Says the person who made the deep-throated defense of LTG as unfairly picked on once again last weekend. Interesting projection going on though.

Private businesses can refuse to serve a product. They can't refuse to serve a person. I'm sure you understand the difference.

That's a fair point, Frank, if- as I pointed out above- the place of business were taking a conciliatory stance with the customers it was excluding rather than using a policy to shame them and promote a medical procedure. You showed that terse sign as evidence they were doing that, but to me it read like, "HEY, YOU DON'T LIKE IT? CALL THE CITY." and when taken along with the clearly pro-experimental vaccine language used by the employees and the accepted customers, well, it's obviously not a place I'm interested in patronizing.

Is that an unfair opinion? Perhaps. But I do find it odd that in a place where people often call for others to die and mercilessly attack the looks of others, I'm somehow the poster boy for anger. It's actually kind of funny when you think about it.

It feels like some of you are just trying to piss people off and spread anger, or incite it.
This is the kind of thing that drives folks away.
If your goals are to grind the board down and kill it, this is a solid tactic.

As a (relatively) new poster, I’ll disagree - respectfully of course.

I enjoy the arguing. Some of it gets annoying - e.g., Nas could’ve dropped the lapdog bit after a post but kept it running for some reason - but it’s still more entertaining than people gaslighting me that the Sox Vandy-tribute unis aren’t pure trash.

I've been there enough. I won't go again regardless. But that isn't the point.

I've been there. We got kicked out because somebody in our crowd knocked a table over full of beers.

Oh, and my buddy DJ lit his chest on fire.

They had rules even then.