It is currently Mon Nov 18, 2024 2:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9734 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Heisenberg wrote:
If the Packers miss the playoffs, all these Packers guys will disappear like Farvefan did. They don’t even continue posting to analyze the loss after the game.

We just get, “well your team sucks worse.” And my Dad could beat up their Dad.

I’m pretty sure they’ll make the playoffs but they certainly don’t look like a SB contender. I’m not sure what analysis you’re looking for. MLF will again say they didn’t run enough (which is correct), but nothing will change. Personally I hated the series where they threw two long passes that were unnecessary and not even close to completion. One shot, sure, but then go back to the bread and butter stuff that moves the chains.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1379
pizza_Place: Pequods
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
If the Packers miss the playoffs, all these Packers guys will disappear like Farvefan did. They don’t even continue posting to analyze the loss after the game.

We just get, “well your team sucks worse.” And my Dad could beat up their Dad.

I’m pretty sure they’ll make the playoffs but they certainly don’t look like a SB contender. I’m not sure what analysis you’re looking for. MLF will again say they didn’t run enough (which is correct), but nothing will change. Personally I hated the series where they threw two long passes that were unnecessary and not even close to completion. One shot, sure, but then go back to the bread and butter stuff that moves the chains.


Fair enough, I should have replied to ULN’s post. It just seems Packer fans on this board are very chatty pre-game and troll the Bears threads mercilessly. Until the Packers lose, then you disappear. And you have the highest paid player in the NFL on your roster, and multiple posters have stated you wouldn’t miss Adams.

As demented and sad as it may be, Bears fans have at least one entire thread dedicated to analyzing the losses.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
They passed on 4th and one? Lol Dillon was gashing them the whole first half during the few times he was on the field.

How are we not sure LeFluer is a dumbass?


The media loves to but I give the guy near zero credit for his green bay record. He's hackett and getsy without rogers.


Hackett is a damn fool. He might be Getsy but no one is Hackett bad.


LeFleur is. So is your front office.


I realized that you have an irrational hatred for the Packers but they are still way better than your team and have been consistently for the past 3 decades. They will be fine. You on the other hand should be concerned about the direction of your team instead of hoisting the "Adams left the packers" super bowl trophy. He is gone and no one fucking cares because that ship has sailed. If having one high priced dominant wr was so important then why did they just lose to a team with 0 talented wr's today?


The Packers are not fine and will not be fine. Are you even watching their games? :lol: Rodgers is forced to throw to the ghost of Randall Cobb 10+ times because your front office botched the Adams free agency plus totally wasted the 2020 pick on Love. That was a draft in which you could have had Pittman or Higgins. Your last question is just proof that you actually don't watch the games at all and instead rubber stamp everything your dumbass front office does just like any good stooge would do: they lost to a team with no skill players outside of Barkley because you are no longer have credible pass catching weapons. And, yes, that most assuredly goes back to Adams. What you have is this mismatch of parts where your best offensive weapons are RBs but your coaching staff still places passing as the centerpiece of the offense. But that doesn't work anymore because your WRs are shit. See the problem? Probably not. You're probably going to hear a lot of talk about "run/pass balance" this week because LaFleur and his fanboys like you were too late to realize that Jones/Dillon are actually your bread and butter, not Rodgers and "the guy who is not as good as Adams now but is better than rookie Adams," as you so eloquently put it. Have fun seeing if they can figure it all out :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Heisenberg wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
If the Packers miss the playoffs, all these Packers guys will disappear like Farvefan did. They don’t even continue posting to analyze the loss after the game.

We just get, “well your team sucks worse.” And my Dad could beat up their Dad.

I’m pretty sure they’ll make the playoffs but they certainly don’t look like a SB contender. I’m not sure what analysis you’re looking for. MLF will again say they didn’t run enough (which is correct), but nothing will change. Personally I hated the series where they threw two long passes that were unnecessary and not even close to completion. One shot, sure, but then go back to the bread and butter stuff that moves the chains.


Fair enough, I should have replied to ULN’s post. It just seems Packer fans on this board are very chatty pre-game and troll the Bears threads mercilessly. Until the Packers lose, then you disappear. And you have the highest paid player in the NFL on your roster, and multiple posters have stated you wouldn’t miss Adams.

As demented and sad as it may be, Bears fans have at least one entire thread dedicated to analyzing the losses.

Bears fans on here have an entire thread dedicated to whining about the refs.

And I would challenge you on the other comments. I’d bet that Nas, Vegan, Frank and (to a lesser extent) TM have attempted to troll Packers fans far more than the other way around. Beyond that, Im curious who the multiple posters who have stated the Packers wouldn’t miss Adams are. There’s only 3 of us left as far as I can tell, and I know I haven’t said that. I also don’t recall Hawger making that assertion.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
If the Packers miss the playoffs, all these Packers guys will disappear like Farvefan did. They don’t even continue posting to analyze the loss after the game.

We just get, “well your team sucks worse.” And my Dad could beat up their Dad.

