It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 10:08 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 35 of 164
  [ 4903 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 164  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:33 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
So you would take Mac Jones over Trevor Lawrence to lead your team? based on what you know now, that's your guy? Its fine if it is, none of us know for sure, that's just a surprising take.


I'm not sure how clearer I can write it. Mac Jones has been the best quarterback in his class. I'm not sure if that will always be true. If I had a game to win TODAY, I am taking Mac Jones.

I'm not positive Justin Fields will be in the league in 5 years. I have no use for him as my quarterback. I'm fairly confident Lawrence won't be a star. He's going to be a starter. He's fortunate a Mahomes wasn't drafted after him.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Caller Bob
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
So you would take Mac Jones over Trevor Lawrence to lead your team? based on what you know now, that's your guy? Its fine if it is, none of us know for sure, that's just a surprising take.


I'm not sure how clearer I can write it. Mac Jones has been the best quarterback in his class.

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Well you haven't answered the question even once, but your tap dance around an answer is impressive. If you had to draft a QB to lead your team into the future right now, would you choose Mac Jones or Trevor Lawrence? I honestly only barely give a shit one way or the other, but you sound like you think Mac Jones is better than Trevor Lawrence and now I am just curious.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Caller Bob wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
So you would take Mac Jones over Trevor Lawrence to lead your team? based on what you know now, that's your guy? Its fine if it is, none of us know for sure, that's just a surprising take.


I'm not sure how clearer I can write it. Mac Jones has been the best quarterback in his class.

Image


Even after missing multiple games, and playing in hurricane winds, Mac Jones has more passing yards, more touchdowns and fewer turnovers. Trevor Lawrence has Fabio hair. That's probably good for something.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
Well you haven't answered the question even once, but your tap dance around an answer is impressive. If you had to draft a QB to lead your team into the future right now, would you choose Mac Jones or Trevor Lawrence? I honestly only barely give a shit one way or the other, but you sound like you think Mac Jones is better than Trevor Lawrence and now I am just curious.


I would draft Mac Jones. His floor is significantly higher, and I think he has winning intangibles. I thought Trevor Lawrence was overrated years ago.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.
Top
 Profile  
 
Frank Coztansa
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Still think we need around 25 starts. Less than halfway there.
I don't think we need that many. If we don't see major improvements in his game by about Halloween next season, it might be time to pull the pin on Fields.
This was December 2021. I'll stand by it.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Hussra
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Trevor Lawrence's ceiling is Kirk Cousins.

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.
Top
 Profile  
 
Zippy-The-Pinhead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.

I have zero doubt that Trevor Lawrence will emerge as the best QB in that class, and it won't be a debate. Nas, one of us will bump this thread by the end of this season. I'm looking forward to it.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.


I could deduce from your initial reply that you believed Lawrence would be great. Similar to the way MANY feel about Fields. I was just pointing out things that were currently factual. I wasn't looking to draft a quarterback. I don't think any of them are franchise guys.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Zippy-The-Pinhead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.


I could deduce from your initial reply that you believed Lawrence would be great. Similar to the way MANY feel about Fields. I was just pointing out things that were currently factual. I wasn't looking to draft a quarterback. I don't think any of them are franchise guys.

I'm not sure about great at this point but he has a better chance than any of the others in his class. I think his floor is good NFL QB.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.

I have zero doubt that Trevor Lawrence will emerge as the best QB in that class, and it won't be a debate. Nas, one of us will bump this thread by the end of this season. I'm looking forward to it.


It shouldn't currently be a debate based on the Lawrence hype. The fact that Jones has been easily the best quarterback should concern everyone.

If Mac Jones is still better than Lawrence while missing a 1/3 of the season, it should concern you even more.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.


I could deduce from your initial reply that you believed Lawrence would be great. Similar to the way MANY feel about Fields. I was just pointing out things that were currently factual. I wasn't looking to draft a quarterback. I don't think any of them are franchise guys.

