It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 359 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
In limited doses that the ignore function allows, Frank is comedic gold on this board.
You have mentioned my name 27 times over the last 5 days.

https://chicagofanatics.com/search.php? ... mit=Search

I reside in the penthouse of your feeble mind, not on your foe list.

Frank....I like you....you are a valued member of the board, but for the Love of God...Spaulding just knocked you on your ass with a truth bomb.

You bitching about Crest ignoring and replying is just as bad as Caller Bob and vaccination.....LET IT GO. No one cares.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:55 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Missing Link wrote:
Nas wrote:
Anecdotes of desired outcomes should not dictate policies in schools or in any other areas in the country.


Its not really anecdotal though. This was just one of the more egregious instances of it happening. And once this comes out (From what I am hearing) heads are going to roll. As they should.


The kid allegedly brought a gun to the conference prior to the shooting.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
They charged the parents in the Michigan case. That seems to be extreme, but there is a part of me that at times wishes parents were held legally accountable for some of their kids actions.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
Nas wrote:
They charged the parents in the Michigan case. That seems to be extreme, but there is a part of me that at times wishes parents were held legally accountable for some of their kids actions.

Saying so almost cost that exec from McDonald's his job (in the case of Adam Toledo).

It sure seemed like the parents here were opening the door to this kid's behavior, though.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38699
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
They charged the parents in the Michigan case. That seems to be extreme, but there is a part of me that at times wishes parents were held legally accountable for some of their kids actions.


:scratch: OK so the parents werent legally required to keep the gun locked up. What could they possibly be charged with ?

It was not immediately clear what charges the parents, James and Jennifer Crumbley, could face. Oxford County Prosecuting Attorney Karen McDonald, who has said she is considering charging them, has suggested they were negligent in allowing their son access to the gun.

Unlike some states, Michigan does not legally require gun owners to keep their firearms secured from children.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92102
Location: To the left of my post
badrogue17 wrote:
Nas wrote:
They charged the parents in the Michigan case. That seems to be extreme, but there is a part of me that at times wishes parents were held legally accountable for some of their kids actions.


:scratch: OK so the parents werent legally required to keep the gun locked up. What could they possibly be charged with ?

It was not immediately clear what charges the parents, James and Jennifer Crumbley, could face. Oxford County Prosecuting Attorney Karen McDonald, who has said she is considering charging them, has suggested they were negligent in allowing their son access to the gun.

Unlike some states, Michigan does not legally require gun owners to keep their firearms secured from children.

I would guess it's the same type of laws that apply when you don't lock up your alcohol but knowingly and willingly let your children use it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
badrogue17 wrote:
Nas wrote:
They charged the parents in the Michigan case. That seems to be extreme, but there is a part of me that at times wishes parents were held legally accountable for some of their kids actions.


:scratch: OK so the parents werent legally required to keep the gun locked up. What could they possibly be charged with ?

It was not immediately clear what charges the parents, James and Jennifer Crumbley, could face. Oxford County Prosecuting Attorney Karen McDonald, who has said she is considering charging them, has suggested they were negligent in allowing their son access to the gun.

Unlike some states, Michigan does not legally require gun owners to keep their firearms secured from children.


 A Michigan prosecutor on Friday filed involuntary manslaughter charges against the parents of the 15-year-old suspect in the Oxford High School shooting.

Jennifer and James Crumbley were each charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter after their son, Ethan, was accused of fatally shooting four students at the suburban Detroit school on Tuesday.

Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald previously called Crumbley's parent's actions “far beyond negligence."



https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat ... 850669002/

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Last edited by Nas on Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

What about those kids who are just bullies?

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38699
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

Should the parent of our 11 year old prolific carjacker face charges ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Wayne Kerr wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

What about those kids who are just bullies?



What about them? Don't understand what you are asking.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2954
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
they planning on charging any of the school officials? if we're seeking ultimate culpability, school had two known instances for concern couple days prior and kept him enrolled.

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
badrogue17 wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

Should the parent of our 11 year old prolific carjacker face charges ?

Or Adam Toledo, who was out at two in the morning.

People seem to respond to those questions differently and say that the parents can't control them.

I am not saying the carjacker's parents should be charged, but we have to untangle the reasons here, or decide what and what does not count as negligence. Is it if you got the tools for the crime at home, you are in trouble? I am literally asking.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
shakes wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

What about those kids who are just bullies?



What about them? Don't understand what you are asking.

I mean, are parents responsible for them, too? I suppose maybe if they commit a crime?

I seriously am just asking. (I know that's a meme, but that's not what I mean.)

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92102
Location: To the left of my post
badrogue17 wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

Should the parent of our 11 year old prolific carjacker face charges ?

If they provided him the gun to do it? Yes.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
badrogue17 wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

Should the parent of our 11 year old prolific carjacker face charges ?



It's worse when you bring a gun into a house with children and then basically treat it like you treat the family toaster, but in extreme circumstances I think all parents should be looked at for culpability. A kid who keeps carjacking? For sure charge the parents.

Is there a better deterrent to child crime than holding their parents responsible? I would think parents would take a lot more interest in stopping their kids from committing crimes if they were in danger of going to the big house if they didn't.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
they planning on charging any of the school officials? if we're seeking ultimate culpability, school had two known instances for concern couple days prior and kept him enrolled.

Yeah I agree.

The school fucked up in a way that goes beyond negligence as well.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38699
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Brick wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

Should the parent of our 11 year old prolific carjacker face charges ?

If they provided him the gun to do it? Yes.

Wait. Is the story that the parents bought the gun and gave it to the Michigan kid ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.