I’m pretty sure they’ll make the playoffs but they certainly don’t look like a SB contender. I’m not sure what analysis you’re looking for. MLF will again say they didn’t run enough (which is correct), but nothing will change. Personally I hated the series where they threw two long passes that were unnecessary and not even close to completion. One shot, sure, but then go back to the bread and butter stuff that moves the chains.


Fair enough, I should have replied to ULN’s post. It just seems Packer fans on this board are very chatty pre-game and troll the Bears threads mercilessly. Until the Packers lose, then you disappear. And you have the highest paid player in the NFL on your roster, and multiple posters have stated you wouldn’t miss Adams.

As demented and sad as it may be, Bears fans have at least one entire thread dedicated to analyzing the losses.

Bears fans on here have an entire thread dedicated to whining about the refs.

And I would challenge you on the other comments. I’d bet that Nas, Vegan, Frank and (to a lesser extent) TM have attempted to troll Packers fans far more than the other way around. Beyond that, Im curious who the multiple posters who have stated the Packers wouldn’t miss Adams are. There’s only 3 of us left as far as I can tell, and I know I haven’t said that. I also don’t recall Hawger making that assertion.


Urlacher's missing neck wrote:

He was an amazing player for the Packers but they will grow stronger without him. When he played it was like playing madden on easy....most of the time. When he didn't play the offense was forced to be more balanced and did very well going 7-0 the last 3 years. He is going to have a drop off with Carr as his QB....but he got paid for what he has previously done and he is in the city he wants to be in. He bought a house there already this off season.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
veganfan21 wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
If the Packers miss the playoffs, all these Packers guys will disappear like Farvefan did. They don’t even continue posting to analyze the loss after the game.

We just get, “well your team sucks worse.” And my Dad could beat up their Dad.

I’m pretty sure they’ll make the playoffs but they certainly don’t look like a SB contender. I’m not sure what analysis you’re looking for. MLF will again say they didn’t run enough (which is correct), but nothing will change. Personally I hated the series where they threw two long passes that were unnecessary and not even close to completion. One shot, sure, but then go back to the bread and butter stuff that moves the chains.


Fair enough, I should have replied to ULN’s post. It just seems Packer fans on this board are very chatty pre-game and troll the Bears threads mercilessly. Until the Packers lose, then you disappear. And you have the highest paid player in the NFL on your roster, and multiple posters have stated you wouldn’t miss Adams.

As demented and sad as it may be, Bears fans have at least one entire thread dedicated to analyzing the losses.

Bears fans on here have an entire thread dedicated to whining about the refs.

And I would challenge you on the other comments. I’d bet that Nas, Vegan, Frank and (to a lesser extent) TM have attempted to troll Packers fans far more than the other way around. Beyond that, Im curious who the multiple posters who have stated the Packers wouldn’t miss Adams are. There’s only 3 of us left as far as I can tell, and I know I haven’t said that. I also don’t recall Hawger making that assertion.


Urlacher's missing neck wrote:

He was an amazing player for the Packers but they will grow stronger without him. When he played it was like playing madden on easy....most of the time. When he didn't play the offense was forced to be more balanced and did very well going 7-0 the last 3 years. He is going to have a drop off with Carr as his QB....but he got paid for what he has previously done and he is in the city he wants to be in. He bought a house there already this off season.
Unless you have more then I’d say you’ve confirmed what I wrote. The use of the term “Multiple” being the point of dispute.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 6:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Pointing out that the Packers get beneficial calls nearly every week, and that a third string quarterback had to throw a Pick 6 to help Rodgers win his only NFC title game is not trolling. It's pointing out obvious facts. Now you can ignore them or call it trolling if you want, but that doesn't change what actually happened on the football field.

The Packers are light years ahead of the Bears in terms of regular season success. But it's also another fact that since the turn of the century both fanbases have seen their team play in one super bowl. The difference is that the Bears have largely had turnips at quarterback, and the Packers have had two surefire Hall of Famers start well over 80% of those games.

Taking solace in the fact that you've been better than the Bears overall for much of the last 20 years is such low hanging fruit even the rats don't eat it

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
i dont see much difference besides the quarterback over the last 30 years.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1379
pizza_Place: Pequods
Packers threads on here should get trolled. This site is LITERALLY titled “CHICAGOFANATICS.COM.” The five teams listed on the banner are all CHICAGO teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Pointing out that the Packers get beneficial calls nearly every week, and that a third string quarterback had to throw a Pick 6 to help Rodgers win his only NFC title game is not trolling. It's pointing out obvious facts. Now you can ignore them or call it trolling if you want, but that doesn't change what actually happened on the football field.

The Packers are light years ahead of the Bears in terms of regular season success. But it's also another fact that since the turn of the century both fanbases have seen their team play in one super bowl. The difference is that the Bears have largely had turnips at quarterback, and the Packers have had two surefire Hall of Famers start well over 80% of those games.

Taking solace in the fact that you've been better than the Bears overall for much of the last 20 years is such low hanging fruit even the rats don't eat it

Thank you for proving my point.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Heisenberg wrote:
Packers threads on here should get trolled. This site is LITERALLY titled “CHICAGOFANATICS.COM.” The five teams listed on the banner are all CHICAGO teams.

