It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:42 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 6:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Aikman is one of the luckiest players in the past 40 years.

Ridiculous. You are too young to remember Aikman's prime. Stats for QBs from different eras are not comparable. Otherwise Kenny Stabler and Terry Bradshaw were awful.


How young do you think I am? Also, I'm the guy who thinks Brady took the GOAT crown from Elway. I clearly don't care about the stats.

Favre was better than Rodgers too

Elway falls into the category of overrated in my book but I certainly don’t think he wasn’t great. He was most certainly lucky though considering he was along for the ride on the SB or he wouldn’t even be considered as good as Marino.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
You state that throwing ints was never good but Favre is the all time leader in that category. The great Fouts threw for 254 tds but also 242 ints with a 59% completion percentage. Cutler threw for 227 tds with only 160 ints with a 62% cp.


Cmon Zippy , this is Jordan hand check stuff. If Fouts , Stabler, Bradshaw and most of those guys with by today’s standards bad completion percentage iplayed in today’s game they would light it up. Defensive backs were allowed to mug those receivers back in the day you know that. Conversely, Cutler certainly would’ve thrown avhell of a lot more interceptions had he played when those guys did.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
badrogue17 wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
You state that throwing ints was never good but Favre is the all time leader in that category. The great Fouts threw for 254 tds but also 242 ints with a 59% completion percentage. Cutler threw for 227 tds with only 160 ints with a 62% cp.


Cmon Zippy , this is Jordan hand check stuff. If Fouts , Stabler, Bradshaw and most of those guys with by today’s standards bad completion percentage iplayed in today’s game they would light it up. Defensive backs were allowed to mug those receivers back in the day you know that. Conversely, Cutler certainly would’ve thrown avhell of a lot more interceptions had he played when those guys did.

Did you just start on the last page?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Aikman was definitely a good QB. Not sure what some of the people here disagreeing are on about.



As others have mentioned, the stats you see today were much harder to come by back in the day due to defensive rules being much different.


Which should make a guy like Steve Young (for example) look more impressive to some in all honesty..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
As for Dilfers take.. I don’t put too much stock in it. If he’s going to compare what he went through early to what’s going on now with JF.. meh. The only thing I’ll agree on right now is the talent level of Justin Fields, he’s got a great amount of ‘ability’.. but we’ve been down that road with Cutler too and that didn’t work out too well.


One other ‘excuse’ I’ll allow for Fields is that there really isn’t much help at all around him. The O-line is terrible at pass blocking and the receivers are mostly guys who will struggle year to year to make a roster. But still.. some of the bad we’re seeing is Fields just being bad all on his own.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
NME wrote:
Aikman was definitely a good QB. Not sure what some of the people here disagreeing are on about.



As others have mentioned, the stats you see today were much harder to come by back in the day due to defensive rules being much different.


Which should make a guy like Steve Young (for example) look more impressive to some in all honesty..

I have often stated that at his prime, Steve young might have been the best QB I have ever seen. It didn’t last for 10+ years or anything that would catapult him into GOAT territory, but for five or so years in his prime he was outrageously good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
man of few opinions wrote:
NME wrote:
Aikman was definitely a good QB. Not sure what some of the people here disagreeing are on about.



As others have mentioned, the stats you see today were much harder to come by back in the day due to defensive rules being much different.


Which should make a guy like Steve Young (for example) look more impressive to some in all honesty..

I have often stated that at his prime, Steve young might have been the best QB I have ever seen. It didn’t last for 10+ years or anything that would catapult him into GOAT territory, but for five or so years in his prime he was outrageously good.




He had a couple seasons in the 90’s that would be considered a great season by today’s standards.. pretty crazy when you look back at it. People are too used to the inflated stats that defensive rule changes have brought on in today’s game.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The thing I remember most about him is his accuracy and completion percentage. His completion percentages back then were outrageous for the time. And it wasn’t just screen passes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Aikman definitely had some luck. That offensive line (pre salary cap) was ridiculous. I believe at one point all starting five were pro bowlers. No way you assemble a starting five like that in the modern salary cap era.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 7:59 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Augie wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Both of these guys gush over Fields and swear he's a star (Dilfer at least). Are these guys for real or are they hyping Fields up because it's good for their continued on-air exposure and relationships with radio stations?


Football grifters.


Jenkins definitely is.


