It is currently Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9737 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
:lol: And the Bears beat TB last year, so I guess they were better than the Packers!

I appreciate you continuing to make my point for me regarding Bears fans :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Last year they were the 2nd best team in the NFL even in the postseason, so I don't think what you're saying makes sense.

By what metric?

How were they not? They were among the final four teams, they lost by 5 to TB, KC lost by 22 to TB. What's the argument that KC was better?

Are you unironically going full transitive property right now?

We're discussing playoff performances. How is this unfair to bring up?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Last year they were the 2nd best team in the NFL even in the postseason, so I don't think what you're saying makes sense.

By what metric?

How were they not? They were among the final four teams, they lost by 5 to TB, KC lost by 22 to TB. What's the argument that KC was better?


They didn't play in the SB? At full strength, they lost at home?

And that accounts for a 17 point difference?

Packers didnt play at full strength either.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23967
pizza_Place: Pizanos
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Last year they were the 2nd best team in the NFL even in the postseason, so I don't think what you're saying makes sense.

By what metric?

How were they not? They were among the final four teams, they lost by 5 to TB, KC lost by 22 to TB. What's the argument that KC was better?

Are you unironically going full transitive property right now?

We're discussing playoff performances. How is this unfair to bring up?

Why is it unfair to compare two separate games played under completely different circumstances?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Last year they were the 2nd best team in the NFL even in the postseason, so I don't think what you're saying makes sense.

By what metric?

How were they not? They were among the final four teams, they lost by 5 to TB, KC lost by 22 to TB. What's the argument that KC was better?

Are you unironically going full transitive property right now?

We're discussing playoff performances. How is this unfair to bring up?

Why is it unfair to compare two separate games played under completely different circumstances?

Yes, when they just faced the same common opponent.

I've always heard home field is worth 3 points. You and Nas suggesting it's worth 17 is a new one to me.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Rodgers was going to his 2nd Super Bowl until that tub of shit dumbfuck McCarthy lost them the game in Seattle. That game was over until they gave it back to them.


Rodgers doesn't even win his SB if Cutler had guts or a Bears defender picks up a ball like Lovie taught them daily.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23967
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I’ve never heard anybody make a common opponent argument to put some lipstick on a loss, so I’m not quite sure how to respond.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Nas wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Rodgers was going to his 2nd Super Bowl until that tub of shit dumbfuck McCarthy lost them the game in Seattle. That game was over until they gave it back to them.


Rodgers doesn't even win his SB if Cutler had guts or a Bears defender picks up a ball like Lovie taught them daily.


Didn't they actually play better once Cutler exited the game?

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’ve never heard anybody make a common opponent argument to put some lipstick on a loss, so I’m not quite sure how to respond.

I've never seen someone suggest home field is worth 17 points so we're on common ground.

And it's not putting lipstick on it. If the argument from Rick is that the Packers were terrible in the playoffs last year, it's certainly a fair rebuttal to that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23967
pizza_Place: Pizanos
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’ve never heard anybody make a common opponent argument to put some lipstick on a loss, so I’m not quite sure how to respond.

I've never seen someone suggest home field is worth 17 points so we're on common ground.

And it's not putting lipstick on it. If the argument from Rick is that the Packers were terrible in the playoffs last year, it's certainly a fair rebuttal to that.

Well nobody said home field is worth 17 points, so I feel like I’m in a Brick argument only it’s Packer focused.

I’m not looking back more than a few posts but seems like he said they’re a good regular season team that fails in the playoffs, which is factually correct.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’ve never heard anybody make a common opponent argument to put some lipstick on a loss, so I’m not quite sure how to respond.

I've never seen someone suggest home field is worth 17 points so we're on common ground.

And it's not putting lipstick on it. If the argument from Rick is that the Packers were terrible in the playoffs last year, it's certainly a fair rebuttal to that.

Well nobody said home field is worth 17 points, so I feel like I’m in a Brick argument only it’s Packer focused.

