It is currently Fri Sep 20, 2024 1:21 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 402 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 11:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72347
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’ll happily wear being wrong on Fields.

I liked the move and appreciate trading up for a guy I feel like can compete with NFL athletes.

Wrong? Might be misremembering but thought you were on board with the Fields is obviously the 2nd best QB in this class train

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 11:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72347
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jbi11s wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Nas wrote:
Doc and Dolphin, how good do you guys think Fields can be? Doc which quarterbacks would you have taken ahead of Fields?


I would have taken Fields over Wilson. Probably would have.

Lawrence
Lance
Fields
Wilson

I think the ceiling for Fields is 2nd only to Lawrence and not by much. But, he’s no sure thing. He’s worth a shot.

The thing to look at is next year’s QB class is garbage. Fields would be the clear #1 next year if he were in it. This is the Bears chance to get someone. I’m cool with it.

Hold on.

Wait a minute.

Dillon Gabriel is a stud.

Not even close to Fields

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 12:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Osu has produced nfl the qb and no nfl team really produces nfl qb but the logical would be fallacious even if you were correct on the premises


You can't pay for that kind of analysis.

But you can trade a flask of Skol for it.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 1:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Either he's terrible or an All Pro rookie season before there is tape of him slapping the shit out of his girlfriend with a hard loaf of french bread. Bears.


BEARS!!!


BEEEEEEAAAARRSSSSSSSS!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 4:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4724
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
We gave away two first rounders again for a guy that has a weak arm and a bad throwing motion.

Barely can throw the ball 50 yards but, hey, he can run.

Another bust pick. The Bears overpaid again at the position. They never learn.

The Patriots are laughing they got Mac Jones at 15 and the Bears didn't take him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 5:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38458
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
He’ll be lucky to have the career of Mike Tomczak

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 5:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Doesn't know how to read defenses, just like the guy before him. Should have probably just traded for Mitch.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 5:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
One of the dumbest most desperate and irresponsible draft pick with a trade I've ever seen. There is no way that Pace should ever have been allowed to set the franchise back for another half decade by once again making a series of stupid decisions. This locked the Bears into another decade of mediocrity and we should probably start scouting high school junior quarterbacks so we know who we want to draft in 5 years. Pace has solidified himself as the worst GM in Bears history with this latest move.

That's what I expected to think after the draft. Instead, I think as long as you concentrate only on the trade and pick, and not the previous mistakes made by Pace in regards to trading away draft picks, it's a good and defensible trade to have made to catch the qb falling in the draft that could have went as high as 2 overall and clearly has the potential to be an elite player in the NFL. Drafting a QB, outside of pick 1, is mostly luck. You can increase your odds, and Fields has just as high of odds as anyone else out there besides Trevor. The price was steep, but at least the other picks are in the later rounds. Those picks are compounded by some of the other ways that Pace gave up draft picks for very little payoff.

The got a quarterback with a high first round grade. See how it works for 3 or 4 years and be ready to move on if it doesn't to try again.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 6:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 3942
pizza_Place: Lino's
Nagy can now open up the RPO playbook, Fields is more than athletic enough to be a threat to run the ball, but will he be able to read the D and be able to take advantage of the big play opportunities that Mitch always missed? One of the biggest knocks on Fields was that he tended to hold the ball too long and his mechanics broke down, sounds like Mitch 2.0. That said, Pace/Nagy had to make this move to save their jobs, they had painted themselves into a corner at QB and had no other option other than to mortgage the future. The franchise is way overdue to hit on a QB, maybe this time they will actually succeed, will be able to tell pretty quickly if he has the ability to read NFL defenses.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 6:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Brick is exactly right. Ownership is to blame for this pick. Rarely, if ever, is an NFL GM allowed to attempt to correct a colossal mistake at QB. But, that's the Bears


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 6:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41286
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
You can question many things about Fields, but he doesnt have a weak arm. Rube is an idiot


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4724
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Caller Bob wrote:
You can question many things about Fields, but he doesnt have a weak arm. Rube is an idiot


You're the idiot. He throws long balls like punts. He's no Dan Fouts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 22691
pizza_Place: Pizanos
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’ll happily wear being wrong on Fields.

I liked the move and appreciate trading up for a guy I feel like can compete with NFL athletes.

Wrong? Might be misremembering but thought you were on board with the Fields is obviously the 2nd best QB in this class train

Correct. I’m saying I think he’ll be great and if he’s not, I’ll own that incorrect assessment.

Probably shouldn’t have written I’d do it happily, but just trying to make the point I like the guy and I’m glad Pace made the move.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
So Rube and Antioch are the only ones who think Fields will suck?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41286
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Brick wrote:
So Rube and Antioch are the only ones who think Fields will suck?

He might suck, but he doesnt have weak arm.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 22691
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
So Rube and Antioch are the only ones who think Fields will suck?

Correct. And Brick and PM are the only ones blaming ownership for this disaster of a pick.

I propose a tag team match to determine who hates the pick for the right reasons.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
I love the pick.

