Zac Stacy thread

_________________

Not according to MANY who struggle with Covid-19 protocols.

Now they're suggesting that we need to come down hard on middle school criminals before an epidemic of middle school violent crimes break out in the city and country.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

Shouldn't everyone want to come down hard on criminals? Particularly on multiple time ones?

_________________

Is this what you are referring to?

_________________

Yes

_________________

Also this:

_________________

So the reason not to lock up a middle schooler committing multiple violent crimes with a gun is because there aren't more middle schoolers committing violent gun crimes? Do you honestly think you look like you're doing anything other than trying to excuse an 11-year old committing repeated violent crime?

Who are the researchers?

_________________

I asked VitoScot the same question.

_________________

No answer?

_________________

Negative

_________________

What does it matter who the researchers are?

It's another example of vitoSCOTi posting things that are just as bad if not worse than some of the things America posted, yet Seacrest continues to remain obtuse and turns a blind eye.

_________________

Maybe where you live coming down hard on middle school kids (That aren't their own) makes sense, but no, I don't think coming down hard on any middle school child is ever a solution.

How young is too young for you? Are there any crimes that we shouldn't come down hard on middle school kids for? What about the use and distribution of "illegal' drugs and pills inside of school?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

He capitalized black though, so he’s either: 1) closely following the AP style guide, 2) respectfully disrespectful or 3) copying & pasting from somewhere. Option 3 could probably clear up the identity of these researchers.

_________________

Generally agree was kind of a giveaway I think.

Here is a quick google search of domestic violence rates by race.

https://www.google.com/search?q=domesti ... nt=gws-wiz

_________________

Is this thread still about the prolific (armed) carjacker?

_________________

I don't think you get to act like the moral authority when you're the one excusing violent crimes.

If they keep letting him out he's eventually going to kill someone during one of these carjackings. Should we just wait until that happens before coming down hard on him?

_________________

Sticking him into a system where he is bound to be abused and quite possibly raped will almost guarantee he will end up killing someone.

_________________

I did the work so nobody else has to…

Seems like a cut & paste from here: https://www.verywellmind.com/domestic-v ... city-62648

That links back to a 10yr old report from our very trustworthy friends at the CDC.

_________________

So the Catholic Church is out

_________________

https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/ocdv/downlo ... ty-Sex.pdf

I do not think that anyone here believes that NYC is racist for publishing that study.

So if there is a problem, why not address it?

_________________

Of course it has to be one or the other, right?

Nobody is saying throw an 11 year old "in a cage" after their first offense. Maybe not even after their second. But when the Chicago Police Supt says, and I quote, "Unfortunately, this 11-year-old has been arrested before and he is considered a prolific carjacker in our city," simply letting him go is not the answer either. 11 years old is old enough to know that you don't stick a gun into somebody's face and steal their car. Its wrong the first, second, third, and fourth time.

_________________

How to deal with juvenile offenders is a tough problem, no doubt. But this kid has a bad enough rap sheet that the Chief of Police called him "prolific". There are juvenile facilities for young offenders like him.

_________________

For me, violent crimes have to have consequences. If there are multiple crimes the consequences get more severe every time.

Let me turn the question around to you now. Is there any crime for you that would warrant coming down hard on an 11 year old for?

_________________

The stats on the Catholic Church don't back up your assertion.

But The White Knight comes to share his own personal bigotry.

Frank is posting in this thread. Leave the stupidity to him.

_________________

MANY in this thread believe that we need to do more to cure a middle school violent crime epidemic that doesn't exist anywhere in our country. While simultaneously fighting any attempts to get rid of a pandemic that has killed nearly 10 million people worldwide. It just doesn't make sense to me like many of the inconsistent and overly emotional takes in this community.

I'm not saying that an 11 year old kid shouldn't get in trouble/be punished for an armed robbery or any other crimes that they commit. I just don't see a reason why we need to find ways to impose harsher penalties on someone who hasn't even had their first wet dream yet and whose brain won't be fully developed for another 14 years.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

Same problems exist in the juvenile facilities.

_________________

what happened to the dreaded audy homes?

maybe we can use some federal covid money for this? after all, we'll be using it for some families getting $500 a month in guaranteed income.

viewtopic.php?f=168&t=126484

I notice you didn't post in that thread.

You calling others out for being stupid is even worse than Caller Bob running around posting his ankle biter gif.

_________________