It is currently Thu Jan 30, 2025 11:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 515 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 18  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Is revenue sharing actually on the table or is this a Model UN, MLB edition thing?

From what I understand, the owners have wanted to discuss it and the players won't even have a talk about it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think that’d invite disclosure the owners don’t want to provide and more importantly, a cap, which the players would never agree to.

For shits and giggles, players should ask if the owners would want revenue sharing w/independent down in the weeds forensic audits?

Owners- "Not that kind of revenue sharing."

Every other league in America does it. I don't see why baseball couldn't come to do the same thing.

But, call the owners bluff then.

Right now, they want the Pirates to spend more money but they don't want the Red Sox and Yankees to spend less.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
will the lockout draw more viewers than an NBA game?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32564
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think that’d invite disclosure the owners don’t want to provide and more importantly, a cap, which the players would never agree to.

For shits and giggles, players should ask if the owners would want revenue sharing w/independent down in the weeds forensic audits?

Owners- "Not that kind of revenue sharing."

Every other league in America does it. I don't see why baseball couldn't come to do the same thing.

But, call the owners bluff then.

Right now, they want the Pirates to spend more money but they don't want the Red Sox and Yankees to spend less.

The NFL does not share all revenue.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
denisdman wrote:
Brick wrote:
The owners keep too much money!
Well, how about we share revenue?
No!


I know. Simple solution.


Just not being able for the players to say yes we take a cap prevents them from getting the floor.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think that’d invite disclosure the owners don’t want to provide and more importantly, a cap, which the players would never agree to.

For shits and giggles, players should ask if the owners would want revenue sharing w/independent down in the weeds forensic audits?

Owners- "Not that kind of revenue sharing."

Every other league in America does it. I don't see why baseball couldn't come to do the same thing.

But, call the owners bluff then.

Right now, they want the Pirates to spend more money but they don't want the Red Sox and Yankees to spend less.

The NFL does not share all revenue.

The NFL has revenue sharing. Don't try and argue otherwise.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80221
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Is revenue sharing actually on the table or is this a Model UN, MLB edition thing?

From what I understand, the owners have wanted to discuss it and the players won't even have a talk about it.



The owners are willing to "share revenue" based on their cooked books.

The NFL isn't the model you think it is. NFL players are getting a raw deal. Your fanaticism for the sport doesn't make that FACT moot.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32564
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think that’d invite disclosure the owners don’t want to provide and more importantly, a cap, which the players would never agree to.

For shits and giggles, players should ask if the owners would want revenue sharing w/independent down in the weeds forensic audits?

Owners- "Not that kind of revenue sharing."

Every other league in America does it. I don't see why baseball couldn't come to do the same thing.

But, call the owners bluff then.

Right now, they want the Pirates to spend more money but they don't want the Red Sox and Yankees to spend less.

The NFL does not share all revenue.

The NFL has revenue sharing. Don't try and argue otherwise.

Then don't try to argue baseball players get 54%. Deal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Is revenue sharing actually on the table or is this a Model UN, MLB edition thing?

From what I understand, the owners have wanted to discuss it and the players won't even have a talk about it.



The owners are willing to "share revenue" based on their cooked books.

The NFL isn't the model you think it is. NFL players are getting a raw deal. Your fanaticism for the sport doesn't make that FACT moot.

This is always the fallback. The accounting practices are well known and collectively bargained by both sides. The NFL is clear what local revenue is and how it isn't included.

If your argument is that the MLB players do better with their system then I have no problem with that being the argument. Just don't complain that the Pirates don't spend enough of their money on players when you create a system where they don't have to.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:42 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80221
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Brick wrote:
If your argument is that the MLB players do better with their system then I have no problem with that being the argument.


Of course they do better than NFL players. (Although that is irrelevant to their negotiations with MLB owners.) The players had been winning these labor battles for years up until recently. Frankly, I'm surprised the players haven't dumped Tony Clark.

Brick wrote:
Just don't complain that the Pirates don't spend enough of their money on players when you create a system where they don't have to.


That's what the players are negotiating to fix. It's not difficult to understand.

The owners' constant refrain that they are "losing money" is a lie and a bad faith " negotiating tactic."

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think that’d invite disclosure the owners don’t want to provide and more importantly, a cap, which the players would never agree to.

For shits and giggles, players should ask if the owners would want revenue sharing w/independent down in the weeds forensic audits?

Owners- "Not that kind of revenue sharing."

Every other league in America does it. I don't see why baseball couldn't come to do the same thing.

But, call the owners bluff then.

Right now, they want the Pirates to spend more money but they don't want the Red Sox and Yankees to spend less.

The NFL does not share all revenue.

The NFL has revenue sharing. Don't try and argue otherwise.

