It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:56 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 527 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Any of the Right Wing Loons actually have a clue as to why the parents of these children were not as "appalled" as they happen to be? Just Asking A Question

Answered a couple pages ago. You even responded with an assertion that you have insight into the thoughts of the overwhelming majority of parents at the school.

Do you not recall? Just Asking that one question.


If the parents were as opposed as you seem to think then you would have had to hear about it 7 months later courtesy of a Right Wing Loon website. That much is fairly obvious. Maybe not to you apparently

I covered that possibility a couple pages ago. I called those who knew and said nothing bad parents. You defended the parents for not caring about grooming.

So you "answered" it by not having a clue as to what constitutes "grooming"? Just Asking A Question And bring upset with parents that do know what constitutes grooming? That you fallaciously believe that you "answered" it already is only indicative of how ignorant you and MANY others are here on the subject.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Any of the Right Wing Loons actually have a clue as to why the parents of these children were not as "appalled" as they happen to be? Just Asking A Question

Answered a couple pages ago. You even responded with an assertion that you have insight into the thoughts of the overwhelming majority of parents at the school.

Do you not recall? Just Asking that one question.


If the parents were as opposed as you seem to think then you would have had to hear about it 7 months later courtesy of a Right Wing Loon website. That much is fairly obvious. Maybe not to you apparently

I covered that possibility a couple pages ago. I called those who knew and said nothing bad parents. You defended the parents for not caring about grooming.

So you "answered" it by not having a clue as to what constitutes "grooming"? Just Asking A Question And bring upset with parents that do know what constitutes grooming? That you fallaciously believe that you "answered" it already is only indicative of how ignorant you and MANY others are here on the subject.


You are a grooming expert?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
storkinastorm wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Any of the Right Wing Loons actually have a clue as to why the parents of these children were not as "appalled" as they happen to be? Just Asking A Question

Answered a couple pages ago. You even responded with an assertion that you have insight into the thoughts of the overwhelming majority of parents at the school.

Do you not recall? Just Asking that one question.


If the parents were as opposed as you seem to think then you would have had to hear about it 7 months later courtesy of a Right Wing Loon website. That much is fairly obvious. Maybe not to you apparently

I covered that possibility a couple pages ago. I called those who knew and said nothing bad parents. You defended the parents for not caring about grooming.

So you "answered" it by not having a clue as to what constitutes "grooming"? Just Asking A Question And bring upset with parents that do know what constitutes grooming? That you fallaciously believe that you "answered" it already is only indicative of how ignorant you and MANY others are here on the subject.


You are a grooming expert?


Are you? Just Asking A Question

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
storkinastorm wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Any of the Right Wing Loons actually have a clue as to why the parents of these children were not as "appalled" as they happen to be? Just Asking A Question

Answered a couple pages ago. You even responded with an assertion that you have insight into the thoughts of the overwhelming majority of parents at the school.

Do you not recall? Just Asking that one question.


If the parents were as opposed as you seem to think then you would have had to hear about it 7 months later courtesy of a Right Wing Loon website. That much is fairly obvious. Maybe not to you apparently


But the level of outrage of parents isn't what's being discussed here. What do YOU think of it?


Because there is no "outrage" Loon. Of course it wouldn't be "discussed" by someone with your "affinities" unless it was the likes of Spaulding leading the charge of course.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
The Missing Link wrote:
Are you? Just Asking A Question


You just suggested that many here are ignorant about "grooming." By all means, tell us what we're missing. Why in your expert opinion, is this just amateur stuff and not real grooming?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
The Missing Link wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Any of the Right Wing Loons actually have a clue as to why the parents of these children were not as "appalled" as they happen to be? Just Asking A Question

Answered a couple pages ago. You even responded with an assertion that you have insight into the thoughts of the overwhelming majority of parents at the school.

Do you not recall? Just Asking that one question.


If the parents were as opposed as you seem to think then you would have had to hear about it 7 months later courtesy of a Right Wing Loon website. That much is fairly obvious. Maybe not to you apparently


But the level of outrage of parents isn't what's being discussed here. What do YOU think of it?