You would have significantly less street violence from minors. It would be hard to enforce though. While there are a lot of awful parents, you can't ignore the reality that government dictates a lot when it comes to parenting. Plus, there are those outlier kids who'll intentionally do things to get their parents in trouble because they hate them.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
badrogue17 wrote:
Brick wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

Should the parent of our 11 year old prolific carjacker face charges ?

If they provided him the gun to do it? Yes.

Wait. Is the story that the parents bought the gun and gave it to the Michigan kid ?


Yes

4 days before the shooting.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:45 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
badrogue17 wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

Should the parent of our 11 year old prolific carjacker face charges ?


Yes

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Wayne Kerr wrote:
shakes wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

What about those kids who are just bullies?



What about them? Don't understand what you are asking.

I mean, are parents responsible for them, too? I suppose maybe if they commit a crime?

I seriously am just asking. (I know that's a meme, but that's not what I mean.)


For me, I think a crime committed has to be extreme in nature, forseeable given the pre-crime factors and preventable with some non negligent parenting before I would hold parents responsible. I don't think simple bullying would qualify, but if the bullying went on and on and someone was greatly harmed and all the factors above were met then yes, parents could be held responsible.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
Nas wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.


You would have significantly less street violence from minors. It would be hard to enforce though. While there are a lot of awful parents, you can't ignore the reality that government dictates a lot when it comes to parenting. Plus, there are those outlier kids who'll intentionally do things to get their parents in trouble because they hate them.

I think Kamala Harris tried to do something like this with school.

I'm not sure some parents have much control over their kids. Others don't care. Start charging parents....and that's gonna go sideways real quick. It also depends on how you define parent.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
shakes wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
shakes wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

What about those kids who are just bullies?



What about them? Don't understand what you are asking.

I mean, are parents responsible for them, too? I suppose maybe if they commit a crime?

I seriously am just asking. (I know that's a meme, but that's not what I mean.)


For me, I think a crime committed has to be extreme in nature, forseeable given the pre-crime factors and preventable with some non negligent parenting before I would hold parents responsible. I don't think simple bullying would qualify, but if the bullying went on and on and someone was greatly harmed and all the factors above were met then yes, parents could be held responsible.

Gotcha. Thank you, that was very clear.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38699
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jbi11s wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Brick wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

Should the parent of our 11 year old prolific carjacker face charges ?

If they provided him the gun to do it? Yes.

Wait. Is the story that the parents bought the gun and gave it to the Michigan kid ?


Yes

4 days before the shooting.

I know dad bought a gun prior to the shooting. I didnt know he gave it to junior.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38699
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.


You would have significantly less street violence from minors. It would be hard to enforce though. While there are a lot of awful parents, you can't ignore the reality that government dictates a lot when it comes to parenting. Plus, there are those outlier kids who'll intentionally do things to get their parents in trouble because they hate them.

I think Kamala Harris tried to do something like this with school.

I'm not sure some parents have much control over their kids. Others don't care. Start charging parents....and that's gonna go sideways real quick. It also depends on how you define parent.

And its going to disproportionately affect black parents.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.


You would have significantly less street violence from minors. It would be hard to enforce though. While there are a lot of awful parents, you can't ignore the reality that government dictates a lot when it comes to parenting. Plus, there are those outlier kids who'll intentionally do things to get their parents in trouble because they hate them.

I think Kamala Harris tried to do something like this with school.

I'm not sure some parents have much control over their kids. Others don't care. Start charging parents....and that's gonna go sideways real quick. It also depends on how you define parent.


A child not coming to school isn't a reason to arrest a parent IMO. Neither would drug use. I'm thinking more along the lines of violent crimes.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
badrogue17 wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.


You would have significantly less street violence from minors. It would be hard to enforce though. While there are a lot of awful parents, you can't ignore the reality that government dictates a lot when it comes to parenting. Plus, there are those outlier kids who'll intentionally do things to get their parents in trouble because they hate them.

I think Kamala Harris tried to do something like this with school.

I'm not sure some parents have much control over their kids. Others don't care. Start charging parents....and that's gonna go sideways real quick. It also depends on how you define parent.

And its going to disproportionately affect black parents.


That’s the report I read, but maybe it was wrong.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92102
Location: To the left of my post
badrogue17 wrote:
Brick wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.

Should the parent of our 11 year old prolific carjacker face charges ?

If they provided him the gun to do it? Yes.

Wait. Is the story that the parents bought the gun and gave it to the Michigan kid ?

Yes. He was posting with it on social media and that is where the parents are likely going to be in trouble. This isn't just a "He took the gun without my permission" situation.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38699
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
shakes wrote:
There should be a charge similar to dram shop. We hold bars responsible when their customers get hammered and then drive home and cause an accident. Same policy applies here in holding parents responsible when they don't raise or supervise their kids right and the kids go out and shoot up their schools.

I think it's good public policy to hold parents responsible for what their kids do.


You would have significantly less street violence from minors. It would be hard to enforce though. While there are a lot of awful parents, you can't ignore the reality that government dictates a lot when it comes to parenting. Plus, there are those outlier kids who'll intentionally do things to get their parents in trouble because they hate them.

I think Kamala Harris tried to do something like this with school.

I'm not sure some parents have much control over their kids. Others don't care. Start charging parents....and that's gonna go sideways real quick. It also depends on how you define parent.


A child not coming to school isn't a reason to arrest a parent IMO. Neither would drug use. I'm thinking more along the lines of violent crimes.

Juvenile records are sealed, etc. I thought the whole idea was to give kids a clean slate at 18. Now we want to start throwing parents in jail for their repeatedly violent juvenile ( where the crimes arent really supposed to count) kids ? How do you see that going ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 359 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group