Then don't try to argue baseball players get 54%. Deal?

https://www.theringer.com/mlb/2018/2/21/17035624/mlb-revenue-sharing-owners-players-free-agency-rob-manfred

You can put the data in many different formats, but that has a chart(that MLBPA has basically admitted is accurate) that put it at around 50% for the major leagues and around 54% for major league + minor league.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course they do better than NFL players. (Although that is irrelevant to their negotiations with MLB owners.) The players had been winning these labor battles for years up until recently. Frankly, I'm surprised the players haven't dumped Tony Clark.
Exactly. The players have it better than anyone else in pro sports and are cancelling games both in the COVID year and now.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
That's what the players are negotiating to fix. It's not difficult to understand.

The owners' constant refrain that they are "losing money" is a lie and a bad faith " negotiating tactic."
To fix what? They want the Pirates to pay more but the Red Sox and Yankees to keep on paying the same.

If you want to be able to tell the Pirates how much they have to spend then you have to be able to tell the Yankees how much they can spend too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32564
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
https://www.theringer.com/mlb/2018/2/21/17035624/mlb-revenue-sharing-owners-players-free-agency-rob-manfred

You can put the data in many different formats, but that has a chart(that MLBPA has basically admitted is accurate) that put it at around 50% for the major leagues and around 54% for major league + minor league.

OK. No deal
The NFL does not share all revenue.

(that MLBPA has basically admitted is accurate) Link please.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
https://www.theringer.com/mlb/2018/2/21/17035624/mlb-revenue-sharing-owners-players-free-agency-rob-manfred

You can put the data in many different formats, but that has a chart(that MLBPA has basically admitted is accurate) that put it at around 50% for the major leagues and around 54% for major league + minor league.

OK. No deal
The NFL does not share all revenue.

(that MLBPA has basically admitted is accurate) Link please.
Of course the NFL doesn't share all revenue. That's not a requirement for revenue sharing. It is plainly spelled out what revenue is not shared and it's agreed to by both parties.

It was in my link that they basically admitted is accurate.
Quote:
Asked to comment on the MLB data above, an MLBPA spokesman — after running the numbers by the union’s economists — confirmed that they’re “basically accurate.” Zimbalist adds, “The PA does have slightly different numbers because of things like the interest rate they use to find the present value of deferred compensation. It shouldn’t be more than a point different overall.”

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:03 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80221
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course they do better than NFL players. (Although that is irrelevant to their negotiations with MLB owners.) The players had been winning these labor battles for years up until recently. Frankly, I'm surprised the players haven't dumped Tony Clark.
Exactly. The players have it better than anyone else in pro sports and are cancelling games both in the COVID year and now.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
That's what the players are negotiating to fix. It's not difficult to understand.

The owners' constant refrain that they are "losing money" is a lie and a bad faith " negotiating tactic."
To fix what? They want the Pirates to pay more but the Red Sox and Yankees to keep on paying the same.

If you want to be able to tell the Pirates how much they have to spend then you have to be able to tell the Yankees how much they can spend too.



No you don't. A salary cap is un-American. A salary floor is not.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
That's an absurd argument.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16689
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
I was confused when listening to John Heyman question Manfred on the CBT increase. He was intimating that the players want the threshold to go higher than $220m to keep pace with revenues and inflation. But shouldn't they want it to be lower if their goal is more teams spending and competing?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:17 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
denisdman wrote:
The players do not want to give MLB more revenues (ie 14 team playoffs) because they have no incentive to grow league revenues.
I don't care about the revenue aspect. I care about the watered down aspect of expanded playoffs. You can't play 162 then have a bunch of 1 game play in games determine who gets into the A/NLDS

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80221
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Brick wrote:
That's an absurd argument.



:lol: It is? There's a minimum wage. Is there a maximum wage?

The issue we're now discussing really has nothing to do with players. It's about the fact that the Yankees and Red Sox are useless if there aren't other teams. The owners should sort out among themselves how to create competitive franchises when all locations aren't equal.

What you're suggesting is like if you and I both owned fast food franchises and we needed each other to exist. Mine was located at North & Damen and yours was in Cairo, IL. Your answer is making me pay my employees less rather than figuring out how to pay yours more.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
:lol: It is? There's a minimum wage. Is there a maximum wage?
We aren't talking about government regulations.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The issue we're now discussing really has nothing to do with players. It's about the fact that the Yankees and Red Sox are useless if they're aren't other teams. The owners should sort out among themselves how to create competitive franchises when all locations aren't equal.