I'm not sure about great at this point but he has a better chance than any of the others in his class. I think his floor is good NFL QB.


I don't doubt he's a starting quarterback. You want a little bit more than Baker Mayfield when drafting #1.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Dignified Rube
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4773
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
What QB wouldn't be intimidated playing at Giants Stadium for the first time at age 23?

Has he played great? No, but at the same time we're being hard on a guy here who's still learning and has had to deal with poor o-line play that has had him running for his life.

So far he has managed not to get injured, even though he's already taken some good shots, including one to the head in the last game.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Few quarterbacks not in the Manning family were groomed the way Fields was at a young age.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Augie
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Posts: 1544
pizza_Place: Beek's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.


I could deduce from your initial reply that you believed Lawrence would be great. Similar to the way MANY feel about Fields. I was just pointing out things that were currently factual. I wasn't looking to draft a quarterback. I don't think any of them are franchise guys.

I'm not sure about great at this point but he has a better chance than any of the others in his class. I think his floor is good NFL QB.


better than Cousins or Carr?

_________________
"I give you my word as a Biden"
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Augie wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.


I could deduce from your initial reply that you believed Lawrence would be great. Similar to the way MANY feel about Fields. I was just pointing out things that were currently factual. I wasn't looking to draft a quarterback. I don't think any of them are franchise guys.

I'm not sure about great at this point but he has a better chance than any of the others in his class. I think his floor is good NFL QB.


better than Cousins or Carr?


I don't think that good. I believe Cousins and Carr are really good quarterbacks. Cousins is an overpaid loser, though.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
That may be true about baker mayfield BUT getting a long-term starting QB at #1 without trading up to get him is a win. In most cases the team makes the QB, not the other way around. As long as the QB is competent and displays good leadership and keeps the franchise from constantly wasting draft choices to get “the one” over and over.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
That may be true about baker mayfield BUT getting a long-term starting QB at #1 without trading up to get him is a win. In most cases the team makes the QB, not the other way around. As long as the QB is competent and displays good leadership and keeps the franchise from constantly wasting draft choices to get “the one” over and over.


Yeah, they could be the 49ers. That Lance pick should get someone fired.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
man of few opinions
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
I think Mac jones and Lawrence have a good future. But if the measuring stick is always going to be Mahomes for these guys a lot of teams will be disappointed. And teams trading up, blowing draft picks chasing the holy grail are fools I think.
Top
 Profile  
 
Zippy-The-Pinhead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.

I have zero doubt that Trevor Lawrence will emerge as the best QB in that class, and it won't be a debate. Nas, one of us will bump this thread by the end of this season. I'm looking forward to it.


It shouldn't currently be a debate based on the Lawrence hype. The fact that Jones has been easily the best quarterback should concern everyone.

If Mac Jones is still better than Lawrence while missing a 1/3 of the season, it should concern you even more.

The only QB in question that I have any real interest in is Fields (for obvious reasons). I just happen to believe that TL will be good and that Mac will never be more than adequate.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance
Top
 Profile  
 
312player
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
That may be true about baker mayfield BUT getting a long-term starting QB at #1 without trading up to get him is a win. In most cases the team makes the QB, not the other way around. As long as the QB is competent and displays good leadership and keeps the franchise from constantly wasting draft choices to get “the one” over and over.


Yeah, they could be the 49ers. That Lance pick should get someone fired.



That Lance pick is nowhere remotely close to being as bad as the (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky pick. Lance has 4 career starts under his belt, we don't know what he is.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.
Top
 Profile  
 
denisdman
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33070
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Mac Jones may be available based on what I saw with that third stringer who threw for 62 TD’s in one college season.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.

I have zero doubt that Trevor Lawrence will emerge as the best QB in that class, and it won't be a debate. Nas, one of us will bump this thread by the end of this season. I'm looking forward to it.


It shouldn't currently be a debate based on the Lawrence hype. The fact that Jones has been easily the best quarterback should concern everyone.

