It is currently Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:40 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9737 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Glad we have at least more year at the top of the division

So you are conceding that Love is going to suck?

No. Anyone who thinks they know if Love is good or sucks right now is spouting nonsense.


I knew Love sucked in college, many others did also

He probably sucks but his college play is irrelevant. Josh Allen was a terrible college QB

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13243
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
312player wrote:
These guys are fucked cap wise, who should we poach from them.

You don’t know what you’re talking about in this regard. You’re spouting talking points without any actual analysis. Like FF said the cap is a joke. Sure they will have to waive a few “name” players but that doesn’t necessarily change the core of the team. I don’t want to see Za Darius Smith leave but they went 13-3 without him. There will be a few others in that category. If Rodgers stays they will extend him and sign Adams to a cap friendly contract as well. Other key players will get extended and the team will look essentially the same for the next 2 years. At some point it will crash but the 2022 cap won’t be the reason.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
I still don't think he is going to suck if he is ever given the job. He needs to run the actual offense and not the hybrid one that Rodgers has run. Rodgers would manipulate the defense, the route and or the look of the play to get the matchup he wanted. It works for him most of the time but not always as everyone saw last week. Love can not do that and until Rodgers is gone and the get the offense back to being based on the scheme and play call then he nor the rest of the players are going to have an efficient and effective offense.

The kid can move, make all the throws and read the field. They are working heavily on his footwork right now and he might just be good if ever given the chance.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
You guys are nuts, Put Goff or (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Dalton on thatvteam and they go 7-10 this year.. Love/ 4-13 maybev5-12. Rodgers covers up alot of blemishes, more than you know.. so you will have Love or some buster at QB and cap problems.. terrible foreseeable future.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
312player wrote:
These guys are fucked cap wise, who should we poach from them.

You don’t know what you’re talking about in this regard. You’re spouting talking points without any actual analysis. Like FF said the cap is a joke. Sure they will have to waive a few “name” players but that doesn’t necessarily change the core of the team. I don’t want to see Za Darius Smith leave but they went 13-3 without him. There will be a few others in that category. If Rodgers stays they will extend him and sign Adams to a cap friendly contract as well. Other key players will get extended and the team will look essentially the same for the next 2 years. At some point it will crash but the 2022 cap won’t be the reason.


They can make it work if they want. I don't know if they want to though. Top heavy is never really conducive to winning championships.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Make it work means adding years on compounding a problem.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
You guys are nuts, Put Goff or (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Dalton on thatvteam and they go 7-10 this year.. Love/ 4-13 maybev5-12. Rodgers covers up alot of blemishes, more than you know.. so you will have Love or some buster at QB and cap problems.. terrible foreseeable future.

This post is completely nonsensical. Zippy and I already educated you on the cap thing. Outside of that, no team in the NFL has a “terrible forseeable future” unless they are incompetent at in their ownership and front office and the Packers are very clearly not bad there. I would fuckin love to have Fields but literally everything outside of him (who wasnt good this year), everything still says GB > Chicago going forward organization wise.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
You guys are nuts, Put Goff or (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Dalton on thatvteam and they go 7-10 this year.. Love/ 4-13 maybev5-12. Rodgers covers up alot of blemishes, more than you know.. so you will have Love or some buster at QB and cap problems.. terrible foreseeable future.

This post is completely nonsensical. Zippy and I already educated you on the cap thing. Outside of that, no team in the NFL has a “terrible forseeable future” unless they are incompetent at in their ownership and front office and the Packers are very clearly not bad there. I would fuckin love to have Fields but literally everything outside of him (who wasnt good this year), everything still says GB > Chicago going forward organization wise.
There it is. You'll be in midseason form about how good the Packers are before the draft!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
I think Rodgers will be back but if he isn't...... I think Denver is probably the spot.

If they actually have to make that trade I want them to get Seattle involved.

