Has anyone confirmed that this actually occurred, and that Dean Fa*ula wasn't simply trying to impress some other Count Fa*ulas at the bar? Students Chad Hardman and Bruce Balzeker couldn't be reached for comment.

Yes it is.

When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

Hasn't the school said that the video distorts what the class/seminar is like and that it also neglects to mention that the class is voluntary rather than mandatory?

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

What do they bring in for the hetero portion of sex ed? A Real Doll?

Let everyone have a go

So if a 9th grade health teacher gets asked whether you can pregnant while having sex in a pool, should that questioned be answered or should they be told to have a conversation with their parents?

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

What about getting gonorrhea from riding a tractor in your bathing suit?

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

That actually happened to me in high school.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

The overwhelming majority of parents at Francis Parker aren't bad simply because you believe that Educating children about sex during a Sex Ed seminar is a catastrophic event. And again you might want to brush up your "comprehension skills" regarding what is and is not "grooming" because this isn't it.

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

Hasn't the school said that the video distorts what the class/seminar is like and that it also neglects to mention that the class is voluntary rather than mandatory?

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

Now you’re speaking on behalf of the majority of the kids’ parents?.

The reason you can’t be explicit in supporting this and euphemize butt-plug-lube-training as ‘Sex Ed’ is obvious.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

They had 7 months to "speak" for themselves and decided that it wasn't all that important to do so. It isn't hard to ascertain why. And considering the amount of "affluence" that their parents have, if they wanted to "speak" about this they could have and made it roar for both the teacher and the school.


Its because it is considered "sex ed". And to demonstrate how ignorant you and MANY are here, if anything approaching what you and the other loons asserted (grooming) would have occurred, then DCFS would have been stepped in and the teacher would have been suspended or removed pending an "investigation". That is sort of how its done in these "situations".

Sound like a groomer.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

They had 7 months to "speak" for themselves and decided that it wasn't all that important to do so. It isn't hard to ascertain why. And considering the amount of "affluence" that their parents have, if they wanted to "speak" about this they could have and made it roar for both the teacher and the school.


It’s because it is considered "sex ed". And to demonstrate how ignorant you and MANY are here, if anything approaching what you and the other loons asserted (grooming) would have occurred, then DCFS would have been stepped in and the teacher would have been suspended or removed pending an "investigation". That is sort of how it’s done in these "situations".

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

To summarize your argument…the grooming was fine because the parents didn’t mind the grooming and you speak on behalf of the overwhelming majority of them and also it didn’t really happen anyway despite the groomer saying it happened.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

You (along with the other loons here) really do need an "education" on just what constitutes "grooming" don't you? Just Asking A Question. Perhaps the people over at Francis Parker can provide you with a "crash course" on the subject seeing as and other loons here have such an obvious interest in it.

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

I’ll take that as an admission the people of Francis Parker know more about grooming than us non-grooming loons.

We finally agree on something.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

No doubt that is why they didn't have a problem with the guy providing dildos and lube during a seminar on Sex Education. Neither did their parents, trustees or DCFS.

Do "WE"? Just Asking A Question.

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

We did. Right above. You acknowledged the broader Francis Parker community as groomers - a step further than I’d go, but fair enough.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

As previously stated, the Right Wing Loon Brigade doesn't "define" what constitutes "grooming" or non "grooming" much to their chagrin and yours apparently.

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

It’s too important a definition to be left to the groomers and their defenders.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

One tool common to those who sexually abuse kids is grooming: manipulative behaviors that the abuser uses to gain access to a potential victim, coerce them to agree to the abuse, and reduce the risk of being caught. While these tactics are used most often against younger kids, teens and vulnerable adults are also at risk.

Grooming can take place online or in-person. It’s usually employed by a family member or someone else in the victim’s circle of trust, such as a coach, teacher, youth group leader or others who naturally have some interaction with the victim.

Though grooming can take many different forms, it often follows a similar pattern.

Victim selection: Abusers often observe possible victims and select them based on ease of access to them or their perceived vulnerability.
Gaining access and isolating the victim: Abusers will attempt to physically or emotionally separate a victim from those protecting them and often seek out positions in which they have contact with minors.
Trust development and keeping secrets: Abusers attempt to gain trust of a potential victim through gifts, attention, sharing “secrets” and other means to make them feel that they have a caring relationship and to train them to keep the relationship secret.
Desensitization to touch and discussion of sexual topics: Abusers will often start to touch a victim in ways that appear harmless, such as hugging, wrestling and tickling, and later escalate to increasingly more sexual contact, such as massages or showering together. Abusers may also show the victim pornography or discuss sexual topics with them, to introduce the idea of sexual contact.
Attempt by abusers to make their behavior seem natural, to avoid raising suspicions. For teens, who may be closer in age to the abuser, it can be particularly hard to recognize tactics used in grooming. Be alert for signs that your teen has a relationship with an adult that includes secrecy, undue influence or control, or pushes personal boundaries.

The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.

So how exactly is this incident/class an example of grooming?

Here's the definition from RAINN:

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

You (along with the other loons here) really do need an "education" on just what constitutes "grooming" don't you? Just Asking A Question. Perhaps the people over at Francis Parker can provide you with a "crash course" on the subject seeing as and other loons here have such an obvious interest in it.

So how exactly is this incident/class an example of grooming?

Here's the definition from RAINN:

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

This may be the only place I have even heard a mention of groomers. But then again I rarely watch cable news and don’t waste my time on the crackpot idiots on Twitter like many of the perpetually aggrieved right wingers here.

These hypocritical busybodies amuse the hell out of me. Serious laughter at them

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants