It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 12:46 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4899 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 ... 164  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16488
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
The problem with counting on him as a rusher is two-fold: the chance of injury goes way up, and unless he maintains an average of 7+ yards per carry, he's going to be at a disadvantage compared to decent QBs who average 8+ yards per attempted pass. Passing is still better than running. His running has value...I just don't think we can assume he's going to be a 175 passing, 75 running QB in the long term.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
The problem with counting on him as a rusher is two-fold: the chance of injury goes way up, and unless he maintains an average of 7+ yards per carry, he's going to be at a disadvantage compared to decent QBs who average 8+ yards per attempted pass. Passing is still better than running. His running has value...I just don't think we can assume he's going to be a 175 passing, 75 running QB in the long term.


I agree. I think the next question is are you using fields as a runner because it's another threat or because it's a way to mask weaknesses in his passing. If the latter then I wouldn't want him moving forward for the reasons you mentioned.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23843
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Behind this line he’s just as likely to get injured passing than running.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2022 2:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
The problem with counting on him as a rusher is two-fold: the chance of injury goes way up, and unless he maintains an average of 7+ yards per carry, he's going to be at a disadvantage compared to decent QBs who average 8+ yards per attempted pass. Passing is still better than running. His running has value...I just don't think we can assume he's going to be a 175 passing, 75 running QB in the long term.


I agree. I think the next question is are you using fields as a runner because it's another threat or because it's a way to mask weaknesses in his passing. If the latter then I wouldn't want him moving forward for the reasons you mentioned.


Of course, it's the latter. It's the smart thing to do. The hope is the accuracy comes along. I have no issue with the way this staff is developing him.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16488
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
With the addition of Claypool, there is no reason Fields should not be cracking 200 yards of passing every week. He's now got a #1 and #2, a great running game, and while the pass protection is suspect, the running game (including the threat of himself) should take some pressure off. I think Poles made this trade in part to challenge Fields, and I like it. Assuming Fields stays healthy, these remaining games should be enough to show if he's a keeper.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 6:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jaw Breaker wrote:
With the addition of Claypool, there is no reason Fields should not be cracking 200 yards of passing every week. He's now got a #1 and #2, a great running game, and while the pass protection is suspect, the running game (including the threat of himself) should take some pressure off. I think Poles made this trade in part to challenge Fields, and I like it. Assuming Fields stays healthy, these remaining games should be enough to show if he's a keeper.


I would give Claypool a few weeks to get up to speed, but I agree. Poles was on Waddle and Silvy today and he sounded like he was still evaluating Fields.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Claypool is a solid #2 who can turn into a #1, Mooney is a low end #2, probably a good #3 receiver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 11:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Jaw Breaker wrote:
nd while the pass protection is suspect

At this point, it has been proven guilty of being poor beyond a reasonable doubt.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 6:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
With the addition of Claypool, there is no reason Fields should not be cracking 200 yards of passing every week. He's now got a #1 and #2, a great running game, and while the pass protection is suspect, the running game (including the threat of himself) should take some pressure off. I think Poles made this trade in part to challenge Fields, and I like it. Assuming Fields stays healthy, these remaining games should be enough to show if he's a keeper.


This assumes he's going to drop back and pass more. We don't know that though. Again, if the designed run is still a major part of the attack, then that's going to cap the pass yardage stats. Every yard gained on a run is one less pass yard he could have had. I think your benchmark of 200 is reasonable if he starts passing more.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82232
Nas wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
With the addition of Claypool, there is no reason Fields should not be cracking 200 yards of passing every week. He's now got a #1 and #2, a great running game, and while the pass protection is suspect, the running game (including the threat of himself) should take some pressure off. I think Poles made this trade in part to challenge Fields, and I like it. Assuming Fields stays healthy, these remaining games should be enough to show if he's a keeper.


I would give Claypool a few weeks to get up to speed, but I agree. Poles was on Waddle and Silvy today and he sounded like he was still evaluating Fields.


yes but I would have him in immediately to run jump ball plays in the red zone, an area that has really been a problem for the Bears. He can run that type of play this Sunday, as both he and the Bears are familiar with its mechanics.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 1:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14924
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Nas wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
With the addition of Claypool, there is no reason Fields should not be cracking 200 yards of passing every week. He's now got a #1 and #2, a great running game, and while the pass protection is suspect, the running game (including the threat of himself) should take some pressure off. I think Poles made this trade in part to challenge Fields, and I like it. Assuming Fields stays healthy, these remaining games should be enough to show if he's a keeper.


I would give Claypool a few weeks to get up to speed, but I agree. Poles was on Waddle and Silvy today and he sounded like he was still evaluating Fields.


I wouldn't use the term "evaluating" Fields. I would see Poles and company as "developing" Fields. Fields has proven himself to be a franchise quarterback. He has tools that very few qbs in NFL history have had. It is Poles job to keep this guy happy and to build a powerful team around him.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
He's proven less than your desire for pussy

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Caller Bob wrote:
Claypool is a solid #2 who can turn into a #1, Mooney is a low end #2, probably a good #3 receiver

Mooney is CLEARLY a #3 at best. Claypool has all the measurables to be a #1 but if Tomlin couldn't get him to focus, not sure who will.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 2:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
City of Fools wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Claypool is a solid #2 who can turn into a #1, Mooney is a low end #2, probably a good #3 receiver

Mooney is CLEARLY a #3 at best. Claypool has all the measurables to be a #1 but if Tomlin couldn't get him to focus, not sure who will.


