It is currently Thu May 22, 2025 12:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Frank Coztansa wrote:
This is all hypothetical of course...

But if the Bears continued to do what they have done for the better part of 15 years- make the playoffs once in a while and be mediocre or bad otherwise- while a second team in Chicago is playing in Super Bowls and AFC Title games almost yearly, then the tide might turn to make the Bears the second team in town.

That is the only way RR's situation becomes permanent.

Frankly I don't think permanence is a reasonable possibility going forward. With the NFL being primarily t.v. programming now, the fan experience being superior at college and increasingly prep games & then a variety of other factors, I doubt that diehard fandom is likely going forward.

That many parents won't let their sons even play the game until 12-13 is another bad sign imho.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:41 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81467
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Nardi wrote:
Lame? Isn't being a fan of a sports team that you have no friend or relative connections to, lame to begin with? You are actually arguing a degree of lame, which in itself, is lame.

Be a fan of whoever. Because it's all lame.


Fandom was about city, state, school, and community pride. Definitely not lame .

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Nas wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Lame? Isn't being a fan of a sports team that you have no friend or relative connections to, lame to begin with? You are actually arguing a degree of lame, which in itself, is lame.

Be a fan of whoever. Because it's all lame.


Fandom was about city, state, school, and community pride. Definitely not lame .

Yeah, back when people only got 1-2 out of market games and it didn't cost a mortgage payment to take two kids to a game. If not much more.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94761
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Brick wrote:
Aren't most of those people already Packers or Patriots or Cowboys fans now anyways though?

You don't need the Jaguars to move here to root for a team that wins a lot more than the Bears.
Sure, but you saw what happened with the Hawks in 2010. Suddenly everybody was a big Hawks fan. It became the cool thing to do. A second NFL team could have a similar affect.

And I know NFL >>> NHL, but still.

Any team that isn't the Sky and the White Sox will get attention for winning a title in Chicago.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7403
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
Is there anyone on the board who says they are Bears fans now but would switch to the Jaguars if they came here assuming the Bears are in Arlington Heights and the Jaguars play somewhere in the city limits of Chicago likely in Soldier Field?

There are many younger fans and fans not as deeply entrenched in Bears tradition or that are frustrated with Bears tradition that would easily jump into a properly marketed AFC team. Would their fandom over equal that of the Bears? Probably not, unless they started winning super bowls right away but there would be plenty to feed a really fun Chicago rivalry.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:49 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81467
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Regular Reader wrote:
Nas wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Lame? Isn't being a fan of a sports team that you have no friend or relative connections to, lame to begin with? You are actually arguing a degree of lame, which in itself, is lame.

Be a fan of whoever. Because it's all lame.


Fandom was about city, state, school, and community pride. Definitely not lame .

Yeah, back when people only got 1-2 out of market games and it didn't cost a mortgage payment to take two kids to a game. If not much more.


The bots control the football ticket market.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94761
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
Brick wrote:
Is there anyone on the board who says they are Bears fans now but would switch to the Jaguars if they came here assuming the Bears are in Arlington Heights and the Jaguars play somewhere in the city limits of Chicago likely in Soldier Field?

There are many younger fans and fans not as deeply entrenched in Bears tradition or that are frustrated with Bears tradition that would easily jump into a properly marketed AFC team. Would their fandom over equal that of the Bears? Probably not, unless they started winning super bowls right away but there would be plenty to feed a really fun Chicago rivalry.
If the Jets-Giants rivalry is decades old and still lame I doubt Bears-Jaguars would be all that interesting.

As I said, your description is basically that the Jaguars would be the White Sox in 20-30 years.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34181
pizza_Place: What??
Regular Reader wrote:
Nas wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Lame? Isn't being a fan of a sports team that you have no friend or relative connections to, lame to begin with? You are actually arguing a degree of lame, which in itself, is lame.

Be a fan of whoever. Because it's all lame.


Fandom was about city, state, school, and community pride. Definitely not lame .

Yeah, back when people only got 1-2 out of market games and it didn't cost a mortgage payment to take two kids to a game. If not much more.

