It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:52 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 249 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Meant more like a failed background check would have theoretically prevented him from purchasing firearms. How's that in the interest of the businesses that sell guns.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38684
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Its certainly easier to digest when someone just uses a vehicle to kill parade participants.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 7:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19027
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
badrogue17 wrote:
Its certainly easier to digest when someone just uses a vehicle to kill parade participants.

Ban cars!

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
NRA should establish a "Price of Liberty" scholarship for kids that have both parents killed by guns.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:00 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79537
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Brick wrote:
NRA should establish a "Price of Liberty" scholarship for kids that have both parents killed by guns.



Great idea. Also a "War on Cars" scholarship for those who have had both parents die in car wrecks.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19027
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
NRA should establish a "Price of Liberty" scholarship for kids that have both parents killed by guns.



Great idea. Also a "War on Cars" scholarship for those who have had both parents die in car wrecks.


This also sounds like a good idea.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
NRA should establish a "Price of Liberty" scholarship for kids that have both parents killed by guns.



Great idea. Also a "War on Cars" scholarship for those who have had both parents die in car wrecks.

Agreed. The name needs work though. The scholarship needs to highlight to the kid the importance of their parents sacrifice.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:11 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65747
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
NRA should establish a "Price of Liberty" scholarship for kids that have both parents killed by guns.



Great idea. Also a "War on Cars" scholarship for those who have had both parents die in car wrecks.

Agreed. The name needs work though. The scholarship needs to highlight to the kid the importance of their parents sacrifice.

How should we honor the hundreds of thousands that have died for all our rights? Maybe a snarky, blame throwing post?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79537
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
NRA should establish a "Price of Liberty" scholarship for kids that have both parents killed by guns.



Great idea. Also a "War on Cars" scholarship for those who have had both parents die in car wrecks.

Agreed. The name needs work though. The scholarship needs to highlight to the kid the importance of their parents sacrifice.

How should we honor the hundreds of thousands that have died for all our rights? Maybe a snarky, blame throwing post?



Rights are no good if we're dead. Take another COVID shot, put 3 masks and a fishbowl or your head and stay the fuck home!

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16472
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
badrogue17 wrote:
Its certainly easier to digest when someone just uses a vehicle to kill parade participants.


Or buys some pressure cookers to make some bombs (like the Boston Marathon bomber). If this attack was in the works for weeks (as reported), he likely would have found some other method if he was unable to buy the gun.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
Darkside wrote:
How should we honor the hundreds of thousands that have died for all our rights? Maybe a snarky, blame throwing post?
Sounds like Memorial Day. Another good option.

But you can stop calling my ideas snarky or blame throwing. If we are going to lean in onto the idea that the current gun situation in America is a byproduct of the need to be able to have enough weapons available to protect us from the government then let's just be open about it. Just like cars as JORR pointed out, a lot of people are going to die a year because of them and that's just the cost of doing business. With guns, the positives outweigh the negatives.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:27 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65747
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Brick wrote:
But you can stop calling my ideas snarky or blame throwing. If we are going to lean in onto the idea that the current gun situation in America is a byproduct of the need to be able to have enough weapons available to protect us from the government then let's just be open about it. Just like cars as JORR pointed out, a lot of people are going to die a year because of them and that's just the cost of doing business. With guns, the positives outweigh the negatives.

No I don't think I will stop that. Because that's precisely what you were going for. You were trying to be your usual clever sarcastic self and you didn't post a legitimate idea or solution, it was just meant to be snarky. Own it if you're gonna post it.

And for the very last time, please and for the love of God, this isn't about being able to defend yourself against the government. It's about being able to simply defend yourself against whomever may be an aggressor.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16814
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:33 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79537
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
And for the very last time, please and for the love of God, this isn't about being able to defend yourself against the government. It's about being able to simply defend yourself against whomever may be an aggressor.


But it would be difficult to find any person or entity more aggressive than the U.S. government.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:38 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65747
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
And for the very last time, please and for the love of God, this isn't about being able to defend yourself against the government. It's about being able to simply defend yourself against whomever may be an aggressor.


But it would be difficult to find any person or entity more aggressive than the U.S. government.

Ok. Dude I know you're totally jilted by the US government right now but we can stay productive.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
Darkside wrote:
No I don't think I will stop that. Because that's precisely what you were going for. You were trying to be your usual clever sarcastic self and you didn't post a legitimate idea or solution, it was just meant to be snarky. Own it if you're gonna post it.
There is only one solution and it would be an Amendment passed to modify the Second Amendment. It won't happen with our generation as gun violence isn't that much of an issue in terms of deaths. It's not in the top ten. It's high on the list for deaths for kids though.

