Jaw Breaker wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
3/71 is a great deal for Stroman in this market.
Maybe, but that says more about the market than Stroman. One 8th place finish in Cy Young in his career and one All-star appearance. Sorry if I expect more from an ace.
I don't know why you are so hung up on the Cubs signing an ace. An ace is wasted on this team, they need warm bodies who can maybe keep them in games. The team was gutted last year. This isn't the time to invest big money long term in an ace.
I wanted Scherzer 7 years ago; the Cubs took Lester, who was cheaper. I wanted Scherzer now; the Cubs took Stroman, who was cheaper. I'm always told "why do you care what Ricketts spends...it's not your money." Well, if that's the case, let's see the Cubs be a top 5 payroll every year. I have no interest in going through another Plan. Is Stroman the new Edwin Jackson?
I think part of the problem is the Dodgers, who have built the right way and spent the right money but only have 1 WS and that in a strike year. You do all the right moves, pay the right money, get all the bites at the apple, and you're the Bills of MLB.