good dolphin wrote:
I remember first listening to sports talk when sleeping over at friend's house in NY, while at an away game for rugby at Fordham. I was immediately hooked.
I was abroad when the Score started and didn't know it existed when I returned until about July or so of its initial year. Chicago was an incredibly tough market for entertaining talk back then as they were competing with shows like Stern, Brandmeier, Dahl and Matthews. Still, the Score was able to carve out a place for my listenership. They never could seem to get mornings correct for what seemed like the first decade. However, once the Monsters and HFC found there voice, the Score was as good of listening irrespective of category as there was in this city. It really had a great balance of sports nerding and entertainment and the hosts styles were diverse.
I was in school during those days so I had the ability to listen at times during middays. I don't have the same freedom now. I listen on the ride in and the ride home. Unlike many, I think Mully has a perfect tone for sports talk in the morning. No frills. Packed with information and indulges venting from the night before when appropriate. I also like Parkins and Speigal.
The lineup is good because the people I don't want to listen to are on at the times I cannot listen.
I would say the very big difference between now and the golden era is that, while I may enjoy the show, I just don't find it as compelling of a listen as back in the day. Anecdotally, I showed up late for class on the day they flipped to 670, just so I could listen. The current hosts haven't instilled that kind of brand loyalty in me and I don't think I'm alone. Remotes were events back in the day because of the loyalty of the listeners. Just as with Stern in his prime, you could strike up a conversation with someone about "did you hear what North said yesterday?"
As a criticism, Danny, if you aren't a winning gambler, I don't want to hear gambling talk. Why would I want to hear the thoughts of a guy who is going to lose me money? The only way that is fun is if you are a true degenerate and are willing to tell the horror stories of your losses.
I think they became extremely vanilla once they decided to go corporate. That was one of the more discernible differences that I noticed. They still maintained a number of the original hosts, but it seemed that there was a great deal more hand slapping going on as a result. The hosts had to dial back a lot of the sophomoric behavior that had become a staple of the earlier years. And when they were replaced often times it would be with guys that were extremely milquetoast by comparison.
_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.