Ok. You answered it but then you put in so many disclaimers you just made it even less clear.

To me, there are two reasons to have it.
1) Knowledge of reproduction. However, does that really matter that much? They'll figure out one day how to have kids no matter what. It's not like anyone 100 years ago was like "I wanted to have kids but I just didn't know what to do!".
2) Safety. You want them to know the downsides and potential problems. STD's. Unwanted pregnancies. Legal issues involved. You can't just act like only one type of activity exists and successfully discuss those things. You don't have to glorify anything or put in anything that does anything more than define things and explain that doing those things can still have negative consequences.

Now again, maybe you think it's only parents who should discuss any of that stuff. Opt your kid out. Teach them yourself and ignore completely all the other things if you want. However, you seem to think it should be taught in schools so that's not the issue here.

It’s maybe out of the ordinary, but the kids I grew up with never seemed as traumatized as many here are about sex ed or the so called gay agenda. Oddly my private school never talked about it, my dad did. Having said that I think the class would have bored the hell out of me, especially when the talk of seventh grade private school was kids spiking up on dog food.

I just didn't want to hear about sex from my teachers, who I thought were pretty weird to begin with. Most of my friends felt the same way. Things get awfully uncomfortable when your homeroom teacher is putting a condom on a banana.

The guy referenced to start this thread is - in his own words - bringing people into children’s classrooms with dildos & butt plugs, teaching queer sex and hosting conversations on the merits of lube v. spit. To children.

MANY would rather disagree with people who find this disgusting (because reasons) than address the actual groomer in the room.

The guy referenced to start this thread is - in his own words - bringing people into children’s classrooms with dildos & butt plugs, teaching queer sex and hosting conversations on the merits of lube v. spit. To children.

MANY would rather disagree with people who find this disgusting (because reasons) than address the actual groomer in the room.

And if you are such a shitty parent to think that paying $40k a year for private school allows you not to take an active role in your child’s development, it says more about you than the gay dean.

I think you’re allowed to have an opinion on the groomer without dropping $160k on high school.

The bigger point is that if you’re a parent so mortified by this it speaks more to your apparently piss poor job as a parent.

The guy referenced to start this thread is - in his own words - bringing people into children’s classrooms with dildos & butt plugs, teaching queer sex and hosting conversations on the merits of lube v. spit. To children.

MANY would rather disagree with people who find this disgusting (because reasons) than address the actual groomer in the room.

I think you’re allowed to have an opinion on the groomer without dropping $160k on high school.

nah, Spaulding got roasted . Tall Midget even used multiple laughing emoji's

The bigger point is that if you’re a parent so mortified by this it speaks more to your apparently piss poor job as a parent.

nah, Spaulding got roasted . Tall Midget even used multiple laughing emoji's

The bigger point is that if you’re a parent so mortified by this it speaks more to your apparently piss poor job as a parent.

This was supposed to be a dance all over CPS thread, when pointed out this was an expensive private school, the response was, "Well, CPS would approve."