Rodgers to Denver
2 1st round picks from Denver and Jordan Love to Seattle
Russ and a 2nd from Denver to GB

Tweak some day 2 or 3 picks if needed but that should in theory work out for everyone if the are all down to trade. The money should work with GB and allow for them to extend Russ and then sign Adams.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10781
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
2022 GB Packers with Aaron Rodgers
- Win NFC North Easily and once again will be competitive in playoffs, but not a favorite to go to Super bowl

2022 GB Packers without Aaron Rodgers
- I'd still call them a favorite to win the NFC North but they'll have to find themselves a competent game manager QB. First round exit from playoffs. They are much worse without Aaron Rodgers and he does cover a lot of mediocrity, but holy shit the Bears and Vikings suck. The Lions will be interesting to watch and see if they've figured shit out.

I think Rodgers is back. The only really good option for HIM is 49ers and if I'm the Packers....it's AFC or nothing. I don't see an AFC team he elevates to automatic super bowl contention. It's basically a wash like staying in Green Bay.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
His best bet is probably to say in Green Bay. There is not much pressure to win, and he can't act like a jag and get what he wants because he's been allowed to do so and sort of earned it for years now.

He goes elsewhere and the pressure to win ramps up 10 fold, and his act may not be tolerated by different coaches/owners.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:49 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Will another team give up a lot of capital for an aging quarterback who doesn't know if he wants to continue playing and chokes in the postseason?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:52 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BigW72 wrote:
2022 GB Packers with Aaron Rodgers
- Win NFC North Easily and once again will be competitive in playoffs, but not a favorite to go to Super bowl

2022 GB Packers without Aaron Rodgers
- I'd still call them a favorite to win the NFC North but they'll have to find themselves a competent game manager QB. First round exit from playoffs. They are much worse without Aaron Rodgers and he does cover a lot of mediocrity, but holy shit the Bears and Vikings suck. The Lions will be interesting to watch and see if they've figured shit out.

I think Rodgers is back. The only really good option for HIM is 49ers and if I'm the Packers....it's AFC or nothing. I don't see an AFC team he elevates to automatic super bowl contention. It's basically a wash like staying in Green Bay.


Didn't Denver hire Hackett with the idea that they will be acquiring Rodgers?

I believe Denver had the best scoring defense in the NFL last year under Fangio.

They would seem to be well positioned to challenge KC with Rodgers, Hackett and a Fangio disciple running their defense.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Will another team give up a lot of capital for an aging quarterback who doesn't know if he wants to continue playing and chokes in the postseason?

It sounds like Rodgers is a free agent after next season too if he wants to be. That's going to hurt the price Green Bay gets.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57213
Tall Midget wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
2022 GB Packers with Aaron Rodgers
- Win NFC North Easily and once again will be competitive in playoffs, but not a favorite to go to Super bowl

2022 GB Packers without Aaron Rodgers
- I'd still call them a favorite to win the NFC North but they'll have to find themselves a competent game manager QB. First round exit from playoffs. They are much worse without Aaron Rodgers and he does cover a lot of mediocrity, but holy shit the Bears and Vikings suck. The Lions will be interesting to watch and see if they've figured shit out.

I think Rodgers is back. The only really good option for HIM is 49ers and if I'm the Packers....it's AFC or nothing. I don't see an AFC team he elevates to automatic super bowl contention. It's basically a wash like staying in Green Bay.


Didn't Denver hire Hackett with the idea that they will be acquiring Rodgers?

I believe Denver had the best scoring defense in the NFL last year under Fangio.

They would seem to be well positioned to challenge KC with Rodgers, Hackett and a Fangio disciple running their defense.

Yep I think Denver would be the best place for him. THey have some good offensive pieces to go around Rodgers too.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65743
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Whatever he does, it would be really nice if he decided before the draft.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Brick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Will another team give up a lot of capital for an aging quarterback who doesn't know if he wants to continue playing and chokes in the postseason?

It sounds like Rodgers is a free agent after next season too if he wants to be. That's going to hurt the price Green Bay gets.


Yep! The Packers will have to pay for another team to take on a cancer and proven loser.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Darkside wrote:
Whatever he does, it would be really nice if he decided before the draft.