Because there is no "outrage" Loon. Of course it wouldn't be "discussed" by someone with your "affinities" unless it was the likes of Spaulding leading the charge of course.


Not sure what you mean by "affinities," but if you mean that I'm not as close to the "grooming" situation as you are, I would agree.

Why so shy to share your thoughts on whether this is wrong?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Any of the Right Wing Loons actually have a clue as to why the parents of these children were not as "appalled" as they happen to be? Just Asking A Question

Answered a couple pages ago. You even responded with an assertion that you have insight into the thoughts of the overwhelming majority of parents at the school.

Do you not recall? Just Asking that one question.


If the parents were as opposed as you seem to think then you would have had to hear about it 7 months later courtesy of a Right Wing Loon website. That much is fairly obvious. Maybe not to you apparently

I covered that possibility a couple pages ago. I called those who knew and said nothing bad parents. You defended the parents for not caring about grooming.

So you "answered" it by not having a clue as to what constitutes "grooming"? Just Asking A Question And bring upset with parents that do know what constitutes grooming? That you fallaciously believe that you "answered" it already is only indicative of how ignorant you and MANY others are here on the subject.

You un-ironically quoted a definition of grooming that covers Bruno’s behavior and said it proved you right. It was hilarious. It happened like a page or two ago - you should check it out.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
storkinastorm wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Are you? Just Asking A Question


You just suggested that many here are ignorant about "grooming." By all means, tell us what we're missing. Why in your expert opinion, is this just amateur stuff and not real grooming?


Because if it were DCFS would have gotten involved months ago. If it were then the teacher would have been removed pending an investigation at the very least. If it were then the parents would have applied pressure to have the guy removed. That's why. You have not "heard" about any of this. What you have heard is from Right Wing Loons like yourself who see "grooming" around each and every corner just as their fellow Qanon members instruct them to do all of the time.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Any of the Right Wing Loons actually have a clue as to why the parents of these children were not as "appalled" as they happen to be? Just Asking A Question

Answered a couple pages ago. You even responded with an assertion that you have insight into the thoughts of the overwhelming majority of parents at the school.

Do you not recall? Just Asking that one question.


If the parents were as opposed as you seem to think then you would have had to hear about it 7 months later courtesy of a Right Wing Loon website. That much is fairly obvious. Maybe not to you apparently

I covered that possibility a couple pages ago. I called those who knew and said nothing bad parents. You defended the parents for not caring about grooming.

So you "answered" it by not having a clue as to what constitutes "grooming"? Just Asking A Question And bring upset with parents that do know what constitutes grooming? That you fallaciously believe that you "answered" it already is only indicative of how ignorant you and MANY others are here on the subject.

You un-ironically quoted a definition of grooming that covers Bruno’s behavior and said it proved you right. It was hilarious. It happened like a page or two ago - you should check it out.


You falsely claimed that it did and seemed "appalled" that a "sexual topic" would be discussed in a seminar on Sexual Education. Ponder that one for a second.

And now you just know that the parents are pissed without the faintest of evidence that they are. Shocking!

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Last edited by The Missing Link on Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
The Missing Link wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Are you? Just Asking A Question


You just suggested that many here are ignorant about "grooming." By all means, tell us what we're missing. Why in your expert opinion, is this just amateur stuff and not real grooming?


Because if it were DCFS would have gotten involved months ago. If it were then the teacher would have been removed pending an investigation at the very least. If it were then the parents would have applied pressure to have the guy removed. That's why. You have not "heard" about any of this. What you have heard is from Right Wing Loons like yourself who see "grooming" around each and every corner just as their fellow Qanon members instruct them to do all of the time.


Wait, what? That is just a bunch of obfuscation.

If a girl were raped at school, I assume (and hope) that your opposition to such a thing wouldn't depend on whether DCFS "got involved," or whether the parents were sufficiently angry.

Wrong is wrong.