Which further cements that fandom itself is lame. What position did Purdue Rick play on the Boilermakers?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7403
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Brick wrote:
Is there anyone on the board who says they are Bears fans now but would switch to the Jaguars if they came here assuming the Bears are in Arlington Heights and the Jaguars play somewhere in the city limits of Chicago likely in Soldier Field?

There are many younger fans and fans not as deeply entrenched in Bears tradition or that are frustrated with Bears tradition that would easily jump into a properly marketed AFC team. Would their fandom over equal that of the Bears? Probably not, unless they started winning super bowls right away but there would be plenty to feed a really fun Chicago rivalry.
If the Jets-Giants rivalry is decades old and still lame I doubt Bears-Jaguars would be all that interesting.

As I said, your description is basically that the Jaguars would be the White Sox in 20-30 years.

I agree with you - the difference is I dont think the White Sox/Cubs relationship in Chicago and this area is lame. Nor do I think the Jets/Giants relationship. Or the Giants/Eagles which is what pretty much all of New Jersey is. Or Giants/Patriots which is what all of New England is. And I know a second team in Chicago would be a hell of a lot more interesting than a single team in Jacksonville, a team that has no interest from anyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94761
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
I agree with you - the difference is I dont think the White Sox/Cubs relationship in Chicago and this area is lame.
White Sox/Cubs is alright but it also has over 100 years of history.
man of few opinions wrote:
Nor do I think the Jets/Giants relationship.
Jets-Giants was a useless fake rivalry.

man of few opinions wrote:
Or the Giants/Eagles which is what pretty much all of New Jersey is.
That's a comparison closer to Packers-Bears.

man of few opinions wrote:
Or Giants/Patriots which is what all of New England is.
There is a Giants/Patriots rivalry?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57592
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I think most of the New Englanders who supported the Giants because the Boston Patriots didn't exist yet are dead now. It's like Chicagoans who are still Arizona Cardinals fans.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34181
pizza_Place: What??
Curious Hair wrote:
I think most of the New Englanders who supported the Giants because the Boston Patriots didn't exist yet are dead now. It's like Chicagoans who are still Arizona Cardinals fans.

I was a huge fan of the Decatur Staleys.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7403
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Or Giants/Patriots which is what all of New England is.
There is a Giants/Patriots rivalry?

:lol: You're kidding, right? Its called the state of Connecticut. You do realize the Patriots entire territory was carved out of an existing Giants fan base, right? Or did you think people in Boston and New England just didn't have a rooting interest in football until the Patriots were founded?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102716
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Or Giants/Patriots which is what all of New England is.
There is a Giants/Patriots rivalry?
Much like Aaron Rodgers with the Bears, Eli- the hammer- has no rivalry with with Brady- the nail.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34181
pizza_Place: What??
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Or Giants/Patriots which is what all of New England is.
There is a Giants/Patriots rivalry?
Much like Aaron Rodgers with the Bears, Eli- the hammer- has no rivalry with with Brady- the nail.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94761
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Or Giants/Patriots which is what all of New England is.
There is a Giants/Patriots rivalry?

:lol: You're kidding, right? Its called the state of Connecticut. You do realize the Patriots entire territory was carved out of an existing Giants fan base, right? Or did you think people in Boston and New England just didn't have a rooting interest in football until the Patriots were founded?

You mean the people who were old enough to be football fans in the 1950s? :lol:

The Jets and Patriots were created at the same time in the same way.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7403
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
no kidding, and they both have succeeded in have successful fan-bases! The same thing would easily work here. i'm not sure what you are arguing, which is a pretty recurring theme with you. We seem to agree, but you are doing it in a very contrary way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94761
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
no kidding, and they both have succeeded in have successful fan-bases! The same thing would easily work here. i'm not sure what you are arguing, which is a pretty recurring theme with you. We seem to agree, but you are doing it in a very contrary way.
There is no reason to think a second team in Chicago would be successful and the fact that the Patriots and Giants are both able to have a strong fan base in no way shows it can happen.

The Giants-Jets are the only real comparison but the area they play in is far more populated and the Jets are still second class citizens there after 60 years.