He said he will have made a decision before the Franchise tag deadline so they know what they are doing with Adams. Lebron Rodgers will announcing it on his barstool podcast thing. I believe they have to wait until the new league year in June to do it though or it will cost them another 10 or so mil on the cap. That makes for an awkward timeline. They would almost have to make a trade with Denver or whomever for the Rodgers return before the draft and then trade him after it get around the cap stuff. It would be like 2 1sts for a 2023 7th and then a month later Rodgers for that 2023 7th back. That is way too complicated. He will go on Mcafee and announce his return.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
You guys are nuts, Put Goff or (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Dalton on thatvteam and they go 7-10 this year.. Love/ 4-13 maybev5-12. Rodgers covers up alot of blemishes, more than you know.. so you will have Love or some buster at QB and cap problems.. terrible foreseeable future.

This post is completely nonsensical. Zippy and I already educated you on the cap thing. Outside of that, no team in the NFL has a “terrible forseeable future” unless they are incompetent at in their ownership and front office and the Packers are very clearly not bad there. I would fuckin love to have Fields but literally everything outside of him (who wasnt good this year), everything still says GB > Chicago going forward organization wise.
There it is. You'll be in midseason form about how good the Packers are before the draft!

Nah. It's not saying a whole lot to be better than the Bears who are one of the most dysfunctional franchises in the league. I don't have much hope for 2022 but I also don't agree with this fantasy Bears fans have that the team will be terrible for the next decade.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:04 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
You guys are nuts, Put Goff or (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Dalton on thatvteam and they go 7-10 this year.. Love/ 4-13 maybev5-12. Rodgers covers up alot of blemishes, more than you know.. so you will have Love or some buster at QB and cap problems.. terrible foreseeable future.

This post is completely nonsensical. Zippy and I already educated you on the cap thing. Outside of that, no team in the NFL has a “terrible forseeable future” unless they are incompetent at in their ownership and front office and the Packers are very clearly not bad there. I would fuckin love to have Fields but literally everything outside of him (who wasnt good this year), everything still says GB > Chicago going forward organization wise.
There it is. You'll be in midseason form about how good the Packers are before the draft!

Nah. It's not saying a whole lot to be better than the Bears who are one of the most dysfunctional franchises in the league. I don't have much hope for 2022 but I also don't agree with this fantasy Bears fans have that the team will be terrible for the next decade.


Packer fan denial is spreading all across America.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
BigW72 wrote:
2022 GB Packers with Aaron Rodgers
- Win NFC North Easily and once again will be competitive in playoffs, but not a favorite to go to Super bowl

2022 GB Packers without Aaron Rodgers
- I'd still call them a favorite to win the NFC North but they'll have to find themselves a competent game manager QB. First round exit from playoffs. They are much worse without Aaron Rodgers and he does cover a lot of mediocrity, but holy shit the Bears and Vikings suck. The Lions will be interesting to watch and see if they've figured shit out.

I think Rodgers is back. The only really good option for HIM is 49ers and if I'm the Packers....it's AFC or nothing. I don't see an AFC team he elevates to automatic super bowl contention. It's basically a wash like staying in Green Bay.



Id pick GB to finish last in the division minus Rodgers.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:10 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
I also don't agree with this fantasy Bears fans have that the team will be terrible for the next decade.
Our team will not be terrible for the next decade. Your time probably will be.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10781
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
312player wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
2022 GB Packers with Aaron Rodgers
- Win NFC North Easily and once again will be competitive in playoffs, but not a favorite to go to Super bowl

2022 GB Packers without Aaron Rodgers
- I'd still call them a favorite to win the NFC North but they'll have to find themselves a competent game manager QB. First round exit from playoffs. They are much worse without Aaron Rodgers and he does cover a lot of mediocrity, but holy shit the Bears and Vikings suck. The Lions will be interesting to watch and see if they've figured shit out.