Is this wrong, in your opinion?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
storkinastorm wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Are you? Just Asking A Question


You just suggested that many here are ignorant about "grooming." By all means, tell us what we're missing. Why in your expert opinion, is this just amateur stuff and not real grooming?


Because if it were DCFS would have gotten involved months ago. If it were then the teacher would have been removed pending an investigation at the very least. If it were then the parents would have applied pressure to have the guy removed. That's why. You have not "heard" about any of this. What you have heard is from Right Wing Loons like yourself who see "grooming" around each and every corner just as their fellow Qanon members instruct them to do all of the time.


Wait, what? That is just a bunch of obfuscation.

If a girl were raped at school, I assume (and hope) that your opposition to such a thing wouldn't depend on whether DCFS "got involved," or whether the parents were sufficiently angry.

Wrong is wrong.

Is this wrong, in your opinion?


I just provided you with examples of what would actually happen if this were "grooming". That it has not is proof that it isn't.

You can remain willfully ignorant if you like. As most Loons here happen to be .

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
The Missing Link wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Are you? Just Asking A Question


You just suggested that many here are ignorant about "grooming." By all means, tell us what we're missing. Why in your expert opinion, is this just amateur stuff and not real grooming?


Because if it were DCFS would have gotten involved months ago. If it were then the teacher would have been removed pending an investigation at the very least. If it were then the parents would have applied pressure to have the guy removed. That's why. You have not "heard" about any of this. What you have heard is from Right Wing Loons like yourself who see "grooming" around each and every corner just as their fellow Qanon members instruct them to do all of the time.


Wait, what? That is just a bunch of obfuscation.

If a girl were raped at school, I assume (and hope) that your opposition to such a thing wouldn't depend on whether DCFS "got involved," or whether the parents were sufficiently angry.

Wrong is wrong.

Is this wrong, in your opinion?


I just provided you with examples What would actually happen if this were "grooming". That it has not is proof that it isn't.

You can remain willfully ignorant if you like. As most Loons here happen to do. That's what actually makes you a Loon thus I'd expect no less of you.


So you are in favor of school administrators showing butt plugs and dildos to students and explaining their use.

I was sort of joking about the "grooming" before, but I honestly have to wonder. Is this common in your industry? Where do most groomers draw the line? I'm fascinated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
And now you just know that the parents are pissed without the faintest of evidence that they are. Shovking!

I quoted from his definition, friend. You didn’t read it but assumed it supported the groomer.

I don’t know what the parents think. I gave a range of possibilities. You’re the guy who said you know what the parents think (without evidence).

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
And now you just know that the parents are pissed without the faintest of evidence that they are. Shovking!

I quoted from his definition, friend. You didn’t read it but assumed it supported the groomer.

I don’t know what the parents think. I gave a range of possibilities. You’re the guy who said you know what the parents think (without evidence).


You fabricated what was included in the definition in order to fit your narrative. Hardly a "quote".

And I stated that I know that the parents were hardly "appalled" by it seeing as you really have not heard all that much complaining from them.

And this is how deep the "falsifying" of information runs with the lunatic fringe around here. It wasn't the teacher that "passed out" butt plugs and dildos to the children. Did you not know this? Just Asking A Question

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Last edited by The Missing Link on Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
And now you just know that the parents are pissed without the faintest of evidence that they are. Shovking!

I quoted from his definition, friend. You didn’t read it but assumed it supported the groomer.

I don’t know what the parents think. I gave a range of possibilities. You’re the guy who said you know what the parents think (without evidence).


You fabricated what was included in the definition in order to fit your narrative. Hardly a "quote".

And I stated that I know that the parents were hardly "appalled" by it seeing as you really have not heard all that much complaining from them.

And this how deep the "falsifying" of information rins with the lunatic fringe around here. It wasn't the teacher that "passed out" butt plugs and dildos to the children. Did you not know this? Just Asking A Question

Easier to just acknowledge you didn’t read his post. It was a long post, it’s ok.