I accept your apology.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1379
pizza_Place: Pequods
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
Packers threads on here should get trolled. This site is LITERALLY titled “CHICAGOFANATICS.COM.” The five teams listed on the banner are all CHICAGO teams.

I accept your apology.

There was one?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
[Unless you have more then I’d say you’ve confirmed what I wrote. The use of the term “Multiple” being the point of dispute.



I didn't say multiple, that was Walter White's post. Sometimes you come across something so dumb that it carries the weight of 1,000 posts. That's the "we're better off without Adams post" above.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Heisenberg wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
Packers threads on here should get trolled. This site is LITERALLY titled “CHICAGOFANATICS.COM.” The five teams listed on the banner are all CHICAGO teams.

I accept your apology.

There was one?

Meh. Almost admitting you were wrong is about all I can hope for on this board.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
veganfan21 wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
[Unless you have more then I’d say you’ve confirmed what I wrote. The use of the term “Multiple” being the point of dispute.



I didn't say multiple, that was Walter White's post. Sometimes you come across something so dumb that it carries the weight of 1,000 posts. That's the "we're better off without Adams post" above.

You’re kind of a weird dude.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2022 8:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Now you admit you were wrong and we might be getting somewhere.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 4:48 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
If the Packers miss the playoffs, all these Packers guys will disappear like Farvefan did. They don’t even continue posting to analyze the loss after the game.

We just get, “well your team sucks worse.” And my Dad could beat up their Dad.

I’m pretty sure they’ll make the playoffs but they certainly don’t look like a SB contender. I’m not sure what analysis you’re looking for. MLF will again say they didn’t run enough (which is correct), but nothing will change. Personally I hated the series where they threw two long passes that were unnecessary and not even close to completion. One shot, sure, but then go back to the bread and butter stuff that moves the chains.


Fair enough, I should have replied to ULN’s post. It just seems Packer fans on this board are very chatty pre-game and troll the Bears threads mercilessly. Until the Packers lose, then you disappear. And you have the highest paid player in the NFL on your roster, and multiple posters have stated you wouldn’t miss Adams.

As demented and sad as it may be, Bears fans have at least one entire thread dedicated to analyzing the losses.

Bears fans on here have an entire thread dedicated to whining about the refs.

And I would challenge you on the other comments. I’d bet that Nas, Vegan, Frank and (to a lesser extent) TM have attempted to troll Packers fans far more than the other way around. Beyond that, Im curious who the multiple posters who have stated the Packers wouldn’t miss Adams are. There’s only 3 of us left as far as I can tell, and I know I haven’t said that. I also don’t recall Hawger making that assertion.


The notion that a Packers fan would accuse Bears fans of trolling him on a Chicago sports message board is pretty hilarious in and of itself. The hilarity is amplified, though, when that accusation comes in a thread that was started by a Packers fan for the sole purpose of trolling Bears fans.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30303
Go Pack!!!!

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:19 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Go Pack!!!!


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31571
pizza_Place: What??
Hawg Ass wrote:
Go Pack!!!!

:lol: Very timely.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Thanks to front office incompetence Aaron Rodgers' legacy is probably Carmelo Anthony-level despite having MJ-like talent.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:53 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
Thanks to front office incompetence Aaron Rodgers' legacy is probably Carmelo Anthony-level despite having MJ-like talent.


I don't know. Aaron Rodgers regularly chokes in the 4th quarter of playoff games. Maybe he would have had the career of LeBron. Instead, he's slightly better than Reggie Miller.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Thanks to front office incompetence Aaron Rodgers' legacy is probably Carmelo Anthony-level despite having MJ-like talent.


I don't know. Aaron Rodgers regularly chokes in the 4th quarter of playoff games. Maybe he would have had the career of LeBron. Instead, he's slightly better than Reggie Miller.


That's fair. I like the Miller comparison over Melo.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
MVS has figured out how to catch without Karen.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
:oops:

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30303
Nas wrote:
:oops:

:lol:

And look at what has happened to Davante, he never would have pushed a camera dude like that in Green Bay.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
MVS is another guy the Bears could have had but they went with the shitty Packers FA WR.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:38 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Caller Bob wrote:
MVS is another guy the Bears could have had but they went with the shitty Packers FA WR.


They were in on him. He correctly chose Mahomes over Fields. Did you want the Bears to overpay for him to reconsider?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Nas wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
MVS is another guy the Bears could have had but they went with the shitty Packers FA WR.


They were in on him. He correctly chose Mahomes over Fields. Did you want the Bears to overpay for him to reconsider?


He only got 3/30 million


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:48 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
:oops:

:lol:

And look at what has happened to Davante, he never would have pushed a camera dude like that in Green Bay.


I think he's frustrated with McDaniels unwillingness to force feed him the ball. Nearly every time the ball is thrown in his direction something good happens. He's essentially always open. Rodgers understood that.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9734 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group