.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You're wrong almost all the time and teaching children so they can be wrong too. What a world.
You see Jorr what you are about to observe below is what "WE" in the Field of Education like to refer to as "supporting evidence" . You might want to take "notes" while you're at it. Its because of this particular strategy that students, such as the ones that are taught by me, are able to immediately cut through all of the double speak and bullshit of hypocritical rubes such as yourself. If provided with the necessary tools, any student or person with a functioning brain can see that you are utterly full of shit on BOTH accounts. First with the Clinton Foundation and later with Comey.
As stated previously, for the better part of 5-6 years you have proceeded to make a complete ass of yourself with all of the rationalizing and excusing of Trump's actions and behavior that you do around here. Below are but 2 examples of this.
long time guy wrote:
With the Clinton Foundation you criticized the hell out of them for "defrauding their charity", yet when Trump was proven to have defrauded his own charity you really didn't give a shit about it.
Whenever Trump has been shown to be running a scam you pooh pooh it, only to claim that it is everyone else that loves "degenerates". Huh?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Please quote the posts. You can't. Because you are just a guy who is full of shit. Just like you were wrong about when the vaccines were available. You're wrong almost all the time and teaching children so they can be wrong too. What a world.
You pulled the exact same stunt last time too.
long time guy wrote:
Every discussion always reverts back to this (though you never provide anything besides silly presumptions for any of it). The investigation into Collusion/medddling predates the election of Trump.
While you are at it with all of the silly presumptions is there any doubt what your opinion would be if Trump had won the election as a Democrat?
Would you be poohing poohing all of this if he were a Dem.? How about the other contingent of Trump apologists that post on here?
You have people( you included) that criticized the hell out of the Clinton Foundation yet Trump Charities has been shown to have been a corrupt, fraudulently run Organization and yet not one peep from you or all of the other hacks on here.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Wrong. I'm not sure I've ever mentioned the Clinton Foundation. If I have it was in passing. Keep your many beefs straight please.
Liar, Denier pants on fire!
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Seriously now, with everything we know about the Clinton Foundation, etc., which candidate do you really believe is more compromised due to relationships with foreign governments?
Look, I'm predisposed to vote for the Democrat. But when I see the way the Clinton machine and their media pals are trying to spin this, I can't help but be sympathetic to a guy I consider an absolute goof. I'd still never vote for Donald Trump, but if I feel that way, you can imagine how the middle of the road guy or the voter who is on the fence might feel.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
As I said, in passing. But this is the dishonest type of thing you do all the time. You attempted to make it seem that I had railed about the Clinton Foundation and when I stated the truth you came up with the above. Pretty weak.
In any case, if you want my thoughts on the Clinton Foundation, here they are. You can look up its record and as a charitable organization and see that while it isn't the best, it's certainly not horrible like Goodwill. I think the fact that donations have dropped off so much now that the Clintons aren't in a position of power shows the influence peddling involved. I don't find that shocking or rare. I'm from Chicago, just like you.
Cheers.
As same move in fact.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There was plenty of foreign influence peddling with Clinton when she was Secretary of State. What's happened to her Foundation since? But not a peep.
and here. But yeah it was all in "passing".
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I never mentioned Hillary Clinton.
But I'm trying to understand. Is it the editorial stance of "The Paper of Record" that building a few hotels with partners in India has more potential for conflict than running a foundation that accepts 8 figure "donations" from foreign governments? I certainly assume that's your stance.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You win! I'm obsessed with the Clinton Foundation.
Face it dude the honesty with you is "dishonesty". You can't tell the truth about much of anything.
_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