You don’t seem to know the guy isn’t even a teacher. He’s a dean. In his own words, he hired his fellow groomers to come into the school for butt plug training time. Is that kosher with you?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
And now you just know that the parents are pissed without the faintest of evidence that they are. Shovking!

I quoted from his definition, friend. You didn’t read it but assumed it supported the groomer.

I don’t know what the parents think. I gave a range of possibilities. You’re the guy who said you know what the parents think (without evidence).


You fabricated what was included in the definition in order to fit your narrative. Hardly a "quote".

And I stated that I know that the parents were hardly "appalled" by it seeing as you really have not heard all that much complaining from them.

And this how deep the "falsifying" of information rins with the lunatic fringe around here. It wasn't the teacher that "passed out" butt plugs and dildos to the children. Did you not know this? Just Asking A Question

Easier to just acknowledge you didn’t read his post. It was a long post, it’s ok.

You don’t seem to know the guy isn’t even a teacher. He’s a dean. In his own words, he hired his fellow groomers to come into the school for butt plug training time. Is that kosher with you?


More lying. "Fellow Groomers". He brought in a health organization to discuss some of the risks of queer sex.

You have lyingly claimed that this is somehow "grooming" on the part of the teacher when clearly it isn't.

Might be time to bump the "your home for Qanon information" thread once again given the thoughts contained in this thread.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Last edited by The Missing Link on Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
Why the hyperfocus on the word "grooming"? If it's not "grooming," does that make it okay to pass out butt plugs and dildos to kids?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
storkinastorm wrote:
Why the hyperfocus on the word "grooming"? If it's not "grooming," does that make it okay to pass out butt plugs and dildos to kids?


I don't think that is what was actually done. The reason that there is a hyperfocus upon "grooming" is because the right wing Loons on here are hyperfocused on it for some strange reason

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
And now you just know that the parents are pissed without the faintest of evidence that they are. Shovking!

I quoted from his definition, friend. You didn’t read it but assumed it supported the groomer.

I don’t know what the parents think. I gave a range of possibilities. You’re the guy who said you know what the parents think (without evidence).


You fabricated what was included in the definition in order to fit your narrative. Hardly a "quote".

And I stated that I know that the parents were hardly "appalled" by it seeing as you really have not heard all that much complaining from them.

And this how deep the "falsifying" of information rins with the lunatic fringe around here. It wasn't the teacher that "passed out" butt plugs and dildos to the children. Did you not know this? Just Asking A Question

Easier to just acknowledge you didn’t read his post. It was a long post, it’s ok.

You don’t seem to know the guy isn’t even a teacher. He’s a dean. In his own words, he hired his fellow groomers to come into the school for butt plug training time. Is that kosher with you?


More lying. "Fellow Groomers". He brought in a health organization to discuss some of the risks of queer sex.

You have lyingly claimed that this is somehow "grooming" on the part of the teacher when clearly it isn't.

Might be time to bump the "your home for Qanon information" thread once again given the information contained in this thread.

You keep saying the groomer is a teacher - he isn’t. You’re complaining about people misrepresenting what happened absent any clue what the groomer said. You’re closing in on adorable at this point.

Is it cool with you for a dean to bring in groomers to discuss the proper way to use butt plugs with adolescents?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
And now you just know that the parents are pissed without the faintest of evidence that they are. Shovking!

I quoted from his definition, friend. You didn’t read it but assumed it supported the groomer.

I don’t know what the parents think. I gave a range of possibilities. You’re the guy who said you know what the parents think (without evidence).


You fabricated what was included in the definition in order to fit your narrative. Hardly a "quote".

And I stated that I know that the parents were hardly "appalled" by it seeing as you really have not heard all that much complaining from them.

And this how deep the "falsifying" of information rins with the lunatic fringe around here. It wasn't the teacher that "passed out" butt plugs and dildos to the children. Did you not know this? Just Asking A Question

Easier to just acknowledge you didn’t read his post. It was a long post, it’s ok.

You don’t seem to know the guy isn’t even a teacher. He’s a dean. In his own words, he hired his fellow groomers to come into the school for butt plug training time. Is that kosher with you?


More lying. "Fellow Groomers". He brought in a health organization to discuss some of the risks of queer sex.

You have lyingly claimed that this is somehow "grooming" on the part of the teacher when clearly it isn't.

Might be time to bump the "your home for Qanon information" thread once again given the information contained in this thread.

You keep saying the groomer is a teacher - he isn’t. You’re complaining about people misrepresenting what happened absent any clue what the groomer said. You’re closing in on adorable at this point.

Is it cool with you for a dean to bring in groomers to discuss the proper way to use butt plugs with adolescents?


Hey Darko how does your focus on his being a "Dean" rather than a Teacher change your narrative regarding "grooming" taking place in school?
Just Asking A Question.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
The Missing Link wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
Why the hyperfocus on the word "grooming"? If it's not "grooming," does that make it okay to pass out butt plugs and dildos to kids?


I don't think that is what was actually done. The reason that there is a hyperfocus upon "grooming" is because the right wing Loons on here are hyperfocused on it for some strange reason


Okay, but rather than focusing on what the "right wing loons" think, why don't you explain why you think that wasn't done (what evidence are you basing that on) and what you think about the situation? Is it really that painful to just say that you disagree with this type of ideology in schools?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
.
Is it cool with you for a dean to bring in groomers to discuss the proper way to use butt plugs with adolescents?


How does your lying about Public health officials being "groomers" further the discussion? Or provide validity for your argument? Just Asking Questions

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Last edited by The Missing Link on Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Darko and I posted at the same time. Even had a few exchanges - he seemed like a genuinely good guy. You don’t have to pretend we’re the same, it’s ok, it’s not helpful to your point here.

You’re complaining people misrepresent things while misrepresenting things. It’s full fledged adorable.

Do you support what this groomer said he did at his school?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Darko and I posted at the same time. Even had a few exchanges - he seemed like a genuinely good guy. You don’t have to pretend we’re the same, it’s ok, it’s not helpful to your point here.

You’re complaining people misrepresent things while misrepresenting things. It’s full fledged adorable.

Do you support what this groomer said he did at his school?


How does your repeated lying about Public Health officials being groomers add validity to your argument?

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Darko and I posted at the same time. Even had a few exchanges - he seemed like a genuinely good guy. You don’t have to pretend we’re the same, it’s ok, it’s not helpful to your point here.

You’re complaining people misrepresent things while misrepresenting things. It’s full fledged adorable.

Do you support what this groomer said he did at his school?


How does your repeated lying about Public Health officials being groomers add validity to your argument?

I like this thing where you remain scared to answer questions. I’m not sure what comes after adorable but you’re getting there.

Do you support what the groomer said he did?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Darko and I posted at the same time. Even had a few exchanges - he seemed like a genuinely good guy. You don’t have to pretend we’re the same, it’s ok, it’s not helpful to your point here.

You’re complaining people misrepresent things while misrepresenting things. It’s full fledged adorable.

Do you support what this groomer said he did at his school?


How does your repeated lying about Public Health officials being groomers add validity to your argument?

I like this thing where you remain scared to answer questions. I’m not sure what comes after adorable but you’re getting there.

Do you support what the groomer said he did?


How does your lying about Public Health officials being "groomers" add validity to your argument? Just Asking A Question

And how does your lying about me not "answering questions" add validity to your argument? Just Asking Questions

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Do you support what the groomer said he does at his school?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Do you support what the groomer said he does at his school?


It's hard to take you serious provided that you have an obvious hard on (no pun intended) for people that you consider to be "groomers"

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24047
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Do you support what the groomer said he does at his school?


It's hard to take you serious provided that you have an obvious hard on (no pun intended) for people that you consider to be "groomers"

I’ll just put you down for a yes.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Do you support what the groomer said he does at his school?


It's hard to take you serious provided that you have an obvious hard on (no pun intended) for people that you consider to be "groomers"

I’ll just put you down for a yes.


And I'll just add this to your ever growing tally of lies and fabrications

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 527 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group