I think Rodgers is back. The only really good option for HIM is 49ers and if I'm the Packers....it's AFC or nothing. I don't see an AFC team he elevates to automatic super bowl contention. It's basically a wash like staying in Green Bay.



Id pick GB to finish last in the division minus Rodgers.

Jordan Love at QB....maybe. They wouldn't do that though. They could upgrade and still beat the Bears and Vikings.

I hate the Packers too, but let's not fool ourselves.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
BigW72 wrote:
312player wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
2022 GB Packers with Aaron Rodgers
- Win NFC North Easily and once again will be competitive in playoffs, but not a favorite to go to Super bowl

2022 GB Packers without Aaron Rodgers
- I'd still call them a favorite to win the NFC North but they'll have to find themselves a competent game manager QB. First round exit from playoffs. They are much worse without Aaron Rodgers and he does cover a lot of mediocrity, but holy shit the Bears and Vikings suck. The Lions will be interesting to watch and see if they've figured shit out.

I think Rodgers is back. The only really good option for HIM is 49ers and if I'm the Packers....it's AFC or nothing. I don't see an AFC team he elevates to automatic super bowl contention. It's basically a wash like staying in Green Bay.



Id pick GB to finish last in the division minus Rodgers.

Jordan Love at QB....maybe. They wouldn't do that though. They could upgrade and still beat the Bears and Vikings.

I hate the Packers too, but let's not fool ourselves.


Too much self hate. We saw what the Packers looked like with an injured and disinterested Rodgers in 2017 and 2018. They'll look worse than that with Love.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23775
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Frank Coztansa wrote:
His best bet is probably to say in Green Bay. There is not much pressure to win, and he can't act like a jag and get what he wants because he's been allowed to do so and sort of earned it for years now.

He goes elsewhere and the pressure to win ramps up 10 fold, and his act may not be tolerated by different coaches/owners.


Mostly yes, but if you trade for him you’re conceding that his act will indeed be tolerated. No way you give up all those assets and then nope out on him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I suspect they'll give him a restructured $200M deal to return and give Adams a deal for about $150M. Not sure what the rest of the Packers team will look like. It probably makes more sense to trade him, but LeFleur and Packers Nation would likely kill themselves.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
KDdidit wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
His best bet is probably to say in Green Bay. There is not much pressure to win, and he can't act like a jag and get what he wants because he's been allowed to do so and sort of earned it for years now.

He goes elsewhere and the pressure to win ramps up 10 fold, and his act may not be tolerated by different coaches/owners.


Mostly yes, but if you trade for him you’re conceding that his act will indeed be tolerated. No way you give up all those assets and then nope out on him.
That's all well and good, but then he jumps on the Pat McAfee show after a tough loss in week 5 and starts ripping people just because. That's what I mean by his act not being tolerated.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
I suspect they'll give him a restructured $200M deal to return and give Adams a deal for about $150M. Not sure what the rest of the Packers team will look like. It probably makes more sense to trade him, but LeFleur and Packers Nation would likely kill themselves.

You're all over the place on this :lol:

Talk about denial

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23775
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Right, but what does not tolerated even mean if they’re not going to bench him? A stern talking to?
Frank Coztansa wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
His best bet is probably to say in Green Bay. There is not much pressure to win, and he can't act like a jag and get what he wants because he's been allowed to do so and sort of earned it for years now.

He goes elsewhere and the pressure to win ramps up 10 fold, and his act may not be tolerated by different coaches/owners.


Mostly yes, but if you trade for him you’re conceding that his act will indeed be tolerated. No way you give up all those assets and then nope out on him.
That's all well and good, but then he jumps on the Pat McAfee show after a tough loss in week 5 and starts ripping people just because. That's what I mean by his act not being tolerated.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 1:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
I suspect they'll give him a restructured $200M deal to return and give Adams a deal for about $150M. Not sure what the rest of the Packers team will look like. It probably makes more sense to trade him, but LeFleur and Packers Nation would likely kill themselves.

You're all over the place on this :lol:

Talk about denial


I'm sorry this is difficult for you

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9737 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group