think and say.
I wouldn't judge him based on only a few comments but that also doesn't mean those stupid comments cease to exist.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:33 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Brick wrote:
Juiced wrote:
Brick wrote:
I don't think the argument that Rush believed everything he said helps his legacy.


Everyone on this board has said something they regret. Judging someone's legacy off of a couple stupid comments is lazy. The sad truth is the anti Limbaugh voices have not listened to more then 5 minutes of his radio show in the last decade and base their opinion from leftist who tell them what to think and say.
I wouldn't judge him based on only a few comments but that also doesn't mean those stupid comments cease to exist.


Does anyone believe Limbaugh made only "a few" stupid comments during his career? :lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:45 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Tall Midget wrote:
Does anyone believe Limbaugh made only "a few" stupid comments during his career? :lol:
Drake LaRrieta
Caller Bob
waitingforruffcorn

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Does anyone believe Limbaugh made only "a few" stupid comments during his career? :lol:
Drake LaRrieta
Caller Bob
waitingforruffcorn


I believe I called Limbaugh "morally" a piece of shit a few pages back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Does anyone believe Limbaugh made only "a few" stupid comments during his career? :lol:
Drake LaRrieta
Caller Bob
waitingforruffcorn


You stole Patron Saint's bit.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Does anyone believe Limbaugh made only "a few" stupid comments during his career? :lol:
Drake LaRrieta
Caller Bob
waitingforruffcorn


You stole Patron Saint's bit.


And he's terrible at it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4040
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
One Post wrote:
I hate to burst your bubble, but all those great off the cuff speakers on radio and TV, really aren't speaking off the cuff but have rehearsed and pre-planned the segments 99% of the time. It's professional entertainment, you really think Rush just rolled out of bed and opened the phone lines?

Rush was an entertainer who cultivated and retained a vast audience. There are few people who have done that in radio for the duration that he did it. That's about 98% of his biography right there, and it's a hellava accomplishment. To ascribe anything more to him than that is pure poppycock.

Lets put it this way, how many of his listeners would have been straight ticket democrats had there not been a Rush. I'll start the bidding at zero. He provided entertainment to a radio audience, no different than Stern, Jim Rome, or Dahl.

I’m sure you’re aware that live radio is not 99% scripted. Yes, his show was planned and produced, but he still had to drive it.



Rush took calls that his phone screener put up that were based on the four topics of the day that he and his production team spent hours prepping for, researching, and planning for.

You show put up a clip of him extemporaneously deep dive analyzing Benelux within the context of the broader EU, and then yeah, I'll agree that he's working with no net. He's no more or less planned any any other professional radio personality on a national scale, which is to say, he's entirely planned from stem to stern.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
One Post wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
One Post wrote:
I hate to burst your bubble, but all those great off the cuff speakers on radio and TV, really aren't speaking off the cuff but have rehearsed and pre-planned the segments 99% of the time. It's professional entertainment, you really think Rush just rolled out of bed and opened the phone lines?

Rush was an entertainer who cultivated and retained a vast audience. There are few people who have done that in radio for the duration that he did it. That's about 98% of his biography right there, and it's a hellava accomplishment. To ascribe anything more to him than that is pure poppycock.

Lets put it this way, how many of his listeners would have been straight ticket democrats had there not been a Rush. I'll start the bidding at zero. He provided entertainment to a radio audience, no different than Stern, Jim Rome, or Dahl.

I’m sure you’re aware that live radio is not 99% scripted. Yes, his show was planned and produced, but he still had to drive it.



Rush took calls that his phone screener put up that were based on the four topics of the day that he and his production team spent hours prepping for, researching, and planning for.

You show put up a clip of him extemporaneously deep dive analyzing Benelux within the context of the broader EU, and then yeah, I'll agree that he's working with no net. He's no more or less planned any any other professional radio personality on a national scale, which is to say, he's entirely planned from stem to stern.

But there’s obviously a difference between prep and scripting out the show. Given his success, I’m sure his team planned & prepped better than most. He still had to run the show when it was time to go on air.

The point was he was extremely talented at what he did, arguably more so than anybody in the history of the medium. That’s my error if I made it seem otherwise.

Your Benelux example would probably end up the political equivalent of Grobber’s show - meandering, unfocused, etc. Who - outside of those interested in the Wikipedia definition of a 3-technique - would want to listen to that?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
One Post wrote:
I hate to burst your bubble, but all those great off the cuff speakers on radio and TV, really aren't speaking off the cuff but have rehearsed and pre-planned the segments 99% of the time. It's professional entertainment, you really think Rush just rolled out of bed and opened the phone lines?

Yeah, who was he, Dan Bernstein?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
[
The point was he was extremely talented at what he did, arguably more so than anybody in the history of the medium. That’s my error if I made it seem otherwise.



I assume you mean political talk radio by medium.

I don't think he would rank very highly if you mean all radio personalities.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24040
pizza_Place: Pizanos
good dolphin wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The point was he was extremely talented at what he did, arguably more so than anybody in the history of the medium. That’s my error if I made it seem otherwise.



I assume you mean political talk radio by medium.

I don't think he would rank very highly if you mean all radio personalities.

No, I meant all irrespective of genre. At the very least he’s in the team photo (though probably not on the team for next year).

Who clearly outranks him?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The point was he was extremely talented at what he did, arguably more so than anybody in the history of the medium. That’s my error if I made it seem otherwise.



I assume you mean political talk radio by medium.

I don't think he would rank very highly if you mean all radio personalities.

No, I meant all irrespective of genre. At the very least he’s in the team photo (though probably not on the team for next year).

Who clearly outranks him?

Talent is hard to quantify

As far as making an impact, he's in the top tier for sure


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The point was he was extremely talented at what he did, arguably more so than anybody in the history of the medium. That’s my error if I made it seem otherwise.



I assume you mean political talk radio by medium.

I don't think he would rank very highly if you mean all radio personalities.

No, I meant all irrespective of genre. At the very least he’s in the team photo (though probably not on the team for next year).

Who clearly outranks him?


He couldn't crack the Loop lineup of Brandmeier, Stern, Dahl and Matthews back in the day. That is just a starting point. Most of the big markets had at least one incredibly talented guy, but they radio was local.

I don't see any real great radio talent from Rush. He was niche radio. I doubt he would have made it as a general talk entertainer.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group