Your bizarre attempt to link this to Donald Trump is what's funny here. Schefter described the career arc of a quarterback in the mildest of terms, and you somehow believe it's journalistic malfeasance. He's an entertainment reporter who horse trades to be the first with breaking NFL news. That's his brand. Being first. And he's covering the NFL, he's not on the Spotlight team making sure that the nuclear plant isn't dumping waste near an orphanage. He makes millions of dollars covering the NFL for a network that has a contract with the league. It's like saying Mean Gene Okerlund wasn't tough enough in his coverage of Jack Tunney. PR hack!

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

If Zombie Deadspin posted it they’d rightfully get roasted.

I agree that this discussion is going to strange places, but we should all be able to agree that it was a bit clumsy to knock the guy like that in what's effectively a headline or subhead. That's all.

Nordberg in critical condition after cartoonish accident.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.

I wonder if this is a veiled foreshadowing of leaving Deadspin. She'll quit and say the pay wasn't worth it, even though her output is negligible and her editing is deficient. And then she'll be on the air again in some capacity, working for peanuts.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Julie is moving to WBEZ to head up a new feature called Incurious City, where people ask her "why are there twelve blocks to a mile from Madison to Roosevelt but eight to a mile everywhere else" and then she doesn't get around to answering.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

Your bizarre attempt to link this to Donald Trump is what's funny here. Schefter described the career arc of a quarterback in the mildest of terms, and you somehow believe it's journalistic malfeasance. He's an entertainment reporter who horse trades to be the first with breaking NFL news. That's his brand. Being first. And he's covering the NFL, he's not on the Spotlight team making sure that the nuclear plant isn't dumping waste near an orphanage. He makes millions of dollars covering the NFL for a network that has a contract with the league. It's like saying Mean Gene Okerlund wasn't tough enough in his coverage of Jack Tunney. PR hack!

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

I can imagine her fumbling like Les trying to explain 3 technique.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

He's a reporter, so accuracy is pretty important.

No matter what he covers.

Bringing up nuclear waste is a nice touch from you however.

For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.

And God forbid if July did it.

For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.

No he isn’t. He’s a hype man for the NFL. The nuclear waste reference was to present what journalists are supposed to uncover instead of trades into the 2nd round.

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

No one would give a fuck. It’s only because blue checkmarks hate Schefter.

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

Here is his bio. https://espnpressroom.com/us/bios/schef ... the%20year.



One of the top sports reporters in the country, Schefter has covered the NFL since 1990,...

Before joining ESPN, Schefter was a reporter/analyst for NFL Network (2004-08) and a sportswriter for more than 15 years for the Denver Post and the Rocky Mountain News, where he covered the NFL and the Denver Broncos team that won back-to-back Super Bowls. He was the Colorado Sports Writer of the Year in 2002 and 2003 and frequently appeared on ESPN’s Around the Horn and the Sports Reporters during his time with the Post.

For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.

Why do you think that’s important?

The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.

He's a reporter, so accuracy is pretty important.

No he isn’t. He’s a hype man for the NFL. The nuclear waste reference was to present what journalists are supposed to uncover instead of trades into the 2nd round.

Here is his bio. https://espnpressroom.com/us/bios/schef ... the%20year.



One of the top sports reporters in the country, Schefter has covered the NFL since 1990,...

Before joining ESPN, Schefter was a reporter/analyst for NFL Network (2004-08) and a sportswriter for more than 15 years for the Denver Post and the Rocky Mountain News, where he covered the NFL and the Denver Broncos team that won back-to-back Super Bowls. He was the Colorado Sports Writer of the Year in 2002 and 2003 and frequently appeared on ESPN’s Around the Horn and the Sports Reporters during his time with the Post.

Why do you think that’s important?

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

Why do you use those quotation marks incorrectly so much?

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

There it is again.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

Yeah you deflecting? Sure it is.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

You just keep being you, Pumpkin. It's adorable.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

More deflecting. As stated you are predictable as hell to say the least. And the "gay blading" routine of yours might actually be funny if the shit hadn't been tried by Tom Hanks circa 1980 already. Or John Ritter.

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

It's uncanny just how often you show up for the sole purpose of trying to take the focus off of one of your "guys" around here. You are nothing if not extremely predictable.