I’m not looking back more than a few posts but seems like he said they’re a good regular season team that fails in the playoffs, which is factually correct.

He said they are a bad team in the playoffs. True this year. Not true last year for the reasons i stated. Unless every team except the SB winner is “bad”

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 6:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Nas wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Rodgers was going to his 2nd Super Bowl until that tub of shit dumbfuck McCarthy lost them the game in Seattle. That game was over until they gave it back to them.


Rodgers doesn't even win his SB if Cutler had guts or a Bears defender picks up a ball like Lovie taught them daily.


Didn't they actually play better once Cutler exited the game?


Nope. A pick 6 ended the game in the 4th. In fairness, Cutler usually threw several interceptions a half against the Packers.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23967
pizza_Place: Pizanos
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’ve never heard anybody make a common opponent argument to put some lipstick on a loss, so I’m not quite sure how to respond.

I've never seen someone suggest home field is worth 17 points so we're on common ground.

And it's not putting lipstick on it. If the argument from Rick is that the Packers were terrible in the playoffs last year, it's certainly a fair rebuttal to that.

Well nobody said home field is worth 17 points, so I feel like I’m in a Brick argument only it’s Packer focused.

I’m not looking back more than a few posts but seems like he said they’re a good regular season team that fails in the playoffs, which is factually correct.

He said they are a bad team in the playoffs. True this year. Not true last year for the reasons i stated. Unless every team except the SB winner is “bad”

K how bout disappointing or underperforming instead of bad?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
2019 and 2021, sure. Last year they were a good team and played well and just fell a little short to the champions. I don’t consider that a choke job or underachieving. The SF losses this year and in 2019 were embarrassing. I dont think last year was.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’ve never heard anybody make a common opponent argument to put some lipstick on a loss, so I’m not quite sure how to respond.

I've never seen someone suggest home field is worth 17 points so we're on common ground.

And it's not putting lipstick on it. If the argument from Rick is that the Packers were terrible in the playoffs last year, it's certainly a fair rebuttal to that.

Well nobody said home field is worth 17 points, so I feel like I’m in a Brick argument only it’s Packer focused.

I’m not looking back more than a few posts but seems like he said they’re a good regular season team that fails in the playoffs, which is factually correct.

He said they are a bad team in the playoffs. True this year. Not true last year for the reasons i stated. Unless every team except the SB winner is “bad”


Brady tried his hardest to give that game to the Packers, but they wouldn't take it. That was a bad performance by them in a sloppy game.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I don’t agree. Losing to the SB champs by 5 when they go on to beat the shit out of the vaunted Chiefs is fine. The SF losses were awful, last years loss sucked but was in no way embarrassing rxcrpt for LaFleurs FG call at the end

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Last year they were the 2nd best team in the NFL even in the postseason, so I don't think what you're saying makes sense.

By what metric?

How were they not? They were among the final four teams, they lost by 5 to TB, KC lost by 22 to TB. What's the argument that KC was better?

Are you unironically going full transitive property right now?

We're discussing playoff performances. How is this unfair to bring up?


Last year Rodgers smoked Brady, GB defense was abysmal in the post season.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Last year the Bucs throttled the Pack early and Brady started turning it over to keep them in it. That game was on its way to the blowout they had earlier in the season when they met.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Last year they were the 2nd best team in the NFL even in the postseason, so I don't think what you're saying makes sense.

By what metric?

How were they not? They were among the final four teams, they lost by 5 to TB, KC lost by 22 to TB. What's the argument that KC was better?

Are you unironically going full transitive property right now?

We're discussing playoff performances. How is this unfair to bring up?


Last year Rodgers smoked Brady, GB defense was abysmal in the post season.

And this year our defense was great allowing only 6 offensive points and Rodgers lost the game for us. Always something different

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Last year the Bucs throttled the Pack early and Brady started turning it over to keep them in it. That game was on its way to the blowout they had earlier in the season when they met.