This may be why you view it as snarky. It's more about acceptance. When my kid came home talking about a "bad guy drill" and how he had to practice hiding in a closet and being silent and acted like it was a completely normal thing like we viewed tornado and fire drills I just accepted that this is just how things have changed and no one wants and real change and even if they did the Constitution as it is written makes it virtually impossible. Even you know none of the stuff that can be done will change anything. I do think the next generation is going to be raised differently on guns and then maybe the sanctity of the Second Amendment won't be the insurmountable hurdle to an Amendment that actually could limit gun violence but that also requires guns to even more deadly.

Darkside wrote:
And for the very last time, please and for the love of God, this isn't about being able to defend yourself against the government. It's about being able to simply defend yourself against whomever may be an aggressor.

But, these discussions almost invariably go to the guns being protection from the Government. I mean, it's the whole reason for the "well regulated militia" part.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79537
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Darkside wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
And for the very last time, please and for the love of God, this isn't about being able to defend yourself against the government. It's about being able to simply defend yourself against whomever may be an aggressor.


But it would be difficult to find any person or entity more aggressive than the U.S. government.

Ok. Dude I know you're totally jilted by the US government right now but we can stay productive.


Look, whether or not you find it "practical" in 2022, the purpose of the Second Amendment wasn't to ensure you could hunt or even that you could protect yourself from Indians. You know that.

I get that BRick finds it absurd that a bunch of ranchers in Nevada could take on the U.S. Government. (Though that actually happened rather recently: https://nohostagesradio.com/articles/bu ... government ). But is anything more absurd than a bunch of guys with muskets (I keep being told THEY HAD MUSKETS!) taking on the most powerful military and navy on the planet and winning?

There's been plenty of talk on this board and in our politics about eliminating the Senate and/or Electoral College. My contention is that doing so would effectively end the Union. What would that look like? It's hard to say. But the fact that The People have weapons is what would allow that to happen. I guess President Ocasio-Cortez could nuke Texas, but that seems a whole lot less "practical" than a bunch of hillbillies from Montana beating back a division of the same U.S. Army that just got its brains beaten in by goat farmers in Afghanistan. And who knows what side China or Russia would be on? Maybe South Dakota would have its own nuclear support.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:56 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79537
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Brick wrote:
When my kid came home talking about a "bad guy drill" and how he had to practice hiding in a closet and being silent and acted like it was a completely normal thing like we viewed tornado and fire drills I just accepted that this is just how things have changed


Things haven't changed. The world has always been a dangerous place. I hid under my desk from Russian bombs every Tuesday at 10:30.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I get that BRick finds it absurd that a bunch of ranchers in Nevada could take on the U.S. Government. (Though that actually happened rather recently: https://nohostagesradio.com/articles/bu ... government ). But is anything more absurd than a bunch of guys with muskets (I keep being told THEY HAD MUSKETS!) taking on the most powerful military and navy on the planet and winning?
:lol: That article was amazing.

But, the government botching a case and losing in court, as they should have, isn't exactly the Bundy militia forcing the government to retreat.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 9:01 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
And for the very last time, please and for the love of God, this isn't about being able to defend yourself against the government. It's about being able to simply defend yourself against whomever may be an aggressor.


But it would be difficult to find any person or entity more aggressive than the U.S. government.


I'm not sure you can take down the government on your own, JORR. Maybe you can enlist this guy, though. He's got a tank and everything:

Image

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
When my kid came home talking about a "bad guy drill" and how he had to practice hiding in a closet and being silent and acted like it was a completely normal thing like we viewed tornado and fire drills I just accepted that this is just how things have changed


Things haven't changed. The world has always been a dangerous place. I hid under my desk from Russian bombs every Tuesday at 10:30.

That's exactly the point and it had a major impact on all the kids of your generation who had to deal with the idea that the Russians were going to kill them to the point where you had to practice on how to best survive them. Even now, you see it as a way that Russia is looked at. This does go against your thoughts on Russia only being viewed as a problem since Trump though.

We'll see how the current generation of kids views guns in the constant school shooting era.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 9:03 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79537
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I get that BRick finds it absurd that a bunch of ranchers in Nevada could take on the U.S. Government. (Though that actually happened rather recently: https://nohostagesradio.com/articles/bu ... government ). But is anything more absurd than a bunch of guys with muskets (I keep being told THEY HAD MUSKETS!) taking on the most powerful military and navy on the planet and winning?
:lol: That article was amazing.

But, the government botching a case and losing in court, as they should have, isn't exactly the Bundy militia forcing the government to retreat.



The Bundys did win the standoff with the government though. You could argue that the government had the manpower and firepower to slaughter the Bundys and that's true. But if they had done that, there may have been a lot larger group with even more weapons the next time the Feds stuck their noses into business thousands of miles away from Washington, D.C.

I get that we imagine these things "can't happen here" but they happen all the time all over the world. A bunch of Iranian students hatched a revolution at Alumni Hall right here in Chicago and managed to take out the Shah who was backed by the United States.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 9:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79537
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Brick wrote:
This does go against your thoughts on Russia only being viewed as a problem since Trump though.