Both of these guys seem oily, but they also often make fair points in their analyses. Dilfer is clearly more confident in Fields attaining elite status than Jenkins is, and that conclusion stems from his past relationship with Fields. His opinion therefore seems shaped more by having worked with/observed Fields as a younger player than it is by Fields' performance in the NFL. Does Dilfer have a good track record in predicting the future success of young quarterbacks? He talks a good game, but there are plenty of reasons to doubt him.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 8:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Aikman is one of the luckiest players in the past 40 years.

Ridiculous. You are too young to remember Aikman's prime. Stats for QBs from different eras are not comparable. Otherwise Kenny Stabler and Terry Bradshaw were awful.


How young do you think I am? Also, I'm the guy who thinks Brady took the GOAT crown from Elway. I clearly don't care about the stats.

Favre was better than Rodgers too

Elway falls into the category of overrated in my book but I certainly don’t think he wasn’t great. He was most certainly lucky though considering he was along for the ride on the SB or he wouldn’t even be considered as good as Marino.


You should get that brain injury checked out. I'm concerned.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37838
Location: ...
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 9:19 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Elway guy here. He had a game that 1st Super Bowl

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Posts: 1544
pizza_Place: Beek's
I'm old and most of my memory died with my wife, but I could swear that before "The Drive" Elway was a guy that could be counted on to throw a bad pick at the worst time. He seemingly saved his worst performances for the biggest moments until he had Terrell Davis. Again, I could be wrong.

_________________
"I give you my word as a Biden"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 6:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Elway guy here. He had a game that 1st Super Bowl

Elways first super bowl will always be my favorite that’s for sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 6:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92085
Location: To the left of my post
312player wrote:
I believe Kyle Orton could do his job and that franchise don't skip a beat.

Well said!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
312player wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ridiculous. You are too young to remember Aikman's prime. Stats for QBs from different eras are not comparable. Otherwise Kenny Stabler and Terry Bradshaw were awful.


Bradshaw was garbage, Aikman had the best O line ever assembled, no salary cap. The team was loaded on both sides of the ball.
Did you actually watch Aikman play during his prime? I know you didn't watch Bradshaw or Stabler.



I watched Aikman, not Bradshaw.. but it was never good to throw interceptions and always good to score TDs for as long as the game was invented..he was benched a couple times.[/quote]
How do you feel about Favre? Stabler? Jay Cutler? Dan Fouts?[/quote]

Great
Don't know
Sucked
Great[/quote]You state that throwing ints was never good but Favre is the all time leader in that category. The great Fouts threw for 254 tds but also 242 ints with a 59% completion percentage. Cutler threw for 227 tds with only 160 ints with a 62% cp.[/quote]

Cutler wouldnt last 2 seasons in the old nfl, I really dont give a shit about completion percentage, Guys that throw downfield will haveca lower % then (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky who cant throw downfield.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 1:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Aikman is one of the luckiest players in the past 40 years.

Ridiculous. You are too young to remember Aikman's prime. Stats for QBs from different eras are not comparable. Otherwise Kenny Stabler and Terry Bradshaw were awful.


How young do you think I am? Also, I'm the guy who thinks Brady took the GOAT crown from Elway. I clearly don't care about the stats.

Favre was better than Rodgers too

Elway falls into the category of overrated in my book but I certainly don’t think he wasn’t great. He was most certainly lucky though considering he was along for the ride on the SB or he wouldn’t even be considered as good as Marino.


I grudgingly finally gave the GOAT title to Brady. I loved Drew Brees and wish that he had some good defenses or he might have been the GOAT. I think that one of the worst decisions ever by the Chicago Bears was not signing Brees when he was a free agent after his Charger years and getting hurt. I think about Brees playing on the Bears teams when they had the great defenses. Wishful dreaming.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 1:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
badrogue17 wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
You state that throwing ints was never good but Favre is the all time leader in that category. The great Fouts threw for 254 tds but also 242 ints with a 59% completion percentage. Cutler threw for 227 tds with only 160 ints with a 62% cp.


Cmon Zippy , this is Jordan hand check stuff. If Fouts , Stabler, Bradshaw and most of those guys with by today’s standards bad completion percentage iplayed in today’s game they would light it up. Defensive backs were allowed to mug those receivers back in the day you know that. Conversely, Cutler certainly would’ve thrown avhell of a lot more interceptions had he played when those guys did.


