It's hard to take you serious provided that you have an obvious hard on (no pun intended) for people that you consider to be "groomers"

Being opposed to sexual predators is now a character flaw?

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

And I'll just add this to your ever growing tally of lies and fabrications

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

If you find a way to prove it, you’re at 1.

Ironically, that’d a bigger number than questions you’ve answered. Do you think the dean should’ve done what he said he did?

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

If you find a way to prove it, you’re at 1.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

What did he say that he did that you deem to be so inappropriate?

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

You haven’t even watched the video? And you’re arguing over its contents across several pages?

Adorable.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

No I asked you to provide clarification on why you feel that what he did was inappropriate. Seemingly its difficult for you apparently.

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

If only you had proof that this is what the guy happens to be then you might be correct about it. Spewing Qanon inspired drivel hardly constitutes said proof however. Maybe with fellow "followers" it does though.

Hit the “previous” page button a few times.

I’m assuming at this point you either can’t find the groomer’s statements or are unwilling to watch the groomer’s statements.

Pro tip: don’t white knight for a cause you’ve not investigated.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

Seemingly its rather difficult for you apparently.

Irrelevant.

You took shots at a guy for being opposed to groomers. I've learned a lot tonight. I'll pray for your soul.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

The Iliad?

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

More like "took shots" at a guy for lying about what constitutes "grooming".

Why are you so focused on what constitutes "grooming"?

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

Are you really that tone deaf? Just Asking A Question. The focus (as always() has been provided by you and your fellow loons.

This is verbal diarrhea.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

Sort of like the "movement" itself aye?

Okay?

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

You're "Okay" (obviously) with being a conspiratorial spouting Loon on the internet? Interesting

Great point. Compelling and rich.

[
Being opposed to sexual predators is now a character flaw?

This is verbal diarrhea.

You took shots at a guy for being opposed to groomers. I've learned a lot tonight. I'll pray for your soul.

So you are in favor of school administrators showing butt plugs and dildos to students and explaining their use.

I was sort of joking about the "grooming" before, but I honestly have to wonder. Is this common in your industry? Where do most groomers draw the line? I'm fascinated.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

A renewed moral panic, stoked by the far right and trickling into mainstream conservatism, has come on the heels of an abrupt shift in the fight for gay rights in America. Following the recent passage of Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law and a wave of other homophobic and transphobic legislation throughout the country, current right-wing rhetoric has focused on accusations of “grooming.” The term — which describes the actions an adult takes to make a child vulnerable to sexual abuse — is taking on a conspiracy-theory tone as conservatives use it to imply that the LGBTQ community, their allies, and liberals more generally are pedophiles or pedophile-enablers.

Attempting to reframe the controversial Florida law, Gov. Ron DeSantis’s press secretary Christina Pushaw described it as “the Anti-Grooming Bill” in early March, tweeting that if you’re against it, “you are probably a groomer or at least you don’t denounce the grooming of 4-8 year old children.” Those familiar with QAnon will recognize this bizarre leap in logic. Pushaw adopted language that QAnon conspiracy theory believers and the related #SaveTheChildren crusaders have used to imply that liberals are, if not pedophiles themselves, advocates of pedophilia.

This rhetoric has long existed among fringe conspiracy-theory-mongers and extremists, but Pushaw’s usage helped turn grooming into a mainstream conservative talking point. Fox News has run several segments devoted to pedophilia throughout March and April. During the same period, numerous Fox pundits began describing the behavior of parents and teachers who want to allow children to express their transgender identity as grooming; one Fox and Friends guest suggested children were “being ripened for grooming for sexual abuse by adults,” while America Reports guest Charlie Hurt said affirmative care for trans children “goes beyond just predatory grooming” into “psychological torture.”

Accusations of pedophilia were also a refrain during the March 2022 confirmation hearings for new Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. After Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) falsely accused Jackson of giving child pornographers unusually lenient sentences and “soft” treatment, other conservatives, like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and the Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway, ran with the idea that Jackson and anyone who supported her confirmation was supporting or sympathetic to pedophilia.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants

Sex toy training for children isn’t grooming because Aja Romano, self described culture warrior at Vox, vomited up some nonsense earlier this year.

Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.

Again, your comprehension needs work.

Being in agreement with the Right Wing Loons at Qanon and Marjorie Taylor Greene is a most desired "position" for ya I see. Keep up the good (loon) work why do you.

Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.

We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants