It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:08 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16822
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Drunk Squirrel wrote:
billypootons wrote:
they have a black dog so they cant be racists



The dog leaked the video.


noticed the dog took a knee and didn't give chase when they were apprehending the burglar




Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Is she an appointed or elected judge?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16822
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Spaulding wrote:
Who here blamed it on rum in the past?


An ex-gf used to get violent and then violently horny when she drank gin. But I don't think anything matches the caffeinated malt liquor stupidity of about a decade back. Shortest distance btw wherever you were and the drunk tank: 3 original (now banned) Four Lokos


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
:lol:

How have I never heard that song?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16822
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Is she an appointed or elected judge?



looks like she was first elected in 2020:

Image

crappy google images screengrab, need to have fuckfacebook to view the original.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16822
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Jbi11s wrote:
:lol:

How have I never heard that song?



catchy tune, loko on dey ass, loko on dey ass i like the joe the plumber or larry the whatever guy accent on git er dun


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 9:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

+1

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.

Yeah I don’t get that POV either, unless it’s trying to do a confirmation bias thing.

The lady is obviously a piece of shit; I guess it’s fair to assess her judicial record to see if the racism comes through in court, but I very much doubt that’s what’s coming next.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 7:45 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.


Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:31 am
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Le Grand Pizza
https://g.factoryoutletstore.com/detail ... ry_id=1637


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:12 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.


Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.



Aren't posts like the one above the reason WaitingforRuffcorn is considered a racist?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.


Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.



Aren't posts like the one above the reason WaitingforRuffcorn is considered a racist?


No

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.


Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.



Aren't posts like the one above the reason WaitingforRuffcorn is considered a racist?


She what I mean by certain people being apologists for racism? And it starts right at the very top around here.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.


Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.



Aren't posts like the one above the reason WaitingforRuffcorn is considered a racist?


No


I think so.

I also think Nas's position is eminently reasonable. I'm just pretty certain it might be received a lot differently were it expressed by someone else.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.


Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.

^

What you said earlier was rational. If there is a clear bias in her rulings, then we have a huge problem.

Like I said before, it just shocks me when a parent uses a racial slur in front of a (younger) child. One of the most interesting phenomenons I have seen is people who will occasionally use a racist slur (pretty much the N-word, but others, too) around close friends will NEVER use one around their children. There's a recognition there either that you have to break the chain or that having a child who drops racial slurs may not, as former poster Apologist* once put it, prepare you well for the 21st century, or both.

I never know what to think when someone (not just Whites, but mostly) will use a racial slur when talking to me. It's like they trust me that I'm cool with it, or almost like they are confiding something. They'll whisper it, too. I am sure this will enrage some of the context-free Millennials on this site, but it's actually really funny, kind of like a real-life Michael Scott moment.

* who incidentally left this board due to someone dropping a racial slur on him. Too bad; he was cool. Nas was the only one to call the person (a person who is hilarious but sometimes bobs in vileness, as we all do) out.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2021 5:52 am
Posts: 33
pizza_Place: What About Burgers
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I think so.

I also think Nas's position is eminently reasonable. I'm just pretty certain it might be received a lot differently were it expressed by someone else.


Lots of attention on the judge here but what about Randy Moss? He beat the shit out of someone in highschool and no one talks about that.

WFR is a hero for reminding us about the evil deeds of Randy Moss in high school and for reminding us that some out there have reduced cranial capacity which leads to increased rates of violent crime.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.


Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.



Aren't posts like the one above the reason WaitingforRuffcorn is considered a racist?

Sometimes, and I always defend him.

At other times, WFR creates problems for himself.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:26 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.


Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.



Aren't posts like the one above the reason WaitingforRuffcorn is considered a racist?


Is it based on 1 opinion or a clear pattern of predictable opinions that are inconsistent with other thoughts?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Sometimes, and I always defend him.

At other times, WFR creates problems for himself.


Let's not confuse or even conflate the actual issue. Twitter Feed is labeled a racist because he says blatantly racist things. Unfortunately we live in a society where far too often racists and those that deny/ignore racism are afforded the opportunity to define exactly what it is. As is happening now.

No one is falsely accusing that bigoted asswipe of being racist. He is considered racist because he says racist shit all of the time. That's it. That's all.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know that we're in an era where we're required to be outraged about everything, however, this doesn't bother me even a little. I'm not shocked that someone, including a judge, may use slurs in their home. I'm also not shocked that someone may have said something offensive during an attempted robbery. If she has a clear pattern of racial bias in her rulings, I would be outraged about that.

Agree with all of that.

The problem with that is she clearly does have a racial bias so I’m not sure how you could presume that doesn’t enter into her judicial rulings. Maybe not overtly but enough to effect an outcome.


Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.



Aren't posts like the one above the reason WaitingforRuffcorn is considered a racist?


Is it based on 1 opinion or a clear pattern of predictable opinions that are inconsistent with other thoughts?



I don't know. But what I do know is that if WfR had posted the same exact thought you did, instead of making snarky comments and obliquely calling me a racist, The Missing Link would be attacking him for making the post. I'm 100% certain of that.

Anyway, I get your point. Sure, she's a piece of shit. But if we eliminated every piece of shit from their employment, I'm not sure what the country would look like.

But if her reflex is to start shouting the thing she did, I have my doubts that she could actually do the job she has without letting her biases creep in. Let her do something else where people's lives aren't in the balance.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
The Missing Link wrote:
No one is falsely accusing that bigoted asswipe of being racist


I do think that sometimes happens, though. He can make insightful points.

But he does come with some baggage. Like this judge now does.

On a different note, I'd love to have that judge dropped on top of me. Less so with WFR.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37833
Location: ...
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Are you of the belief that she's the only judge with racial or others biases? Everyone has personal biases. If those things negatively impact their professional work, I see them as a problem. We have zero proof that they've impacted hers. All we know is that she shouted something offensive during an attempted robbery.


doesn't look right.

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Do you really think she's racist because she said the n word? Her family got another piece of shit off the street, and all anyone talks about is the victim who actually helped stop a criminal. Put that judge in Chicago and we'd have less pieces of shit being set free by Kim Foxx. Maybe she's a shitty person for saying what she did but nothing she said was wrong or a lie. Fuck all you I live in a big house with amazing children.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't know. But what I do know is that if WfR had posted the same exact thought you did, instead of making snarky comments and obliquely calling me a racist, The Missing Link would be attacking him for making the post. I'm 100% certain of that.

Anyway, I get your point. Sure, she's a piece of shit. But if we eliminated every piece of shit from their employment, I'm not sure what the country would look like.

But if her reflex is to start shouting the thing she did, I have my doubts that she could actually do the job she has without letting her biases creep in. Let her do something else where people's lives aren't in the balance.


If Twitter Feed happened to make the post he'd claim that the use of the "N" word wasn't racist because some black kid on Maypole and Kedzie shot and killed their best friend's cousin. So why are we concerned about some judge in LA. And not that?

And away we go. I'm not appalled by what the judge or her children said because I know that racism is very much prevalent in our society.

Ironically the first time I was ever called that word by someone that wasn't black was in Ruston, La. at a stoplight.

And I'm not the person who comes here day after day trying to minimize the effects of racism. You are.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:57 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

I don't know. But what I do know is that if WfR had posted the same exact thought you did, instead of making snarky comments and obliquely calling me a racist, The Missing Link would be attacking him for making the post. I'm 100% certain of that.

Anyway, I get your point. Sure, she's a piece of shit. But if we eliminated every piece of shit from their employment, I'm not sure what the country would look like.

But if her reflex is to start shouting the thing she did, I have my doubts that she could actually do the job she has without letting her biases creep in. Let her do something else where people's lives aren't in the balance
.


We would have a few dozen of Tim Tebow's trying to hold things together.

I hear you, but we wouldn't even know what she said during an attempted robbery if her spoiled kids didn't release the recording where they're telling us. I'm fine with allowing her constituents decide if she should stay on the beach.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 9:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't know. But what I do know is that if WfR had posted the same exact thought you did, instead of making snarky comments and obliquely calling me a racist, The Missing Link would be attacking him for making the post. I'm 100% certain of that.


And what I am certain of is that people such as yourself provide cover for the bigotry of guys like Twitter Feed. This is but another example of it.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
The Missing Link wrote:
Wayne Kerr wrote:
Sometimes, and I always defend him.

At other times, WFR creates problems for himself.


Let's not confuse or even conflate the actual issue. Twitter Feed is labeled a racist because he says blatantly racist things. Unfortunately we live in a society where far too often racists and those that deny/ignore racism are afforded the opportunity to define exactly what it is. As is happening now.

No one is falsely accusing that bigoted asswipe of being racist. He is considered racist because he says racist shit all of the time. That's it. That's all.

But sometimes he says things that make perfect sense. Despite his reputation, it seems prudent to respond first to what he is posting. If you smell bullshit based on his history as a poster, no one can blame you for that (if you can make the argument, that is).

However, he does sometimes offer pretty good analysis. He also goes after several people I really respect, which always makes me hesitant to defend him, but . . . ya gotta stay honest. Otherwise, I tend to get dumber.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 10:21 pm
Posts: 663
pizza_Place: Angie's
Nas wrote:
I'm fine with allowing her constituents decide if she should stay on the beach.


Definitely.

Of course, this might win her a ton of votes.

_________________
W_Z wrote:
we continue to live in a real-time "monsters are due on maple street."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 10:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Wayne Kerr wrote:
But sometimes he says things that make perfect sense. Despite his reputation, it seems prudent to respond first to what he is posting.

He very well may but that still doesn't make him any less of a racist. And the "just respond to what he is posting" angle doesn't quite jive because he himself never does this. The overwhelming number of disagreements that he has on here are with blacks or people that happen to defend them. He never entertains the thought of either group in fact. Its the very same two step. If you are black you are falsely accusing him of racism and if you are white you hate yourself, which is why you defend blacks. He is easily the most biased and prejudiced person here. For what it's worth Nas goes out of his to not label the clown a bigot and he still claims Nas is playing the "race card". Reader goes out of his way to avoid him yet whenever Reader dares to make a comment about race he just always seems to be right there with a personal attack.

There isn't a discussion that he will or can have with a person of another race that will not be seeped in his own prejudices, biases, and racism. It is impossible for him to do and rather than apologize or ignore it I prefer to simply call it for it is and keep it stepping.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group