The Soviet Union fell in the early 90s. Russia was a quasi-ally until "Putin helped DRUMPF steal the election from Hillary Clinton."


Image

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Bundys did win the standoff with the government though. You could argue that the government had the manpower and firepower to slaughter the Bundys and that's true. But if they had done that, there may have been a lot larger group with even more weapons the next time the Feds stuck their noses into business thousands of miles away from Washington, D.C.
They won it through the traditional legal channels though. That's the point.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 9:27 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I get that BRick finds it absurd that a bunch of ranchers in Nevada could take on the U.S. Government. (Though that actually happened rather recently: https://nohostagesradio.com/articles/bu ... government ). But is anything more absurd than a bunch of guys with muskets (I keep being told THEY HAD MUSKETS!) taking on the most powerful military and navy on the planet and winning?
:lol: That article was amazing.

But, the government botching a case and losing in court, as they should have, isn't exactly the Bundy militia forcing the government to retreat.



The Bundys did win the standoff with the government though. You could argue that the government had the manpower and firepower to slaughter the Bundys and that's true. But if they had done that, there may have been a lot larger group with even more weapons the next time the Feds stuck their noses into business thousands of miles away from Washington, D.C.

I get that we imagine these things "can't happen here" but they happen all the time all over the world. A bunch of Iranian students hatched a revolution at Alumni Hall right here in Chicago and managed to take out the Shah who was backed by the United States.


But wasn't the Iranian revolution a product of mass protest, not armed insurrection? The government had the superior firepower and lost. So how does a victory by largely unarmed People validate your position on the Second Amendment?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 9:45 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
NRA should establish a "Price of Liberty" scholarship for kids that have both parents killed by guns.
Great idea. Also a "War on Cars" scholarship for those who have had both parents die in car wrecks.
There is nothing about cars or aircraft in the Constitution. How can we have rights to cars or to wear pajamas on an airplane if these weren't expressly written in a 250 year old document?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 11:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79537
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tall Midget wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Brick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I get that BRick finds it absurd that a bunch of ranchers in Nevada could take on the U.S. Government. (Though that actually happened rather recently: https://nohostagesradio.com/articles/bu ... government ). But is anything more absurd than a bunch of guys with muskets (I keep being told THEY HAD MUSKETS!) taking on the most powerful military and navy on the planet and winning?
:lol: That article was amazing.

But, the government botching a case and losing in court, as they should have, isn't exactly the Bundy militia forcing the government to retreat.



The Bundys did win the standoff with the government though. You could argue that the government had the manpower and firepower to slaughter the Bundys and that's true. But if they had done that, there may have been a lot larger group with even more weapons the next time the Feds stuck their noses into business thousands of miles away from Washington, D.C.

I get that we imagine these things "can't happen here" but they happen all the time all over the world. A bunch of Iranian students hatched a revolution at Alumni Hall right here in Chicago and managed to take out the Shah who was backed by the United States.


But wasn't the Iranian revolution a product of mass protest, not armed insurrection? The government had the superior firepower and lost. So how does a victory by largely unarmed People validate your position on the Second Amendment?


I never said a revolution can't be successful without weapons. It certainly is more difficult though.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This isn't commentary for or against the second amendment but notwithstanding the example JORR shared there's no way private gun owners are gonna defeat the state if the state really wanted to crush some movement. The only thing that would stop it is people refusing to carry out orders to execute or imprison their own fellow citizens, so some social bonds are needed in addition to an appetite to refuse orders.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 11:53 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65747
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
veganfan21 wrote:
This isn't commentary for or against the second amendment but notwithstanding the example JORR shared there's no way private gun owners are gonna defeat the state if the state really wanted to crush some movement. The only thing that would stop it is people refusing to carry out orders to execute or imprison their own fellow citizens, so some social bonds are needed in addition to an appetite to refuse orders.

Yeah I don't know man. A third world armed insurgency that's a fraction of the US population stymied the United States armed forces for a decade in Iraq and Afghanistan. If there was a rebellion, they wouldn't know who was and wasn't on which side. They're not waging a traditional war with armies entrenched and fighting across battle Iines.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 12:04 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
This isn't commentary for or against the second amendment but notwithstanding the example JORR shared there's no way private gun owners are gonna defeat the state if the state really wanted to crush some movement. The only thing that would stop it is people refusing to carry out orders to execute or imprison their own fellow citizens, so some social bonds are needed in addition to an appetite to refuse orders.

Yeah I don't know man. A third world armed insurgency that's a fraction of the US population stymied the United States armed forces for a decade in Iraq and Afghanistan. If there was a rebellion, they wouldn't know who was and wasn't on which side. They're not waging a traditional war with armies entrenched and fighting across battle Iines.


For the same reasons we defeated a superpower 250 years ago. We were fighting on a terrain that we were unfamiliar with. That provides a huge advantage to the inferior army. Especially if the superpower is unwilling to use extreme measures to win. Ask Russia what it did to their country.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 249 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group