Nardi wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Quintana had MANY games where he gave up 1 or 2 runs, and the Sox scored 1 or 0 runs. Those games were blended with the handful of stinkers he had in the minds of people who didn't want to like him. In reality, Quintana gave up 3 or fewer runs in the overwhelming majority of his outings with the Sox. The Sox scored 2 or fewer runs in most of his losses.
So basically he faced a lot of pitchers who were better than he was on the days he pitched.
It's not always black and white. The Sox had a shit offense.
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Quintana had MANY games where he gave up 1 or 2 runs, and the Sox scored 1 or 0 runs. Those games were blended with the handful of stinkers he had in the minds of people who didn't want to like him. In reality, Quintana gave up 3 or fewer runs in the overwhelming majority of his outings with the Sox. The Sox scored 2 or fewer runs in most of his losses.
So basically he faced a lot of pitchers who were better than he was on the days he pitched.
It's not always black and white. The Sox had a shit offense.
In 2012 Quintana was 6-6 and the Sox were fourth in runs scored.
In 2013 Quintana was 9-7 and the Sox were last in runs scored.
In 2014 Quintana was 9-11 and the Sox were ninth in runs scored (about league average).
In 2015 Quintana was 9-10 and the Sox were last in runs scored.
In 2012 Quintana was 13-12 and the Sox were eleventh in runs scored.
He seems to post about the same record regardless of what kind of offense his team has.
I don't know what the overall team RS has to do with Quintana's every 5th day RS. A quick check on his best year, 2016, and his offense scored 22 runs in his 12 losses. You say he couldn't make the pitch he needed to make in high leverage situations. Ok, I hear you. But this pitcher vs pitcher thing, I'm never going to agree, because it's nonsense.
Of course it makes sense.
Overall run scoring is a measure of a team's offense. I'm blowing up the baseless argument that Poor Jose Quintana has somehow had worse offenses over the course of his 285 start career than a typical pitcher. Surely, you're not suggesting that Quintana is "unlucky" over almost 300 career starts. Or that his teams refuse to hit on the days he is pitching.
Baseball at its core is a competition between pitchers. Think of it this way. (I don't follow the NFL so I don't really know who is supposed to be good.) Let's say the Chiefs are the best team. The most important guy on that team is Mahomes. Now let's say Mahomes can only start every fourth game. So the Chiefs have a rotation of quarterbacks. Now the Chiefs may only be the best team once every four games.
The starting pitchers are BY FAR the two most important players in any baseball game. And the guy facing Jose Quintana is obviously as good or better than Quintana right around half the time he takes the mound. That's the very definition of "mediocre."
There's no such thing as "run support." All "run support" is is the lesser number of runs allowed by the pitcher(s) facing Quintana than Quintana is allowing himself.