What you're suggesting is like if you and I both owned fast food franchises and we needed each other to exist. Mine was located at North & Damen and yours was in Cairo, IL. Your answer is making me pay my employees less rather than figuring out how to pay yours more.
I don't really think the analogy fits but isn't your argument simply the opposite, which is forcing me to pay the same rates as you rather than both of us doing what is best for our organization?

The Yankees and Red Sox are always going to outspend pretty much everyone. If you want to increase the competitiveness of other teams then set parameters on how much and how little you can spend.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25211
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
Just don't complain that the Pirates don't spend enough of their money on players when you create a system where they don't have to.


That's what the players are negotiating to fix. It's not difficult to understand.

The owners' constant refrain that they are "losing money" is a lie and a bad faith " negotiating tactic."

Are they though? They seem to be throwing out things they know to be unacceptable to the owners then running to Twitter/friendly media as soon as they’re rejected.

That doesn’t seem like a negotiation. Seems like they’re trying to win a PR war with people who don’t care about PR.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6383
pizza_Place: Frozen
Bernstein crying about MLB pauper player's salaries stalling at 4 mil the last few years. But it's ok he's made millions living like a king while fellow Score host Les made peanuts and wasn't given hospitalization without Bernstein being outraged he couldn't go to a doctor his final weeks. But he's outraged millionaires are being hardball contract negotiated.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32564
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
https://www.theringer.com/mlb/2018/2/21/17035624/mlb-revenue-sharing-owners-players-free-agency-rob-manfred

You can put the data in many different formats, but that has a chart(that MLBPA has basically admitted is accurate) that put it at around 50% for the major leagues and around 54% for major league + minor league.

OK. No deal
The NFL does not share all revenue.

(that MLBPA has basically admitted is accurate) Link please.
Of course the NFL doesn't share all revenue. That's not a requirement for revenue sharing. It is plainly spelled out what revenue is not shared and it's agreed to by both parties.

It was in my link that they basically admitted is accurate.
Quote:
Asked to comment on the MLB data above, an MLBPA spokesman — after running the numbers by the union’s economists — confirmed that they’re “basically accurate.” Zimbalist adds, “The PA does have slightly different numbers because of things like the interest rate they use to find the present value of deferred compensation. It shouldn’t be more than a point different overall.”

Nameless "MLBPA Spokesman".

Some spokesman.

The Walt Disney Company announced that it has agreed to purchase the majority stake in BAMTech, the digital media company spun off from MLB Advanced Media for $2.58 billion.

Not included in the "54%"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Are you saying they are lying about talking to a MLBPA spokesman? This was done in 2018 in a major news source. I don't think MLBPA has called them out for making it up.

MLB Advanced Media is included in the data in the chart. Based on the date of the Disney purchase, it probably would be in the 2018 numbers but the chart only goes up to 2017 since the article was written in 2018.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:54 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
So how long do we think this lasts?

I think the most optimistic timeline is Opening Day around May 1st. It would not surprise me if this drags to or past Memorial Day though.

Its just brutal.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16689
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Frank Coztansa wrote:
So how long do we think this lasts?

I think the most optimistic timeline is Opening Day around May 1st. It would not surprise me if this drags to or past Memorial Day though.

Its just brutal.


It's interesting (and understandable) that Sox fans are more upset about it than Cubs fans. This is supposed to be the Sox' year, while the Cubs are in The Plan: Part Deux.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25211
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Frank Coztansa wrote:
So how long do we think this lasts?

I think the most optimistic timeline is Opening Day around May 1st. It would not surprise me if this drags to or past Memorial Day though.

Its just brutal.

I’m guessing mid-May. I’m basing that on nothing.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Cubs fans probably didn't expect more than 80 wins at best or so from their club, but MANY will miss the games not being played.

Definitely hurts the Sox more, but JERRY! hates Manfred and iirc was one of the only owners to vote "NO" to Manfred becoming Commissioner.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32564
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Are you saying they are lying about talking to a MLBPA spokesman? This was done in 2018 in a major news source. I don't think MLBPA has called them out for making it up.

MLB Advanced Media is included in the data in the chart. Based on the date of the Disney purchase, it probably would be in the 2018 numbers but the chart only goes up to 2017 since the article was written in 2018.

How do we look at the Braves $104 million profit after the 2021 revenues have been dispersed?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Future of MLB
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Are you saying they are lying about talking to a MLBPA spokesman? This was done in 2018 in a major news source. I don't think MLBPA has called them out for making it up.

MLB Advanced Media is included in the data in the chart. Based on the date of the Disney purchase, it probably would be in the 2018 numbers but the chart only goes up to 2017 since the article was written in 2018.

How do we look at the Braves $104 million profit after the 2021 revenues have been dispersed?

What do you mean?

The Braves made $104 million profit after $457 million spent. That seems to be a justifiable profit for the World Series champions.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 515 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group