We don't agree. A second Chicago team has no built in fanbase besides being the second favorite team of people who live in Chicago but don't root for the Bears.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7403
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
LOL ok. Truth is it will likely never happen anyway if the Bears have any say, and not because it wouldn't work. They dont want some other team swooping in here pressuring them to win right under their noses in their old stadium. The market is RIPE for competition even if you incorrectly think it impossible for two teams to co-exist.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34181
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
no kidding, and they both have succeeded in have successful fan-bases! The same thing would easily work here. i'm not sure what you are arguing, which is a pretty recurring theme with you. We seem to agree, but you are doing it in a very contrary way.
There is no reason to think a second team in Chicago would be successful and the fact that the Patriots and Giants are both able to have a strong fan base in no way shows it can happen.

The Giants-Jets are the only real comparison but the area they play in is far more populated and the Jets are still second class citizens there after 60 years.

We don't agree. A second Chicago team has no built in fanbase besides being the second favorite team of people who live in Chicago but don't root for the Bears.

Brass tacks. You're saying the Chicago Chargers could not sell out a domed Soldier Field 8 or 9 times a year? TV ratings doesn't matter as those revenues are shared equally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94761
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Brass tacks. You're saying the Chicago Chargers could not sell out a domed Soldier Field 8 or 9 times a year? TV ratings doesn't matter as those revenues are shared equally.
The Bears and Jaguars pull in roughly the same number of fans a game. If that is the goal then why wouldn't the Jaguars just stay in Jacksonville? Why wouldn't they move them to San Antonio or Louisville or Portland?

With a new domed stadium, and a lot of success, the Chicago Jaguars could one day become as big as the Jacksonville Jaguars.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26605
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
no kidding, and they both have succeeded in have successful fan-bases! The same thing would easily work here. i'm not sure what you are arguing, which is a pretty recurring theme with you. We seem to agree, but you are doing it in a very contrary way.
There is no reason to think a second team in Chicago would be successful and the fact that the Patriots and Giants are both able to have a strong fan base in no way shows it can happen.

The Giants-Jets are the only real comparison but the area they play in is far more populated and the Jets are still second class citizens there after 60 years.

We don't agree. A second Chicago team has no built in fanbase besides being the second favorite team of people who live in Chicago but don't root for the Bears.

Brass tacks. You're saying the Chicago Chargers could not sell out a domed Soldier Field 8 or 9 times a year? TV ratings doesn't matter as those revenues are shared equally.

Are the Lake Michigan Chargers going to own the hypothetically domed soldier field?

No NFL Governor in her right mind is moving a multibillion dollar business into a CPD-owned ruin with a hastily constructed glass roof.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7403
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
no kidding, and they both have succeeded in have successful fan-bases! The same thing would easily work here. i'm not sure what you are arguing, which is a pretty recurring theme with you. We seem to agree, but you are doing it in a very contrary way.
There is no reason to think a second team in Chicago would be successful and the fact that the Patriots and Giants are both able to have a strong fan base in no way shows it can happen.

The Giants-Jets are the only real comparison but the area they play in is far more populated and the Jets are still second class citizens there after 60 years.

We don't agree. A second Chicago team has no built in fanbase besides being the second favorite team of people who live in Chicago but don't root for the Bears.

Brass tacks. You're saying the Chicago Chargers could not sell out a domed Soldier Field 8 or 9 times a year? TV ratings doesn't matter as those revenues are shared equally.

Are the Lake Michigan Chargers going to own the hypothetically domed soldier field?

No NFL Governor in her right mind is moving a multibillion dollar business into a CPD-owned ruin with a hastily constructed glass roof.

I wouldn't hastily construct any roof to Soldier Field if my team was moving in. I would invest in whatever improvements need to be made to the current structure and leave it as an outdoor venue. If the Bears want to play indoors in a new dome in the suburbs, MY incoming team would embrace old-school cold-weather football by the lake while all the Bears fans are flocking to the new Bears Mall in Arlington Heights.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 3:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102716
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Are the Lake Michigan Chargers going to own the hypothetically domed soldier field?
There is a "California Lake Michigan" pipeline joke in here somehwere.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 11036
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Are the Lake Michigan Chargers going to own the hypothetically domed soldier field?