If Mac Jones is still better than Lawrence while missing a 1/3 of the season, it should concern you even more.

The only QB in question that I have any real interest in is Fields (for obvious reasons). I just happen to believe that TL will be good and that Mac will never be more than adequate.


You should be concerned about Love. Rodgers is going to retire after next year. The quarterback gods have been very good to you, but it's unreasonable to expect it to happen again. You're going to have some Bear quarterback years.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Zippy-The-Pinhead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Augie wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
OK, great, glad we have that sorted out.


Why would you take Lawrence? Because of the natural talent that he and Fields has?

I never said I would. I just found it funny how you were avoiding the question. But if you are asking me now I would take Lawrence because I think he is starting to flash some upside this year, yesterdays fumble-fest notwithstanding.


I could deduce from your initial reply that you believed Lawrence would be great. Similar to the way MANY feel about Fields. I was just pointing out things that were currently factual. I wasn't looking to draft a quarterback. I don't think any of them are franchise guys.

I'm not sure about great at this point but he has a better chance than any of the others in his class. I think his floor is good NFL QB.


better than Cousins or Carr?

Floor is as good as both, but I think he'll end up better. If not he'll be considered a disappointment.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
312player wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
That may be true about baker mayfield BUT getting a long-term starting QB at #1 without trading up to get him is a win. In most cases the team makes the QB, not the other way around. As long as the QB is competent and displays good leadership and keeps the franchise from constantly wasting draft choices to get “the one” over and over.


Yeah, they could be the 49ers. That Lance pick should get someone fired.



That Lance pick is nowhere remotely close to being as bad as the (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky pick. Lance has 4 career starts under his belt, we don't know what he is.


You're insane. The Bears gave up a 3rd for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. They gave up even more for Fields. The 49ers gave up 3 first round picks for a kid who looked years away before his injury. Trey Lance would be lucky to have the career (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky had in Chicago. He may not have the career Fields has had.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Zippy-The-Pinhead
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I have zero doubt that Trevor Lawrence will emerge as the best QB in that class, and it won't be a debate. Nas, one of us will bump this thread by the end of this season. I'm looking forward to it.


It shouldn't currently be a debate based on the Lawrence hype. The fact that Jones has been easily the best quarterback should concern everyone.

If Mac Jones is still better than Lawrence while missing a 1/3 of the season, it should concern you even more.

The only QB in question that I have any real interest in is Fields (for obvious reasons). I just happen to believe that TL will be good and that Mac will never be more than adequate.


You should be concerned about Love. Rodgers is going to retire after next year. The quarterback gods have been very good to you, but it's unreasonable to expect it to happen again. You're going to have some Bear quarterback years.
Love seems to be more of a concern to Bears fans for some reason. I honestly don't give him a thought outside of pre-season. I also have confidence that the Packers will move on from him if they think he can't play.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 6:03 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I have zero doubt that Trevor Lawrence will emerge as the best QB in that class, and it won't be a debate. Nas, one of us will bump this thread by the end of this season. I'm looking forward to it.


It shouldn't currently be a debate based on the Lawrence hype. The fact that Jones has been easily the best quarterback should concern everyone.

If Mac Jones is still better than Lawrence while missing a 1/3 of the season, it should concern you even more.

The only QB in question that I have any real interest in is Fields (for obvious reasons). I just happen to believe that TL will be good and that Mac will never be more than adequate.


You should be concerned about Love. Rodgers is going to retire after next year. The quarterback gods have been very good to you, but it's unreasonable to expect it to happen again. You're going to have some Bear quarterback years.
Love seems to be more of a concern to Bears fans for some reason. I honestly don't give him a thought outside of pre-season. I also have confidence that the Packers will move on from him if they think he can't play.


It warms our heart to know that you don't have an adequate replacement for Rodgers.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 35 of 164
  [ 4903 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 164  Next

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: RFDC, tywebb2112 and 7 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group