I'm just saying Pace wouldn't have had this chance with any other team. That's on George and Ted


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Clawmaster wrote:
Nagy can now open up the RPO playbook, Fields is more than athletic enough to be a threat to run the ball, but will he be able to read the D and be able to take advantage of the big play opportunities that Mitch always missed? One of the biggest knocks on Fields was that he tended to hold the ball too long and his mechanics broke down, sounds like Mitch 2.0. That said, Pace/Nagy had to make this move to save their jobs, they had painted themselves into a corner at QB and had no other option other than to mortgage the future. The franchise is way overdue to hit on a QB, maybe this time they will actually succeed, will be able to tell pretty quickly if he has the ability to read NFL defenses.

So the RPO book wasn’t open with Mitch?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10711
Location: Lindenhurst
pizza_Place: 1. Aurelio's 2. Pizano's
Brick wrote:
So Rube and Antioch are the only ones who think Fields will suck?

I think Fields will suck.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
Peoria Matt wrote:
I love the pick.

I'm just saying Pace wouldn't have had this chance with any other team. That's on George and Ted

Yup.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4687
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
blackhawksfan wrote:
Justin Fields Throws 3 INTERCEPTIONS vs. Indiana | #3 Ohio State vs. #9 Indiana 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaxXD-plado




I’m not going to bother posting a YouTube video of Fields 6 td’s against Clemson..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 8:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4687
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:




lol @ this tired ass talking point.. yeah, Texas Tech was a school that ‘couldn’t produce NFL QB’s’ either. Till they did.


It’s no different than saying shit like ‘he was surrounded by future NFL talent’.. ok, so was Trevor Lawrence. So was Joe Burrow. So was Peyton Manning. So was Joe Montana.. lol.


Get new material. Stuff like this is just a lazy way of trying to justify ones opinion. There’s literally zero critical analysis of the player as an individual in these statements.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Last edited by NME on Fri Apr 30, 2021 8:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 32634
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
NME wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
Justin Fields Throws 3 INTERCEPTIONS vs. Indiana | #3 Ohio State vs. #9 Indiana 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaxXD-plado




I’m not going to bother posting a YouTube video of Fields 6 td’s against Clemson..


Do you know which former Big Ten QB who is going to enter the HoF threw a lot of college picks? Drew Brees-20, 12, 12. I thought that dude had no shot in the NFL.

The QB’s that make it in the NFL are next to impossible to predict.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 56712
Caller Bob wrote:
Brick wrote:
So Rube and Antioch are the only ones who think Fields will suck?

He might suck, but he doesnt have weak arm.

If you want to be down on Fields that is fine. But there is no way shape or form the man has a weak arm. That is just idiotic, but that is what we expect from Rube.

Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40336
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Hockey Gay wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Either he's terrible or an All Pro rookie season before there is tape of him slapping the shit out of his girlfriend with a hard loaf of french bread. Bears.


BEARS!!!


BEEEEEEAAAARRSSSSSSSS!!!!!


Where the hell you been?

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4687
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
denisdman wrote:
NME wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
Justin Fields Throws 3 INTERCEPTIONS vs. Indiana | #3 Ohio State vs. #9 Indiana 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaxXD-plado




I’m not going to bother posting a YouTube video of Fields 6 td’s against Clemson..


Do you know which former Big Ten QB who is going to enter the HoF threw a lot of college picks? Drew Brees-20, 12, 12. I thought that dude had no shot in the NFL.

The QB’s that make it in the NFL are next to impossible to predict.




Agreed. Landing with the right team/coaches at the next level matters too. As I’ve said a few times now I like Fields but I don’t like Nagy. We’ll see what happens when the pads go on.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
NME wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:




lol @ this tired ass talking point.. yeah, Texas Tech was a school that ‘couldn’t produce NFL QB’s’ either. Till they did.


It’s no different than saying shit like ‘he was surrounded by future NFL talent’.. ok, so was Trevor Lawrence. So was Joe Burrow. So was Peyton Manning. So was Joe Montana.. lol.


Get new material. Stuff like this is just a lazy way of trying to justify ones opinion. There’s literally zero critical analysis of the player as an individual in these statements.


I would feel better about the pick if it wasn't made by the same talent evaluators that had to trade picks because Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was certainly better than Mahomes or Watson. I have no idea if Fields will be great or terrible. He's a great athlete. Hope that translates to NFL quarterback.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 8:28 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29025
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
NME wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:




lol @ this tired ass talking point.. yeah, Texas Tech was a school that ‘couldn’t produce NFL QB’s’ either. Till they did.


It’s no different than saying shit like ‘he was surrounded by future NFL talent’.. ok, so was Trevor Lawrence. So was Joe Burrow. So was Peyton Manning. So was Joe Montana.. lol.


Get new material. Stuff like this is just a lazy way of trying to justify ones opinion. There’s literally zero critical analysis of the player as an individual in these statements.


I would feel better about the pick if it wasn't made by the same talent evaluators that had to trade picks because Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was certainly better than Mahomes or Watson. I have no idea if Fields will be great or terrible. He's a great athlete. Hope that translates to NFL quarterback.


Isn't the assumption that Fields was selected by Nagy rather than Pace?

Didn't Nagy have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky ranked behind Watson and Mahomes?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Better be fields
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2021 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The story was that Nagy loved (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, and that's one of the reasons he wanted to come to Chicago. Who knows though? I'm pretty sure Nagy pushed to get Foles though, which seems like an error in talent evaluation.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 402 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group