No NFL Governor in her right mind is moving a multibillion dollar business into a CPD-owned ruin with a hastily constructed glass roof.

This is a really good point.
I stand by my original statement...the NFL themselves will place the Chargers, Jaguars, or expansion teams anywhere but Chicago. It doesn't grow the game at all to siphon fans from the Bears.

Back to the land of make believe original question....one where a new owner gets his own stadium in Downtown Chicago and the Bears are in Arlington Heights. You bet your ass the downtown stadium would be sold out each home game. Over time I think you'd develop a city v. burbs fan division, but that would take some years to build.

It's not happening, though. The NFL would never go for it. Again...the Chargers are an anomaly and that situation is temporary.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34181
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brass tacks. You're saying the Chicago Chargers could not sell out a domed Soldier Field 8 or 9 times a year? TV ratings doesn't matter as those revenues are shared equally.
The Bears and Jaguars pull in roughly the same number of fans a game. If that is the goal then why wouldn't the Jaguars just stay in Jacksonville? Why wouldn't they move them to San Antonio or Louisville or Portland?

With a new domed stadium, and a lot of success, the Chicago Jaguars could one day become as big as the Jacksonville Jaguars.

Can you read?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94761
Location: To the left of my post
Your question was flawed. The Chicago Jaguars could draw 60k. The Salt Lake City Jaguars could draw 60k. The Jacksonville Jaguars could draw 60k. The Louisville Jaguars could draw 60k. The Boston Jaguars could draw 60k.

If this argument is if the Chicago Jaguars could physically exist in Chicago then of course they could. To me, the argument is about if they could exist in any way that makes sense for the league or the area.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34181
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Your question was flawed. The Chicago Jaguars could draw 60k. The Salt Lake City Jaguars could draw 60k. The Jacksonville Jaguars could draw 60k. The Louisville Jaguars could draw 60k. The Boston Jaguars could draw 60k.

If this argument is if the Chicago Jaguars could physically exist in Chicago then of course they could. To me, the argument is about if they could exist in any way that makes sense for the league or the area.

I never mentioned the Jaguars. Is that why it's flawed?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34181
pizza_Place: What??
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
no kidding, and they both have succeeded in have successful fan-bases! The same thing would easily work here. i'm not sure what you are arguing, which is a pretty recurring theme with you. We seem to agree, but you are doing it in a very contrary way.
There is no reason to think a second team in Chicago would be successful and the fact that the Patriots and Giants are both able to have a strong fan base in no way shows it can happen.

The Giants-Jets are the only real comparison but the area they play in is far more populated and the Jets are still second class citizens there after 60 years.

We don't agree. A second Chicago team has no built in fanbase besides being the second favorite team of people who live in Chicago but don't root for the Bears.

Brass tacks. You're saying the Chicago Chargers could not sell out a domed Soldier Field 8 or 9 times a year? TV ratings doesn't matter as those revenues are shared equally.

Are the Lake Michigan Chargers going to own the hypothetically domed soldier field?

No NFL Governor in her right mind is moving a multibillion dollar business into a CPD-owned ruin with a hastily constructed glass roof.

Understood. Purdue Rick is making a lameness argument and I'm addressing that. But granted, even that is a stupid argument. There's aren't different degrees of lameness.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94761
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Your question was flawed. The Chicago Jaguars could draw 60k. The Salt Lake City Jaguars could draw 60k. The Jacksonville Jaguars could draw 60k. The Louisville Jaguars could draw 60k. The Boston Jaguars could draw 60k.

If this argument is if the Chicago Jaguars could physically exist in Chicago then of course they could. To me, the argument is about if they could exist in any way that makes sense for the league or the area.

I never mentioned the Jaguars. Is that why it's flawed?

I was being kind and using the Jaguars as an example.

Using a team like the Chargers that are outdrawing the Bears by 8k a game is only going to make your question worse.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group