Tomlin is an overhyped Lovie. Except he doesn't have an actual defense or philosophy.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4082
pizza_Place: Lino's
Nas wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Claypool is a solid #2 who can turn into a #1, Mooney is a low end #2, probably a good #3 receiver

Mooney is CLEARLY a #3 at best. Claypool has all the measurables to be a #1 but if Tomlin couldn't get him to focus, not sure who will.


Tomlin is an overhyped Lovie. Except he doesn't have an actual defense or philosophy.


Tomlin had a franchise QB, Lovie never did, think that Lovie wins at least one ring with above average QB play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 3:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I don't think that is quite fair, Nas. He's been a head coach for 16 years and has never had a losing season (until now most likely). Also has a ring and another Super Bowl appearance. Tomlin has more playoff wins than any head coach in Bears history...including Ditka and Halas.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 3:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't think that is quite fair, Nas. He's been a head coach for 16 years and has never had a losing season (until now most likely). Also has a ring and another Super Bowl appearance. Tomlin has more playoff wins than any head coach in Bears history...including Ditka and Halas.


He's also had one of the best defensive coordinators, quarterbacks and organizations in NFL history.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 3:10 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Great.

That doesn't refute anything that I said. I'm not arguing he's an all time top ten coach or anything, but saying he's only slightly better than Lovie is just not correct.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't think that is quite fair, Nas. He's been a head coach for 16 years and has never had a losing season (until now most likely). Also has a ring and another Super Bowl appearance. Tomlin has more playoff wins than any head coach in Bears history...including Ditka and Halas.


He's also had one of the best defensive coordinators, quarterbacks and organizations in NFL history.


And he's extracted as much as he could out of all those resources. That's why he's been there for so long. Not to have a losing season for as long as he did is remarkable.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14924
pizza_Place: Grazianos
IkeSouth wrote:
He's proven less than your desire for pussy


Fields is a franchise quarterback.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't think that is quite fair, Nas. He's been a head coach for 16 years and has never had a losing season (until now most likely). Also has a ring and another Super Bowl appearance. Tomlin has more playoff wins than any head coach in Bears history...including Ditka and Halas.


He's also had one of the best defensive coordinators, quarterbacks and organizations in NFL history.


And he's extracted as much as he could out of all those resources. That's why he's been there for so long. Not to have a losing season for as long as he did is remarkable.

I think it’s a little of both. He’s a very good coach but you can honestly say that he has underachieved in the playoffs a bit.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Last edited by badrogue17 on Wed Nov 02, 2022 7:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 7:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I'm not saying Tomlin sucks as a coach. I'm saying he's overrated. I'm saying he may be Doc Rivers of the NFL. He just got lucky enough to join the greatest organization in history of modern football.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Doc rivers is a one hit wonder. Then he screwed up LAC's window by forcing his son onto the team and prioritizing his development. Really bad judgment.

Tomlin is a poor man's belichik. Sustained success but in a better division where he's always had at least one tough rival (Baltimore).

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24068
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nas wrote:
I'm not saying Tomlin sucks as a coach. I'm saying he's overrated. I'm saying he may be Doc Rivers of the NFL. He just got lucky enough to join the greatest organization in history of modern football.

He may be elite at holding a locker room together. Never forget he had some good years with some of the bigger psychos in the NFL.

It’s never been apparent to me what he’s good at from a coaching perspective. Maybe he’s an elite delegator.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 7:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm not saying Tomlin sucks as a coach. I'm saying he's overrated. I'm saying he may be Doc Rivers of the NFL. He just got lucky enough to join the greatest organization in history of modern football.

He may be elite at holding a locker room together. Never forget he had some good years with some of the bigger psychos in the NFL.

It’s never been apparent to me what he’s good at from a coaching perspective. Maybe he’s an elite delegator.


Yeah, like Lovie, he's been like a father to a lot of players. That's HUGE.

Outside of sharing his expectations, I'm not sure what he does. I knew Lovie brought his defense. Tomlin has had great players his entire time there and a great defensive coordinator the majority of the time. Big Ben led the offense.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
They probably had one more good run in them but Le’Veon Bell decided to be a fucking baby. Shazier’s career ender obviously didnt help either, dude was well on his was to being a beast

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
You guys are basically describing a good executive. Fix both sides of the ball and then manage. Lovie never developed a philosophy of offense that could then be executed by an OC. He just randomly picked OCs that would work for him without any regard to a larger philosophy. And I say that as a huge Lovie guy.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 7:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
badrogue17 wrote:
They probably had one more good run in them but Le’Veon Bell decided to be a fucking baby. Shazier’s career ender obviously didnt help either, dude was well on his was to being a beast


Antonio Brown cracked around the same time too. That was a SB caliber team.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 8:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
You guys are basically describing a good executive. Fix both sides of the ball and then manage. Lovie never developed a philosophy of offense that could then be executed by an OC. He just randomly picked OCs that would work for him without any regard to a larger philosophy. And I say that as a huge Lovie guy.


Lovie didn't inherit a HoF quarterback, either. You're right, though; Tomlin is from the same cloth as John Harbaugh.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24068
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Most great coaches can point to some element of the game that they control. They generally have some ‘system’ - whatever side of the ball - and they’re borderline super coordinators that need some other guy to complement their shortcomings.

I’m not sure what Tomlin’s system would be. He’s a little like John Harbaugh in that way.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4899 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 ... 164  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group