Nah.. did you watch the game?

The bucs got lucky AF with a hail mary right before the half, GB D was shit... GB looked like the better team all game.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Last year the Bucs throttled the Pack early and Brady started turning it over to keep them in it. That game was on its way to the blowout they had earlier in the season when they met.


Nah.. did you watch the game?

The bucs got lucky AF with a hail mary right before the half, GB D was shit... GB looked like the better team all game.

Did a huge Packers fan watch the Packers NFC Championship game?

Stop yourself.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 7:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91969
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Last year they were the 2nd best team in the NFL even in the postseason, so I don't think what you're saying makes sense.

By what metric?

How were they not? They were among the final four teams, they lost by 5 to TB, KC lost by 22 to TB. What's the argument that KC was better?

KC had a bad Super Bowl but was better throughout the whole season. Also KC is clearly a far better franchise. What are the odds that GB was better for a couple weeks?

Also, GB lost similarly to how the other teams in the NFC did in the playoffs. If that is the criteria then maybe Washington was as good as the Packers too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Last year the Bucs throttled the Pack early and Brady started turning it over to keep them in it. That game was on its way to the blowout they had earlier in the season when they met.


Nah.. did you watch the game?

The bucs got lucky AF with a hail mary right before the half, GB D was shit... GB looked like the better team all game.

Did a huge Packers fan watch the Packers NFC Championship game?

Stop yourself.


Brady looked terrible, the GB d was garbage.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 10:52 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Last year the Bucs throttled the Pack early and Brady started turning it over to keep them in it. That game was on its way to the blowout they had earlier in the season when they met.


Nah.. did you watch the game?

The bucs got lucky AF with a hail mary right before the half, GB D was shit... GB looked like the better team all game.

Did a huge Packers fan watch the Packers NFC Championship game?

Stop yourself.


Brady looked terrible, the GB d was garbage.


The Great LaFleur offense also scored a total of one touchdown on the three turnovers. And on the last two, I believe the offense moved the ball a total of -8 yards. They would have won the game with a couple of field goals following those INTs.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 12:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
:lol: And the Bears beat TB last year, so I guess they were better than the Packers!

I appreciate you continuing to make my point for me regarding Bears fans :lol:

I appreciate the fact that you still haven't answered the question if the goal of the Packers over the last decadr or so- with a Hall of Fame quarterback- is to Simply win 10 games a year and a division, or be the best team in the league and win the Super Bowl. The silence is deafening.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I figured it was a rhetorical question. Obviously the goal is to win the Super Bowl. I appreciate that I’ve been able to see my team win it twice. Maybe one day you’ll know what it feels like to see your team win one.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
As figured, you gave a nice rhetorical answer.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3612
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
FavreFan wrote:
I figured it was a rhetorical question. Obviously the goal is to win the Super Bowl. I appreciate that I’ve been able to see my team win it twice. Maybe one day you’ll know what it feels like to see your team win one.

But I have...sure that means I'm old, but I have.

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:19 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
How were they not? They were among the final four teams, they lost by 5 to TB, KC lost by 22 to TB. What's the argument that KC was better?

Are you unironically going full transitive property right now?
Using FF's logic, the Bears are pretty damn good! Beat the Super Bowl champs last year, and beat Burrow and the AFC Champs this year.

Better than the Packers!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2022 10:24 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
How were they not? They were among the final four teams, they lost by 5 to TB, KC lost by 22 to TB. What's the argument that KC was better?

Are you unironically going full transitive property right now?
Using FF's logic, the Bears are pretty damn good! Beat the Super Bowl champs last year, and beat Burrow and the AFC Champs this year.

Better than the Packers!


Favre Fan is camped outside Lambeau awaiting delivery of the Lombardi Trophy because the Packers defeated both the Rams and the Bengals during the regular season. Champs!

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9737 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group