Personally I would like them to allow both the defender and the receiver to hand fight for the ball in the air. To me before the ball is in the air, the receiver should not be grabbed but let them both be able to fight for the ball equally. Right now there is way too much power given to the officials to decide football games with very iffy pass interference calls on the defense where the offensive player is the one really interfering with the defenders right to the ball.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 1:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14929
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Caller Bob wrote:
Aikman definitely had some luck. That offensive line (pre salary cap) was ridiculous. I believe at one point all starting five were pro bowlers. No way you assemble a starting five like that in the modern salary cap era.


I agree with you. Aikman was a good quarterback who didn't make many mistakes. However, he had luxuries of an amazing team around him like you said along with the fact that there were also all-pros on the Cowboys defense also.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Another thing to remember - a great o-line is a great advantage for sure BUT a great QB who makes quick decisions and is accurate can make an o-line look good. It’s a 2-way street. I’m not hating on the cowboys oline of the 90’s, it was obviously great but having a great quarterback with great pocket presence who makes quick decisions and unloads the ball makes o-lines look pretty good as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 3:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Stop it! That was an offense that, at times, had 8 pro bowl/all pro players. Stan Humphries would have won multiple Super Bowls with those teams.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Jay Novackeck, all pro
Michael Irvin , HOF
Alvin Harper, pro bowler

Beyond loaded!!! Lol


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
W_Z wrote:
I think Nas and I are the only Elway guys, but I watched a lot of him growing up because of where I lived (KC market), and watched him drag teams into the Super Bowl. The NFC was just better all around but Elway was masterful in his ability to spread the ball around and make plays.

He earned the right to be pulled into winning those last 2.

I'd consider myself an Elway guy, but man....it's really hard to put him in the all-time top 10 list. I can't do it.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 4:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.


No one said he sucked. I simply said he was overrated. There is no question that the talent around him propped him up. You could insert Stan Humphries or a league average quarterback in that lineup, and they still win multiple championships.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Caller Bob wrote:
Jay Novackeck, all pro
Michael Irvin , HOF
Alvin Harper, pro bowler

Beyond loaded!!! Lol


LOL Alvin Harper. what an all-time great, you should have stopped at Irvin. I’m pretty sure Novacek isn’t going in the hall of fame any time soon either. He had a nice run with Dallas, no doubt, but he hardly propped up Troy Aikman. Those cowboys teams were great and were loaded with HOF talent, don’t contaminate it by dropping those names.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.


No one said he sucked. I simply said he was overrated. There is no question that the talent around him propped him up. You could insert Stan Humphries or a league average quarterback in that lineup, and they still win multiple championships.

Someone specifically said Aikman sucked earlier in the thread, and he is the one my remarks are pointed at.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 5:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.


No one said he sucked. I simply said he was overrated. There is no question that the talent around him propped him up. You could insert Stan Humphries or a league average quarterback in that lineup, and they still win multiple championships.

Someone specifically said Aikman sucked earlier in the thread, and he is the one my remarks are pointed at.


I missed that. My bad. Phil Simms or Troy Aikman? Jim Kelly or Troy Aikman? Vinny Testaverde or Troy Aikman? Jeff George or Troy Aikman?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2022 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5089
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Nas wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Stop what? i agree, it was an all-time great line. but to say Aikman sucked and was simply propped up by a good line like some are insinuating is ridiculous. the line was lucky to have Aikman, Aikman was lucky to have Irvin, they were all lucky to have Emmitt, the offense was lucky to have a great defense. It was a great team with great players all over the place who all came together at the right time and place.


No one said he sucked. I simply said he was overrated. There is no question that the talent around him propped him up. You could insert Stan Humphries or a league average quarterback in that lineup, and they still win multiple championships.

Someone specifically said Aikman sucked earlier in the thread, and he is the one my remarks are pointed at.


I missed that. My bad. Phil Simms or Troy Aikman? Jim Kelly or Troy Aikman? Vinny Testaverde or Troy Aikman? Jeff George or Troy Aikman?




I’d put Troy and Phil on pretty equal footing, with the slight edge to Troy because he’s more accurate. Kelly might be a little more talented but he fell apart in some big moments so that’s a toss up imo.. Troy was flat out better than Jeff and Vinny tho.. George had a more ‘talented’ arm (one if the best ever imo).. but he could never put it all together.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group