It is currently Mon Nov 18, 2024 4:43 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9734 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2022 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Tall Midget wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
TB was down their top two receivers and Gage was injured. They were down Godwin and Evans got tossed in game. They will be fine.


You don't expect the GOAT to get more out of ordinary receivers than he did yesterday?


I misspoke. He was down his top 3 WR with the 4th hobbled. They pulled Beasley off the street to start. GOAT has made Perryman look like a good WR the last two


Beasley is a perfectly fine possession receiver.


He was on the street when the week began

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2022 8:33 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
TB was down their top two receivers and Gage was injured. They were down Godwin and Evans got tossed in game. They will be fine.


You don't expect the GOAT to get more out of ordinary receivers than he did yesterday?


I misspoke. He was down his top 3 WR with the 4th hobbled. They pulled Beasley off the street to start. GOAT has made Perryman look like a good WR the last two


Beasley is a perfectly fine possession receiver.


He was on the street when the week began


I think that had more to do with him being outspoken about the vaccine.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2022 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
TB was down their top two receivers and Gage was injured. They were down Godwin and Evans got tossed in game. They will be fine.


You don't expect the GOAT to get more out of ordinary receivers than he did yesterday?


I misspoke. He was down his top 3 WR with the 4th hobbled. They pulled Beasley off the street to start. GOAT has made Perryman look like a good WR the last two


Beasley is a perfectly fine possession receiver.


He was on the street when the week began


I think that had more to do with him being outspoken about the vaccine.


Sure, but I still can't expect Brady to get him up to top form in 3 days.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 11:08 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Posts: 1871
pizza_Place: Colombo's
Its good to see Nixon doing well hated to see him go. Great guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
but of course sammy watkins got extremely uncomfortable playing 2 consecutive games and decided to go on IR with a hammy injury that must have happened at practice. Whatever.....Romeo is just about ready to do his thing.

You might wanna hold off putting Dobbs in the HOF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Caller Bob wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
but of course sammy watkins got extremely uncomfortable playing 2 consecutive games and decided to go on IR with a hammy injury that must have happened at practice. Whatever.....Romeo is just about ready to do his thing.

You might wanna hold off putting Dobbs in the HOF

He’ll be fine. Actually I like the way he looks.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38676
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hey are the Packers still in trouble cuz Adams left and Rodgers is bad , unvaccinated and has no one to throw to ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
badrogue17 wrote:
Hey are the Packers still in trouble cuz Adams left and Rodgers is bad , unvaccinated and has no one to throw to ?

Saved by ayahuasca

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
badrogue17 wrote:
Hey are the Packers still in trouble cuz Adams left and Rodgers is bad , unvaccinated and has no one to throw to ?

They are in trouble but not because of the vaccines. They've got a Jordan Love problem - wasted pick.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30303
Winning is always good, lots to improve on.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38676
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Hey are the Packers still in trouble cuz Adams left and Rodgers is bad , unvaccinated and has no one to throw to ?

They are in trouble but not because of the vaccines. They've got a Jordan Love problem - wasted pick.

Could be worse. They could have a Justin Fields problem

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Winning is always good, lots to improve on.


True. The offense could use a #1 receiver. A motivated Rodgers wouldn't hurt.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Winning is always good, lots to improve on.

You will say the same thing in January.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
badrogue17 wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Hey are the Packers still in trouble cuz Adams left and Rodgers is bad , unvaccinated and has no one to throw to ?

They are in trouble but not because of the vaccines. They've got a Jordan Love problem - wasted pick.

Could be worse. They could have a Justin Fields problem


If fields ends up staying a problem you can simply move on. However the Pack can never go back to 2020 when they had a chance to give Rodgers more help, help that could have propelled them to greater heights the last two years, and instead of investing in help they invested in someone whose job it is to sit on a bench. Dumbest thing I've ever seen.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30303
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Winning is always good, lots to improve on.


True. The offense could use a #1 receiver. A motivated Rodgers wouldn't hurt.

Lazard 6 for 116 wasn't bad today.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Winning is always good, lots to improve on.


True. The offense could use a #1 receiver. A motivated Rodgers wouldn't hurt.

Lazard 6 for 116 wasn't bad today.


You know what was bad? Pre 2022 the Pack would have bombed NE out of the building. Instead the watered down offense barely beat Bryan Hoyer and whoever came in after Hoyer. I think it was Hoyer's son.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2022 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
veganfan21 wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Winning is always good, lots to improve on.


True. The offense could use a #1 receiver. A motivated Rodgers wouldn't hurt.

Lazard 6 for 116 wasn't bad today.


You know what was bad? Pre 2022 the Pack would have bombed NE out of the building. Instead the watered down offense barely beat Bryan Hoyer and whoever came in after Hoyer. I think it was Hoyer's son.

Are you really still fixated on a draft pick from 2020? That’s all you’ve got? Remember what your beloved Ditka said about the past.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 10:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Remember what your beloved Ditka said about the past.
We'll remember this when the decade plus old singular Super Bowl appearance of Aaron Rodgers is referenced.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 10:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Rodgers is already complaining about the offense. He says this isn't sustainable. I wonder what players the Packers could have signed that would instantly make the offense better.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Winning is always good, lots to improve on.


True. The offense could use a #1 receiver. A motivated Rodgers wouldn't hurt.

Lazard 6 for 116 wasn't bad today.


You know what was bad? Pre 2022 the Pack would have bombed NE out of the building. Instead the watered down offense barely beat Bryan Hoyer and whoever came in after Hoyer. I think it was Hoyer's son.

Are you really still fixated on a draft pick from 2020? That’s all you’ve got? Remember what your beloved Ditka said about the past.


Ditka? He's a putz. I'm a Love Smith guy.

The past looms large when looking at the state of the Packers. How great it would have been to see Michael Pittman running those routes instead of butterfinger Watson or confused Doubs. Just a tragic mistake that sealed the curtain on Rodgers' chances for more rings. Enjoy the 11-6 season and your usual early exit from the playoffs.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30303
Nas wrote:
Rodgers is already complaining about the offense. He says this isn't sustainable. I wonder what players the Packers could have signed that would instantly make the offense better.

He needs to play like he did in the 2nd half, he was absolutely awful in the 1st half.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
I don't understand this obsession with the Love pick. The 1st rd picks in the last 7 drafts have produced 6 current starting players on the defense. How many other teams have hit that many times on 1st round picks? The Raiders have pissed away 3 first round picks in the last few years. Love also did not look that bad in the pre season. He ran the offense, went through his progressions and made some pretty nice throws. Getsy would take him over Fields in a heartbeat right now.

...and for those that aren't buying in on Doubs....look at Adams' stats his first few years. Doubs is way ahead of him as a rookie. Everyone wants to compare rookie Doubs to seasoned veteran Adams but anyone that paid attention to Adams early in his career knows that he struggled mightily early on, dropped a ton of passes and was hated by the fanbase. Doubs has plenty to work on, especially holding on to the damn ball after he catches it, but he is going to be good.

Watson was always going to be a project but he can absolutely fly as seen with his td yesterday.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 8:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Rodgers is going to retire after next year. There's no one to help those guys continue to develop. Enjoy the final months of an underachieving 30 year run with HoF quarterbacks.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
I don't understand this obsession with the Love pick. The 1st rd picks in the last 7 drafts have produced 6 current starting players on the defense. How many other teams have hit that many times on 1st round picks? The Raiders have pissed away 3 first round picks in the last few years. Love also did not look that bad in the pre season. He ran the offense, went through his progressions and made some pretty nice throws. Getsy would take him over Fields in a heartbeat right now.

...and for those that aren't buying in on Doubs....look at Adams' stats his first few years. Doubs is way ahead of him as a rookie. Everyone wants to compare rookie Doubs to seasoned veteran Adams but anyone that paid attention to Adams early in his career knows that he struggled mightily early on, dropped a ton of passes and was hated by the fanbase. Doubs has plenty to work on, especially holding on to the damn ball after he catches it, but he is going to be good.

Watson was always going to be a project but he can absolutely fly as seen with his td yesterday.


So you support the Adams divorce because now you're relying on a guy who is not better than 2022 Adams but is marginally better than 2017 Adams. And this is good how?

:lol:

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
You speak as if there was a way for Adams to return to the Packers. He had made a decision to move on before last year even kicked off. Even if he wanted to come back it would have been really difficult to do financially. The ran that team out there how many years in a row and came up short every time with a healthy all pro Adams. They have mixed up the formula, spread the money around to the defense and are working on developing some new weapons on offense. They will be fine. They always are.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
The ran that team out there how many years in a row and came up short every time with a healthy all pro Adams. They have mixed up the formula, spread the money around to the defense and are working on developing some new weapons on offense. They will be fine. They always are.



:lol: There you go again. You're criticizing him and Rodgers for "not running the offense," as if having Adams around was actually a bad thing for both Rodgers and the entire team. By intimating Adams was the root cause of the Packers' inability to make it back to the SB while simultaneously whitewashing the piss poor talent at WR (developing weapons :lol: ) you're continuing to prove you have no idea what you're talking about. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "fine," they are quite obviously a lesser team post-Adams that barely survived something called Bailey Zappe while at home.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 9:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
You speak as if there was a way for Adams to return to the Packers. He had made a decision to move on before last year even kicked off. Even if he wanted to come back it would have been really difficult to do financially. The ran that team out there how many years in a row and came up short every time with a healthy all pro Adams. They have mixed up the formula, spread the money around to the defense and are working on developing some new weapons on offense. They will be fine. They always are.


Spread the money around? They just gave Rodgers a golden parachute. His 2nd HUGE payday in the last 5 years.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Since 2016 the Packers have added 6 starters and 2 backups to their lineup with 1st round picks. In that same time the Bears have added 2 starters in Fields and Roquan, and zero backups. Good luck with that.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 9:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Since 2016 the Packers have added 6 starters and 2 backups to their lineup with 1st round picks. In that same time the Bears have added 2 starters in Fields and Roquan, and zero backups. Good luck with that.


Imagine if one of them was a TE or WR? The Packers may have another SB or SB appearance.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Since 2016 the Packers have added 6 starters and 2 backups to their lineup with 1st round picks. In that same time the Bears have added 2 starters in Fields and Roquan, and zero backups. Good luck with that.


Imagine if one of them was a TE or WR? The Packers may have another SB or SB appearance.

Yep.

Also, zippy, your draft track record has resulted in the same exact number of NFC championship game wins as the bears enjoyed during that same stretchn of time. If only y'all used that 2020 1st round pick more thoughtfully. I forgot that y'all traded up for love as well. That makes it worse! :lol:

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9734 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group